ATL: HARVEY - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 16012
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1581 Postby Kingarabian » Tue Aug 22, 2017 4:51 pm

18z GFS compared to the 12z:

Image
0 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 16012
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1582 Postby Kingarabian » Tue Aug 22, 2017 4:52 pm

South Texas Storms wrote:Almost the exact same position as the 12z run for the GFS. It is weaker this run though.


Yeah, just east.
0 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

hd44

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1583 Postby hd44 » Tue Aug 22, 2017 4:52 pm

Gfs shows favorable conditons from hour 48 to hour 72. Key is what shape can it get to before then. Lets say this a tropical storm before then... then it can landfall much stronger. Key take away is slow formation through 48 hours... then quick ramp up.
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1584 Postby Alyono » Tue Aug 22, 2017 4:52 pm

GFS appears to have the wrong initial vortex. I am seeing the ONLY reason this run is weaker is the vortex is too broad. Simply takes a little too long to spin up
1 likes   

AxaltaRacing24
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1753
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 11:14 am
Location: Jupiter, FL

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1585 Postby AxaltaRacing24 » Tue Aug 22, 2017 4:52 pm

Image

According to the GFS, this is weaker......
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1586 Postby RL3AO » Tue Aug 22, 2017 4:53 pm

Alyono wrote:GFS appears to have the wrong initial vortex. I am seeing the ONLY reason this run is weaker is the vortex is too broad. Simply takes a little too long to spin up


Similar to my thoughts. A well defined vortex is likely by tomorrow.
1 likes   

TheStormExpert

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1587 Postby TheStormExpert » Tue Aug 22, 2017 4:54 pm

Alyono wrote:GFS appears to have the wrong initial vortex. I am seeing the ONLY reason this run is weaker is the vortex is too broad. Simply takes a little too long to spin up

So that could make a huge difference in how strong the GFS makes it?
0 likes   

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 16012
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1588 Postby Kingarabian » Tue Aug 22, 2017 4:54 pm

18z GFS through hour 84:

Image
0 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1589 Postby Alyono » Tue Aug 22, 2017 4:55 pm

TheStormExpert wrote:
Alyono wrote:GFS appears to have the wrong initial vortex. I am seeing the ONLY reason this run is weaker is the vortex is too broad. Simply takes a little too long to spin up

So that could make a huge difference in how strong the GFS makes it?


yeah. Could be by as much a 40 mb
0 likes   

Frank P
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2776
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 10:52 am
Location: Biloxi Beach, Ms
Contact:

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1590 Postby Frank P » Tue Aug 22, 2017 4:56 pm

[quote="Kingarabian"]18z GFS through hour 84:

and pressure still falling over land albeit not much... :D
0 likes   

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 16012
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1591 Postby Kingarabian » Tue Aug 22, 2017 4:56 pm

Alyono wrote:GFS appears to have the wrong initial vortex. I am seeing the ONLY reason this run is weaker is the vortex is too broad. Simply takes a little too long to spin up


I think the GFS has been developing the same vortex for the past couple of runs now. Just that the previous were more north and in turn the system had more time over very warm waters and that's why we would see a Cat.3 - Cat.4 landfall.
0 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

Thetxhurricanemaster
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 279
Age: 34
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 6:53 pm
Location: Corpus christi

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1592 Postby Thetxhurricanemaster » Tue Aug 22, 2017 4:57 pm

Alyono wrote:
TheStormExpert wrote:
Alyono wrote:GFS appears to have the wrong initial vortex. I am seeing the ONLY reason this run is weaker is the vortex is too broad. Simply takes a little too long to spin up

So that could make a huge difference in how strong the GFS makes it?


yeah. Could be by as much a 40 mb

Exactly and that's what draws it further north is the broad spin if you watch it and thanks for pointing that out
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1593 Postby Alyono » Tue Aug 22, 2017 4:58 pm

Kingarabian wrote:
Alyono wrote:GFS appears to have the wrong initial vortex. I am seeing the ONLY reason this run is weaker is the vortex is too broad. Simply takes a little too long to spin up


I think the GFS has been developing the same vortex for the past couple of runs now. Just that the previous were more north and in turn the system had more time over very warm waters and that's why we would see a Cat.3 - Cat.4 landfall.


it's too broad. If it were tighter, it would intensify quicker given that upper environment
0 likes   

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 16012
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1594 Postby Kingarabian » Tue Aug 22, 2017 4:58 pm

GFS through hour 96:

Image
1 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 16012
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1595 Postby Kingarabian » Tue Aug 22, 2017 4:59 pm

Alyono wrote:
Kingarabian wrote:
Alyono wrote:GFS appears to have the wrong initial vortex. I am seeing the ONLY reason this run is weaker is the vortex is too broad. Simply takes a little too long to spin up


I think the GFS has been developing the same vortex for the past couple of runs now. Just that the previous were more north and in turn the system had more time over very warm waters and that's why we would see a Cat.3 - Cat.4 landfall.


it's too broad. If it were tighter, it would intensify quicker given that upper environment


On satellite the vort we're tracking seems considerably smaller. The models including the Euro for some reason think the whole system is one large circulation.
1 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1596 Postby RL3AO » Tue Aug 22, 2017 5:00 pm

Keep this thread on topic and avoid back and forths with other users.
2 likes   

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 16012
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1597 Postby Kingarabian » Tue Aug 22, 2017 5:06 pm

18z GFS through hour 120. Now just looping and meandering:

Image

Bad flooding event.
2 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4823
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1598 Postby ronjon » Tue Aug 22, 2017 5:09 pm

Weakening over Hill Country on 18z GFS.
0 likes   

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4231
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1599 Postby South Texas Storms » Tue Aug 22, 2017 5:10 pm

18z GFS looks more similar to the 12z Euro Ensemble with it tracking back south across TX after stalling in central TX.
2 likes   

Frank P
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2776
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 10:52 am
Location: Biloxi Beach, Ms
Contact:

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1600 Postby Frank P » Tue Aug 22, 2017 5:15 pm

H50 GFS heading SSE back towards the Gulf on the immediate coast
0 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests