
ATL: KAREN - Remnants - Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
- tropicwatch
- Category 5
- Posts: 3383
- Age: 61
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:01 am
- Location: Panama City Florida
- Contact:
The lowest pressures are near 19.59n and 85.1W not too far from the large flair up of showers.
0 likes
Tropicwatch
Agnes 72', Eloise 75, Elena 85', Kate 85', Charley 86', Florence 88', Beryl 94', Dean 95', Erin 95', Opal 95', Earl 98', Georges 98', Ivan 2004', Arlene 2005', Dennis 2005', Ida 2009' Debby 2012' Irma 2017' Michael 2018'
Agnes 72', Eloise 75, Elena 85', Kate 85', Charley 86', Florence 88', Beryl 94', Dean 95', Erin 95', Opal 95', Earl 98', Georges 98', Ivan 2004', Arlene 2005', Dennis 2005', Ida 2009' Debby 2012' Irma 2017' Michael 2018'
- TropicalAnalystwx13
- Category 5
- Posts: 2109
- Age: 27
- Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 8:20 pm
- Location: Wilmington, NC
- Contact:
- wxman57
- Moderator-Pro Met
- Posts: 22978
- Age: 67
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
- Location: Houston, TX (southwest)
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion - 70% / 70%
I'm not seeing anything to justify an upgrade at this time. LLC is way too broad and ill-defined. Probably by tomorrow morning it will be a TD/TS. Western FL panhandle still looks like the prime target. I'd say 40-45 kts at landfall (45-50 mph). Will likely be weakening as it moves into the coast Saturday afternoon/evening.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 2907
- Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 6:19 pm
- Location: Trinidad and Tobago
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion - 70% / 70%
1. Is this going to make landfall over the Yucatan Peninsula?
2. Do you think we'll have a TS by tonight or earlier?
3. How is the dry air 'magically' breaking up as the system approaches, even though there are no rainbands there?
Thanks!
2. Do you think we'll have a TS by tonight or earlier?
3. How is the dry air 'magically' breaking up as the system approaches, even though there are no rainbands there?
Thanks!
0 likes
PLEASE NOTE: With the exception of information from weather agencies that I may copy and paste here, my posts will NEVER be official, since I am NOT a meteorologist. They are solely my amateur opinion, and may or may not be accurate. Therefore, please DO NOT use them as official details, particularly when making important decisions. Thank you.
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 2907
- Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 6:19 pm
- Location: Trinidad and Tobago
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion - 70% / 70%
wxman57 wrote:I'm not seeing anything to justify an upgrade at this time. LLC is way too broad and ill-defined. Probably by tomorrow morning it will be a TD/TS. Western FL panhandle still looks like the prime target. I'd say 40-45 kts at landfall (45-50 mph). Will likely be weakening as it moves into the coast Saturday afternoon/evening.
Wow, how did you answer 2 of my questions before I even posted them?


0 likes
PLEASE NOTE: With the exception of information from weather agencies that I may copy and paste here, my posts will NEVER be official, since I am NOT a meteorologist. They are solely my amateur opinion, and may or may not be accurate. Therefore, please DO NOT use them as official details, particularly when making important decisions. Thank you.
- wxman57
- Moderator-Pro Met
- Posts: 22978
- Age: 67
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
- Location: Houston, TX (southwest)
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion - 70% / 70%
hurricanes1234 wrote:Wow, how did you answer 2 of my questions before I even posted them?![]()
I'm psycho, I mean psychic. Even though the center may clip the NE Yucatan, heaviest squalls & rain should pass east of the Yucatan tonight/tomorrow morning.
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 6684
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
- Location: Houston, TX
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion - 70% / 70%
97L looks way better than Jerry so based on that alone I would upgrade it. IMO 

0 likes
- TropicalAnalystwx13
- Category 5
- Posts: 2109
- Age: 27
- Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 8:20 pm
- Location: Wilmington, NC
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion - 70% / 70%
Nice blow up of convection near the broad center 85W/20N (right at DMIN). Maybe help consolidate the circulation?
http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis ... display=12
http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis ... display=12
http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis ... display=12
http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis ... display=12
0 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 4743
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
- Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion - 70% / 70%
hurricanes1234 wrote:1. Is this going to make landfall over the Yucatan Peninsula?
2. Do you think we'll have a TS by tonight or earlier?
3. How is the dry air 'magically' breaking up as the system approaches, even though there are no rainbands there?
Thanks!
For #3 there, dry air usually doesn't last that long over such a high theta-e (in grossly simple terms high surface moisture and warmth content) body of water. Also the mid-level winds were bringing in dry air from the north but those winds are turning easterly and eventually southerly which is bringing in more moist tropical air aloft. And the counterclockwise low and mid level circulation around this disturbance is starting to do two things: pushes drier air away to the west, but also feeds some of its own higher Relative Humidity air westward which helps moisten up the dry air. It's a delicate balance - sometimes the TC starts ingesting the dry air more than it can push it away. That's often been a problem this season. The advantage for this one in maintaining is that it's a large system and seems to be devbeloping a nice circulation envelope which can wall out dry air.
Last edited by ozonepete on Wed Oct 02, 2013 4:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion - 70% / 70%
Yeah JH, the blow up of convection near 20N-85W looks like the COC developing now!
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 6684
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
- Location: Houston, TX
Re:
I agree.
TropicalAnalystwx13 wrote:1006.8 millibars from the latest pass. They were investigating the dying, remnant low-level center to the SE while a new one was getting better organized near 86.0W 20.2N. This may be a tropical cyclone after all...waiting for them to close it off.
0 likes
- wxman57
- Moderator-Pro Met
- Posts: 22978
- Age: 67
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
- Location: Houston, TX (southwest)
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion - 70% / 70%
Stormcenter wrote:97L looks way better than Jerry so based on that alone I would upgrade it. IMO
Looks, on satellite, can be deceiving. It's the well-defined surface circulation that counts. Currently, 97L lacks a well-defined LLC. Perhaps Jerry should be downgraded?
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion - 70% / 70%
How will the new center change the track if any- Please advise and thank you!
0 likes
- wxman57
- Moderator-Pro Met
- Posts: 22978
- Age: 67
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
- Location: Houston, TX (southwest)
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion - 70% / 70%
BUCMAN48 wrote:How will the new center change the track if any- Please advise and thank you!
If a center formed/reformed near 20N/86W it would make very little difference in the track.
0 likes
- northjaxpro
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:21 am
- Location: Jacksonville, FL
Yeah, center is apparently reforming a bit northeast. I think we may see this get named late tonight of by early tomorrow morning. The system looks rather good right now.
0 likes
NEVER, EVER SAY NEVER in the tropics and weather in general, and most importantly, with life itself!!
________________________________________________________________________________________
Fay 2008 Beryl 2012 Debby 2012 Colin 2016 Hermine 2016 Julia 2016 Matthew 2016 Irma 2017 Dorian 2019
________________________________________________________________________________________
Fay 2008 Beryl 2012 Debby 2012 Colin 2016 Hermine 2016 Julia 2016 Matthew 2016 Irma 2017 Dorian 2019
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion - 70% / 70%
RECON flying toward 20N-85W now - let's see what they find.
0 likes
- tropicwatch
- Category 5
- Posts: 3383
- Age: 61
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:01 am
- Location: Panama City Florida
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion - 70% / 70%
ronjon wrote:RECON flying toward 20N-85W now - let's see what they find.

0 likes
Tropicwatch
Agnes 72', Eloise 75, Elena 85', Kate 85', Charley 86', Florence 88', Beryl 94', Dean 95', Erin 95', Opal 95', Earl 98', Georges 98', Ivan 2004', Arlene 2005', Dennis 2005', Ida 2009' Debby 2012' Irma 2017' Michael 2018'
Agnes 72', Eloise 75, Elena 85', Kate 85', Charley 86', Florence 88', Beryl 94', Dean 95', Erin 95', Opal 95', Earl 98', Georges 98', Ivan 2004', Arlene 2005', Dennis 2005', Ida 2009' Debby 2012' Irma 2017' Michael 2018'
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 2907
- Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 6:19 pm
- Location: Trinidad and Tobago
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion - 70% / 70%
ozonepete wrote:hurricanes1234 wrote:1. Is this going to make landfall over the Yucatan Peninsula?
2. Do you think we'll have a TS by tonight or earlier?
3. How is the dry air 'magically' breaking up as the system approaches, even though there are no rainbands there?
Thanks!
For #3 there, dry air usually doesn't last that long over such a high theta-e (in grossly simple terms high surface moisture and warmth content) body of water. Also the mid-level winds were bringing in dry air from the north but those winds are turning easterly and eventually southerly which is bringing in more moist tropical air aloft. And the counterclockwise low and mid level circulation around this disturbance is starting to do two things: pushes drier air away to the west, but also feeds some of its own higher Relative Humidity air westward which helps moisten up the dry air. It's a delicate balance - sometimes the TC starts ingesting the dry air more than it can push it away. That's often been a problem this season. The advantage for this one in maintaining is that it's a large system and seems to be devbeloping a nice circulation envelope which can wall out dry air.
Thanks for the answer. It is much appreciated.

0 likes
PLEASE NOTE: With the exception of information from weather agencies that I may copy and paste here, my posts will NEVER be official, since I am NOT a meteorologist. They are solely my amateur opinion, and may or may not be accurate. Therefore, please DO NOT use them as official details, particularly when making important decisions. Thank you.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests