ATL: INGRID - Remnants - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Rgv20
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2466
Age: 38
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 5:42 pm
Location: Edinburg/McAllen Tx

#201 Postby Rgv20 » Wed Sep 11, 2013 4:06 pm

NWS in Brownsville afternoon discussion..

''.LONG TERM...A VERY ACTIVE WEATHER PATTERN WILL REMAIN IN PLACE
THROUGH MOST OF THE LONG TERM FORECAST OVER DEEP SOUTH TEXAS DUE
TO AN AREA OF THUNDERSTORMS OVER THE YUCATAN PENINSULA. THE
DISTURBANCE IS EXPECTED TO DEVELOP INTO A TROPICAL CYCLONE OR
DEPRESSION AS IT MOVES INTO THE BAY OF CAMPECHE THIS WEEKEND AND
SLOWLY MOVE TO THE WEST. MODELS AREA IN BETTER AGREEMENT TODAY
COMPARED TO YESTERDAY. GFS/ECMWF PROJECT THE PATH OF THIS LOW
PRESSURE TO ENTERED MEXICO AS THE UPPER HIGH BUILDS ACROSS THE
CENTRAL PLAINS AND DEEP SOUTH TEXAS BLOCKING THE LOWER VALLEY OF
ANY DIRECT IMPACT AT THIS TIME. HOWEVER...ABUNDANT GULF MOISTURE
FROM THIS TROPICAL WAVE WILL MIGRATE WESTWARD AND AS A RESULT
ENHANCE SHOWERS AND ISOLATED THUNDERSTORMS ACROSS THE RGV. THIS
MOISTURE FROM THIS SYSTEM IN ADDITION TO THE HIGH MOISTURE IN
PLACE WILL ENHANCE THE SHOWERS ACROSS THE CWA THROUGH THE WEEKEND.
THE BEST CHANCE OF SHOWERS FOR THE CWA WILL BE SUNDAY INTO MONDAY
AT THIS TIME. THE PROLONGED EAST FLOW WITH THIS DEEP MOISTURE WILL
CAUSE SHOWERS TO PRODUCE HEAVY RAINFALL WITH ACCUMULATION BETWEEN
2 TO 4 INCHES MORE ASIDE TO THE RAIN WE HAD THE PAST WEEK. SINCE
THE GROUND IS SATURATED FROM ALL THE RAIN WE HAD...EXPECT A
POSSIBLE FLOOD WATCH. THERE IS SOME UNCERTAINTY AS TO HOW FAR SW
THE SYSTEM WILL REMAIN FROM SOUTH TEXAS...BUT DO EXPECT THE
RAINFALL TO OCCUR. STAY TUNED TO ANY CHANGES ONCE THIS SYSTEM
MOVES OVER THE GULF WATERS. DUE TO THE LACK OF DAYTIME
HEATING...TEMPERATURES WILL REMAIN BETWEEN 85 TO 95 DEGREES FOR
MUCH OF THE CWA AND LOW TEMPERATURES IN THE MID 70S.''
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re:

#202 Postby ROCK » Wed Sep 11, 2013 4:17 pm

HouTXmetro wrote:I know there is a vigorous rotation deep in the Yucatan, but Is it possible this storm can consolidate further north towards deeper convection? Or are the current dynamics against any type of "center" relocation?


I think if this was sheared to the NE we could get a center relo...seen it happen before..doesnt look all that sheared to me...I think its slightly tilted though to the SW.....
0 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

#203 Postby Wx_Warrior » Wed Sep 11, 2013 4:21 pm

IMO, if it sits, I can see Brownsville.

GOM is wide open next week if this turns tropical.
0 likes   

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9914
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 40% - 70%

#204 Postby Portastorm » Wed Sep 11, 2013 4:34 pm

Satellite loop review of the last few hours shows a very disorganized system and that MLC which many of us were tracking this morning seems to have diminished. Think this thing has a while to go before any consolidation. However, the overall cloud pattern does have "the look." Just my two pesos.
0 likes   
Any forecasts under my name are to be taken with a grain of salt. Get your best forecasts from the National Weather Service and National Hurricane Center.

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4224
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Re:

#205 Postby South Texas Storms » Wed Sep 11, 2013 4:36 pm

ROCK wrote:
HouTXmetro wrote:I know there is a vigorous rotation deep in the Yucatan, but Is it possible this storm can consolidate further north towards deeper convection? Or are the current dynamics against any type of "center" relocation?


I think if this was sheared to the NE we could get a center relo...seen it happen before..doesnt look all that sheared to me...I think its slightly tilted though to the SW.....


But most of the convection is currently NE of the MLC. I wonder if that remains the case when it enters the BOC if a relocation of the center could happen.
0 likes   

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4224
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re:

#206 Postby South Texas Storms » Wed Sep 11, 2013 4:38 pm

Wx_Warrior wrote:IMO, if it sits, I can see Brownsville.

GOM is wide open next week if this turns tropical.


I agree with you on that. IMO, the longer it sits and spins in the BOC, the greater chance it has to move further north once the ridge slides off to the SE US.
0 likes   

User avatar
TropicalAnalystwx13
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2109
Age: 27
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 8:20 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC
Contact:

#207 Postby TropicalAnalystwx13 » Wed Sep 11, 2013 4:43 pm

I've got the low at 891W 188N moving west-northwest.
0 likes   

User avatar
Rgv20
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2466
Age: 38
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 5:42 pm
Location: Edinburg/McAllen Tx

#208 Postby Rgv20 » Wed Sep 11, 2013 4:43 pm

Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Tropical cyclone development is likely over the Bay of Campeche later this week. The next name on the list will be "Ingrid". We'll need to keep an eye on the possibility of minor coastal flooding this weekend and early next week if something does indeed develop. Rip currents and increased surf will also be a hazard.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

PauleinHouston
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 102
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 10:23 am
Location: League City, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 40% - 70%

#209 Postby PauleinHouston » Wed Sep 11, 2013 4:50 pm

Here's a google earth snapshot of all best track points including 18Z today:

Best Track Position and Intensity as of:
Wednesday, Sep. 11, 2013 18:00 Z

Location at the time:
68 statue miles (109 km) to the WSW (258°) from Chetumal, Quintana Roo, México.

Wind (1 min. avg.):
25 knots (~29 mph | 13 m/s | 46 km/h)

Pressure:
1008 mb (29.77 inHg | 1008 hPa)

Coordinates:
18.3N 89.3W
Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of this amateur poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to NWS products.

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 41
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 40% - 70%

#210 Postby Hammy » Wed Sep 11, 2013 4:58 pm

PauleinHouston wrote:Here's a google earth snapshot of all best track points including 18Z today:

Best Track Position and Intensity as of:
Wednesday, Sep. 11, 2013 18:00 Z

Location at the time:
68 statue miles (109 km) to the WSW (258°) from Chetumal, Quintana Roo, México.

Wind (1 min. avg.):
25 knots (~29 mph | 13 m/s | 46 km/h)

Pressure:
1008 mb (29.77 inHg | 1008 hPa)

Coordinates:
18.3N 89.3W
Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us


looks to be taking the same northwest turn as it gets closer to the Gulf as Barry and Fernand did, but starting out farther north.
0 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

PauleinHouston
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 102
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 10:23 am
Location: League City, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 40% - 70%

#211 Postby PauleinHouston » Wed Sep 11, 2013 5:11 pm

Hammy wrote:looks to be taking the same northwest turn as it gets closer to the Gulf as Barry and Fernand did, but starting out farther north.


Just like you said a few pages back :D ...disorganized at this point, but to be expected, although the visible presentation still is good imo for having crossed such a large amount of landmass so far:
http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis/online/loop_timestamp.asp?data_folder=tropical/tropical_ge_4km_visir2_floater_1&width=640&height=480&number_of_images_to_display=12
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of this amateur poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to NWS products.

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145295
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 40% - 70%

#212 Postby cycloneye » Wed Sep 11, 2013 5:36 pm

Will new invest 90E in EPAC located south of BOC have an influence on 93L? All is part of the big monsoon gyre.

Image
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
TexWx
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 370
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 11:00 pm
Location: Pearland, Texas
Contact:

#213 Postby TexWx » Wed Sep 11, 2013 5:42 pm

I think it would.
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

#214 Postby HouTXmetro » Wed Sep 11, 2013 5:45 pm

Someone mentioned Fujiwara effect earlier. Maybe that's why It's going stay stuck in the BOC for a while.
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9914
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 40% - 70%

#215 Postby Portastorm » Wed Sep 11, 2013 5:53 pm

No, there won't be a Fujiwara effect as you have to have two developed systems. This was explained by a pro met in a different storm thread earlier this summer. However, I think it is very possible that the developing EPAC system would have an effect on 93L, depending on which one develops first. This really is a monsoonal slop-gyre setup down there.
0 likes   
Any forecasts under my name are to be taken with a grain of salt. Get your best forecasts from the National Weather Service and National Hurricane Center.

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145295
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 40% - 70%

#216 Postby cycloneye » Wed Sep 11, 2013 5:56 pm

It would be good for the men in blue to chim in on this interesting scenario developing.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

#217 Postby Alyono » Wed Sep 11, 2013 5:58 pm

the EPAC disturbance will almost certainly simply become part of the inflow of 93L
0 likes   

PauleinHouston
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 102
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 10:23 am
Location: League City, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 40% - 70%

#218 Postby PauleinHouston » Wed Sep 11, 2013 5:58 pm

Portastorm wrote:No, there won't be a Fujiwara effect as you have to have two developed systems. This was explained by a pro met in a different storm thread earlier this summer. However, I think it is very possible that the developing EPAC system would have an effect on 93L, depending on which one develops first. This really is a monsoonal slop-gyre setup down there.


Porta...afternoon from League City/South of Houston. So, can you give me a bit of insight as to what sort of affect might be expected...in either scenario...i.e.- 93L develops first or the EPAC system first?

Ntxw wrote:Concur with Portastorm, very monsoonal gyre mess. Between the Epac and Boc systems whichever develops quicker/dominant will likely cause the other to be weaker.


And why is that? Available moisture or venting?
Last edited by PauleinHouston on Wed Sep 11, 2013 5:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of this amateur poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to NWS products.

User avatar
Ntxw
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 22784
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:34 pm
Location: DFW, Texas

#219 Postby Ntxw » Wed Sep 11, 2013 5:58 pm

Concur with Portastorm, very monsoonal gyre mess. Between the Epac and Boc systems whichever develops quicker/dominant will likely cause the other to be weaker.
0 likes   
The above post and any post by Ntxw is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including Storm2k. For official information, please refer to NWS products.

  Help support Storm2K!
Help Support Storm2K

PauleinHouston
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 102
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 10:23 am
Location: League City, TX
Contact:

Re:

#220 Postby PauleinHouston » Wed Sep 11, 2013 6:08 pm

Alyono wrote:the EPAC disturbance will almost certainly simply become part of the inflow of 93L


Fair enough...and what about the deep ULL over East Texas area? Fairly significant surface pressure falls across SE/SCentral and West Texas.

http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis/online/loop_timestamp.asp?data_folder=goes-west_goes-east/geir304&width=640&height=480
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of this amateur poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to NWS products.


Return to “2013”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests