
ATL: MILTON - Models
Moderator: S2k Moderators
-
- Admin
- Posts: 20009
- Age: 62
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
- Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)
Re: ATL: MILTON - Models

0 likes
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
- Kazmit
- Category 5
- Posts: 2124
- Age: 22
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2016 8:49 am
- Location: Williamsburg, VA / Bermuda
Re: ATL: MILTON - Models
GFS has been consistently north of Tampa. Could either be a big win or a big fail. ICON shifted closer to it, but hardly a trend with just one model run.
0 likes
Igor 2010, Sandy 2012, Fay 2014, Gonzalo 2014, Joaquin 2015, Nicole 2016, Humberto 2019
I am only a tropical weather enthusiast. My predictions are not official and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
I am only a tropical weather enthusiast. My predictions are not official and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: MILTON - Models
Trend so far with the operational 12z models is back north. Let's see what the ensembles say. If they follow the operationals NHC could shift back north at 5pm.
0 likes
Re: ATL: MILTON - Models
Steve wrote:NDG wrote:tolakram wrote:Trust in the ICON just got real, will it be correct again with sniffing out the east/south shift early?
Do you trust the Euro jump north and stop solution?
https://i.imgur.com/FpLYKKi.gif
Or the ICON; stay well south but also weaker solution?
https://i.imgur.com/mLirR6a.gif
You spoke too soon before its 12z run.
ICON has been fairly inconsistent with Milton so far, IMO.
It’s not that different of a landfall position from 00z and 06 in the grand scheme. Of course it matters to people in sw fl and it matters that there are differences in intensity with landfall position. So I think those differences magnify what otherwise could seem insignificant. Obviously population has exploded down there the last couple of decades. Upper setup is similar last 3 runs. Only thing moderately different is the trough in eastern Canada is very slightly more north in the 12z run.
50+ miles further north from previous run makes a big difference.
0 likes
-
- Tropical Depression
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2024 8:20 am
Re: ATL: MILTON - Models
In the short-term, the models seem to agree on a track further south, closer to the north coast of Yucatan. After that...they wildly diverge.
1 likes
Re: ATL: MILTON - Models
uh oh, south trends may have stopped, and slow ticks back north from here? not good for tampa if true!

0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1794
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:20 am
- Location: Toms River, NJ
Re: ATL: MILTON - Models
GFS is alarming because despite a south track early on it still landfalls north of Tampa as a strong hurricane.
1 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 2651
- Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 3:45 am
- Location: Florida State University
Re: ATL: MILTON - Models
It appears the southern adjustments are just pushing back landfall on the dynamic models for 12z so far (ICON/GFS). Here is the trend at 72 hours for the GFS:

While shear begins to increases around 72 hours, we can see above the dry air is walled off. I would expect slight weakening on approach to landfall, but this will mean very little to landfall location and surge given the increased movement speed (perhaps displacement of convection to the northern periphery):


While shear begins to increases around 72 hours, we can see above the dry air is walled off. I would expect slight weakening on approach to landfall, but this will mean very little to landfall location and surge given the increased movement speed (perhaps displacement of convection to the northern periphery):

4 likes
Re: ATL: MILTON - Models
NDG wrote:Steve wrote:NDG wrote:
You spoke too soon before its 12z run.
ICON has been fairly inconsistent with Milton so far, IMO.
It’s not that different of a landfall position from 00z and 06 in the grand scheme. Of course it matters to people in sw fl and it matters that there are differences in intensity with landfall position. So I think those differences magnify what otherwise could seem insignificant. Obviously population has exploded down there the last couple of decades. Upper setup is similar last 3 runs. Only thing moderately different is the trough in eastern Canada is very slightly more north in the 12z run.
50+ miles further north from previous run makes a big difference.
It’s past 3 days out on the runs so not that significant of a change.
0 likes
-
- Admin
- Posts: 20009
- Age: 62
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
- Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)
Re: ATL: MILTON - Models
NDG wrote:Steve wrote:NDG wrote:
You spoke too soon before its 12z run.
ICON has been fairly inconsistent with Milton so far, IMO.
It’s not that different of a landfall position from 00z and 06 in the grand scheme. Of course it matters to people in sw fl and it matters that there are differences in intensity with landfall position. So I think those differences magnify what otherwise could seem insignificant. Obviously population has exploded down there the last couple of decades. Upper setup is similar last 3 runs. Only thing moderately different is the trough in eastern Canada is very slightly more north in the 12z run.
50+ miles further north from previous run makes a big difference.
Yes, it certainly does, but models are just not that accurate. People moving near the Florida coasts have to be prepared and ready to move at all times, I just don't see these 3 day predictions getting much more accurate in the short term. I'll repeat what I said above, this is where only slow official track adjustments really pays off.
4 likes
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
- Kazmit
- Category 5
- Posts: 2124
- Age: 22
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2016 8:49 am
- Location: Williamsburg, VA / Bermuda
Re: ATL: MILTON - Models
Also the GFS's angle of attack is steeper than most models. It comes within 70 miles of the Yucatan and then heads straight NW to landfall at Cedar Key. The steeper angle means any slight deviations to the left/right will result in big differences in where it comes ashore.
2 likes
Igor 2010, Sandy 2012, Fay 2014, Gonzalo 2014, Joaquin 2015, Nicole 2016, Humberto 2019
I am only a tropical weather enthusiast. My predictions are not official and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
I am only a tropical weather enthusiast. My predictions are not official and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- Hypercane_Kyle
- Category 5
- Posts: 3352
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
- Location: Cape Canaveral, FL
Re: ATL: MILTON - Models
One thing I've noticed is the GFS has consistently been showing a track that isn't so completely abnormal (i.e., heading of nearly 90 degrees on the compass) coming into Florida. It has a more traditional NW track, especially before landfall. However, I do feel that an Ian/Charley-esque situation could be unfolding that drives it south like the Euro was showing. Did the 12z get any recon data ingested into it?
0 likes
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.
Re: ATL: MILTON - Models
USTropics wrote:It appears the southern adjustments are just pushing back landfall on the dynamic models for 12z so far (ICON/GFS). Here is the trend at 72 hours for the GFS:
https://i.imgur.com/tPqAAhW.gif
While shear begins to increases around 72 hours, we can see above the dry air is walled off. I would expect slight weakening on approach to landfall, but this will mean very little to landfall location and surge given the increased movement speed (perhaps displacement of convection to the northern periphery):
https://i.imgur.com/995vyjd.png
The GFS is all on its own walling out the dry air. I think it may be right because there could not be strong enough shear to penetrate such a intense system that quickly.
0 likes
Re: ATL: MILTON - Models
tolakram wrote:NDG wrote:Steve wrote:
It’s not that different of a landfall position from 00z and 06 in the grand scheme. Of course it matters to people in sw fl and it matters that there are differences in intensity with landfall position. So I think those differences magnify what otherwise could seem insignificant. Obviously population has exploded down there the last couple of decades. Upper setup is similar last 3 runs. Only thing moderately different is the trough in eastern Canada is very slightly more north in the 12z run.
50+ miles further north from previous run makes a big difference.
Yes, it certainly does, but models are just not that accurate. People moving near the Florida coasts have to be prepared and ready to move at all times, I just don't see these 3 day predictions getting much more accurate in the short term. I'll repeat what I said above, this is where only slow official track adjustments really pays off.
https://hurricanescience.org/science/fo ... index.html
0 likes
Re: ATL: MILTON - Models
Hypercane_Kyle wrote:One thing I've noticed is the GFS has consistently been showing a track that isn't so completely abnormal (i.e., heading of nearly 90 degrees on the compass) coming into Florida. It has a more traditional NW track, especially before landfall. However, I do feel that an Ian/Charley-esque situation could be unfolding that drives it south like the Euro was showing. Did the 12z get any recon data ingested into it?
It initialized at 991 which is what recon showed
0 likes
Re: ATL: MILTON - Models
xironman wrote:USTropics wrote:It appears the southern adjustments are just pushing back landfall on the dynamic models for 12z so far (ICON/GFS). Here is the trend at 72 hours for the GFS:
https://i.imgur.com/tPqAAhW.gif
While shear begins to increases around 72 hours, we can see above the dry air is walled off. I would expect slight weakening on approach to landfall, but this will mean very little to landfall location and surge given the increased movement speed (perhaps displacement of convection to the northern periphery):
https://i.imgur.com/995vyjd.png
The GFS is all on its own walling out the dry air. I think it may be right because there could not be strong enough shear to penetrate such a intense system that quickly.
Gfs was the spot on with Helene and not doing windshield wiper swings like Icon. I'm watching it closely
2 likes
-
- Tropical Storm
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2023 3:41 pm
Re: ATL: MILTON - Models
Are there any recon data in the 12z runs today?
While others went slightly north or North, it seems the CMC went due east into SW FL.
While others went slightly north or North, it seems the CMC went due east into SW FL.
0 likes
Re: ATL: MILTON - Models
The full 12z GFS run. As everyone has said, it dips further south while passing the Yucatan but takes a steeper angle of approach on the approach to Florida ending up around Crystal River. The concerning thing is it seems to have a second bout of strengthening at around 60 hours when conditions are supposed to be hostile.


1 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests