RL3AO wrote:Alyono wrote:18Z GFS dissipates this in about 2 days
Maybe not.
fujiwara due to convective feedback

Moderator: S2k Moderators
RL3AO wrote:Alyono wrote:18Z GFS dissipates this in about 2 days
Maybe not.
Alyono wrote:run is junk. Too much feedback going on there
Hurricaneman wrote:Alyono wrote:run is junk. Too much feedback going on there
The GFS isn't going to drop the convective feedback until a low has formed to latch onto
RL3AO wrote:The GFS says the thunderstorms that directly lead to a TS should be forming right about...................................now.
Alyono wrote:18Z GFS dissipates this in about 2 days
otowntiger wrote:Alyono wrote:18Z GFS dissipates this in about 2 days
So More false alarms? Will this be another 99l? It's starting to sound like not much will come out of these waves? More sal, dry air and troughs to save the day?
otowntiger wrote:Alyono wrote:18Z GFS dissipates this in about 2 days
So More false alarms? Will this be another 99l? It's starting to sound like not much will come out of these waves? More sal, dry air and troughs to save the day?
FLpanhandle91 wrote:Does the error of convective feedback also impact that accuracy in track as well? Or just intensity?
RL3AO wrote:FLpanhandle91 wrote:Does the error of convective feedback also impact that accuracy in track as well? Or just intensity?
Both. In the short term, the Fujiwhara interaction between the vorticity maxima put it north of where it will likely be. In the mid-term, by having a hurricane at day 5, it's moving the system NW towards the central Atlantic weakness. It's most likely to be a wave or weak tropical cyclone moving westward at day 5.
FLpanhandle91 wrote:
Probably a noob question, but a stronger system would be influenced more by a steering influence like a weakness in a ridge than a weaker, less vertically prominent, system?
RL3AO wrote:FLpanhandle91 wrote:
Probably a noob question, but a stronger system would be influenced more by a steering influence like a weakness in a ridge than a weaker, less vertically prominent, system?
In this case yes. Some make the mistake of assuming stronger = north which isn't always true, but in this case it is true.
Here's 700mb in 3 days. Strong easterlies with a ridge to the north of the system.
Here's 500mb in 3 days. A weakness to the NW of the system which the stronger modeled system is steered by more than a weak system would be.
Steve wrote:It takes a WSW dive into the Bahamas and moves north landfalling along the South Carolina Coast but paralleling and not going very far inland. It's too far out but it has moved a bit West from prior developing runs.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests