ATL: HARVEY - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: Central Atlantic Disturbance (west of 91L)

#161 Postby Alyono » Sun Aug 13, 2017 4:51 pm

RL3AO wrote:
Alyono wrote:18Z GFS dissipates this in about 2 days


Maybe not.

Image



fujiwara due to convective feedback :break:
2 likes   

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7351
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#162 Postby Hurricaneman » Sun Aug 13, 2017 4:59 pm

Alyono wrote:run is junk. Too much feedback going on there

The GFS isn't going to drop the convective feedback until a low has formed to latch onto
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#163 Postby Alyono » Sun Aug 13, 2017 5:01 pm

Hurricaneman wrote:
Alyono wrote:run is junk. Too much feedback going on there

The GFS isn't going to drop the convective feedback until a low has formed to latch onto


won't matter. The feedback issue does not stop just because there is a defined low. It's a fundamental flaw in the model
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7351
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#164 Postby Hurricaneman » Sun Aug 13, 2017 5:01 pm

RL3AO wrote:The GFS says the thunderstorms that directly lead to a TS should be forming right about...................................now.

Image

Convective feedback and it's making most of the GFS runs trash
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#165 Postby RL3AO » Sun Aug 13, 2017 5:03 pm

Incredibly, it's ended up a little south of the 12z run after it's dance of (∂v/∂x - ∂u/∂y) maxima.

Image
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#166 Postby RL3AO » Sun Aug 13, 2017 5:06 pm

GFS has a borderline hurricane at 108 hrs. Since that almost certainly won't verify, the wave will be weaker and probably further south.
1 likes   

otowntiger
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1921
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:06 pm

Re: Central Atlantic Disturbance (west of 91L)

#167 Postby otowntiger » Sun Aug 13, 2017 5:08 pm

Alyono wrote:18Z GFS dissipates this in about 2 days

So More false alarms? Will this be another 99l? It's starting to sound like not much will come out of these waves? More sal, dry air and troughs to save the day?
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: Central Atlantic Disturbance (west of 91L)

#168 Postby Alyono » Sun Aug 13, 2017 5:10 pm

otowntiger wrote:
Alyono wrote:18Z GFS dissipates this in about 2 days

So More false alarms? Will this be another 99l? It's starting to sound like not much will come out of these waves? More sal, dry air and troughs to save the day?


I think something does form here, but not how the GFS says. It makes no dynamical sense
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: Central Atlantic Disturbance (west of 91L)

#169 Postby RL3AO » Sun Aug 13, 2017 5:10 pm

otowntiger wrote:
Alyono wrote:18Z GFS dissipates this in about 2 days

So More false alarms? Will this be another 99l? It's starting to sound like not much will come out of these waves? More sal, dry air and troughs to save the day?


I think the Euro has a good idea. In five days, an intensifying system east of the islands.
0 likes   

User avatar
FLpanhandle91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1033
Age: 34
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 3:50 pm
Location: Fort Walton Beach, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#170 Postby FLpanhandle91 » Sun Aug 13, 2017 5:16 pm

Does the error of convective feedback also impact that accuracy in track as well? Or just intensity?
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#171 Postby RL3AO » Sun Aug 13, 2017 5:19 pm

FLpanhandle91 wrote:Does the error of convective feedback also impact that accuracy in track as well? Or just intensity?


Both. In the short term, the Fujiwhara interaction between the vorticity maxima put it north of where it will likely be. In the mid-term, by having a hurricane at day 5, it's moving the system NW towards the central Atlantic weakness. It's most likely to be a wave or weak tropical cyclone moving westward at day 5.
0 likes   

User avatar
FLpanhandle91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1033
Age: 34
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 3:50 pm
Location: Fort Walton Beach, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#172 Postby FLpanhandle91 » Sun Aug 13, 2017 5:22 pm

RL3AO wrote:
FLpanhandle91 wrote:Does the error of convective feedback also impact that accuracy in track as well? Or just intensity?


Both. In the short term, the Fujiwhara interaction between the vorticity maxima put it north of where it will likely be. In the mid-term, by having a hurricane at day 5, it's moving the system NW towards the central Atlantic weakness. It's most likely to be a wave or weak tropical cyclone moving westward at day 5.


Probably a noob question, but a stronger system would be influenced more by a steering influence like a weakness in a ridge than a weaker, less vertically prominent, system?
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#173 Postby RL3AO » Sun Aug 13, 2017 5:25 pm

FLpanhandle91 wrote:
Probably a noob question, but a stronger system would be influenced more by a steering influence like a weakness in a ridge than a weaker, less vertically prominent, system?


In this case yes. Some make the mistake of assuming stronger = north which isn't always true, but in this case it is true.

Here's 700mb in 3 days. Strong easterlies with a ridge to the north of the system.

Image

Here's 500mb in 3 days. A weakness to the NW of the system which the stronger modeled system is steered by more than a weak system would be.

Image
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#174 Postby RL3AO » Sun Aug 13, 2017 5:29 pm

120 hours out Euro vs GFS. I like the Euro solution more although maybe it's a bit too fast?

Image

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
FLpanhandle91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1033
Age: 34
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 3:50 pm
Location: Fort Walton Beach, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#175 Postby FLpanhandle91 » Sun Aug 13, 2017 5:33 pm

RL3AO wrote:
FLpanhandle91 wrote:
Probably a noob question, but a stronger system would be influenced more by a steering influence like a weakness in a ridge than a weaker, less vertically prominent, system?


In this case yes. Some make the mistake of assuming stronger = north which isn't always true, but in this case it is true.

Here's 700mb in 3 days. Strong easterlies with a ridge to the north of the system.

Image

Here's 500mb in 3 days. A weakness to the NW of the system which the stronger modeled system is steered by more than a weak system would be.

Image


Thanks for the explanation!

So it would seem that a track quite a bit further south of the GFS model runs would make more sense. Seems like that would damn near put it into the eastern Caribbean next weekend.
0 likes   

AutoPenalti
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4030
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#176 Postby AutoPenalti » Sun Aug 13, 2017 5:41 pm

I have a feeling that 91L is going to have the same issue as 99L did with its competing vorticies. Which may cause some faux runs with the GFS or the Euro.
1 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)

TCVN
is a weighted averaged

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15979
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#177 Postby Kingarabian » Sun Aug 13, 2017 5:48 pm

18z GFS hrs 120-240:

Image
0 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9620
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#178 Postby Steve » Sun Aug 13, 2017 5:52 pm

It takes a WSW dive into the Bahamas and moves north close to landfalling along the South Carolina Coast but paralleling and not going very far inland (eyewall 960s and close to/partially on land) It's too far out but it has moved a bit West from prior developing runs. Looks like it spins right along that curved part of the Coast from GA to NC).
Last edited by Steve on Sun Aug 13, 2017 6:09 pm, edited 2 times in total.
1 likes   

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15979
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#179 Postby Kingarabian » Sun Aug 13, 2017 5:54 pm

Steve wrote:It takes a WSW dive into the Bahamas and moves north landfalling along the South Carolina Coast but paralleling and not going very far inland. It's too far out but it has moved a bit West from prior developing runs.


Joaquin 2015 esque?
1 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

floridasun78
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 10:16 pm
Location: miami fl

Re: Central Atlantic Disturbance (west of 91L)

#180 Postby floridasun78 » Sun Aug 13, 2017 5:58 pm

look this could be soon invest looking better by hour it big tropical wave
0 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests