ATL: EMILY - Remnants

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#2801 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Aug 01, 2011 11:36 am

the upper environment must get hostile enough to separate the mid level circ move it to the wsw...

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... loop.shtml
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#2802 Postby KWT » Mon Aug 01, 2011 11:36 am

Its a right ole mess out there, system jsut can't get stacked at all...

Looks like the more conservative models that do northing with the system till at least north of the islands may well have had the right idea afterall...

Still needs close watching, but the bullish models aren't going to come off in the short term...MLC needs to die, its not going to dig down a surface feature because convection poofs every day too quickly for that to happen, attention needs to focus elsewhere...

Amazing to watch this system!
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
SouthDadeFish
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2835
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:54 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re:

#2803 Postby SouthDadeFish » Mon Aug 01, 2011 11:37 am

Aric Dunn wrote:the upper environment must get hostile enough to separate the mid level circ move it to the wsw...

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... loop.shtml


I noticed that as well, but to be honest I don't see how. The GFS never really had them well stacked at any point after Hispaniola...
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5197
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re:

#2804 Postby ConvergenceZone » Mon Aug 01, 2011 11:37 am

SouthDadeFish wrote:The fact that the NHC sent another plane into this feature right after another one left leads me to believe this storm isn't as disorganized as some people here think.... They kept it at 90% for a reason.



Well, just like sometimes they keep it at 10% and we can't understand why it's not at 50%.
It's just the opposite too. Sometimes they have a high percentage and we can't figure out why it's not lower.

They might strart bringing the percentage down gradually IF the storm doesn't make any progress at all today with organizing.
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10162
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#2805 Postby Blown Away » Mon Aug 01, 2011 11:37 am

otowntiger wrote:
cycloneye wrote::uarrow: Blown Away,here is a closeup.

Looks less and less impressive. It seems to be drying up.


Watch the loop and you will see convection building along the E side.
0 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05… Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

underthwx
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2363
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 2:14 pm
Location: Brazoria County Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#2806 Postby underthwx » Mon Aug 01, 2011 11:38 am

Gone fishin Emily.......... :?:
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: Re:

#2807 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Aug 01, 2011 11:38 am

SouthDadeFish wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:the upper environment must get hostile enough to separate the mid level circ move it to the wsw...

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... loop.shtml


I noticed that as well, but to be honest I don't see how. The GFS never really had them well stacked at any point after Hispaniola...


yeah could be classic gfs anomaly .. lo
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#2808 Postby RL3AO » Mon Aug 01, 2011 11:39 am

620
URNT15 KNHC 011636
AF305 04EEA INVEST HDOB 03 20110801
162600 1644N 06231W 5278 05453 0281 -030 -125 086018 019 030 007 00
162630 1643N 06229W 5275 05456 0281 -030 -126 083018 019 029 003 00
162700 1642N 06227W 5278 05456 0281 -030 -126 087018 019 025 000 00
162730 1641N 06225W 5275 05455 0281 -030 -126 088018 019 022 000 00
162800 1640N 06223W 5277 05460 0280 -030 -127 087018 019 024 001 00
162830 1639N 06221W 5278 05449 0279 -030 -128 089019 019 024 001 00
162900 1638N 06218W 5276 05453 0278 -030 -129 088020 021 024 001 00
162930 1637N 06216W 5277 05452 0278 -034 -129 087021 022 026 000 00
163000 1636N 06214W 5278 05446 0278 -030 -130 080019 020 025 000 00
163030 1635N 06212W 5274 05457 0280 -028 -131 078017 018 026 000 00
163100 1634N 06210W 5278 05454 0279 -028 -132 079017 018 026 000 00
163130 1633N 06208W 5278 05445 0278 -027 -133 079017 018 026 000 00
163200 1632N 06205W 5275 05457 0279 -026 -133 076017 017 025 001 00
163230 1631N 06203W 5277 05451 0279 -025 -134 072017 017 025 000 00
163300 1629N 06201W 5278 05449 0280 -023 -134 074018 018 027 000 00
163330 1628N 06159W 5277 05454 0278 -020 -134 077017 018 027 000 00
163400 1627N 06157W 5275 05450 0278 -020 -134 078017 017 030 000 00
163430 1626N 06154W 5277 05450 0279 -024 -134 080017 018 034 005 00
163500 1625N 06152W 5275 05457 0279 -031 -134 085019 019 031 001 00
163530 1624N 06150W 5277 05455 0278 -035 -134 087018 018 027 000 00
$$
;
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#2809 Postby Sanibel » Mon Aug 01, 2011 11:40 am

The question is what the Caribbean will do to it if it doesn't organize better before getting there.
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5197
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#2810 Postby ConvergenceZone » Mon Aug 01, 2011 11:40 am

Blown Away wrote:
otowntiger wrote:
cycloneye wrote::uarrow: Blown Away,here is a closeup.

Looks less and less impressive. It seems to be drying up.


Watch the loop and you will see convection building along the E side.



the problem is, it's been doing that off and on for the last 24 hours.... Builds convection, then it dies down, then it looks like it's taking shape, then it doesn't....It doesn't seem to want to sustain any organization for very long.
0 likes   

User avatar
northjaxpro
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8900
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:21 am
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re:

#2811 Postby northjaxpro » Mon Aug 01, 2011 11:40 am

KWT wrote:Another landfall near Florida, system probably wouldn't be *too strong* given the disruption by Hispaniola but the upper pattern does look good...obviously also dependant on the status of the system as well before land.

I think there is STILL more westward adjustments to come...



Although we don't yet have an initialization point in terms of a defined closed circulation with 91L, KWT I think that you are correct. It is reasonably safe to reason that westward adjustments with the models will continue. The length of time it is taking for this invest to consolidate assures that it will not be strong enough in terms of the system feeling any effects of a weakness to be drawn poleward, at least through the middle part of this week at the minimum.
0 likes   
NEVER, EVER SAY NEVER in the tropics and weather in general, and most importantly, with life itself!!

________________________________________________________________________________________

Fay 2008 Beryl 2012 Debby 2012 Colin 2016 Hermine 2016 Julia 2016 Matthew 2016 Irma 2017 Dorian 2019

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7383
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#2812 Postby Hurricaneman » Mon Aug 01, 2011 11:41 am

I cant say for certian this will be Emily, this may never develop at all, but as we all know this could still become a strong system if it gets away from the stable enviornment
0 likes   

otowntiger
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1924
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:06 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#2813 Postby otowntiger » Mon Aug 01, 2011 11:41 am

Gustywind wrote:
Fyzn94 wrote:It's kinda scary as to how long this is taking to develop. Unless residents on the islands already know about this, they will have mere hours to prepare if it is classified.

Absolutely and that's why that's often a worrying scenario... but let's wait and see and hoping for the best if 91L continues to pose a threat for the Northern Windwards/Leewards.
There's some irony in all of that. I know what you're saying but if you think about it ,the fact that it's taking so long to develop is the opposite of scary. Since it's so slow to develop now there shouldn't be much worry about 'short notice' for the islanders because it certainly wont be much of anything at this rate of development. There is no evidence that this thing is going to spin up into anything too menacing if anything at all, in the short term anyway.
Last edited by otowntiger on Mon Aug 01, 2011 11:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
TreasureIslandFLGal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1581
Age: 57
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2004 6:16 pm
Location: Clearwater, Florida ~3 miles from the coast now. We finally moved safely off the barrier island!

#2814 Postby TreasureIslandFLGal » Mon Aug 01, 2011 11:41 am

I still suspect an even further shift west of the models, as this still hasn't developed yet. A track over Cuba I suspect, prior to trying to recurve before hitting that ridge expanding west.

At what point is it "break point" for development, where anything that may (or may not) develop is instead forced westward without any pull to the north? Destination central America.

(S2k disclaimer)
0 likes   
Chrissy & Ligeia
:flag:

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#2815 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Aug 01, 2011 11:42 am

ConvergenceZone wrote:
Blown Away wrote:
otowntiger wrote:


Watch the loop and you will see convection building along the E side.



the problem is, it's been doing that off and on for the last 24 hours.... Builds convection, then it dies down, then it looks like it's taking shape, then it doesn't....It doesn't seem to want to sustain any organization for very long.


but this is the first time there has been and well defined low level vort at all.. I would put some money on this taking over..
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#2816 Postby KWT » Mon Aug 01, 2011 11:42 am

Strange upper splitting of the energy, I know Hispaniola can do that to a system but then why does the GFS strengthen the system into landfall??

Hmm!
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

otowntiger
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1924
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:06 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#2817 Postby otowntiger » Mon Aug 01, 2011 11:42 am

I"m beginning to wonder if future Emily may be one of the disturbances out in the eastern Atlantic.
Last edited by otowntiger on Mon Aug 01, 2011 11:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#2818 Postby KWT » Mon Aug 01, 2011 11:44 am

ConvergenceZone wrote:
the problem is, it's been doing that off and on for the last 24 hours.... Builds convection, then it dies down, then it looks like it's taking shape, then it doesn't....It doesn't seem to want to sustain any organization for very long.


Thats true, it seems to be struggling, but thats what happens when the system can't get stacked all that well, I honestly think that MLC will need to decay before development, to expect that feature to spin down a LLC is optimisitic, its had 72hrs to do that and has failed...
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

Re:

#2819 Postby Dean4Storms » Mon Aug 01, 2011 11:44 am

Aric Dunn wrote:the upper environment must get hostile enough to separate the mid level circ move it to the wsw...

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... loop.shtml



Has to be a TUTT on the SW periphery of the ridge?
0 likes   

psyclone
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4772
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:04 pm
Location: palm harbor fl

#2820 Postby psyclone » Mon Aug 01, 2011 11:45 am

i thought this thing was gonna develop two days ago...instead it keeps looking worse. tough to imagine the nhc not slowly dropping down development chances. it looks pathetic right now.
0 likes   


Return to “2011”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests