ATL: KAREN - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6356
Age: 61
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

Re:

#81 Postby Dean4Storms » Wed Oct 02, 2013 10:21 am

Aric Dunn wrote:essentially the same story as with every other system if we get a deeper system its quite likely a more east track.. similar to the runs a couple days ago into the big bend.. and if weak likely central LA


With the current trend of organization and deepening you can just about throw out the further west scenario's as none of those models hardly even close off a low much less
develop a TC near the Yucatan Channel.
0 likes   
My opinion and statements DO NOT represent the opinion of the EMA, NHC, NWS, or any other professional agency, organization, or group. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6617
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Re:

#82 Postby Stormcenter » Wed Oct 02, 2013 10:26 am

I thought the further west tracks also had something to do with the front arriving slower than anticipated and not just the strength of whatever develops. IMO

Dean4Storms wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:essentially the same story as with every other system if we get a deeper system its quite likely a more east track.. similar to the runs a couple days ago into the big bend.. and if weak likely central LA


With the current trend of organization and deepening you can just about throw out the further west scenario's as none of those models hardly even close off a low much less
develop a TC near the Yucatan Channel.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9254
Age: 53
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: Re:

#83 Postby ROCK » Wed Oct 02, 2013 10:29 am

Stormcenter wrote:I thought the further west trend also had something to do with the front arriving slower than anticipated and not just the strength of whatever develops. IMO

Dean4Storms wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:essentially the same story as with every other system if we get a deeper system its quite likely a more east track.. similar to the runs a couple days ago into the big bend.. and if weak likely central LA


With the current trend of organization and deepening you can just about throw out the further west scenario's as none of those models hardly even close off a low much less
develop a TC near the Yucatan Channel.



that is correct....also take into account the GOM is not all that favorable for development into a deep system. All globals keep this as a 1008ish TC if that....until they change I dont throw any model out the window... :wink:
0 likes   

User avatar
PTrackerLA
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5248
Age: 40
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
Location: Lafayette, LA

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#84 Postby PTrackerLA » Wed Oct 02, 2013 10:35 am

It IS 2013 and I'm extremely hesitant to believe any of the models that make this much more than a very weak tropical storm. In a normal year I would be quite concerned for the Gulf Coast in this situation. Looking forward to the 50's though! :D 8-)
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9254
Age: 53
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#85 Postby ROCK » Wed Oct 02, 2013 10:48 am

PTrackerLA wrote:It IS 2013 and I'm extremely hesitant to believe any of the models that make this much more than a very weak tropical storm. In a normal year I would be quite concerned for the Gulf Coast in this situation. Looking forward to the 50's though! :D 8-)


agreed, the front will be a nice change. The season has been so frustrating its almost a relief that it is almost over... :lol: less stress!...technically it is over for Texas so ready to move on to 2014 season.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9254
Age: 53
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#86 Postby ROCK » Wed Oct 02, 2013 10:50 am

12Z NAM still into SW LA....deepens it to about 1005 but then weakens it to 1010...
0 likes   

supercane4867
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4966
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#87 Postby supercane4867 » Wed Oct 02, 2013 10:55 am

0 likes   

stormlover2013
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2312
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:06 pm
Location: Lumberton, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#88 Postby stormlover2013 » Wed Oct 02, 2013 10:56 am

isn't over till that fat lady sings!!!!!!!
0 likes   

User avatar
TreasureIslandFLGal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1558
Age: 56
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2004 6:16 pm
Location: Clearwater, Florida ~3 miles from the coast now. We finally moved safely off the barrier island!

#89 Postby TreasureIslandFLGal » Wed Oct 02, 2013 11:01 am

hmm on that run GFS is still stronger with the system, but takes it further west than it showed earlier. Does ti slow up teh approachign front?
0 likes   
Chrissy & Ligeia
Chrissy & Nikki
:flag:

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6617
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#90 Postby Stormcenter » Wed Oct 02, 2013 11:03 am

Ok so what happened to the shear that was going to keep it in check?


supercane4867 wrote:12Z GFS running at 87HR
http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/gfsfull/2013100212/gfsfull_pres_wind_watl_30.png

Near hurricane strength
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

#91 Postby deltadog03 » Wed Oct 02, 2013 11:08 am

It appears that the GFS tries to move the upper high, thats over it now, northward with the system.
0 likes   

User avatar
tropicwatch
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3206
Age: 60
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:01 am
Location: Panama City Florida
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#92 Postby tropicwatch » Wed Oct 02, 2013 11:08 am

Stormcenter wrote:Ok so what happened to the shear that was going to keep it in check?


supercane4867 wrote:12Z GFS running at 87HR
http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/gfsfull/2013100212/gfsfull_pres_wind_watl_30.png

Near hurricane strength


Ouch! :roll:
0 likes   
Tropicwatch


Agnes 72', Eloise 75, Elena 85', Kate 85', Charley 86', Florence 88', Beryl 94', Dean 95', Erin 95', Opal 95', Earl 98', Georges 98', Ivan 2004', Arlene 2005', Dennis 2005', Ida 2009' Debby 2012' Irma 2017' Michael 2018'

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

#93 Postby Alyono » Wed Oct 02, 2013 11:16 am

987mb at landfall as per the GFS
0 likes   

User avatar
cajungal
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2205
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 9:34 pm
Location: Schriever, Louisiana (60 miles southwest of New Orleans)

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#94 Postby cajungal » Wed Oct 02, 2013 11:20 am

Looks like a westward trend taking place with the models?
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

#95 Postby deltadog03 » Wed Oct 02, 2013 11:22 am

Looks like a 55-60kt at landfall….somewhere around there?
0 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4672
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#96 Postby ronjon » Wed Oct 02, 2013 11:30 am

If the GFS continues this trend and organization ramps up today, we could have our first FL hurricane LF in what 7 years?
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

#97 Postby deltadog03 » Wed Oct 02, 2013 11:32 am

I am interested to see if the models will keep moving the upper high northward with this into the northern gom. 12z GFS did, i.e. stronger system. I think its going to be a race btwn this moving northward, and the huge trof incoming from the west.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21228
Age: 41
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#98 Postby Aric Dunn » Wed Oct 02, 2013 11:58 am

cajungal wrote:Looks like a westward trend taking place with the models?


GFS came east quite a bit this run.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4758
Age: 63
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re:

#99 Postby chaser1 » Wed Oct 02, 2013 11:59 am

deltadog03 wrote:I am interested to see if the models will keep moving the upper high northward with this into the northern gom. 12z GFS did, i.e. stronger system. I think its going to be a race btwn this moving northward, and the huge trof incoming from the west.


I'll be honest, at first glance today I fully expected nearly all convection gained from last night to be gone. Though I am not overly impressed given what past storms/past years have looked, it certainly attaining a better look and looks to be organizing slowly at the lower levels. It just seems that its not nearly firing on all 8 cylanders and what seems to be still lacking is that explosive bursting and quicker development of a CDO. One cant really blame the upper level conditions and in fact is now showing better outflow to the west. Therefore while looking at the GFS as previously stated, I have a couple problems with "it" verses the NAVGEM. Looking at the 500mb ridge in place, I just dont see how the 12Z GFS run has this E.Gulf ridge eroded so quickly (like 6-12 hours??), thus allowing a deepening low to better turn more poleward. I suppose that if more significant deepening were presently occuring, this might seem a bit more plausible, but I'm just not buying into any quick development - I just dont see it.

Meanwhile the GEM (or NAM) just seems way to quick for me to buy into this low being on the N. Gulf Coast in 60 hours. The NAVGEM seems like a more reasonable outcome by 1) indicating that little significant development is to occur in the near term, thus allowing the low to have less of a NNW motion and move more Northwest to a position of just north of W. Yucatan as a 1009 low. 2) Because this relatively weak system isn't able to better develop any decent core thus helping the upper anticyclone to build over it, this is where upper level conditions will deteriorate due to southerly shear from the aforementioned upper anticyclone (now to its East). The only thing I could see perhaps might be some deepening (baroclinic?) nearly along the front while sliding more eastward from near Louisiana towards Pensacola, but that would be based on timing at that point. So at least the way I see it, just another bust in a season striving to suck :cheesy:
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.



Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6356
Age: 61
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

#100 Postby Dean4Storms » Wed Oct 02, 2013 12:13 pm

That 12z GFS run has my full attention. Looks like a Panama City landfall.
0 likes   


Return to “2013”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests