cheezyWXguy wrote:
Would there be any subtractions from center not being in the middle of the apparent eye?
No. Eye counts as WMG there.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
cheezyWXguy wrote:
Would there be any subtractions from center not being in the middle of the apparent eye?
Kazmit wrote:https://i.ibb.co/jT3dYNR/Larry-1.png
aspen wrote:The eye is collapsing. Something is causing Larry to significantly weaken. The 18z best track keeps it at 110 kt, which I disagree with; it might not even be a major anymore. I have no idea what could be causing this.
cycloneye wrote:aspen wrote:The eye is collapsing. Something is causing Larry to significantly weaken. The 18z best track keeps it at 110 kt, which I disagree with; it might not even be a major anymore. I have no idea what could be causing this.
SW shear?
aspen wrote:cycloneye wrote:aspen wrote:The eye is collapsing. Something is causing Larry to significantly weaken. The 18z best track keeps it at 110 kt, which I disagree with; it might not even be a major anymore. I have no idea what could be causing this.
SW shear?
Is it even enough to cause such a degradation? If you look on visible imagery, the southern side doesn’t seem as restricted as it was yesterday and earlier this morning. Either something else is going on (possibly upwelling due to marginal SSTs abs Larry’s large size), or the shear is changing from upper-level to mid-level.
aspen wrote:The eye is collapsing. Something is causing Larry to significantly weaken. The 18z best track keeps it at 110 kt, which I disagree with; it might not even be a major anymore. I have no idea what could be causing this.
supercane4867 wrote:https://i.imgur.com/9NoZkHD.jpg
sikkar wrote:The outline of the new eye is taking shape! Anyways is it not surprising that NHC kept the same intensity given how degraded Larry looks?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests