ATL: NATE - Post Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
bob rulz
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1704
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1781 Postby bob rulz » Sat Oct 07, 2017 2:10 am

dexterlabio wrote:Is no one else considering the likelihood of a cat 3 (or 4) in the gulf? Its current structure looks mighty impressive, a brief RI phase would easily bump this to a 100kt hurricane IMO. I know all hurricanes are dangerous, be it a Cat1 or 5, but people out there might let their guard down a bit because they're only preparing for a minimak hurricane..


There have been several posts indicating people think a category 3 is possible.

A category 4 is unlikely simply because of time but would be foolish to 100% rule it out.
0 likes   

AutoPenalti
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4030
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1782 Postby AutoPenalti » Sat Oct 07, 2017 2:25 am

FLpanhandle91 wrote:Ok, I have to vent here for a second. Some random guy's joint pains in Orlando serve literally no purpose in the discussion thread of an imminent landfalling Hurricane. Also, Alyono, I am extraordinarily curious as to why you feel New Orleans will see more significant impact than the panhandle of Florida.

Okey Dokey.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)

TCVN
is a weighted averaged

Airboy
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 439
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 10:41 am

Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1783 Postby Airboy » Sat Oct 07, 2017 2:30 am

I'm correct that a fast moving hurricane cause more storm surge than a slow moving one, everything else being the same, or?
It's really moving fast from the north of Yucutan to the US coast, around 24 hours if it keep it up.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15446
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1784 Postby NDG » Sat Oct 07, 2017 2:31 am

SE LA and MS better hope that the NHC's track is correct because all of the Global Models have Nate making at least a first landfall in SE LA. Look how far to the right the NHC track and TVCN are.

Image
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1785 Postby Alyono » Sat Oct 07, 2017 2:32 am

FLpanhandle91 wrote:
Alyono wrote:
FLpanhandle91 wrote:Ok, I have to vent here for a second. Some random guy's joint pains in Orlando serve literally no purpose in the discussion thread of an imminent landfalling Hurricane. Also, Alyono, I am extraordinarily curious as to why you feel New Orleans will see more significant impact than the panhandle of Florida.


because there is little evidence indicating a landfall on the Panhandle. It's not making landfall where you live. That is unlikely


Great. Never implied that. The fact of the matter is that the strongest winds are well east of the CoC and in all likelihood, will be at the time of LF. An AL/MS line landfall with a storm moving NE at that point spells way more impact for the FL panhandle than the New Orleans metro.


The risk is greater for New Orleans as it may yet make a direct hit there
0 likes   

User avatar
FLpanhandle91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1033
Age: 34
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 3:50 pm
Location: Fort Walton Beach, FL

Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1786 Postby FLpanhandle91 » Sat Oct 07, 2017 2:36 am

Alyono wrote:
FLpanhandle91 wrote:
Alyono wrote:
because there is little evidence indicating a landfall on the Panhandle. It's not making landfall where you live. That is unlikely


Great. Never implied that. The fact of the matter is that the strongest winds are well east of the CoC and in all likelihood, will be at the time of LF. An AL/MS line landfall with a storm moving NE at that point spells way more impact for the FL panhandle than the New Orleans metro.


The risk is greater for New Orleans as it may yet make a direct hit there


I assume it is an infrastructure risk vs the actual effects of the storm itself.
0 likes   

bella_may
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 908
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 2:13 pm
Location: SE Mississippi coast

Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1787 Postby bella_may » Sat Oct 07, 2017 2:37 am

Wouldn't surprise me if they shifted it slightly west in the morning
0 likes   

User avatar
FLpanhandle91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1033
Age: 34
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 3:50 pm
Location: Fort Walton Beach, FL

Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1788 Postby FLpanhandle91 » Sat Oct 07, 2017 2:37 am

AutoPenalti wrote:
FLpanhandle91 wrote:Ok, I have to vent here for a second. Some random guy's joint pains in Orlando serve literally no purpose in the discussion thread of an imminent landfalling Hurricane. Also, Alyono, I am extraordinarily curious as to why you feel New Orleans will see more significant impact than the panhandle of Florida.

Okey Dokey.



You agree that joint pains are an accurate reflection of potential impacts of a hurricane?
0 likes   

bamajammer4eva
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 907
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 3:21 am
Location: Ozark, AL

Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1789 Postby bamajammer4eva » Sat Oct 07, 2017 2:39 am

Alyono wrote:
FLpanhandle91 wrote:
Alyono wrote:
because there is little evidence indicating a landfall on the Panhandle. It's not making landfall where you live. That is unlikely


Great. Never implied that. The fact of the matter is that the strongest winds are well east of the CoC and in all likelihood, will be at the time of LF. An AL/MS line landfall with a storm moving NE at that point spells way more impact for the FL panhandle than the New Orleans metro.


The risk is greater for New Orleans as it may yet make a direct hit there


I for my own area hope you are right and it goes way west of Al/Fl Panhandle. So since this storm is so lopsided and the weather is supposed to be to the east you are thinking it will go even West of NOLA for them to get the worst impacts?
Last edited by bamajammer4eva on Sat Oct 07, 2017 2:41 am, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1790 Postby Alyono » Sat Oct 07, 2017 2:39 am

FLpanhandle91 wrote:
Alyono wrote:
FLpanhandle91 wrote:
Great. Never implied that. The fact of the matter is that the strongest winds are well east of the CoC and in all likelihood, will be at the time of LF. An AL/MS line landfall with a storm moving NE at that point spells way more impact for the FL panhandle than the New Orleans metro.


The risk is greater for New Orleans as it may yet make a direct hit there


I assume it is an infrastructure risk vs the actual effects of the storm itself.


no, it's the actual impacts from the storm. A reasonable outcome is a cat 2 into the center of New Orleans. Far more likely than a landfall in Florida
3 likes   

Billyp542
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2017 2:31 pm

Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1791 Postby Billyp542 » Sat Oct 07, 2017 2:42 am

FLpanhandle91 wrote:
Alyono wrote:
FLpanhandle91 wrote:
Great. Never implied that. The fact of the matter is that the strongest winds are well east of the CoC and in all likelihood, will be at the time of LF. An AL/MS line landfall with a storm moving NE at that point spells way more impact for the FL panhandle than the New Orleans metro.


The risk is greater for New Orleans as it may yet make a direct hit there


I assume it is an infrastructure risk vs the actual effects of the storm itself.

Why would it be more of an infrastructure risk, than the storm itself.
0 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15446
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1792 Postby NDG » Sat Oct 07, 2017 2:44 am

To make things worst, 06z SHIPS forecast chances for RI before landfall went up compared to previous run.
0 likes   

bella_may
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 908
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 2:13 pm
Location: SE Mississippi coast

Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1793 Postby bella_may » Sat Oct 07, 2017 2:45 am

It looks like convection is dying a little bit. Or am I seeing things?
0 likes   

bamajammer4eva
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 907
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 3:21 am
Location: Ozark, AL

Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1794 Postby bamajammer4eva » Sat Oct 07, 2017 2:47 am

Has the NHC ever used the term "Booking" in an advisory before???? :lol:

...HURRRICANE NATE BOOKING TOWARD THE CENTRAL GULF OF MEXICO...
4 likes   

User avatar
FLpanhandle91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1033
Age: 34
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 3:50 pm
Location: Fort Walton Beach, FL

Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1795 Postby FLpanhandle91 » Sat Oct 07, 2017 2:48 am

Alyono wrote:
FLpanhandle91 wrote:
Alyono wrote:
The risk is greater for New Orleans as it may yet make a direct hit there


I assume it is an infrastructure risk vs the actual effects of the storm itself.


no, it's the actual impacts from the storm. A reasonable outcome is a cat 2 into the center of New Orleans. Far more likely than a landfall in Florida


Disagree. Adamantly.
1 likes   

User avatar
FLpanhandle91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1033
Age: 34
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 3:50 pm
Location: Fort Walton Beach, FL

Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1796 Postby FLpanhandle91 » Sat Oct 07, 2017 2:49 am

Billyp542 wrote:
FLpanhandle91 wrote:
Alyono wrote:
The risk is greater for New Orleans as it may yet make a direct hit there


I assume it is an infrastructure risk vs the actual effects of the storm itself.

Why would it be more of an infrastructure risk, than the storm itself.


See: Katrina.
2 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1797 Postby Alyono » Sat Oct 07, 2017 2:54 am

bamajammer4eva wrote:
Alyono wrote:
FLpanhandle91 wrote:
Great. Never implied that. The fact of the matter is that the strongest winds are well east of the CoC and in all likelihood, will be at the time of LF. An AL/MS line landfall with a storm moving NE at that point spells way more impact for the FL panhandle than the New Orleans metro.


The risk is greater for New Orleans as it may yet make a direct hit there


I for my own area hope you are right and it goes way west of Al/Fl Panhandle. So since this storm is so lopsided and the weather is supposed to be to the east you are thinking it will go even West of NOLA for them to get the worst impacts?


I'm thinking SLIGHTLY east of New Orleans, maybe about 20-25 miles. That means a slight deviation to the west puts them in the worst of it
1 likes   

poof121
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 316
Age: 44
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:33 am
Location: Laurel, MD

Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1798 Postby poof121 » Sat Oct 07, 2017 2:54 am

FLpanhandle91 wrote:
Billyp542 wrote:
FLpanhandle91 wrote:
I assume it is an infrastructure risk vs the actual effects of the storm itself.

Why would it be more of an infrastructure risk, than the storm itself.


See: Katrina.


The walls failed due to storm surge into drainage canals. Since Katrina, the USACE installed gates where they meet Lake Ponchartrain that can be closed to keep the surge from backing up into the canals. Pumps however, different story. But that's a rainfall issue, not a surge issue.
3 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1799 Postby Alyono » Sat Oct 07, 2017 2:55 am

bella_may wrote:It looks like convection is dying a little bit. Or am I seeing things?


redeveloping with more banding. Looks to be slowly intensifying
0 likes   

bamajammer4eva
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 907
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 3:21 am
Location: Ozark, AL

Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1800 Postby bamajammer4eva » Sat Oct 07, 2017 2:55 am

FLpanhandle91 wrote:
Billyp542 wrote:Why would it be more of an infrastructure risk, than the storm itself.


See: Katrina.


I don't think they are talking about this being a Katrina but that Katrina showed New Orleans major vulnerability as being in a Bowl and being surge/flood prone.
2 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests