ATL: EX Tropical Depression FIVE - Models
Moderator: S2k Moderators
- Ivanhater
- Storm2k Moderator
- Posts: 11160
- Age: 38
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
- Location: Pensacola
Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models
Right Rock, it is a blend. You will see the NHC mention in the discussion quite often "and track is in close agreement with the TVCN model"
It is the easiest way to see how the NHC track will look like before hand...
It is the easiest way to see how the NHC track will look like before hand...
0 likes
Michael
Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models
I was beating the west drum last night but I kept getting beat down by the NAM, NOGAPS, CMC...this was after the 0z EURO....you guys need to keep the faith!! 

0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models
Ivanhater wrote:Right Rock, it is a blend. You will see the NHC mention in the discussion quite often "and track is in close agreement with the TVCN model"
It is the easiest way to see how the NHC track will look like before hand...
Yes but for the neebies out there the TVCN is just a blend and not an independent model. Just clarifying my NAM posting brother...

0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models
ROCK wrote:Ivanhater wrote:Right Rock, it is a blend. You will see the NHC mention in the discussion quite often "and track is in close agreement with the TVCN model"
It is the easiest way to see how the NHC track will look like before hand...
Yes but for the neebies out there the TVCN is just a blend and not an independent model. Just clarifying my NAM posting brother...
Very good work, Rock. I was unaware of what the TVCN was. Thanks!
0 likes
- Pearl River
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 825
- Age: 66
- Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 6:07 pm
- Location: SELa
Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models
From the NHC and MIT:
TVCN:
TVCN - Variable Consensus of AVNI/2, EGRI/2, NGPI/2, GHMI/2, HWRI/2, EMXI/2)
Any acronym with an 'I' as the last letter is the model run from 6 hours prior interpolated to the analysis time.
Average of at least 2 of GHMI, EGRI, NGPI, HWFI, GFSI, GFNI, EMXI
TVCN:
TVCN - Variable Consensus of AVNI/2, EGRI/2, NGPI/2, GHMI/2, HWRI/2, EMXI/2)
Any acronym with an 'I' as the last letter is the model run from 6 hours prior interpolated to the analysis time.
Average of at least 2 of GHMI, EGRI, NGPI, HWFI, GFSI, GFNI, EMXI
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models
Pearl River wrote:From the NHC and MIT:
TVCN:
TVCN - Variable Consensus of AVNI/2, EGRI/2, NGPI/2, GHMI/2, HWRI/2, EMXI/2)
Any acronym with an 'I' as the last letter is the model run from 6 hours prior interpolated to the analysis time.
Average of at least 2 of GHMI, EGRI, NGPI, HWFI, GFSI, GFNI, EMXI
looks like a bunch of GFS ensembles and or extended family. Got a NOGAPS brother in there and a NAM cousin.....
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models
Ivanhater wrote:EMXI is the Euro
good catch.....


0 likes
- KFDM Meteorologist
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 1314
- Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 9:52 pm
- Location: Upper Texas Coast/Orange County
- thetruesms
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 844
- Age: 41
- Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:14 pm
- Location: Tallahasee, FL
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models
GFDL, UKMET, NOGAPS, HWRF, GFS, GFDL-Navy, and Euro, respectivelyROCK wrote:Pearl River wrote:From the NHC and MIT:
TVCN:
TVCN - Variable Consensus of AVNI/2, EGRI/2, NGPI/2, GHMI/2, HWRI/2, EMXI/2)
Any acronym with an 'I' as the last letter is the model run from 6 hours prior interpolated to the analysis time.
Average of at least 2 of GHMI, EGRI, NGPI, HWFI, GFSI, GFNI, EMXI
looks like a bunch of GFS ensembles and or extended family. Got a NOGAPS brother in there and a NAM cousin.....
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models
FWIW
The model consensus beats any individual model (and often times, indivudual official forecasts) over any forecast interval you want to measure. Ignoring the TVCN is ignoring the best possible model in the aggregate...
I don't have time today to get into model verification and deterministic vs. probabilistic forecasting...but I can say that looking at any one point and seeing if a model "hits" it or not at any point in time will result in a "bad" forecast almost 100% of the time. By that standard, they are all failures.
However, one crazy outlier can force the whole consensus to shift in a weird direction...if you look at the model tracks for Wilma in 2005, they had it retrograding into the western Caribbean because the GFDL had a wacky solution. So yeah, the TVCN could be way too far left because of the GFS component...
And if you look at the 12Z GFS, it moves 94L quickly compared to the other models...and by the very slow current motion...the 12Z GFS is probably already off by 30MN.
That would suggest...to me that an eventual landfall for 94L is more likely east of New Orleans than west of there.
MW
The model consensus beats any individual model (and often times, indivudual official forecasts) over any forecast interval you want to measure. Ignoring the TVCN is ignoring the best possible model in the aggregate...
I don't have time today to get into model verification and deterministic vs. probabilistic forecasting...but I can say that looking at any one point and seeing if a model "hits" it or not at any point in time will result in a "bad" forecast almost 100% of the time. By that standard, they are all failures.
However, one crazy outlier can force the whole consensus to shift in a weird direction...if you look at the model tracks for Wilma in 2005, they had it retrograding into the western Caribbean because the GFDL had a wacky solution. So yeah, the TVCN could be way too far left because of the GFS component...
And if you look at the 12Z GFS, it moves 94L quickly compared to the other models...and by the very slow current motion...the 12Z GFS is probably already off by 30MN.
That would suggest...to me that an eventual landfall for 94L is more likely east of New Orleans than west of there.
MW
0 likes
Updating on the twitter now: http://www.twitter.com/@watkinstrack
- KFDM Meteorologist
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 1314
- Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 9:52 pm
- Location: Upper Texas Coast/Orange County
Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models
MWatkins wrote:FWIW
The model consensus beats any individual model (and often times, indivudual official forecasts) over any forecast interval you want to measure. Ignoring the TVCN is ignoring the best possible model in the aggregate...
I don't have time today to get into model verification and deterministic vs. probabilistic forecasting...but I can say that looking at any one point and seeing if a model "hits" it or not at any point in time will result in a "bad" forecast almost 100% of the time. By that standard, they are all failures.
However, one crazy outlier can force the whole consensus to shift in a weird direction...if you look at the model tracks for Wilma in 2005, they had it retrograding into the western Caribbean because the GFDL had a wacky solution. So yeah, the TVCN could be way too far left because of the GFS component...
And if you look at the 12Z GFS, it moves 94L quickly compared to the other models...and by the very slow current motion...the 12Z GFS is probably already off by 30MN.
That would suggest...to me that an eventual landfall for 94L is more likely east of New Orleans than west of there.
MW
Oh no doubt that is why the NHC uses it. I totally agree. However I do look at model solutions that are against the current consensus. You never know if it is the front runner of a shift or not....my only point..
0 likes
- HouTXmetro
- Category 5
- Posts: 3949
- Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
- Location: District of Columbia, USA
Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models
Sure wish Mike was still doing his Talkin' Tropics show.
You were good man.
You were good man.
0 likes
- cycloneye
- Admin
- Posts: 145295
- Age: 68
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models
18z Tropical Models

Code: Select all
021
WHXX01 KWBC 101823
CHGHUR
TROPICAL CYCLONE GUIDANCE MESSAGE
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
1823 UTC TUE AUG 10 2010
DISCLAIMER...NUMERICAL MODELS ARE SUBJECT TO LARGE ERRORS.
PLEASE REFER TO NHC OFFICIAL FORECASTS FOR TROPICAL CYCLONE
AND SUBTROPICAL CYCLONE INFORMATION.
ATLANTIC OBJECTIVE AIDS FOR
DISTURBANCE INVEST (AL942010) 20100810 1800 UTC
...00 HRS... ...12 HRS... ...24 HRS. .. ...36 HRS...
100810 1800 100811 0600 100811 1800 100812 0600
LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON
BAMS 25.8N 83.7W 26.5N 85.3W 27.4N 87.0W 28.1N 88.5W
BAMD 25.8N 83.7W 26.4N 85.5W 27.5N 87.6W 28.7N 89.5W
BAMM 25.8N 83.7W 26.5N 85.4W 27.7N 87.1W 28.7N 88.6W
LBAR 25.8N 83.7W 26.0N 85.1W 26.6N 86.7W 27.4N 88.3W
SHIP 25KTS 26KTS 30KTS 34KTS
DSHP 25KTS 26KTS 30KTS 34KTS
...48 HRS... ...72 HRS... ...96 HRS. .. ..120 HRS...
100812 1800 100813 1800 100814 1800 100815 1800
LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON
BAMS 29.1N 89.8W 31.1N 92.1W 33.9N 93.4W 34.5N 93.7W
BAMD 29.8N 91.1W 31.9N 92.6W 34.4N 90.8W 35.5N 86.0W
BAMM 29.8N 89.8W 31.9N 90.8W 34.2N 89.1W 34.5N 85.9W
LBAR 28.0N 89.7W 29.5N 91.8W 31.5N 92.6W 33.4N 90.9W
SHIP 40KTS 48KTS 56KTS 58KTS
DSHP 34KTS 28KTS 27KTS 27KTS
...INITIAL CONDITIONS...
LATCUR = 25.8N LONCUR = 83.7W DIRCUR = 280DEG SPDCUR = 3KT
LATM12 = 25.5N LONM12 = 82.7W DIRM12 = 255DEG SPDM12 = 2KT
LATM24 = 25.9N LONM24 = 82.5W
WNDCUR = 25KT RMAXWD = 60NM WNDM12 = 25KT
CENPRS = 1009MB OUTPRS = 1012MB OUTRAD = 150NM SDEPTH = S
RD34NE = 0NM RD34SE = 0NM RD34SW = 0NM RD34NW = 0NM
$$

0 likes
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models
12Z HWRF - runs more north along FL west coast to Tampa and then turns W-NW to mouth of Miss. Weak tropical storm.
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/hwrftc2.cgi?time=2010081012-invest94l&field=Sea+Level+Pressure&hour=Animation
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/hwrftc2.cgi?time=2010081012-invest94l&field=Sea+Level+Pressure&hour=Animation
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 6358
- Age: 62
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
- Location: Miramar Bch. FL
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests