ATL: KARL - Models
Moderator: S2k Moderators
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 2718
- Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
- Location: Beaumont, TX
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 2718
- Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
- Location: Beaumont, TX
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 2718
- Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
- Location: Beaumont, TX
GFDL makes 92L quite strong from the looks of things and looks rather realistic in terms of track as well...but we will see, quite a few models now don't do anything with 92L at all...
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
It is stronger than the ECMWF which heads for BOC as does CMC (in 108 hours but weaker) and the UKMET. HWRF is more northerly and slower. Like you said, other models are not doing much with it, so it is a watching period. Like I said in the other thread though, 92L has some energy and is pulsing up nicely tonight.
0 likes
Re: ATL : 92L - Models
How long has this chart been on the NHC site.
![Image](http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/tafb/fxc/latest_a.png)
![Image](http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/tafb/fxc/latest_a.png)
0 likes
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 6810
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
- Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
- Contact:
Re: ATL : 92L - Models
tailgater wrote:How long has this chart been on the NHC site.
i dont know but it doesnt tell us much unless we want a basic geography lesson
0 likes
- gatorcane
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 23499
- Age: 46
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
- Location: Boca Raton, FL
Re:
Steve wrote:It is stronger than the ECMWF which heads for BOC as does CMC (in 108 hours but weaker) and the UKMET. HWRF is more northerly and slower. Like you said, other models are not doing much with it, so it is a watching period. Like I said in the other thread though, 92L has some energy and is pulsing up nicely tonight.
Most of the models shoot this west towards the western Carib. That is where I think it is headed also. Don't think it gains enough latitude to pose a threat to Florida. Should stay far to the south as ridging sits over Florida and Bahamas. Now if this were October, could be a much different setup indeed.
0 likes
- cycloneye
- Admin
- Posts: 139594
- Age: 67
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re: ATL : 92L - Models
12z Tropical Models Suite
![Image](http://my.sfwmd.gov/sfwmd/common/images/weather/plots/storm_92.gif)
Code: Select all
CHGHUR
TROPICAL CYCLONE GUIDANCE MESSAGE
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
1310 UTC SAT SEP 11 2010
DISCLAIMER...NUMERICAL MODELS ARE SUBJECT TO LARGE ERRORS.
PLEASE REFER TO NHC OFFICIAL FORECASTS FOR TROPICAL CYCLONE
AND SUBTROPICAL CYCLONE INFORMATION.
ATLANTIC OBJECTIVE AIDS FOR
DISTURBANCE INVEST (AL922010) 20100911 1200 UTC
...00 HRS... ...12 HRS... ...24 HRS. .. ...36 HRS...
100911 1200 100912 0000 100912 1200 100913 0000
LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON
BAMS 14.0N 63.6W 14.8N 65.4W 15.5N 67.4W 16.2N 69.5W
BAMD 14.0N 63.6W 14.7N 65.9W 15.3N 68.2W 15.8N 70.6W
BAMM 14.0N 63.6W 14.8N 65.8W 15.5N 68.1W 16.2N 70.4W
LBAR 14.0N 63.6W 15.0N 65.6W 16.0N 67.8W 16.9N 69.9W
SHIP 25KTS 30KTS 39KTS 49KTS
DSHP 25KTS 30KTS 39KTS 49KTS
...48 HRS... ...72 HRS... ...96 HRS. .. ..120 HRS...
100913 1200 100914 1200 100915 1200 100916 1200
LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON
BAMS 16.7N 71.6W 17.7N 76.0W 18.6N 81.1W 19.5N 86.1W
BAMD 16.4N 72.9W 17.5N 77.6W 18.7N 83.3W 20.0N 88.7W
BAMM 16.8N 72.7W 18.0N 77.6W 19.2N 83.2W 20.5N 88.6W
LBAR 17.9N 71.9W 20.0N 75.4W 22.3N 78.3W 23.8N 79.6W
SHIP 62KTS 79KTS 91KTS 107KTS
DSHP 62KTS 63KTS 80KTS 60KTS
...INITIAL CONDITIONS...
LATCUR = 14.0N LONCUR = 63.6W DIRCUR = 285DEG SPDCUR = 10KT
LATM12 = 13.4N LONM12 = 61.6W DIRM12 = 284DEG SPDM12 = 11KT
LATM24 = 12.9N LONM24 = 60.0W
WNDCUR = 25KT RMAXWD = 60NM WNDM12 = 25KT
CENPRS = 1009MB OUTPRS = 1011MB OUTRAD = 150NM SDEPTH = S
RD34NE = 0NM RD34SE = 0NM RD34SW = 0NM RD34NW = 0NM
![Image](http://my.sfwmd.gov/sfwmd/common/images/weather/plots/storm_92.gif)
0 likes
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
- gatorcane
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 23499
- Age: 46
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
- Location: Boca Raton, FL
In this image below taken by the 500MB chart from the 12Z NAM, you can see the large ridge setting up right over the GOM and Florida at 84 hours. So if 92L decides to develop farther west, it cannot go into GOM or Florida with this kind of setup. That is why the camp of models that bring it west take it right into the Yucatan and Mexico. Now if it develops more quickly, sure it can shoot off the the NW into the Bahamas and east of Florida. In fact that is what the NAM is doing with 92L, shooting it through a weakness east of the United States.
![Image](http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod/analysis/carib/nam/12/images/nam_500_084l.gif)
![Image](http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod/analysis/carib/nam/12/images/nam_500_084l.gif)
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 6:48 am
- Location: HOLLYWOOD.FL
Re: ATL : 92L - Models
http://radar.weather.gov/ridge/radar.ph ... 1&loop=yes
Puerto Rico radar show 92L moving somewhat wnw.
Puerto Rico radar show 92L moving somewhat wnw.
0 likes
hurricanelonny
- AtlanticWind
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1809
- Age: 65
- Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 9:57 pm
- Location: Plantation,Fla
Re: ATL : 92L - Models
HURRICANELONNY wrote:http://radar.weather.gov/ridge/radar.php?rid=jua&product=N0R&overlay=11101111&loop=yes
Puerto Rico radar show 92L moving somewhat wnw.
Cant see far enough south to determine motion, all you are seeing is the northernmost convection.
0 likes
Re:
gatorcane wrote:In this image below taken by the 500MB chart from the 12Z NAM, you can see the large ridge setting up right over the GOM and Florida at 84 hours. So if 92L decides to develop farther west, it cannot go into GOM or Florida with this kind of setup. That is why the camp of models that bring it west take it right into the Yucatan and Mexico. Now if it develops more quickly, sure it can shoot off the the NW into the Bahamas and east of Florida. In fact that is what the NAM is doing with 92L, shooting it through a weakness east of the United States.
No GC, that weakness is already in the process of closing off and moving east so it'll only nudge 92L north of the islands. From that point on, it'll likely move W-NW under the building ridge, similar to yesterdays CMC and GFDL.
0 likes
Re: ATL : 92L - Models
CMC, GFDL, HWRF and NAM seem to have the pattern sniffed out so far. Doesn't mean they will be right in the end though.
0 likes
- Ivanhater
- Storm2k Moderator
- Posts: 10859
- Age: 37
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
- Location: Pensacola
Re: ATL : 92L - Models
It may not develop, but the GFS dry bias is noted today. GFS for the past few days showed only a couple sprinkles moving through the Caribbean.
Good looking sprinkles
![Image](http://twister.sbs.ohio-state.edu/surface/caribbean.gif)
Good looking sprinkles
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
![Image](http://twister.sbs.ohio-state.edu/surface/caribbean.gif)
0 likes
Michael
Re: ATL : 92L - Models
looks like a developing system to me..over the hottest part of the basin....the question is what entry does it take into the GOM and track thereafter.....
0 likes
>>looks like a developing system to me..over the hottest part of the basin....the question is what entry does it take into the GOM and track thereafter.....
If the southern alliance models that showed development at 00z are right (GFDL/Euro/UKMET/CMC), and if I had to bet, it would be at some classifiable level on the Yucatan between Tulum and Mahaual.
If the southern alliance models that showed development at 00z are right (GFDL/Euro/UKMET/CMC), and if I had to bet, it would be at some classifiable level on the Yucatan between Tulum and Mahaual.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests