ATL: MATTHEW - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
ScottNAtlanta
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2404
Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 3:11 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2601 Postby ScottNAtlanta » Fri Sep 30, 2016 11:46 pm

I believe it is the furthest South cat 5 on record just barely eclipsing Ivan.


I think Emily 2005 was a cat 5 in the vicinity of Matthew
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

AutoPenalti
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4047
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2602 Postby AutoPenalti » Fri Sep 30, 2016 11:47 pm

sponger wrote:
WeatherEmperor wrote:
Bailey1777 wrote:Real quick I am pledging that whatever Matthews final ace is I am going to donate that much in dollars to storm2k, anybody else in?


Matthew's and all other tropical cyclone ACE can be tracked here:

http://models.weatherbell.com/tropical.php


Sent from my iPhone 6 using Tapatalk


Ditto for me!

I wouldn't mind donating too.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)

TCVN
is a weighted averaged

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34009
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2603 Postby CrazyC83 » Fri Sep 30, 2016 11:48 pm

I was out tonight in my school's broadcast lab and did a report live primarily on Hurricane Matthew, so I am just catching up (although I did get the Category 5 advisory).
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2604 Postby RL3AO » Fri Sep 30, 2016 11:50 pm

ScottNAtlanta wrote:
I believe it is the furthest South cat 5 on record just barely eclipsing Ivan.


I think Emily 2005 was a cat 5 in the vicinity of Matthew

 https://twitter.com/islivingston/status/782060108016603136


0 likes   

User avatar
ScottNAtlanta
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2404
Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 3:11 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2605 Postby ScottNAtlanta » Fri Sep 30, 2016 11:51 pm

ronyan wrote:Latest IR frame looks like the inner eyewall may be collapsing.

There is my ERC starting! I was just 6 hours early! :wink:
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7374
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2606 Postby Hurricaneman » Fri Sep 30, 2016 11:51 pm

RL3AO wrote:
ScottNAtlanta wrote:
I believe it is the furthest South cat 5 on record just barely eclipsing Ivan.


I think Emily 2005 was a cat 5 in the vicinity of Matthew

 https://twitter.com/islivingston/status/782060108016603136




Emily wasn't that far south
0 likes   

User avatar
fci
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3324
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Lake Worth, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2607 Postby fci » Fri Sep 30, 2016 11:51 pm

stephen23 wrote:The Phantom lingering low to the North has vanished. The only weakness shown now is digging down into Texas Just as Mathew is reaching Texas. I feel the Gulf is still fair game. The west shift of the models are inching toward that solution slowly but surely


Zero models showing this in the Gulf.
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
My posts are just my opinion and are most likely not backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Bottom line is that I am just expressing my opinion!!!

User avatar
1900hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6059
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 12:04 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2608 Postby 1900hurricane » Fri Sep 30, 2016 11:51 pm

ozonepete wrote:
1900hurricane wrote:
ozonepete wrote:Ok, for all of you who said I was wrong about seeing an ERC about to begin, this is directly from the 11PM discussion:

"HURRICANE MATTHEW DISCUSSION NUMBER 12
NWS NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL AL142016
1100 PM EDT FRI SEP 30 2016

...Matthew probably is near its peak intensity and will likely maintain a similar strength during the next 12 hours or so. Data from the reconnaissance plane show an incipient outer band of maximum winds, indicating that an eyewall replacement cycle could occur soon...

That's what I said I saw in a post not long ago, and I saw it because you could see a ring of higher topped thunderstorms surrounding the small eye. RECON does NOT usually see an ERC before we see it on satellite and/or radar since the developing outer eyewall, while immediately visible on satellite, does not immediately induce the corresponding increase in winds that a plane can detect; it takes a little time for the outer ring of winds to get established and be measureable by RECON. Just sayin' to you guys who questioned me that not all aspects of hurricane dynamics can be detected by our incredible RECON planes first.

Eyewall replacement may be beginning now, but I do maintain that eyewall replacement had not begun at the time of your original post over five hours ago. Even now, I'm not 100% sold that one has begun, despite NHC mentioning the possibility in their discussion. I do respect your thoughts, don't get me wrong. However, based on the information I have, I do not agree that eyewall replacement was underway over five hours ago.


I'm replying because you are one of the best forecasters on here. :)
I said it was near or about to begin, or at least that was clearly my intention from the post. My main point was that:
1) I could see an outer ring of thunderstorms surrounding the small eye at that time
and
2) most importantly, that we can usually see that feature on satellite before RCON can measure it.

Do you disagree with those two points?

First of all, thanks! Image

It looks like there may have been some slight misunderstanding in my interpretation of your original post. It seemed like you were stating that Matthew was in the midst of one at the time.

Regarding point 1, I'm not sure if you mean the intense thunderstorm activity intermittently pulsing around the eyewall or signs of a secondary max in thunderstorm activity that could be from a developing outer eyewall. I can't remember for certain which image we were looking at at the time, but based on your post time of 2227Z, it was probably the 2145Z image. The eyewall convection looked well defined at the time, but I have difficulty seeing anything beyond that.

As far as point 2, yes, I agree that we are usually able to remotely detect the beginning stages of eyewall replacement before recon is able to detect a double wind maximum. My go to choice for trying to identify eyewall replacement as early as possible is from microwave imagery aboard the polar orbiters, and this is another place where we may differ. Based on a number of microwave images as recently as a 0157Z Metop-B pass (below), I don't see any signs of eyewall replacement. It could be possible that an outer eyewall developed in so tight that it it's too difficult to discern from the inner on the somewhat low resolution Metop-B pass (Fiji radar actually captured an eyewall replacement cycle like this beautifully in Cyclone Winston earlier this year), but until I see more concrete evidence, probably in the form of a higher resolution microwave pass (crossing my fingers that AMSR2 gets a clean hit) or obvious tell-tale signs on IR of an inner eyewall dissipating, I am a little skeptical of Matthew currently being in the process of eyewall replacement.

Image

Could I be wrong? Heck yeah I could. If I am, better now on an internet forum rather than when something more is at stake. :P
0 likes   
Contract Meteorologist. TAMU & MSST. Fiercely authentic, one of a kind. We are all given free will, so choose a life meant to be lived. We are the Masters of our own Stories.
Opinions expressed are mine alone.

Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/

Mouton
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 222
Age: 79
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 8:13 am
Location: Amelia Island Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2609 Postby Mouton » Fri Sep 30, 2016 11:53 pm

"I am growing more concerned with the west shift and now tonight for the first time, NHC has placed a portion of the SE Florida coast region in that cone of uncertainty. That is an ominous sign for me and one that we must keep in our minds that if these west shifts with the models continue into this weekend, the possibility of seeing significant effects on the Florida coast increases with time as well. Extremely interesting and nerve-wrecking times ahead for sure."

Yes I go with that same observation. The GFS is rolling at the moment and the shift westward is evident there. It looks like the hurricane windfield pings the coast north of Palm Beach and continues to Canaveral on the O0z run. Then Matt begins a more NNE turn. JAX is in the lower end of the tropical force winds at that point of critical importance to me. Beyond that, the progress would be along the coast up to Maine, a beach disaster. However, with all the variables in place and that being at day 6+ there cannot be much certainty in the actual path.
0 likes   

stephen23
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 341
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 10:57 pm
Location: North Fort Worth

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2610 Postby stephen23 » Fri Sep 30, 2016 11:55 pm

Blinhart wrote:
stephen23 wrote:The Phantom lingering low to the North has vanished. The only weakness shown now is digging down into Texas Just as Mathew is reaching Texas. I feel the Gulf is still fair game. The west shift of the models are inching toward that solution slowly but surely


I am actually starting to worry about this system. I don't think he will make it to Louisiana, but you never know with systems like this. I hope my gut is correct and this will not make it into the gulf, but if he does make it into the Gulf we might end up seeing the strongest hurricane on record with winds over 210. The GoM is a steaming pot waiting to feed a major hurricane to new records.

Yes misspoke. Watching TV and typing at same time. Did not mean to say as storm reaches Texas. I meant to say Florida. The afternoon GFS showed strong ridging to the east and North with a strong trough over Texas. Path of least resistance would bring it into the Gulf if that materialized. May be an exaggeration to say Texas. But the Gulf is still fair game. All models to the east are relying on a phantom low to the North that some are starting to drop. The slower this goes the more that pans out. Everyone should watch this closely and I have a cousin stationed in Miami for the Coast Guard so watching this one extra close
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

stephen23
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 341
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 10:57 pm
Location: North Fort Worth

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2611 Postby stephen23 » Fri Sep 30, 2016 11:59 pm

fci wrote:
stephen23 wrote:The Phantom lingering low to the North has vanished. The only weakness shown now is digging down into Texas Just as Mathew is reaching Texas. I feel the Gulf is still fair game. The west shift of the models are inching toward that solution slowly but surely


Zero models showing this in the Gulf.

Wait until tomorrow
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
ScottNAtlanta
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2404
Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 3:11 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2612 Postby ScottNAtlanta » Sat Oct 01, 2016 12:01 am

RL3AO wrote:
ScottNAtlanta wrote:
I believe it is the furthest South cat 5 on record just barely eclipsing Ivan.
Last edited by ScottNAtlanta on Sat Oct 01, 2016 12:05 am, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
ScottNAtlanta
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2404
Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 3:11 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2613 Postby ScottNAtlanta » Sat Oct 01, 2016 12:03 am

RL3AO wrote:
ScottNAtlanta wrote:
I believe it is the furthest South cat 5 on record just barely eclipsing Ivan.


I think Emily 2005 was a cat 5 in the vicinity of Matthew

 https://twitter.com/islivingston/status/782060108016603136





Emily 2005

Image
Last edited by ScottNAtlanta on Sat Oct 01, 2016 12:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

HurricaneFrances04
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 597
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 8:09 am
Location: Fort Lauderdale, Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2614 Postby HurricaneFrances04 » Sat Oct 01, 2016 12:04 am

Emily didn't attain Cat 5 status until it passed Jamaica.
0 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2615 Postby ozonepete » Sat Oct 01, 2016 12:04 am

1900hurricane wrote: Eyewall replacement may be beginning now, but I do maintain that eyewall replacement had not begun at the time of your original post over five hours ago. Even now, I'm not 100% sold that one has begun... ,
...
but until I see more concrete evidence, probably in the form of a higher resolution microwave pass (crossing my fingers that AMSR2 gets a clean hit) or obvious tell-tale signs on IR of an inner eyewall dissipating, I am a little skeptical of Matthew currently being in the process of eyewall replacement.

Could I be wrong? Heck yeah I could. If I am, better now on an internet forum rather than when something more is at stake. :P



Lol, join the crowd of those who are ready to eat crow and who've eaten it many times.

89 and 91GHZ satellite images are notoriously weak and vague. They both show structure of the precip targets below the cirrus at the top of the storm but cannot ever be more clear than the overnight IR or RGB satellite images for showing the highest coldest cloud tops, and therefore the highest most intense thunderstorms around and within the eyewall. So you take the 88 or 91GHZ images to look for the newest indications of a second outer eyewall and I'll take the regular channel IR images. :)

P.S. The current eyewall may be winking at you as it disappears...
0 likes   

hurricanehunter69
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 343
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 5:21 pm
Location: New Orleans

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2616 Postby hurricanehunter69 » Sat Oct 01, 2016 12:09 am

First off let me say that being a Katrina survivor; my heart goes out to anyone who has to deal with this thing. We talk about Trough vs Ridge....Ridge vs Trough vs Ridge...Although still influenced; The Big Boy ( Cat 5 ) is usually the Bully in the synoptic setup.
2 likes   

User avatar
ScottNAtlanta
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2404
Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 3:11 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2617 Postby ScottNAtlanta » Sat Oct 01, 2016 12:09 am

I was being sarcastic this time...I was obviously wrong the first time...thats why I said I was 6 hours early. The NHC has stated on the 11p discussion that it looks like an ERC could be starting
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
ScottNAtlanta
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2404
Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 3:11 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2618 Postby ScottNAtlanta » Sat Oct 01, 2016 12:10 am

HurricaneFrances04 wrote:Emily didn't attain Cat 5 status until it passed Jamaica.

Sorry...color blindness getting best of me. Thought the color was the same in the Matthew vicinity
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Blinhart
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2081
Age: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Crowley, La.

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2619 Postby Blinhart » Sat Oct 01, 2016 12:20 am

No matter where Matthew goes, you know the cruise companies right now are trying to figure out exactly they will be doing with all their cruises, a lot of them will have to change their schedules and decide where they will be going or cancelling and moving their ships to another area to ride out the storm.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
1900hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6059
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 12:04 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2620 Postby 1900hurricane » Sat Oct 01, 2016 12:21 am

ozonepete wrote:
1900hurricane wrote: Eyewall replacement may be beginning now, but I do maintain that eyewall replacement had not begun at the time of your original post over five hours ago. Even now, I'm not 100% sold that one has begun... ,
...
but until I see more concrete evidence, probably in the form of a higher resolution microwave pass (crossing my fingers that AMSR2 gets a clean hit) or obvious tell-tale signs on IR of an inner eyewall dissipating, I am a little skeptical of Matthew currently being in the process of eyewall replacement.

Could I be wrong? Heck yeah I could. If I am, better now on an internet forum rather than when something more is at stake. :P



Lol, join the crowd of those who are ready to eat crow and who've eaten it many times.

89 and 91GHZ satellite images are notoriously weak and vague. They both show structure of the precip targets below the cirrus at the top of the storm but cannot ever be more clear than the overnight IR or RGB satellite images for showing the highest coldest cloud tops, and therefore the highest most intense thunderstorms around and within the eyewall. So you take the 88 or 91GHZ images to look for the newest indications of a second outer eyewall and I'll take the regular channel IR images. :)

P.S. The current eyewall may be winking at you as it disappears...

No arguments here that the overall IR struture had degraded somewhat over the past few hours. However, if I do not believe it is eyewall replacement at the moment causing the degradation, it would probably be best for me to have some other explanation. The one I support actually has to do with a brief uptick in shear thanks in part by earlier daytime pulsing convection from Central America. Storm outflow appears to me to have reenforced upper level southwesterlies just enough to have an impact on Matthew. That upper level thunderstorm debris may be sneaking in into Matthew's circulation just under outflow level.

Image

Image

Also, based on radar from South America, Matthew's eyewall still looks rather lonely.
0 likes   
Contract Meteorologist. TAMU & MSST. Fiercely authentic, one of a kind. We are all given free will, so choose a life meant to be lived. We are the Masters of our own Stories.
Opinions expressed are mine alone.

Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests