ATL: Ex-Tropical Storm HERMINE - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
fasterdisaster
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1868
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: Miami, Florida

#61 Postby fasterdisaster » Sun Sep 05, 2010 3:48 pm

Almost no chance this develops IMO, it looks like an absolute mess and has virtually no time.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#62 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun Sep 05, 2010 3:49 pm

Expect a more N then NW motion with a landfall closer to the TX/MEX border. It should follow the weak trough axis it is currently attached too.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 29112
Age: 73
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Cypress, TX
Contact:

Re:

#63 Postby vbhoutex » Sun Sep 05, 2010 3:55 pm

fasterdisaster wrote:Almost no chance this develops IMO, it looks like an absolute mess and has virtually no time.

What do you mean by develops? NHC and the Navy see a decent chance for this to become a TC before it moves inland. My best guess without some more study of the situation is that it more than likely will move inland before development into a TC, but could be a big rainmaker for parts of MX and TX. Imo it still has a lot of consolidation to do before it can be classified.
0 likes   
Skywarn, C.E.R.T.
Please click below to donate to STORM2K to help with the expenses of keeping the site going:
Image

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#64 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun Sep 05, 2010 4:23 pm

Its nearly a depression... just needs a little more organized convection. the LLC is well defined and is slowly getting farther off shore... just drifting north atm
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

Vortmax1
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 360
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 11:35 pm
Location: Port Salerno, FL
Contact:

#65 Postby Vortmax1 » Sun Sep 05, 2010 4:44 pm

I had to back off from the floater....the GOM shot looks like depression material there.
Thanks Aric...I think you're right:


Image
0 likes   

fasterdisaster
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1868
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: Miami, Florida

Re: Re:

#66 Postby fasterdisaster » Sun Sep 05, 2010 4:46 pm

vbhoutex wrote:
fasterdisaster wrote:Almost no chance this develops IMO, it looks like an absolute mess and has virtually no time.

What do you mean by develops? NHC and the Navy see a decent chance for this to become a TC before it moves inland. My best guess without some more study of the situation is that it more than likely will move inland before development into a TC, but could be a big rainmaker for parts of MX and TX. Imo it still has a lot of consolidation to do before it can be classified.


I mean I think it's unlikely it becomes a depression, and almost impossible for it to be a TS. I can't see an LLC in those clouds, unless someone could point it out to me. Also, if anything organization is getting worse.
0 likes   

User avatar
TwisterFanatic
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1041
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 12:43 pm
Location: Sallisaw, Oklahoma

Re:

#67 Postby TwisterFanatic » Sun Sep 05, 2010 4:51 pm

fasterdisaster wrote:Almost no chance this develops IMO, it looks like an absolute mess and has virtually no time.


The NHC disagrees with you.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: Re:

#68 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun Sep 05, 2010 4:53 pm

fasterdisaster wrote:
vbhoutex wrote:
fasterdisaster wrote:Almost no chance this develops IMO, it looks like an absolute mess and has virtually no time.

What do you mean by develops? NHC and the Navy see a decent chance for this to become a TC before it moves inland. My best guess without some more study of the situation is that it more than likely will move inland before development into a TC, but could be a big rainmaker for parts of MX and TX. Imo it still has a lot of consolidation to do before it can be classified.


I mean I think it's unlikely it becomes a depression, and almost impossible for it to be a TS. I can't see an LLC in those clouds, unless someone could point it out to me. Also, if anything organization is getting worse.


the satellite is pretty clear but the radar is even more clear... its only three images at the moment but it clearly shows a well defined LLC.

Image
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

fasterdisaster
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1868
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: Miami, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#69 Postby fasterdisaster » Sun Sep 05, 2010 5:02 pm

Agh, I see it now. I was assuming it was further south and east like yesterday. Yeah, organization's improving and it does look like this could very well develop. Never mind.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22975
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#70 Postby wxman57 » Sun Sep 05, 2010 5:19 pm

Look near 20.4N/95.4W. I can see an LLC tightening up there just slipping below some heavy convection. Could be upgraded at any time. Hard to see on a still image, the convection is now covering the LLC:

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11160
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#71 Postby Ivanhater » Sun Sep 05, 2010 5:23 pm

Great day in New Orleans today...Warm front connected to the stalled out front (contributing to this invest) should move back onshore tomorrow...

Looks very suspicious in the BOC today.
0 likes   
Michael

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#72 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun Sep 05, 2010 5:24 pm

wxman57 wrote:Look near 20.4N/95.5W. I can see an LLC tightening up there just slipping below some heavy convection. Could be upgraded at any time.


Agreed its very close and its quickly organizing..

couple more images... showing increasing banding and convection
Image
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

fasterdisaster
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1868
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: Miami, Florida

#73 Postby fasterdisaster » Sun Sep 05, 2010 5:25 pm

No I see it now guys, and I agree it's very close.
0 likes   

User avatar
srainhoutx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6919
Age: 67
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 11:34 am
Location: Haywood County, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#74 Postby srainhoutx » Sun Sep 05, 2010 5:28 pm

Hi Res Vis Imagery a bit earlier was rather impressive. I agree that it is nearing TD status.
0 likes   
Carla/Alicia/Jerry(In The Eye)/Michelle/Charley/Ivan/Dennis/Katrina/Rita/Wilma/Ike/Harvey

Member: National Weather Association
Wx Infinity Forums
http://wxinfinity.com/index.php

Facebook.com/WeatherInfinity
Twitter @WeatherInfinity

Shuriken

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#75 Postby Shuriken » Sun Sep 05, 2010 5:32 pm

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/flash-vis.html

IMO it's already clearly a depression and developing very quickly. Movement is apparently NNE at ~15kt.

Remember Bret; remember Opel....storms starting here don't mess around.
0 likes   

fasterdisaster
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1868
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: Miami, Florida

#76 Postby fasterdisaster » Sun Sep 05, 2010 5:33 pm

Mmm I don't think it's a depression quite yet. Convection needs to tighten up a bit.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#77 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun Sep 05, 2010 5:34 pm

Shuriken wrote:http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/flash-vis.html

IMO it's already clearly a depression and developing very quickly. Movement is apparently NNE at ~15kt.

Remember Bret; remember Opel....storms starting here don't mess around.


yeah its seems to be a drift too the N or just east of north..
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

redfish1
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 125
Age: 44
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 9:24 pm
Location: Port Arthur, Tx

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#78 Postby redfish1 » Sun Sep 05, 2010 5:34 pm

Shuriken wrote:http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/flash-vis.html

IMO it's already clearly a depression and developing very quickly. Movement is apparently NNE at ~15kt.

Remember Bret; remember Opel....storms starting here don't mess around.



if it is moving NNE could we see a landfall possibly more north than what was expected?
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#79 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun Sep 05, 2010 5:34 pm

redfish1 wrote:
Shuriken wrote:http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/flash-vis.html

IMO it's already clearly a depression and developing very quickly. Movement is apparently NNE at ~15kt.

Remember Bret; remember Opel....storms starting here don't mess around.



if it is moving NNE could we see a landfall possibly more north than what was expected?


yes I posted at the top of this page about that..
Last edited by Aric Dunn on Sun Sep 05, 2010 5:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#80 Postby KWT » Sun Sep 05, 2010 5:35 pm

I agree I think its getting there but its not quite there yet, probably does need to upped to 80% chance though, and I see no real reason why it can't become Hermine in the next 36-48hrs.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests