ATL: MATTHEW - Post-Tropical - Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
That hot tower literally exploded into the tropopause.
Cirrus from it is very high in altitude masking the eye.
Rarely see that.
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floater ... -long.html
East-side feeder band is also firing off hot towers.
Working off of very high OHC water.
Cirrus from it is very high in altitude masking the eye.
Rarely see that.
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floater ... -long.html
East-side feeder band is also firing off hot towers.
Working off of very high OHC water.
Last edited by GCANE on Fri Sep 30, 2016 4:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
- p1nheadlarry
- Category 2
- Posts: 672
- Age: 33
- Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 2:42 pm
- Location: SR County FL
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Exalt wrote:boca wrote:Why didn't the NHC adjust the the cone to the left.They haven't budged the cone in 3 days and I wonder if they see something that makes them certain of their forecast.
A SE Florida hit has been extremely questionable since the formation of Matthew, however a lot of the models are agreeing upon a miss on Florida, and a trending a probable NC/VA landfall.
However I do agree that the NHC should include more of FL in its cone though, and issue watches for the Keys as soon as Sunday.
Nope
0 likes
--;->#GoNoles--;->.
- La Sirena
- Category 1
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 4:02 pm
- Location: Formerly of the Keys, back home in East TN
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Exalt wrote:boca wrote:Why didn't the NHC adjust the the cone to the left.They haven't budged the cone in 3 days and I wonder if they see something that makes them certain of their forecast.
A SE Florida hit has been extremely questionable since the formation of Matthew, however a lot of the models are agreeing upon a miss on Florida, and a trending a probable NC/VA landfall.
However I do agree that the NHC should include more of FL in its cone though, and issue watches for the Keys as soon as Sunday.
Yeah, evacuating the Keys is no easy task. I'm still trying to catch up on what's going on....
0 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Of course, scientific analysis of data is important, but hunches (or "gut feelings", if you will) are worth a lot too. From yesterday evening when I saw the appearance of Matthew in the visible satellite image I quoted in this post, I had a hunch it would rapidly intensify to a major cane and that it would probably reach Cat 4 at some point. I didn't think it would happen quite this quickly, though. I figured it would have been more likely to occur late tonight. Now I'm thinking Matthew might just make a run a Cat 5 tonight!OntarioEggplant wrote:The overly conservative intensity forecasts by the NHC have been unacceptable. Even with plenty of data arguing that it would be stronger, they consistently go against it.
And what are my spidey senses telling me about where it's heading? As Balki in the sitcom Perfect Strangers would say, "Get out of the city!". Which city? Kingston. Then again, it's just a hunch. Hopefully, those in Jamaica and elsewhere in Matthew's possible path are paying close attention. This is a serious situation developing.
1 likes
- Yellow Evan
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 16169
- Age: 27
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
- Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
- Contact:
-
- Tropical Storm
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2013 5:06 pm
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
It's also starting to move away from the northern part of SA which should improve the southern Inflow.
0 likes
The content of this post does NOT constitute official forecast and should not be used as such. They are the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or Storm2K. For official information, please refer to the local meteorological centers of respective areas.
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
I've always believed that winds should be the main factor to rate the intensity of tropical cyclones and not the pressure.
If Matthew reaches category 5 but the pressure doesn't drop below 924 mbar, Igor would still be "most intense" by pressure, even Felix had a higher pressure than Igor (929 mbar).
If Matthew reaches category 5 but the pressure doesn't drop below 924 mbar, Igor would still be "most intense" by pressure, even Felix had a higher pressure than Igor (929 mbar).
0 likes
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
GCANE wrote:That hot tower literally exploded into the tropopause.
Cirrus from it is very high in altitude masking the eye.
Rarely see that.
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floater ... -long.html
East-side feeder band is also firing off hot towers.
Working off of very high OHC water.
Now another hot tower popping out that one.
Incredible.
0 likes
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Waiting for a post about the Trochoidal wobble signaling a direction change.
0 likes
- TheProfessor
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 3506
- Age: 28
- Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:56 am
- Location: Wichita, Kansas
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Does Matthew have a legit shot at going sub 900mb?
0 likes
An alumnus of The Ohio State University.
Your local National Weather Service office is your best source for weather information.
Your local National Weather Service office is your best source for weather information.
- Hurricaneman
- Category 5
- Posts: 7359
- Age: 45
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
- Location: central florida
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
TheProfessor wrote:Does Matthew have a legit shot at going sub 900mb?
We'll find out this weekend
0 likes
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Hurricaneman wrote:TheProfessor wrote:Does Matthew have a legit shot at going sub 900mb?
We'll find out this weekend
Seems like the winds would be obscenely high.
0 likes
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
GCANE wrote:That hot tower literally exploded into the tropopause.
Cirrus from it is very high in altitude masking the eye.
Rarely see that.
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floater ... -long.html
East-side feeder band is also firing off hot towers.
Working off of very high OHC water.
I remember one storm (one of the big guns) had a hot tower that basically was like a large eyewall wart and blocked half of the eye, wonder if we will see something like that here?!
I think sub 900mbs is unlikely for this run of strengthening, but once it clears SA and if it gets into another strengthening burst afterwards, its a legit possiblity.
Then again...watch Matthew blow my ideas out of the water now!
1 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
- weatherwindow
- Category 4
- Posts: 904
- Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 9:48 am
- Location: key west/ft lauderdale
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
.............GCANE wrote:That hot tower literally exploded into the tropopause.
Cirrus from it is very high in altitude masking the eye.
Rarely see that.
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floater ... -long.html
East-side feeder band is also firing off hot towers.
Working off of very high OHC water.
Surely a - 85-90deg candidate,!!!!...........Rich
0 likes
- wxmann_91
- Category 5
- Posts: 8013
- Age: 34
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
- Location: Southern California
- Contact:
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
TheProfessor wrote:Does Matthew have a legit shot at going sub 900mb?
Highly unlikely. Background pressures are fairly high.
1 likes
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
the NHC track forecast is fine. No need for a major shift. The west shifts mainly happened AFTER 5 days
2 likes
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
KWT wrote:GCANE wrote:That hot tower literally exploded into the tropopause.
Cirrus from it is very high in altitude masking the eye.
Rarely see that.
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floater ... -long.html
East-side feeder band is also firing off hot towers.
Working off of very high OHC water.
I remember one storm (one of the big guns) had a hot tower that basically was like a large eyewall wart and blocked half of the eye, wonder if we will see something like that here?!
I think sub 900mbs is unlikely for this run of strengthening, but once it clears SA and if it gets into another strengthening burst afterwards, its a legit possiblity.
Then again...watch Matthew blow my ideas out of the water now!
It is very striking to see that when the sun is setting out there. Should be the same at sunrise Sat.
0 likes
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Exalt wrote:boca wrote:Why didn't the NHC adjust the the cone to the left.They haven't budged the cone in 3 days and I wonder if they see something that makes them certain of their forecast.
A SE Florida hit has been extremely questionable since the formation of Matthew, however a lot of the models are agreeing upon a miss on Florida, and a trending a probable NC/VA landfall.
However I do agree that the NHC should include more of FL in its cone though, and issue watches for the Keys as soon as Sunday.
Since the cone represents an average error rate over time, the only way more of Florida is included in the cone is if the track shifts more to the west. As of the 5PM advisory, no one in Florida has more than a 10% chance of TS winds and even that is confined to a small region. The only way watches will eventually be warranted for portions of Florida is if the track moves west by a meaningful margin. Per the latest NHC product the chance of TS winds in the lower keys is 5%, with 10% for the upper keys.
1 likes
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Geesh, forgot to check this and look at what I come back to find.
I had an itching feeling the last few days that a season everyone writes off is always the one that comes back to bite you in the...
I had an itching feeling the last few days that a season everyone writes off is always the one that comes back to bite you in the...
0 likes
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Starting to see a stadium effect in the eye of Matthew.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests