ATL: DON - Remnant - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15446
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: Re:

#1641 Postby NDG » Wed Jul 27, 2011 8:28 am

ronjon wrote:
NDG wrote:So how many of you think that the NHC may go ahead in upgrading 90L to TD 4 at 15z?
A closed surface circulation is now very evident based on radar, satellite and surface observations with 1.5 sat classification.


NDG I think they'll wait for RECON just a few hours later. You know how conservative NHC is.


Yeah, I agree, but you know how they sometimes throw a curve ball at us, lol.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145487
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#1642 Postby cycloneye » Wed Jul 27, 2011 8:30 am

ATCF has not renumbered 90L,and that is the best sign they will wait for the plane.

ftp://ftp.tpc.ncep.noaa.gov/atcf/tcweb/
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

bbadon
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 190
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 7:21 am
Location: Johnson Bayou, LA
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#1643 Postby bbadon » Wed Jul 27, 2011 8:30 am

I think they may go TD4 at 10a.m. for emergency planning purposes.
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20012
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#1644 Postby tolakram » Wed Jul 27, 2011 8:32 am

0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

Crackbone
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 26
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 10:47 am
Location: Ft Myers

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#1645 Postby Crackbone » Wed Jul 27, 2011 8:36 am



OT, Hebron KY eh? I'm in Edgewood :P
0 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15446
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: Re:

#1646 Postby NDG » Wed Jul 27, 2011 8:40 am

Aric Dunn wrote:
NDG wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:The circulation is beginning to poke out the northern side of the convection from the northerly shear.. pretty apparent we have a closed surface circ. and it seems as though its trying to get pulled north... at the moment..


Initially I thought the same but as vis sat pics keep coming in it appears that the possible LLC is staying under the covers.
But yeah, Cancun and Cuban radar shows that the deep convection is to the south of the COC, it might be already feeling the NE shear.


well half is exposed. convection keeps trying to refire. the shear should relax though today.


Latest RUC sounding in the northern half of 90L shows some dry air intrussion from the NE in the mid levels.
Makes sense for the lack of deep convection in that area.

Image
0 likes   

plasticup

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#1647 Postby plasticup » Wed Jul 27, 2011 8:41 am

bbadon wrote:I think they may go TD4 at 10a.m. for emergency planning purposes.

The NHC makes its decisions based on scientific data, not social or political factors.
0 likes   

User avatar
Rgv20
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2466
Age: 39
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 5:42 pm
Location: Edinburg/McAllen Tx

#1648 Postby Rgv20 » Wed Jul 27, 2011 8:41 am

Honestly I do not trust no model with this system maybe the exception being the ECMWF as it has been the most consistent and it shows a landfall between Brownsville and Corpus.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#1649 Postby RL3AO » Wed Jul 27, 2011 8:44 am

I believe within a few years, NHC would coordinate with Mexico to start issuing watches and warnings and NHC would even issue a forecast before it even becomes a tropical cyclone.
0 likes   

User avatar
TheBurn
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 540
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: Rincon, PR

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#1650 Postby TheBurn » Wed Jul 27, 2011 8:57 am

Image

Image

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Roxy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 657
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 7:58 am
Location: Houston (Clear Lake)

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Models

#1651 Postby Roxy » Wed Jul 27, 2011 8:58 am

ROCK wrote:0z GFDL.....right up the Houston Ship channel ala IKE.....at 66knts....also a Cat 1

http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/gfdltc2. ... =Animation


Good, that means that it definitely won't go right up the Houston ship channel! If you are in the "cone" this far out, no way it's headed your way. IMO.

Been wrong before though. :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#1652 Postby HURAKAN » Wed Jul 27, 2011 9:04 am

Image

latest visible
0 likes   

User avatar
thetruesms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 844
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:14 pm
Location: Tallahasee, FL
Contact:

Re:

#1653 Postby thetruesms » Wed Jul 27, 2011 9:05 am

NDG wrote:So how many of you think that the NHC may go ahead in upgrading 90L to TD 4 at 15z?
A closed surface circulation is now very evident based on radar, satellite and surface observations with 1.5 sat classification.
I'm hesitant to say that it's evident - I haven't yet seen something that tells me with absolute certainty that we have a closed circulation. What's out there is very highly suggestive though, that much is certain. I suppose it's really just splitting hairs, though. NHC will almost certainly wait for recon, at which point I'd expect them to find something there waiting for them.

Edit - I should probably clarify that I would say I agree that there is an LLC there, I just wouldn't say it's coming out and slapping everyone in the face.
Last edited by thetruesms on Wed Jul 27, 2011 9:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11162
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Models

#1654 Postby Ivanhater » Wed Jul 27, 2011 9:15 am

I see models shifting toward Houston and Louisiana...good to see Wxwarrior back :wink:
0 likes   
Michael

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22981
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#1655 Postby wxman57 » Wed Jul 27, 2011 9:23 am

Looks like an LLC up around 22N/86.6W - on the northern side of the convection. I think it's a TD now and possibly a TS.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#1656 Postby RL3AO » Wed Jul 27, 2011 9:26 am

You want recon? You got it.

Code: Select all

NOUS42 KNHC 271415
WEATHER RECONNAISSANCE FLIGHTS
CARCAH, NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER, MIAMI, FL.
1015 AM EDT WED 27 JULY 2011
SUBJECT: TROPICAL CYCLONE PLAN OF THE DAY (TCPOD)
         VALID 28/1100Z TO 29/1100Z JULY 2011
         TCPOD NUMBER.....11-057

I.  ATLANTIC REQUIREMENTS
    1. SUSPECT AREA
       FLIGHT ONE - TEAL 71      FLIGHT TWO - NOAA 49
       A. 28/1200,1800Z          A. 29/0000Z
       B. AFXXX 0204A CYCLONE    B. NOAA9 0304A CYCLONE
       C. 28/1000Z               C. 28/1730Z
       D. 23.9N 90.2W            D. NA
       E. 28/1130Z TO 28/1800Z   E. NA
       F. SFC TO 10,000 FT       F. 41,000 TO 45,000 FT
       FLIGHT THREE - NOAA 42    FLIGHT FOUR - TEAL 72
       A. 29/0000Z               A. 29/0000,0600Z
       B. NOAA2 0404A CYCLONE    B. AFXXX 0504A CYCLONE
       C. 28/2000Z               C. 28/2215Z
       D. 25.1N 92.3W            D. 25.1N 92.3W
       E. 28/2200 TO 29/0230Z    E. 28/2330Z TO 29/0600Z
       F. SFC TO 15,000 FT       F. SFC TO 15,000 FT
       FLIGHT FIVE - NOAA 42
       A. 29/1200Z
       B. NOAA2 0604A CYCLONE
       C. 29/0800Z
       D. 26.4N 94.3W
       E. 29/1030Z TO 29/1430Z
       F. SFC TO 15,000 FT
    2. OUTLOOK FOR SUCCEEDING DAY: POSSIBLE 3-HRLY FIXES.
II. PACIFIC REQUIREMENTS....NEGATIVE/ JWP
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145487
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Recon

#1657 Postby cycloneye » Wed Jul 27, 2011 9:26 am

Here is todays TCPOD and look how busy they will be in the next couple of days. Among the flights,there will be the gulfstream jet.

Code: Select all

NOUS42 KNHC 271415
WEATHER RECONNAISSANCE FLIGHTS
CARCAH, NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER, MIAMI, FL.
1015 AM EDT WED 27 JULY 2011
SUBJECT: TROPICAL CYCLONE PLAN OF THE DAY (TCPOD)
         VALID 28/1100Z TO 29/1100Z JULY 2011
         TCPOD NUMBER.....11-057

I.  ATLANTIC REQUIREMENTS
    1. SUSPECT AREA
       FLIGHT ONE - TEAL 71      FLIGHT TWO - NOAA 49
       A. 28/1200,1800Z          A. 29/0000Z
       B. AFXXX 0204A CYCLONE    B. NOAA9 0304A CYCLONE
       C. 28/1000Z               C. 28/1730Z
       D. 23.9N 90.2W            D. NA
       E. 28/1130Z TO 28/1800Z   E. NA
       F. SFC TO 10,000 FT       F. 41,000 TO 45,000 FT
       FLIGHT THREE - NOAA 42    FLIGHT FOUR - TEAL 72
       A. 29/0000Z               A. 29/0000,0600Z
       B. NOAA2 0404A CYCLONE    B. AFXXX 0504A CYCLONE
       C. 28/2000Z               C. 28/2215Z
       D. 25.1N 92.3W            D. 25.1N 92.3W
       E. 28/2200 TO 29/0230Z    E. 28/2330Z TO 29/0600Z
       F. SFC TO 15,000 FT       F. SFC TO 15,000 FT
       FLIGHT FIVE - NOAA 42
       A. 29/1200Z
       B. NOAA2 0604A CYCLONE
       C. 29/0800Z
       D. 26.4N 94.3W
       E. 29/1030Z TO 29/1430Z
       F. SFC TO 15,000 FT
    2. OUTLOOK FOR SUCCEEDING DAY: POSSIBLE 3-HRLY FIXES.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

BeachBumJen
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 12
Age: 46
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 6:14 pm
Location: Hempstead, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Models

#1658 Postby BeachBumJen » Wed Jul 27, 2011 9:29 am

Roxy wrote:
ROCK wrote:0z GFDL.....right up the Houston Ship channel ala IKE.....at 66knts....also a Cat 1

http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/gfdltc2. ... =Animation


Good, that means that it definitely won't go right up the Houston ship channel! If you are in the "cone" this far out, no way it's headed your way. IMO.

Been wrong before though. :lol:


You say that now Roxy, but don't you remember IKE? 3 and 4 days out thay projected a Rio Grand hit...Houstone was in the cone just just a hair....We know where it ended up. A lot can change in a day or two so at this point no one knows. IMO I suggest that anyone from Beaumont to Mex border get their flash lights ready! Although this may not be a big storm but we all know it does not take more then a small thunder store to sometimes knock out the lights!
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#1659 Postby HURAKAN » Wed Jul 27, 2011 9:30 am

I can do the graphics today
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#1660 Postby HouTXmetro » Wed Jul 27, 2011 9:30 am

wxman57 wrote:Looks like an LLC up around 22N/86.6W - on the northern side of the convection. I think it's a TD now and possibly a TS.


It's looking impressive this morning in terms of presentation for a TD....35Kmph was the 8AM update on Weatherunderground
Last edited by HouTXmetro on Wed Jul 27, 2011 9:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]


Return to “2011”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests