ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION TWO - DISCUSSION

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
jasons2k
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 8245
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX

#21 Postby jasons2k » Sun Jul 04, 2010 8:33 am

This one looks almost ready to go. I don't think it will be so painfully slow to develop. The next day or so will have me glued to the Ecmwf...in between pool time & grilling burgers at least 8-)
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#22 Postby ROCK » Sun Jul 04, 2010 8:53 am

Jasons I can relate... :D

The BAMMS are to far south with this. They are initialized wrong IMO.....
0 likes   

Frank P
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2774
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 10:52 am
Location: Biloxi Beach, Ms
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#23 Postby Frank P » Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:06 am

ROCK wrote:Jasons I can relate... :D

The BAMMS are to far south with this. They are initialized wrong IMO.....


Not sure why they initialized it so far south either.... I can't really pinpoint any LLC to speak of in either blob areas... perhaps that is the area of lowest pressure of the two blobs...
0 likes   

User avatar
AdamFirst
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2491
Age: 36
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:54 am
Location: Port Saint Lucie, FL

#24 Postby AdamFirst » Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:36 am

Alex part II?

Whats the steering currents looking like?
0 likes   
Dolphins Marlins Canes Golden Panthers HEAT
Andrew 1992 - Irene 1999 - Frances 2004 - Jeanne 2004 - Wilma 2005 - Fay 2008 - Isaac 2012 - Matthew 2016 - Irma 2017 - Dorian 2019 - Ian 2022 - Nicole 2022 - Milton 2024

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re:

#25 Postby HURAKAN » Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:37 am

AdamFirst wrote:Alex part II?

Whats the steering currents looking like?


Image

Right now, it should be moving NW
0 likes   

Weatherfreak000

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#26 Postby Weatherfreak000 » Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:43 am

As far as people asking where this is going- it's almost the same setup as Alex. If it develops quickly, it will make it through the Yucatan channel and Central Gulf may be the most at risk. If it stays very weak and smashes into the Yucatan could be a Mex/Tex threat.
0 likes   

Weatherfreak000

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#27 Postby Weatherfreak000 » Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:47 am

Image


Impressive, it makes a stronger signature than 95L now. Medium percentage is coming very shortly with this invest.
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#28 Postby Sanibel » Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:52 am

This doesn't have as much energy associated with it as Alex. Plus it is right in the same track.


Hard to say. Amazing what a hyperactive year will do. The last two years made fools out of satellite image watchers with deep round waves dissipating. And in some years like 2005 every wave with thunderstorms spins-up and develops.
0 likes   

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9914
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#29 Postby Portastorm » Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:55 am

I'm not sure just how much difference two degrees celsius water temperature makes with a tropical system but clearly Alex left his tire marks in the Western Gulf.

Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
0 likes   

User avatar
Macrocane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4218
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 5:35 pm
Location: El Salvador

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#30 Postby Macrocane » Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:57 am

:uarrow: 2008 was a pretty active year, I don't remember good waves dissipating, they struggled to survive for a while but once they got their act together nothing could stop them.
0 likes   

Weatherfreak000

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#31 Postby Weatherfreak000 » Sun Jul 04, 2010 10:09 am

Sanibel wrote:This doesn't have as much energy associated with it as Alex. Plus it is right in the same track.


Hard to say. Amazing what a hyperactive year will do. The last two years made fools out of satellite image watchers with deep round waves dissipating. And in some years like 2005 every wave with thunderstorms spins-up and develops.




Hard to find an invest with an much wasted potential as 93L had. It almost had a monsoonal look to it and for days it was anything but organized.


Image

I think it's shocking, UTTERLY shocking, to think I see FOUR development potential spots on that map. 96L is looking absolutely fantastic with every new satellite image it keeps looking better and better.

The wave i've been tracking at 60W is in a deceptively good environment. It very well may be our next invest 97L...that is if we don't get a Bahamas invest.

Geez...what a season.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#32 Postby HURAKAN » Sun Jul 04, 2010 10:12 am

Image

Latest
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#33 Postby HURAKAN » Sun Jul 04, 2010 10:13 am

Image

Looking good
0 likes   

NOLA2010
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 61
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 7:10 pm
Location: New Orleans

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#34 Postby NOLA2010 » Sun Jul 04, 2010 10:24 am

Weatherfreak000 wrote:
Sanibel wrote:This doesn't have as much energy associated with it as Alex. Plus it is right in the same track.


Hard to say. Amazing what a hyperactive year will do. The last two years made fools out of satellite image watchers with deep round waves dissipating. And in some years like 2005 every wave with thunderstorms spins-up and develops.




Hard to find an invest with an much wasted potential as 93L had. It almost had a monsoonal look to it and for days it was anything but organized.


I think it's shocking, UTTERLY shocking, to think I see FOUR development potential spots on that map. 96L is looking absolutely fantastic with every new satellite image it keeps looking better and better.

The wave i've been tracking at 60W is in a deceptively good environment. It very well may be our next invest 97L...that is if we don't get a Bahamas invest.

Geez...what a season.



Wasn't 93L Hurricane Alex?
0 likes   

User avatar
Macrocane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4218
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 5:35 pm
Location: El Salvador

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#35 Postby Macrocane » Sun Jul 04, 2010 10:28 am

NOLA2010 wrote:

Wasn't 93L Hurricane Alex?


I think 93L was the wave that looked very good while moving between Africa and the Caribbean but it never developed (though it looked like it almost reached TD status). It was the wave ahead of Alex.
0 likes   

Ikester
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 361
Age: 39
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:00 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#36 Postby Ikester » Sun Jul 04, 2010 10:39 am

Macrocane wrote:
NOLA2010 wrote:

Wasn't 93L Hurricane Alex?


I think 93L was the wave that looked very good while moving between Africa and the Caribbean but it never developed (though it looked like it almost reached TD status). It was the wave ahead of Alex.


The wave way out in the Atlantic early on eventually became Alex i thought.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22976
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#37 Postby wxman57 » Sun Jul 04, 2010 10:40 am

Model initialization location looks fine to me. Just off the coast of Honduras near where Alex passed. Probably a very similar track. May not develop until it gets into the BoC, though. And if that's the case, it may track south of Alex.
0 likes   

rockyman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1967
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 12:24 pm
Location: Dauphin Island, AL

#38 Postby rockyman » Sun Jul 04, 2010 10:45 am

FWIW (probably very little), Cayman Brac's winds have shifted from south to southeast to due east this morning
0 likes   

User avatar
Raininfyr
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 49
Joined: Tue May 20, 2003 9:19 pm
Location: Louisiana

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#39 Postby Raininfyr » Sun Jul 04, 2010 10:52 am

Well, the NHC has been doing a fantastic job so far this season. They are very good at what they do. They have all the latest forecasting tools at their disposal. If they are saying a similar landfall as Alex, I trust that, I am watchful, always, but I trust that. Can't afford to not watch what is going on in the tropics. I saw where the EPAC may have something soon, and sometimes that means activity in the Gulf and Atlantic follow, going to be busy, busy, busy, this year.
0 likes   

clfenwi
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3331
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:54 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#40 Postby clfenwi » Sun Jul 04, 2010 10:54 am

Ikester wrote:
Macrocane wrote:
NOLA2010 wrote:

Wasn't 93L Hurricane Alex?


I think 93L was the wave that looked very good while moving between Africa and the Caribbean but it never developed (though it looked like it almost reached TD status). It was the wave ahead of Alex.


The wave way out in the Atlantic early on eventually became Alex i thought.


92L was the wave that looked good deep in the tropics, only to ultimately die in the Caribbean. 93L, which became Alex, was designated an invest when it was in the eastern Caribbean (see beginning of Alex thread and 92L thread.)
0 likes   


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests