Ntxw wrote:This morning's individual GFS ensemble cluster
I don't remember what the last ones looked like but did these shift west cause I don't ever remember seeing that many in Texas
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Ntxw wrote:This morning's individual GFS ensemble cluster
Dean4Storms wrote:06z GFDL off to TX. This model is lost!
rainstorm wrote:Dean4Storms wrote:06z GFDL off to TX. This model is lost!
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/gfdltc2. ... hour=066hr
it keeps isaac very weak and shallow which is why it just rides the low level flow. looks like a high end TS.
wxwatcher1999 wrote: I don't remember what the last ones looked like but did these shift west cause I don't ever remember seeing that many in Texas
rainstorm wrote:Dean4Storms wrote:06z GFDL off to TX. This model is lost!
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/gfdltc2. ... hour=066hr
it keeps isaac very weak and shallow which is why it just rides the low level flow. looks like a high end TS.
wxwatcher1999 wrote:rainstorm wrote:Dean4Storms wrote:06z GFDL off to TX. This model is lost!
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/gfdltc2. ... hour=066hr
it keeps isaac very weak and shallow which is why it just rides the low level flow. looks like a high end TS.
How big of a storm does it have to be to feel the weakness?
EasyTiger wrote:What's interesting about the GFDL, is that it's forecasting a path similar (albeit a little right) to that of the 1900 Hurricane aka Isaac's storm. The intensity of the 1900 storm was a little stronger at the same latitude as Isaac, but not by much. The 1900 storm didn't really ramp up until it hit the central gulf. Could history repeat...probably not, but who knows![]()
wxwatcher1999 wrote:
I don't remember what the last ones looked like but did these shift west cause I don't ever remember seeing that many in Texas
southerngale wrote:wxwatcher1999 wrote:
I don't remember what the last ones looked like but did these shift west cause I don't ever remember seeing that many in Texas
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests