EPAC: ADRIAN - Tropical Depression

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33398
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#21 Postby CrazyC83 » Sun Jun 05, 2011 7:22 pm

I would expect this to be a TD by tomorrow afternoon.
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#22 Postby Chacor » Sun Jun 05, 2011 10:05 pm

EP, 91, 2011060600, , BEST, 0, 106N, 982W, 25, 1007, DB, 34, NEQ, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1010, 175, 90, 0, 0, E, 0, , 0, 0, INVEST, M,
0 likes   

dwsqos2

Re: EPAC: INVEST 91E

#23 Postby dwsqos2 » Mon Jun 06, 2011 1:09 am

Thank goodness it's hideous at the moment. There's nothing worse than a pointless EPAC tc.
0 likes   

Florida1118
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1805
Age: 27
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 12:57 pm
Location: Tampa, Florida

Re: EPAC: INVEST 91E

#24 Postby Florida1118 » Mon Jun 06, 2011 1:48 am

dwsqos2 wrote:Thank goodness it's hideous at the moment. There's nothing worse than a pointless EPAC tc.

Its not hideous...90% inst hideous by a long shot. And why are they pointless? They are much more fun to watch and observe, since only a few like to hit mexico...you can enjoy natures shows without any devistation...I dont think thats pointless by any means.
0 likes   

dwsqos2

Re: EPAC: INVEST 91E

#25 Postby dwsqos2 » Mon Jun 06, 2011 1:57 am

Might want to look at a recent satellite image instead of using NHC probabilities as a proxy for appearance. At the moment low-level convergence is kind of lacking; convection has weakened tremendously over the past few hours.

Pointlessness is arbitrary, but generally speaking tropical cyclones in that region mean westerly low level winds over Nino regions 1+2. Nevermind that, put a decent anticyclone over a tc in that region, and the result will be westerly or northwesterly upper-level winds over a portion of the Caribbean. Yeah, I hope it doesn't form.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31391
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#26 Postby KWT » Mon Jun 06, 2011 3:32 am

ECM still develops this into quite a a strong system in the 4-5 day period and most moedels are keen on it as wlell.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#27 Postby Chacor » Mon Jun 06, 2011 6:59 am

ABPZ20 KNHC 061139
TWOEP

TROPICAL WEATHER OUTLOOK
NWS NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
500 AM PDT MON JUN 6 2011

FOR THE EASTERN NORTH PACIFIC...EAST OF 140 DEGREES WEST LONGITUDE..

THUNDERSTORM ACTIVITY ASSOCIATED WITH A WELL-DEFINED LOW PRESSURE
SYSTEM CENTERED ABOUT 425 MILES SOUTH OF ACAPULCO CONTINUES TO SHOW
SIGNS OF ORGANIZATION. ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS REMAIN FAVORABLE
FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A TROPICAL DEPRESSION AND THERE IS A HIGH
CHANCE...90 PERCENT...OF THIS SYSTEM BECOMING A TROPICAL CYCLONE
DURING THE NEXT 48 HOURS AS IT DRIFTS TOWARD THE NORTHWEST.

ELSEWHERE...TROPICAL CYCLONE FORMATION IS NOT EXPECTED DURING THE
NEXT 48 HOURS.

$$
FORECASTER STEWART
0 likes   

dwsqos2

Re: EPAC: INVEST 91E

#28 Postby dwsqos2 » Mon Jun 06, 2011 7:08 am

Well, it looks better this morning. Vomit. It's such a shame.
0 likes   

Florida1118
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1805
Age: 27
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 12:57 pm
Location: Tampa, Florida

Re: EPAC: INVEST 91E

#29 Postby Florida1118 » Mon Jun 06, 2011 7:32 am

dwsqos2 wrote:Well, it looks better this morning. Vomit. It's such a shame.

Thats pretty dramatic and im not getting why such a response is needed for a simple Invest... :?:
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: EPAC: INVEST 91E

#30 Postby RL3AO » Mon Jun 06, 2011 7:36 am

dwsqos2 wrote:Well, it looks better this morning. Vomit. It's such a shame.


:roll:

You don't actually have to post in this thread because you don't like "boring" storms that don't ruin peoples lives.
0 likes   

User avatar
srainhoutx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6919
Age: 66
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 11:34 am
Location: Haywood County, NC
Contact:

Re: EPAC: INVEST 91E

#31 Postby srainhoutx » Mon Jun 06, 2011 7:40 am

Back on topic folks. :wink:
0 likes   
Carla/Alicia/Jerry(In The Eye)/Michelle/Charley/Ivan/Dennis/Katrina/Rita/Wilma/Ike/Harvey

Member: National Weather Association
Wx Infinity Forums
http://wxinfinity.com/index.php

Facebook.com/WeatherInfinity
Twitter @WeatherInfinity

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#32 Postby Chacor » Mon Jun 06, 2011 7:44 am

OHC, SST and shear continue to be extremely good for development, but SHIPS no longer makes it a hurricane within 5 days.

Code: Select all

                    *   EAST PACIFIC SHIPS INTENSITY FORECAST   *
                    * GOES AVAILABLE,       OHC AVAILABLE       *
                    *      INVEST  EP912011  06/06/11  12 UTC   *

TIME (HR)          0     6    12    18    24    36    48    60    72    84    96   108   120
V (KT) NO LAND    25    26    27    29    32    38    43    49    53    55    56    59    59
V (KT) LAND       25    26    27    29    32    38    43    49    53    55    56    59    59
V (KT) LGE mod    25    25    26    27    28    32    34    36    39    41    43    46    48

SHEAR (KT)         6     8     8     8     6     3     1     3     7     4     3     9     5
SHEAR ADJ (KT)     0    -1    -1    -1    -2     0     2     1     3     5     2     0     2
SHEAR DIR         91    98   118   143   167   217   202   358   304    29    53    45    54
SST (C)         29.6  29.7  29.9  30.0  30.1  30.2  30.1  29.9  29.5  29.2  28.8  28.5  28.4
POT. INT. (KT)   158   160   162   163   163   165   165   162   158   154   150   145   144
200 MB T (C)   -53.3 -52.9 -52.6 -52.8 -52.9 -52.0 -52.2 -50.9 -51.0 -50.6 -51.2 -50.5 -51.0
TH_E DEV (C)       7     8     8     8     7     8     7     9     8     9     8    10     9
700-500 MB RH     72    69    68    66    63    61    55    51    48    47    47    44    43
GFS VTEX (KT)     10    10    11    11    12    12    13    14    16    15    15    16    16
850 MB ENV VOR    14    21    18    15    15    16     5     5     3    11     9    10     5
200 MB DIV        24     6    13    40    51    62    50    82    71    27    27    22    -7
700-850 TADV       0     0     0     0     0     0     0    -3    -6    -2     0     0     0
LAND (KM)        563   531   498   469   445   410   344   282   255   226   252   268   260
LAT (DEG N)     10.9  11.3  11.6  12.0  12.3  12.9  13.9  14.9  15.7  16.2  16.5  16.7  16.9
LONG(DEG W)     98.3  98.6  98.9  99.3  99.6 100.2 101.0 101.9 102.9 103.8 104.8 105.3 105.4
STM SPEED (KT)     3     5     5     5     4     5     7     6     6     5     4     2     1
HEAT CONTENT      40    48    55    58    59    61    28    58    41    40    34    29    27

  FORECAST TRACK FROM OFCI      INITIAL HEADING/SPEED (DEG/KT):330/  1      CX,CY:   0/  1
  T-12 MAX WIND:  25            PRESSURE OF STEERING LEVEL (MB):  595  (MEAN=581)
  GOES IR BRIGHTNESS TEMP. STD DEV.  50-200 KM RAD:  18.6 (MEAN=14.5)
  % GOES IR PIXELS WITH T < -20 C    50-200 KM RAD:  43.0 (MEAN=65.0)

                        INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO INTENSITY CHANGE
                         6   12   18   24   36   48   60   72   84   96  108  120
                        ----------------------------------------------------------
  SAMPLE MEAN CHANGE     0.   0.   0.   1.   1.   1.   0.   0.  -1.  -1.  -1.  -2.
  SST POTENTIAL          0.  -1.   0.   1.   7.  15.  23.  31.  35.  38.  40.  42.
  VERTICAL SHEAR MAG     1.   2.   3.   4.   6.   8.  10.  11.  11.  12.  12.  12.
  VERTICAL SHEAR ADJ     0.   0.   0.   0.   1.   0.   0.   0.   0.   0.  -1.  -1.
  VERTICAL SHEAR DIR     1.   1.   2.   2.   1.  -1.  -2.  -4.  -3.  -2.  -1.  -1.
  PERSISTENCE            0.   0.   0.  -1.  -1.  -1.  -1.  -1.  -1.  -1.  -1.   0.
  200/250 MB TEMP.       0.   0.  -1.  -1.  -3.  -5.  -6.  -7.  -8.  -9.  -9.  -8.
  THETA_E EXCESS         0.   0.   0.  -1.  -1.  -1.  -1.  -1.  -1.  -1.  -1.  -1.
  700-500 MB RH          0.   0.   0.   1.   1.   1.   1.   1.   1.   0.   0.   0.
  GFS VORTEX TENDENCY    0.   0.   1.   2.   2.   5.   6.   8.   7.   7.   9.   8.
  850 MB ENV VORTICITY   0.   0.   0.   0.   0.   0.  -1.  -1.  -1.  -1.  -1.  -2.
  200 MB DIVERGENCE      0.   0.   0.   0.   1.   1.   1.   1.   0.   0.  -1.  -1.
  850-700 T ADVEC        0.   0.   0.   0.   0.   0.   0.   0.   0.   0.   0.   0.
  ZONAL STORM MOTION     0.  -1.  -1.  -2.  -3.  -4.  -5.  -5.  -5.  -5.  -5.  -5.
  STEERING LEVEL PRES    0.   0.   0.   0.   0.   0.   1.   1.   1.   1.   1.   1.
  DAYS FROM CLIM. PEAK   0.   0.   0.   0.   0.   0.   0.  -1.  -1.  -1.  -1.  -1.
  GOES PREDICTORS        0.  -1.  -1.  -1.  -2.  -4.  -6.  -7.  -7.  -8.  -8.  -8.
  OCEAN HEAT CONTENT     0.   1.   2.   3.   4.   4.   4.   3.   3.   3.   2.   1.
                        ----------------------------------------------------------
  TOTAL CHANGE           1.   2.   4.   7.  13.  18.  24.  28.  30.  32.  34.  34.

   ** 2011 E. Pacific RI INDEX EP912011     INVEST 06/06/11  12 UTC **
 
 12 HR PERSISTENCE (KT):   0.0 Range:-20.0 to  35.0 Scaled/Wgted Val:  0.4/  0.7
 850-200 MB SHEAR (KT) :   6.9 Range: 17.0 to   1.6 Scaled/Wgted Val:  0.7/  0.9
 STD DEV OF IR BR TEMP :  18.6 Range: 35.4 to   2.7 Scaled/Wgted Val:  0.5/  0.7
 Heat content (KJ/cm2) :  52.0 Range:  0.0 to  67.0 Scaled/Wgted Val:  0.8/  0.8
 POT = MPI-VMAX (KT)   : 136.0 Range: 44.8 to 134.3 Scaled/Wgted Val:  1.0/  0.8
 D200 (10**7s-1)       :  26.8 Range:-10.0 to 129.0 Scaled/Wgted Val:  0.3/  0.2
 % area w/pixels <-30 C:  36.0 Range: 26.0 to 100.0 Scaled/Wgted Val:  0.1/  0.1
 850-700 MB REL HUM (%):  71.0 Range: 64.0 to  88.0 Scaled/Wgted Val:  0.3/  0.0
 
 Prob of RI for 25 kt RI threshold=    29% is   2.5 times the sample mean(11.7%)
 Prob of RI for 30 kt RI threshold=    24% is   3.1 times the sample mean( 7.9%)
 Prob of RI for 35 kt RI threshold=     2% is   0.3 times the sample mean( 5.4%)
 Prob of RI for 40 kt RI threshold=     1% is   0.3 times the sample mean( 3.9%)

   ##         ANNULAR HURRICANE INDEX (AHI) EP912011     INVEST 06/06/11  12 UTC         ##
   ## STORM NOT ANNULAR, SCREENING STEP FAILED, NPASS=5 NFAIL=2                          ##
   ## AHI=  0   (AHI OF 100 IS BEST FIT TO ANN. STRUC., 1 IS MARGINAL, 0 IS NOT ANNULAR) ##
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#33 Postby HURAKAN » Mon Jun 06, 2011 9:20 am

Image

looks like it could be TD 1-E later today
0 likes   

User avatar
Cyclenall
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6628
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re:

#34 Postby Cyclenall » Mon Jun 06, 2011 10:54 am

For 91E, I didn't follow it very closely until today and it appears it could blow up later today and pull a John like in 2006. It has the exact same look as one of those storms in 2006 when the system was still an invest and it intensified extremely rapidly until it reached 70 knots. I think it will strengthen quickly as a TS and then level out once it reaches it's destiny of Hurricane Adrian.

CrazyC83 wrote:Yeah this one looks like the first tropical cyclone of 2011 for the North American region.

I tend to say "The first tropical cyclone in the western hemisphere for 2011".

dwsqos2 wrote:Thank goodness it's hideous at the moment. There's nothing worse than a pointless EPAC tc.

There is something worse and it's called "No Activity" :lol: .

Florida1118 wrote:
dwsqos2 wrote:Thank goodness it's hideous at the moment. There's nothing worse than a pointless EPAC tc.

Its not hideous...90% inst hideous by a long shot. And why are they pointless? They are much more fun to watch and observe, since only a few like to hit mexico...you can enjoy natures shows without any devistation...I dont think thats pointless by any means.

That's precisely why he called it pointless.

dwsqos2 wrote:Pointlessness is arbitrary, but generally speaking tropical cyclones in that region mean westerly low level winds over Nino regions 1+2. Nevermind that, put a decent anticyclone over a tc in that region, and the result will be westerly or northwesterly upper-level winds over a portion of the Caribbean. Yeah, I hope it doesn't form.

There has been systems in both that region and the Caribbean (western and western Gulf) concurrently hasn't there? I think it's possible without too much interaction but it does occur.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#35 Postby HURAKAN » Mon Jun 06, 2011 12:18 pm

Image

The convection remains weak
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139596
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: EPAC: INVEST 91E

#36 Postby cycloneye » Mon Jun 06, 2011 12:40 pm

Up to 100%

TROPICAL WEATHER OUTLOOK
NWS NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
1100 AM PDT MON JUN 6 2011

FOR THE EASTERN NORTH PACIFIC...EAST OF 140 DEGREES WEST LONGITUDE..

THUNDERSTORM ACTIVITY ASSOCIATED WITH A WELL-DEFINED LOW PRESSURE
SYSTEM CENTERED ABOUT 425 MILES SOUTH OF ACAPULCO CONTINUES TO SHOW
SIGNS OF ORGANIZATION. ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS REMAIN FAVORABLE
FOR DEVELOPMENT AND THERE IS A HIGH CHANCE...NEAR 100 PERCENT...OF
THIS SYSTEM BECOMING A TROPICAL CYCLONE DURING THE NEXT 48 HOURS AS
IT DRIFTS TOWARD THE NORTHWEST.

ELSEWHERE...TROPICAL CYCLONE FORMATION IS NOT EXPECTED DURING THE
NEXT 48 HOURS.

$$
FORECASTER BLAKE/STEWART
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
somethingfunny
ChatStaff
ChatStaff
Posts: 3926
Age: 35
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 10:30 pm
Location: McKinney, Texas

Re: EPAC: INVEST 91E

#37 Postby somethingfunny » Mon Jun 06, 2011 4:14 pm

RL3AO wrote:
dwsqos2 wrote:Well, it looks better this morning. Vomit. It's such a shame.


:roll:

You don't actually have to post in this thread because you don't like "boring" storms that don't ruin peoples lives.


I think this one has a pretty good shot at ruining somebody's life unfortunately. The models are keen on recurving this towards a landfall and the unseasonably massive trough off of California backs that premise up.
0 likes   
I am not a meteorologist, and any posts made by me are not official forecasts or to be interpreted as being intelligent. These posts are just my opinions and are probably silly opinions.

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#38 Postby RL3AO » Mon Jun 06, 2011 4:47 pm

Early on, I think the NHC might be changing up on they apply the percentages. I don't think that this would have gotten 90% how it was yesterday and certainly not gotten a 100% unless it was basically already a TC. Remember that its near 100% that it will form in the next 48 hours which is probably right.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31391
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#39 Postby KWT » Mon Jun 06, 2011 5:15 pm

Almost certainly will be our first TD of the season within the next 6-12hrs, looks good at the moment, though convection is a little on the weak side for now.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#40 Postby HURAKAN » Mon Jun 06, 2011 5:56 pm

Image

beautiful structure, only needs deep convection
0 likes   


Return to “2011”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests