ATL: FOUR - Remnants - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145292
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#221 Postby cycloneye » Mon Jul 03, 2017 8:09 pm

Image
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145292
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#222 Postby cycloneye » Mon Jul 03, 2017 8:20 pm

cycloneye wrote:00z Best Track:

AL, 94, 2017070400, , BEST, 0, 88N, 332W, 25, 1011, LO


There were changes to the 00z Best Track.

AL, 94, 2017070400, , BEST, 0, 90N, 334W, 30, 1010, LO
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#223 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Jul 03, 2017 8:22 pm

last couple hours.. convection has really expanded and deepened over the low to mid level center if that maintains for the next 12 to 24 hours we will have a TD/TS
1 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#224 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Jul 03, 2017 8:25 pm

you all also have to remember that the models are showing a decent jog to the north north west as the circ interacts with a surge/wave to its east and the ITCZ. if it does to rotate around and begins a more wnw track from current position then a more southerly track is likely.
1 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
Gustywind
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 12334
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 7:29 am
Location: Baie-Mahault, GUADELOUPE

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#225 Postby Gustywind » Mon Jul 03, 2017 8:28 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:last couple hours.. convection has really expanded and deepened over the low to mid level center if that maintains for the next 12 to 24 hours we will have a TD/TS

ok thanks...but already :eek: ? What are you best thoughts about the path especially for those who lived in the Leewards like me and the Northern Leewards even PR?
REGARDS.
Gustywind :)
2 likes   

User avatar
Gustywind
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 12334
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 7:29 am
Location: Baie-Mahault, GUADELOUPE

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#226 Postby Gustywind » Mon Jul 03, 2017 8:32 pm

000
AXNT20 KNHC 040005
TWDAT

Tropical Weather Discussion
NWS National Hurricane Center Miami FL
805 PM EDT Mon Jul 3 2017

A tropical wave is over the central Atlantic with axis extending
from 15N34W to 05N34W, moving west at about 5 kt within the last
24 hours. A broad 1011 mb surface low is detached from the wave,
and is best satellite estimated position is near 09N33W based on
low-level cloud motion and on Ascat data.
The atmospheric
conditions are similar to the wave east of it already described
above. Scattered showers are from 05N to 11N between 30W and 40W.
0 likes   

User avatar
FLpanhandle91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1033
Age: 34
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 3:50 pm
Location: Fort Walton Beach, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#227 Postby FLpanhandle91 » Mon Jul 03, 2017 8:43 pm

GFS seems to be consistent with the dominant Bermuda high absolutely tearing the weak vertical presence of 94L apart. What do the pro METS think? July seems to favor the presence of strong high pressure in the mid-atlantic this time of year.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 41
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#228 Postby Hammy » Mon Jul 03, 2017 8:46 pm

This seems like it's going for a monsoonal sort of development, similar to Pacific systems, rather than how most easterly waves form. Certainly doesn't seem to be moving much at the moment.
1 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#229 Postby wxman57 » Mon Jul 03, 2017 8:52 pm

Gustywind wrote:...What are you best thoughts about the path especially for those who lived in the Leewards like me and the Northern Leewards even PR?
REGARDS.
Gustywind :)


I'd say that you should be prepared in case a tropical storm impacts the NE Caribbean next Sat/Sun. I'm thinking about a 100% chance of development. Fair chance it may graze the NE Caribbean islands. No indication of a strong TS or Hurricane at this time.
5 likes   

User avatar
Ntxw
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 22784
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:34 pm
Location: DFW, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#230 Postby Ntxw » Mon Jul 03, 2017 8:56 pm

Hammy wrote:This seems like it's going for a monsoonal sort of development, similar to Pacific systems, rather than how most easterly waves form. Certainly doesn't seem to be moving much at the moment.


1900hurricane mentioned that this morning and it does resemble such an event. Similar to what is happening over in the EPAC (94E) and often in the WPAC. Development can be slow and sloppy if they do occur. This happens more often in the Western Carib than this part of the Atlantic. Perhaps the very robust westerlies burst a key player, similar to WWBs in the Pacific.

Image
4 likes   
The above post and any post by Ntxw is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including Storm2k. For official information, please refer to NWS products.

  Help support Storm2K!
Help Support Storm2K

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#231 Postby Alyono » Mon Jul 03, 2017 9:08 pm

SHIPS has very little shear with this
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145292
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#232 Postby cycloneye » Mon Jul 03, 2017 9:13 pm

* ATLANTIC SHIPS INTENSITY FORECAST *
* IR SAT DATA AVAILABLE, OHC AVAILABLE *
* INVEST AL942017 07/04/17 00 UTC *

TIME (HR) 0 6 12 18 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120
V (KT) NO LAND 30 33 36 40 42 51 55 60 65 66 68 70 67
V (KT) LAND 30 33 36 40 42 51 55 60 65 66 68 70 67
V (KT) LGEM 30 32 34 36 38 41 45 48 51 54 57 59 59
Storm Type TROP TROP TROP TROP TROP TROP TROP TROP TROP TROP TROP TROP TROP

SHEAR (KT) 16 20 24 23 20 14 3 11 6 5 7 7 9
SHEAR ADJ (KT) 0 -5 -7 -6 -7 -1 5 1 1 8 4 11 11
SHEAR DIR 50 42 43 48 44 25 323 313 304 272 186 279 272
SST (C) 27.8 27.7 27.7 27.6 27.5 27.0 25.8 26.3 27.0 27.3 27.4 27.5 27.6
POT. INT. (KT) 131 129 129 128 129 127 116 121 128 130 130 130 130
ADJ. POT. INT. 125 124 123 123 125 129 119 125 129 129 124 120 118
200 MB T (C) -54.4 -54.7 -54.6 -54.2 -54.6 -54.7 -53.9 -54.4 -54.2 -54.7 -54.2 -54.4 -53.9
200 MB VXT (C) 0.0 0.0 -0.1 -0.1 -0.2 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3
TH_E DEV (C) 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 7 8 8 9 9 9
700-500 MB RH 71 74 75 80 80 76 68 59 57 56 55 54 57
MODEL VTX (KT) 10 11 13 14 14 17 16 16 16 15 15 15 13
850 MB ENV VOR 41 32 28 21 9 0 -7 6 27 24 24 2 -19
200 MB DIV 62 75 84 85 80 28 36 21 25 44 29 41 48
700-850 TADV 0 -1 -3 -3 -6 -12 7 11 4 8 1 2 8
LAND (KM) 1845 1875 1902 1914 1920 1875 1746 1604 1454 1252 1033 907 807
LAT (DEG N) 9.0 9.0 9.1 9.3 9.7 11.4 14.0 16.2 17.3 17.7 17.9 18.3 19.3
LONG(DEG W) 33.4 33.7 34.0 34.2 34.4 35.8 38.9 43.3 47.8 51.8 54.8 57.1 58.1
STM SPEED (KT) 3 3 3 4 6 16 22 24 21 17 12 9 6
HEAT CONTENT 15 17 19 19 20 19 2 8 15 14 35 19 29

FORECAST TRACK FROM TABM INITIAL HEADING/SPEED (DEG/KT):280/ 3 CX,CY: -2/ 1
T-12 MAX WIND: 25 PRESSURE OF STEERING LEVEL (MB): 659 (MEAN=618)
GOES IR BRIGHTNESS TEMP. STD DEV. 50-200 KM RAD: 19.4 (MEAN=14.5)
% GOES IR PIXELS WITH T < -20 C 50-200 KM RAD: 54.0 (MEAN=65.0)
PRELIM RI PROB (DV .GE. 55 KT IN 48 HR): 4.3

INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO INTENSITY CHANGE
6 12 18 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120
----------------------------------------------------------
SAMPLE MEAN CHANGE 1. 2. 3. 4. 6. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 13.
SST POTENTIAL 1. 1. 2. 3. 6. 10. 14. 18. 21. 23. 25. 26.
VERTICAL SHEAR MAG -0. -1. -1. -2. -2. -1. 0. 2. 3. 4. 5. 5.
VERTICAL SHEAR ADJ 0. 1. 1. 2. 3. 3. 3. 3. 2. 1. 0. -1.
VERTICAL SHEAR DIR 0. 1. 2. 3. 5. 7. 7. 7. 6. 6. 5. 4.
PERSISTENCE 1. 1. 2. 2. 2. 2. 1. 1. 1. 0. 0. -0.
200/250 MB TEMP. -0. -0. -0. -0. -0. -0. -0. 0. 0. 1. 2. 2.
THETA_E EXCESS -0. -0. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. -2. -2. -1. -2.
700-500 MB RH -0. -0. -1. -1. -2. -4. -5. -5. -5. -5. -5. -4.
MODEL VTX TENDENCY 0. 1. 2. 3. 5. 5. 5. 4. 2. 1. 1. -2.
850 MB ENV VORTICITY 0. 0. 0. -0. -0. -0. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1.
200 MB DIVERGENCE 0. 0. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 0. 0. -0.
850-700 T ADVEC 0. -0. -0. -0. -0. -1. -1. -0. -0. -0. -0. -0.
ZONAL STORM MOTION -0. -0. -0. -0. -0. -0. -0. -1. -1. -1. -2. -2.
STEERING LEVEL PRES -0. -0. -0. -0. -0. -0. -0. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1.
DAYS FROM CLIM. PEAK 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 1. 1. 2. 2. 2.
GOES PREDICTORS -0. -0. -0. -0. -1. -1. -2. -2. -2. -2. -2. -1.
OCEAN HEAT CONTENT -0. -0. -0. -0. -0. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. -0.
----------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL CHANGE 3. 6. 10. 12. 21. 25. 30. 35. 36. 38. 40. 37.

CURRENT MAX WIND (KT): 30. LAT, LON: 9.0 33.4

** 2017 ATLANTIC RI INDEX AL942017 INVEST 07/04/17 00 UTC **
(SHIPS-RII PREDICTOR TABLE for 30 KT OR MORE MAXIMUM WIND INCREASE IN NEXT 24-h)

Predictor Value RI Predictor Range Scaled Value(0-1) % Contribution
12 HR PERSISTENCE (KT): 5.0 -49.5 to 33.0 0.66 4.2
850-200 MB SHEAR (KT) : 20.5 30.1 to 2.9 0.35 0.9
HEAT CONTENT (KJ/cm2) : 18.0 0.0 to 156.2 0.12 0.3
2nd PC OF IR BR TEMP : 0.8 2.4 to -3.0 0.30 0.8
STD DEV OF IR BR TEMP : 19.4 36.6 to 2.8 0.51 1.4
MAXIMUM WIND (kt) : 30.0 22.5 to 121.0 0.21 0.3
POT = MPI-VMAX (KT) : 93.9 28.4 to 139.6 0.59 1.1
D200 (10**7s-1) : 77.2 -29.7 to 181.5 0.51 0.4
BL DRY-AIR FLUX (w/m2): 42.6 961.4 to -67.1 0.89 0.0
% AREA WITH TPW <45 mm: 0.0 100.0 to 0.0 1.00 0.1

SHIPS Prob RI for 20kt/ 12hr RI threshold= 4% is 0.8 times sample mean ( 5.4%)
SHIPS Prob RI for 25kt/ 24hr RI threshold= 13% is 1.1 times sample mean (11.5%)
SHIPS Prob RI for 30kt/ 24hr RI threshold= 9% is 1.3 times sample mean ( 7.4%)
SHIPS Prob RI for 35kt/ 24hr RI threshold= 6% is 1.3 times sample mean ( 4.3%)
SHIPS Prob RI for 40kt/ 24hr RI threshold= 5% is 1.6 times sample mean ( 2.8%)
SHIPS Prob RI for 45kt/ 36hr RI threshold= 9% is 1.9 times sample mean ( 5.1%)
SHIPS Prob RI for 55kt/ 48hr RI threshold= 11% is 2.0 times sample mean ( 5.3%)
SHIPS Prob RI for 65kt/ 72hr RI threshold= 16% is 2.7 times sample mean ( 6.0%)

Matrix of RI probabilities
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RI (kt / h) | 20/12 | 25/24 | 30/24 | 35/24 | 40/24 | 45/36 | 55/48 |65/72
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SHIPS-RII: 4.3% 12.6% 9.4% 5.7% 4.6% 9.5% 10.8% 16.4%
Logistic: 3.0% 12.3% 5.2% 1.3% 0.3% 4.4% 5.8% 10.8%
Bayesian: 1.1% 9.5% 1.2% 0.1% 0.0% 1.5% 1.1% 0.8%
Consensus: 2.8% 11.4% 5.3% 2.4% 1.6% 5.1% 5.9% 9.4%

** PROBLTY OF AT LEAST 1 SCNDRY EYEWL FORMTN EVENT AL942017 INVEST 07/04/2017 00 UTC **
TIME(HR) 0-12 12-24(0-24) 24-36(0-36) 36-48(0-48)
CLIMO(%) 0 0( 0) 0( 0) 0( 0) <-- PROB BASED ON INTENSITY ONLY
PROB(%) 0 0( 0) 0( 0) 0( 0) <-- FULL MODEL PROB (RAN NORMALLY)

** DSHIPS INTENSITY FORECAST ADJUSTED RELATIVE TO ONSET OF ERC WEAKENING PHASE **
TIME (HR) 0 6 12 18 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120
>24HR AGO (DSHIPS) 30 33 36 40 42 51 55 60 65 66 68 70 67
18HR AGO 30 29 32 36 38 47 51 56 61 62 64 66 63
12HR AGO 30 27 26 30 32 41 45 50 55 56 58 60 57
6HR AGO 30 24 21 20 22 31 35 40 45 46 48 50 47
NOW CURRENT INTENSITY < 83 KT
IN 6HR INTENSITY IN 6HR < 83 KT
IN 12HR
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
AubreyStorm
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 337
Age: 44
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2017 6:21 pm
Location: Texas, USA

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#233 Postby AubreyStorm » Mon Jul 03, 2017 9:21 pm

cycloneye wrote:
* ATLANTIC SHIPS INTENSITY FORECAST *
* IR SAT DATA AVAILABLE, OHC AVAILABLE *
* INVEST AL942017 07/04/17 00 UTC *

TIME (HR) 0 6 12 18 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120
V (KT) NO LAND 30 33 36 40 42 51 55 60 65 66 68 70 67
V (KT) LAND 30 33 36 40 42 51 55 60 65 66 68 70 67
V (KT) LGEM 30 32 34 36 38 41 45 48 51 54 57 59 59
Storm Type TROP TROP TROP TROP TROP TROP TROP TROP TROP TROP TROP TROP TROP

SHEAR (KT) 16 20 24 23 20 14 3 11 6 5 7 7 9
SHEAR ADJ (KT) 0 -5 -7 -6 -7 -1 5 1 1 8 4 11 11
SHEAR DIR 50 42 43 48 44 25 323 313 304 272 186 279 272
SST (C) 27.8 27.7 27.7 27.6 27.5 27.0 25.8 26.3 27.0 27.3 27.4 27.5 27.6
POT. INT. (KT) 131 129 129 128 129 127 116 121 128 130 130 130 130
ADJ. POT. INT. 125 124 123 123 125 129 119 125 129 129 124 120 118
200 MB T (C) -54.4 -54.7 -54.6 -54.2 -54.6 -54.7 -53.9 -54.4 -54.2 -54.7 -54.2 -54.4 -53.9
200 MB VXT (C) 0.0 0.0 -0.1 -0.1 -0.2 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3
TH_E DEV (C) 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 7 8 8 9 9 9
700-500 MB RH 71 74 75 80 80 76 68 59 57 56 55 54 57
MODEL VTX (KT) 10 11 13 14 14 17 16 16 16 15 15 15 13
850 MB ENV VOR 41 32 28 21 9 0 -7 6 27 24 24 2 -19
200 MB DIV 62 75 84 85 80 28 36 21 25 44 29 41 48
700-850 TADV 0 -1 -3 -3 -6 -12 7 11 4 8 1 2 8
LAND (KM) 1845 1875 1902 1914 1920 1875 1746 1604 1454 1252 1033 907 807
LAT (DEG N) 9.0 9.0 9.1 9.3 9.7 11.4 14.0 16.2 17.3 17.7 17.9 18.3 19.3
LONG(DEG W) 33.4 33.7 34.0 34.2 34.4 35.8 38.9 43.3 47.8 51.8 54.8 57.1 58.1
STM SPEED (KT) 3 3 3 4 6 16 22 24 21 17 12 9 6
HEAT CONTENT 15 17 19 19 20 19 2 8 15 14 35 19 29

FORECAST TRACK FROM TABM INITIAL HEADING/SPEED (DEG/KT):280/ 3 CX,CY: -2/ 1
T-12 MAX WIND: 25 PRESSURE OF STEERING LEVEL (MB): 659 (MEAN=618)
GOES IR BRIGHTNESS TEMP. STD DEV. 50-200 KM RAD: 19.4 (MEAN=14.5)
% GOES IR PIXELS WITH T < -20 C 50-200 KM RAD: 54.0 (MEAN=65.0)
PRELIM RI PROB (DV .GE. 55 KT IN 48 HR): 4.3

INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO INTENSITY CHANGE
6 12 18 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120
----------------------------------------------------------
SAMPLE MEAN CHANGE 1. 2. 3. 4. 6. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 13.
SST POTENTIAL 1. 1. 2. 3. 6. 10. 14. 18. 21. 23. 25. 26.
VERTICAL SHEAR MAG -0. -1. -1. -2. -2. -1. 0. 2. 3. 4. 5. 5.
VERTICAL SHEAR ADJ 0. 1. 1. 2. 3. 3. 3. 3. 2. 1. 0. -1.
VERTICAL SHEAR DIR 0. 1. 2. 3. 5. 7. 7. 7. 6. 6. 5. 4.
PERSISTENCE 1. 1. 2. 2. 2. 2. 1. 1. 1. 0. 0. -0.
200/250 MB TEMP. -0. -0. -0. -0. -0. -0. -0. 0. 0. 1. 2. 2.
THETA_E EXCESS -0. -0. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. -2. -2. -1. -2.
700-500 MB RH -0. -0. -1. -1. -2. -4. -5. -5. -5. -5. -5. -4.
MODEL VTX TENDENCY 0. 1. 2. 3. 5. 5. 5. 4. 2. 1. 1. -2.
850 MB ENV VORTICITY 0. 0. 0. -0. -0. -0. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1.
200 MB DIVERGENCE 0. 0. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 0. 0. -0.
850-700 T ADVEC 0. -0. -0. -0. -0. -1. -1. -0. -0. -0. -0. -0.
ZONAL STORM MOTION -0. -0. -0. -0. -0. -0. -0. -1. -1. -1. -2. -2.
STEERING LEVEL PRES -0. -0. -0. -0. -0. -0. -0. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1.
DAYS FROM CLIM. PEAK 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 1. 1. 2. 2. 2.
GOES PREDICTORS -0. -0. -0. -0. -1. -1. -2. -2. -2. -2. -2. -1.
OCEAN HEAT CONTENT -0. -0. -0. -0. -0. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. -0.
----------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL CHANGE 3. 6. 10. 12. 21. 25. 30. 35. 36. 38. 40. 37.

CURRENT MAX WIND (KT): 30. LAT, LON: 9.0 33.4

** 2017 ATLANTIC RI INDEX AL942017 INVEST 07/04/17 00 UTC **
(SHIPS-RII PREDICTOR TABLE for 30 KT OR MORE MAXIMUM WIND INCREASE IN NEXT 24-h)

Predictor Value RI Predictor Range Scaled Value(0-1) % Contribution
12 HR PERSISTENCE (KT): 5.0 -49.5 to 33.0 0.66 4.2
850-200 MB SHEAR (KT) : 20.5 30.1 to 2.9 0.35 0.9
HEAT CONTENT (KJ/cm2) : 18.0 0.0 to 156.2 0.12 0.3
2nd PC OF IR BR TEMP : 0.8 2.4 to -3.0 0.30 0.8
STD DEV OF IR BR TEMP : 19.4 36.6 to 2.8 0.51 1.4
MAXIMUM WIND (kt) : 30.0 22.5 to 121.0 0.21 0.3
POT = MPI-VMAX (KT) : 93.9 28.4 to 139.6 0.59 1.1
D200 (10**7s-1) : 77.2 -29.7 to 181.5 0.51 0.4
BL DRY-AIR FLUX (w/m2): 42.6 961.4 to -67.1 0.89 0.0
% AREA WITH TPW <45 mm: 0.0 100.0 to 0.0 1.00 0.1

SHIPS Prob RI for 20kt/ 12hr RI threshold= 4% is 0.8 times sample mean ( 5.4%)
SHIPS Prob RI for 25kt/ 24hr RI threshold= 13% is 1.1 times sample mean (11.5%)
SHIPS Prob RI for 30kt/ 24hr RI threshold= 9% is 1.3 times sample mean ( 7.4%)
SHIPS Prob RI for 35kt/ 24hr RI threshold= 6% is 1.3 times sample mean ( 4.3%)
SHIPS Prob RI for 40kt/ 24hr RI threshold= 5% is 1.6 times sample mean ( 2.8%)
SHIPS Prob RI for 45kt/ 36hr RI threshold= 9% is 1.9 times sample mean ( 5.1%)
SHIPS Prob RI for 55kt/ 48hr RI threshold= 11% is 2.0 times sample mean ( 5.3%)
SHIPS Prob RI for 65kt/ 72hr RI threshold= 16% is 2.7 times sample mean ( 6.0%)

Matrix of RI probabilities
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RI (kt / h) | 20/12 | 25/24 | 30/24 | 35/24 | 40/24 | 45/36 | 55/48 |65/72
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SHIPS-RII: 4.3% 12.6% 9.4% 5.7% 4.6% 9.5% 10.8% 16.4%
Logistic: 3.0% 12.3% 5.2% 1.3% 0.3% 4.4% 5.8% 10.8%
Bayesian: 1.1% 9.5% 1.2% 0.1% 0.0% 1.5% 1.1% 0.8%
Consensus: 2.8% 11.4% 5.3% 2.4% 1.6% 5.1% 5.9% 9.4%

** PROBLTY OF AT LEAST 1 SCNDRY EYEWL FORMTN EVENT AL942017 INVEST 07/04/2017 00 UTC **
TIME(HR) 0-12 12-24(0-24) 24-36(0-36) 36-48(0-48)
CLIMO(%) 0 0( 0) 0( 0) 0( 0) <-- PROB BASED ON INTENSITY ONLY
PROB(%) 0 0( 0) 0( 0) 0( 0) <-- FULL MODEL PROB (RAN NORMALLY)

** DSHIPS INTENSITY FORECAST ADJUSTED RELATIVE TO ONSET OF ERC WEAKENING PHASE **
TIME (HR) 0 6 12 18 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120
>24HR AGO (DSHIPS) 30 33 36 40 42 51 55 60 65 66 68 70 67
18HR AGO 30 29 32 36 38 47 51 56 61 62 64 66 63
12HR AGO 30 27 26 30 32 41 45 50 55 56 58 60 57
6HR AGO 30 24 21 20 22 31 35 40 45 46 48 50 47
NOW CURRENT INTENSITY < 83 KT
IN 6HR INTENSITY IN 6HR < 83 KT
IN 12HR


OMG!
0 likes   
The posts are NOT an official forecast. Please REFER to the NHC and NWS for official forecasts and products.

AutoPenalti
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4030
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#234 Postby AutoPenalti » Mon Jul 03, 2017 9:28 pm

What is so omg about it? Am I missing something?
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)

TCVN
is a weighted averaged

User avatar
1900hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6059
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 12:04 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#235 Postby 1900hurricane » Mon Jul 03, 2017 10:27 pm

Yeah, even on ASCAT, it looks more like a WPac monsoon trough type disturbance, with northerlies on the west side actually being the weakest aspect of the circulation.

Image
1 likes   
Contract Meteorologist. TAMU & MSST. Fiercely authentic, one of a kind. We are all given free will, so choose a life meant to be lived. We are the Masters of our own Stories.
Opinions expressed are mine alone.

Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7351
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#236 Postby Hurricaneman » Mon Jul 03, 2017 10:37 pm

1900hurricane wrote:Yeah, even on ASCAT, it looks more like a WPac monsoon trough type disturbance, with northerlies on the west side actually being the weakest aspect of the circulation.

Image

The circulation is definitely closed looking at the current ASCAT pass
1 likes   

User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 16143
Age: 27
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#237 Postby Yellow Evan » Mon Jul 03, 2017 10:41 pm

:uarrow: No west wind though.
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#238 Postby Alyono » Mon Jul 03, 2017 10:46 pm

Yellow Evan wrote::uarrow: No west wind though.


you mean no northwest wind? Clear westerlies
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#239 Postby Alyono » Mon Jul 03, 2017 10:48 pm

0Z MU MUCH weaker through 48 hrs. Actually shows weakening during this time period

of course, it's likely BS as it somehow shifted north and has the center in line with Dominica in 54 hours... all the way to 15N
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7351
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#240 Postby Hurricaneman » Mon Jul 03, 2017 10:52 pm

Alyono wrote:0Z MU MUCH weaker through 48 hrs. Actually shows weakening during this time period

of course, it's likely BS as it somehow shifted north and has the center in line with Dominica in 54 hours... all the way to 15N

Looks like a garbage run, when in doubt go with th Euro as it seems to have better pattern recognition
0 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests