meriland29 wrote:
gfs want save islands past few runs
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Spacecoast wrote:WAcyclone wrote:ECMWF control run:
[img]http://i.imgur.com/4ZOiE4F.gif[img]
Source: weather.us
Amatuer question... What is the ECMWF control run, and why is it so different than the standard ECMWF model run?
Thx...
meriland29 wrote:
stormreader wrote:
Sure has gained a lot of latitude in recent pics. Seems like that would favor the GFS solution. Funny for me to say this, because I normally favor the Euro.
KWT wrote:SFLcane wrote:Big trof drapped across the SE..
Becomes cut-off low, MUCH stronger than the 12z ECM which has the same idea of making a cutoff low but hangs it back (maybe too far, I have heard the ECM does hang back cutoff lows too much).
My gut is this run swings Irma up towards NE states and Newfoundland.
stormreader wrote:
Sure has gained a lot of latitude in recent pics. Seems like that would favor the GFS solution. Funny for me to say this, because I normally favor the Euro.
RL3AO wrote:stormreader wrote:
Sure has gained a lot of latitude in recent pics. Seems like that would favor the GFS solution. Funny for me to say this, because I normally favor the Euro.
Moving just as forecast by the Euro.
RL3AO wrote:KWT wrote:SFLcane wrote:Big trof drapped across the SE..
Becomes cut-off low, MUCH stronger than the 12z ECM which has the same idea of making a cutoff low but hangs it back (maybe too far, I have heard the ECM does hang back cutoff lows too much).
My gut is this run swings Irma up towards NE states and Newfoundland.
I think you're right. The stronger trough will make this get closer to the US has the 500 mb flow is southerly along the coast instead of southwesterly.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests