ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
NHC flip flopping on the track - had a BOC solution this morning, now back to Mobile Alabama LF. My only thoughts are maybe they're seeing the LLC forming further north, getting stronger, and pulled more poleward?
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/tafb_latest/atlsfc72_latestBW.gif
Ah IH you bet me to it!
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/tafb_latest/atlsfc72_latestBW.gif
Ah IH you bet me to it!
Last edited by ronjon on Wed Aug 14, 2013 1:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
- StormTracker
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 2903
- Age: 59
- Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 6:06 am
- Location: Quail Heights(Redlands), FL.
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
Ivanhater wrote:
Make sure you pre-prep your peeps in Pensa. You never know...ST
0 likes
Something's wrong when you regret, things that haven't happened yet!
- cycloneye
- Admin
- Posts: 145300
- Age: 68
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
Off-Topic= There is a poll at Talking Tropics with the question "92L or 93L develops first" Go here
0 likes
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
- StormTracker
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 2903
- Age: 59
- Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 6:06 am
- Location: Quail Heights(Redlands), FL.
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
ronjon wrote:NHC flip flopping on the track - had a BOC solution this morning, now back to Mobile Alabama LF. My only thoughts are maybe they're seeing the LLC forming further north, getting stronger, and pulled more poleward?
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/tafb_latest/atlsfc72_latestBW.gif
I think climo is starting to kick in! The western solution is gonna get kicked to the curb!
0 likes
Something's wrong when you regret, things that haven't happened yet!
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 2183
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 6:04 pm
- Location: Gonzales, LA
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
Especially the sooner this develops. But if it stays weak and does manage to cross over the Yucatan can easily see it going more west.
0 likes
- CaneCurious
- Tropical Storm
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2004 1:40 pm
- Location: Kenner, LA
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
[quote="ronjon"]NHC flip flopping on the track - had a BOC solution this morning, now back to Mobile Alabama LF. My only thoughts are maybe they're seeing the LLC forming further north, getting stronger, and pulled more poleward?
It's also only showing a wave. If it gets pulled north, will it not intensify?
It's also only showing a wave. If it gets pulled north, will it not intensify?
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
StormTracker wrote:ronjon wrote:NHC flip flopping on the track - had a BOC solution this morning, now back to Mobile Alabama LF. My only thoughts are maybe they're seeing the LLC forming further north, getting stronger, and pulled more poleward?
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/tafb_latest/atlsfc72_latestBW.gif
I think climo is starting to kick in! The western solution is gonna get kicked to the curb!
Mid August is the time of year a western solution would be expected
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
easy now to see a developing center.....1KM scan...but its getting close to the Yucatan. Probably knock it down some as it moves across. I put it on the coast about 8pm tonight..
http://www.ghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/GOES/goeseastconus.html
http://www.ghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/GOES/goeseastconus.html
0 likes
- StormTracker
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 2903
- Age: 59
- Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 6:06 am
- Location: Quail Heights(Redlands), FL.
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
psyclone wrote:StormTracker wrote:ronjon wrote:NHC flip flopping on the track - had a BOC solution this morning, now back to Mobile Alabama LF. My only thoughts are maybe they're seeing the LLC forming further north, getting stronger, and pulled more poleward?
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/tafb_latest/atlsfc72_latestBW.gif
I think climo is starting to kick in! The western solution is gonna get kicked to the curb!
Mid August is the time of year a western solution would be expected
I thought that most "home-grown" systems go more poleward this time of year!
0 likes
Something's wrong when you regret, things that haven't happened yet!
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
If I had to place a center I'd put it near 18N-84W.
http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis/online/loop_timestamp.asp?data_folder=tropical/tropical_ge_4km_visir2_floater_2&width=640&height=480
http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis/online/loop_timestamp.asp?data_folder=tropical/tropical_ge_4km_visir2_floater_2&width=640&height=480
0 likes
- ScottNAtlanta
- Category 5
- Posts: 2367
- Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 3:11 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
Traffic must be increasing here. I've been having a hard time getting pages to load here
0 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
more like 85W....out in front of the heavy convection to the West.....not completely stacked. Better to see it on 1KM scan than 4KM scan...
0 likes
- Ivanhater
- Storm2k Moderator
- Posts: 11161
- Age: 38
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
- Location: Pensacola
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
Have many times have we seen the Yucatan kill any weak low moving onshore and with the main MLC and convection to the NE take over...
0 likes
Michael
- deltadog03
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 3580
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
- Location: Macon, GA
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
From the looks of it this afternoon there appears to be a developing well defined LLC starting to come together at around 18n very likely we will have a td by morning.
0 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
- HouTXmetro
- Category 5
- Posts: 3949
- Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
- Location: District of Columbia, USA
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
Ivanhater wrote:Have many times have we seen the Yucatan kill any weak low moving onshore and with the main MLC and convection to the NE take over...
DIND DING DING, we have a winner. We have seen that Over and Over and Over again. I almost expect that to be the case at this point again.
0 likes
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]
- Extratropical94
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 3538
- Age: 30
- Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 6:36 am
- Location: Hamburg, Germany
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
DIND DING DING, we have a winner. We have seen that Over and Over and Over again. I almost expect that to be the case at this point again.
This is true. But just to play devil's advocate, we have equally seen misleading MLC's that looked almost like hurricanes fade off into nothing only for the convection to refire along the "exposed" llc.
I'm still 35% South TX/N Mex, 30% FL Panhandle, 25% Mexico and 10% random loops/stalls/LA hit or whatever. But since Sunday (anyone can look back to my post from Sunday night for reference), both the Panhandle and N Mex/S Tex scenarios have been completely legit and have split the models. Typhoon Utor's track argued strongly against a North Gulf hit unless either 1) the circulation formed much farther north or was fast to form and find its way out with the trough, or 2) the energy split with a piece of it going north and another piece (presumably with the wave axis) continuing across the Yucatan into the BOC or SW Gulf. There is 0 doubt in my mind that some of this energy will be sucked up out front/east of the trough, and almost 0 doubt that we'll still be tracking some energy in the SW Gulf/BOC in 2-3 days.
Steve
This is true. But just to play devil's advocate, we have equally seen misleading MLC's that looked almost like hurricanes fade off into nothing only for the convection to refire along the "exposed" llc.
I'm still 35% South TX/N Mex, 30% FL Panhandle, 25% Mexico and 10% random loops/stalls/LA hit or whatever. But since Sunday (anyone can look back to my post from Sunday night for reference), both the Panhandle and N Mex/S Tex scenarios have been completely legit and have split the models. Typhoon Utor's track argued strongly against a North Gulf hit unless either 1) the circulation formed much farther north or was fast to form and find its way out with the trough, or 2) the energy split with a piece of it going north and another piece (presumably with the wave axis) continuing across the Yucatan into the BOC or SW Gulf. There is 0 doubt in my mind that some of this energy will be sucked up out front/east of the trough, and almost 0 doubt that we'll still be tracking some energy in the SW Gulf/BOC in 2-3 days.
Steve
Last edited by Steve on Wed Aug 14, 2013 3:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
- canetracker
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 751
- Age: 62
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 8:49 pm
- Location: Suburbia New Orleans...Harahan, LA
Re:
deltadog03 wrote:I honestly think this is destined for the AL/MS coast as a sheared TS (maybe 55-60kt) This has been the year of a NO summer with trof's effecting the East coast with EASE. There is not much doubt in my mind that whatever is out there, is gonna get picked up northward.
Yep shear is something I am not seeing discussed much, but isn't it supposed to be a little hostile in the central to northern GOM?
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests