ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION TWO - DISCUSSION

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
lrak
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1770
Age: 58
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 2:48 pm
Location: Corpus Christi, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#501 Postby lrak » Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:53 pm

Wow the visible satellite is awesome, this is a strange invest :double:

Looks like an A bomb going off.
0 likes   
AKA karl

Also
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
My posts on this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. My posts are my basic observations and are definitely not backed by any "well some" meteorological knowledge. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Frank P
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2776
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 10:52 am
Location: Biloxi Beach, Ms
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#502 Postby Frank P » Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:10 pm

Well it looks pretty crappy to me on the IR loop... convection losing it fast close to where the center should be... systems pulse, on the decline now and maybe it will re-fire later tonight.. but I have not been impressed with this system for the past two days... but ya never know and that's why we watch em...
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#503 Postby HURAKAN » Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:11 pm

Frank P wrote:Well it looks pretty crappy to me on the IR loop... convection losing it fast close to where the center should be... systems pulse, on the decline now and maybe it will re-fire later tonight.. but I have not been impressed with this system for the past two days... but ya never know and that's why we watch em...


We should look for an increase in convection over or near the center as the low moves over water. Remember that the system is over land.
0 likes   

Frank P
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2776
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 10:52 am
Location: Biloxi Beach, Ms
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#504 Postby Frank P » Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:18 pm

HURAKAN wrote:
Frank P wrote:Well it looks pretty crappy to me on the IR loop... convection losing it fast close to where the center should be... systems pulse, on the decline now and maybe it will re-fire later tonight.. but I have not been impressed with this system for the past two days... but ya never know and that's why we watch em...


We should look for an increase in convection over or near the center as the low moves over water. Remember that the system is over land.


Good point, and at least on the IR loop, with the color off, it does show a pretty good spin with this system... not sure how much is at the surface but spin it definitely has tonight... this thing might go right where Alex when last week.. who knows..
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#505 Postby HURAKAN » Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:20 pm

Image

Image

a broad LLC may be present according to the wind direction
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#506 Postby ROCK » Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:21 pm

I think it looks better now than it has since conception...somebody pointed out that the low level swirl looked to get sucked back into the MLC area. I have to agree. Tonight looks different though as far as convection. Every other night it would lose convection not build it.....It has the look IMO...
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#507 Postby HURAKAN » Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:24 pm

Image

Image

Seems to be doing good in the divergence and convergence department
0 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re:

#508 Postby ozonepete » Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:33 pm

HURAKAN wrote:Image

Image

a broad LLC may be present according to the wind direction


As usual, good observation, Hurakan. This RGB satellite shows the really broad center coming off of the Yucatan. Notice also, as Ivanhater and others were saying, that there is another vorticity center/kinetic energy max north of this low which is impeding a rapid buildup. Hmmm... Remind you of anything recent? Like Alex? The pattern looks very similar. That makes me think this will get to TS pretty fast but then get prevented from further quick intensification due to it's elongated stucture. Really rapid intensification won't occur until the other vorticity max dissipates or they consolidate. (Doubt they will ever consolidate.)

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
srainhoutx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6919
Age: 67
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 11:34 am
Location: Haywood County, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#509 Postby srainhoutx » Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:35 pm

:uarrow:

Just lacking deep tropical convection at this time. Notice the dry air to the W decreasing...

Image
0 likes   
Carla/Alicia/Jerry(In The Eye)/Michelle/Charley/Ivan/Dennis/Katrina/Rita/Wilma/Ike/Harvey

Member: National Weather Association
Wx Infinity Forums
http://wxinfinity.com/index.php

Facebook.com/WeatherInfinity
Twitter @WeatherInfinity

redfish1
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 125
Age: 44
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 9:24 pm
Location: Port Arthur, Tx

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#510 Postby redfish1 » Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:39 pm

is it possible for 96L to pull the low pressure to north of it into it? And will the low pressure to the north affect 96L's track?
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#511 Postby Ivanhater » Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:40 pm

Thunderstorms collapsing around the MLC. I'm not sold on this one yet but tomorrow may be a different story

Image
0 likes   
Michael

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

#512 Postby Dean4Storms » Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:53 pm

The water extending out for at least 75 miles north and west of the Yucatan is pretty cool water, don't know if it will help this Invest much the first 1/2 day it emerges over it.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22979
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#513 Postby wxman57 » Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:56 pm

Convection weakening and becoming less organized. Surface obs don't show any LLC forming. Don't mistake land/sea breezes for a broad circulation. That feature to the north closer to the LA coast appears to be robbing energy from 96L. Development chances still appear low.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#514 Postby HURAKAN » Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:56 pm

Image

Vorticity co-located with the MLC
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

#515 Postby ConvergenceZone » Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:02 pm

It does look a little bit better, I understand them upping the chances to 40% now.


Here's a question, while I know that this sytem won't develop into anything big if it does develop, I'm curious, have there ever been any hurricanes that have developed from a wave without ANY model support at all? I suppose only a Met will probably know this, but I'm curious....
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

#516 Postby ConvergenceZone » Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:09 pm

Hehe, once wxman57 speaks about the wave's very small chance of development, the thread gets silent....... :wink:
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22979
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re:

#517 Postby wxman57 » Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:10 pm

ConvergenceZone wrote:It does look a little bit, I understand then upping the chances to 40% now.


Here's a question, while I know that this sytem won't develop into anything big if it does develop, I'm curious, have there ever been any hurricanes that have developed from a wave without ANY model support at all? I suppose only a Met will probably know this, but I'm curious....


Just be wary that Stacey Stewart is known for estimating development chances quite a bit higher than others. I see nothing to indicate an increasing chance of development, perhaps even the opposite.

As for your question, it's a bit ambiguous. Define "any model support". Models didn't forecast Alex to become a hurricane for quite a few runs.
0 likes   

User avatar
funster
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 816
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 4:27 pm
Location: North Dallas

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#518 Postby funster » Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:10 pm

I think this one will develop. It is in a favorable location and it has plenty of time to at least to get a TS status before landfall. Wish there was a floater on it.
0 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re:

#519 Postby ozonepete » Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:14 pm

ConvergenceZone wrote:It does look a little bit better, I understand them upping the chances to 40% now.


Here's a question, while I know that this sytem won't develop into anything big if it does develop, I'm curious, have there ever been any hurricanes that have developed from a wave without ANY model support at all? I suppose only a Met will probably know this, but I'm curious....


If you exclude the CMC ( :lol: ) there have definitely been some small fast developers that were missed. Like Humberto in 2007. The models have problems picking up small waves (or remnant cold front lows) that move into really favorable conditions quickly.

edited to add the remnant lows...
Last edited by ozonepete on Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#520 Postby ozonepete » Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:16 pm

wxman57 wrote:Convection weakening and becoming less organized. Surface obs don't show any LLC forming. Don't mistake land/sea breezes for a broad circulation. That feature to the north closer to the LA coast appears to be robbing energy from 96L. Development chances still appear low.


Good advice. But you don't possibly think that the east to northeast winds a hundred miles north of the northern Yucatan have anything to do with land or sea breezes, right?
0 likes   


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests