cycloneye wrote:No mention of NAM at 10 PM CDT discussion.
But they're probably still laughing about it, though.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
cycloneye wrote:No mention of NAM at 10 PM CDT discussion.
wxman57 wrote:indian wrote:ROCK wrote:moving looks SW to me....and the LLC is partially offshore....
do you think it has time to strengthen
No way! It's expanding and losing tropical characteristics while sucking in a ton of dry air from Texas.
3090 wrote:ROCK wrote:3090 wrote:I don't know where the crow is coming from. A number of models two days ago predicted a loop as being possible. Go back and look. The real southward movement however, was no where. I don't think a real south movement is going to happen. I do think the loop may be starting, with an eventual turn to the ENE/NE as the eventual final movement towards the mid coast of LA.
right, the models showed this 2 days ago...however that was 2 days ago and now a few models are showing the same thing. More guidance coming into night so lets see wht they have to say....
The NAM is a good model for the CONUS and many NWS forecasters rely on it....it totally misses the trof on the NAM and GFDL recent runs...
I don't understand the where eating crow comes from. The NHC goes with their professional opinion based on a lot of dynamics, not just models. So how does eating crow come into it? This isn't over yet, until it makes an offiical landfall and is done as far as a tropical system goes. Of course things can and do change unexpectedly, BUT Lee is doing pretty much spot on as to the forecast. Can the forecast change? Certainly. But let's see what happens. There is no eating crow.
3090 wrote:What will be really interesting is to see if the west side moisture wraps all around the core and we see some re-intensification/organization. Lee really has never had west side banding, due to dry air over Texas filtering in. It appears that has substantially relaxed along with the shear. If Lee moves far away offshore and the new found west side banding wraps all the way around, things could get interesting.
Jagno, its between Grand Lake and Vermillion Bay, close to the coast.
ROCK wrote:LEE is not spot on...really? look at a sat view and click on forecast points.....she is way west and south....I dont think eating crow has anything to do with it. It would just be a busted forecast....like today here in Houston...20% of rain...bumped to 50% for tonight in one forecast...that is a bust....
SoupBone wrote:3090 wrote:What will be really interesting is to see if the west side moisture wraps all around the core and we see some re-intensification/organization. Lee really has never had west side banding, due to dry air over Texas filtering in. It appears that has substantially relaxed along with the shear. If Lee moves far away offshore and the new found west side banding wraps all the way around, things could get interesting.
I respectfully disagree. He hasn't looked worse than he is right now. He's still snacking on the dry air like little debbie snack cakes.
Jagno wrote:Jagno, its between Grand Lake and Vermillion Bay, close to the coast.
Now I know exactly where you are talking about. Unfortunately, I'm not very far from Grand Lake.
wxman57 wrote:cycloneye wrote:No mention of NAM at 10 PM CDT discussion.
But they're probably still laughing about it, though.
Rgv20 wrote:0z Shallow BAM drastically change its track too...Takes lee South until GOM.
The NAM, 18zGFDL,0zBAMS are more than likely wrong....but it makes one wonder.....
imetrice wrote:Local met here (Tom Konvicka, KALB Alexandria) says that he thinks Lee will travel a bit more west and east before it makes that NE turn.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests