ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION ALEX - DISCUSSION

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4822
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#181 Postby ronjon » Mon Jun 21, 2010 6:12 pm

My take is that the system is really large, its proximity to SA (with descending drier air), and its apparent attachment to the ITCZ trough will limit any significant development over the next couple of days. That said, the large upper level high and high TCP, could make rapid development a real possibility in the NW caribbean sea. What the system seems to lack is good vorticity. Perhaps this is what the models are forecasting - no rotation to spark a cyclone. As a reality check though, none of these models are really good at forecasting tropical cyclogenesis.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#182 Postby wxman57 » Mon Jun 21, 2010 6:12 pm

x-y-no wrote:
Ikester wrote:New here, guys/gals. Be polite! LOL. I have meteorological background and look forward to great discussions. Enough of that. Here's my first post. It appears as though our blob is trying to develop a closed circulation. See image below.
http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/product ... 0_SWHR.GIF


How is this image generated? This is satellite scatterometry, I guess? What satellite instruments are involved?


Note that as stated above, they make assumptions that a mid-level (700mb/10,000ft) circulation extends down to the surface. That's not necessarily the case here. Surface obs in the area do not indicate any LLC.

What concerns me is that we do have a moderate to strong wave moving westward beneath a predicted building upper high vs. into 40 kts of shear like 92L. I might give it a 40-50% shot at developing by Wed/Thu.
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

#183 Postby x-y-no » Mon Jun 21, 2010 6:14 pm

Thanks Hurakan ...

So:

Multi-Platform Tropical Cyclone Surface Wind Analysis

Currently, this product combines information from five data sources to create a mid-level (near 700 hPa) wind analysis using a variational approach described in Knaff and DeMaria (2006). The resulting mid-level winds are then adjusted to the surface applying a very simple single column approach. Over the ocean an adjustment factor is applied, which is a function of radius from the center ranging from 0.9 to 0.7, and the winds are turned 20 degrees toward low pressure. Over land, the oceanic winds are reduced by an additional 20% and turned an additional 20 degrees toward low pressure.


Gotta wonder how reliable this methodology is for a system that doesn't have a well-defined surface circulation yet.
0 likes   

User avatar
srainhoutx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6919
Age: 67
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 11:34 am
Location: Haywood County, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#184 Postby srainhoutx » Mon Jun 21, 2010 6:16 pm

wxman57 wrote: I might give it a 40-50% shot at developing by Wed/Thu.


Interesting. Thanks for the update wxman57.
0 likes   
Carla/Alicia/Jerry(In The Eye)/Michelle/Charley/Ivan/Dennis/Katrina/Rita/Wilma/Ike/Harvey

Member: National Weather Association
Wx Infinity Forums
http://wxinfinity.com/index.php

Facebook.com/WeatherInfinity
Twitter @WeatherInfinity

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#185 Postby x-y-no » Mon Jun 21, 2010 6:19 pm

wxman57 wrote:Note that as stated above, they make assumptions that a mid-level (700mb/10,000ft) circulation extends down to the surface. That's not necessarily the case here. Surface obs in the area do not indicate any LLC.

What concerns me is that we do have a moderate to strong wave moving westward beneath a predicted building upper high vs. into 40 kts of shear like 92L. I might give it a 40-50% shot at developing by Wed/Thu.


Looks like we were typing simultaneously. :)

I share your concern about this system in the 2 to 3 day and onward timeframe. I was just a bit skeptical of this particular product giving reliable data in the context of an invest (as opposed to a developed cyclone.)
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: Re:

#186 Postby KWT » Mon Jun 21, 2010 6:27 pm

Hurricanewatcher2007 wrote:
If I were the forecasters I wouldn't decrease the chances just because convection died out during the day which is to be expected. If the overall trend were that the convection was dieing then yes. but They just increased the chances this morning which is hardly enough time to see a overall pattern suggestive of a invest dieing. If they based it on the convection from update to update then every morning they would increase the chances and every evening they would decrease the chances which wouldn't look very good for them. The general over view for 93L is that it's a active tropical wave moving into an area of lighter wind shear, over boiling hot water with plenty of oceanic heat content to power a cat 4 or 5 sub-900mb Hurricane.


Quite often they did actually drop it and raise it based on some longer lasting convective bursts/weakening phases, not by much but usually they were prepared to drop it or raise it 10% based on 6-12hr trends in convection.

As wxman57 said its got a shot, esp a little further down the line when it moves into the W.Caribbean with an upper high present over the system in that region.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#187 Postby HURAKAN » Mon Jun 21, 2010 6:50 pm

360
ABNT20 KNHC 212349
TWOAT
TROPICAL WEATHER OUTLOOK
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
800 PM EDT MON JUN 21 2010

FOR THE NORTH ATLANTIC...CARIBBEAN SEA AND THE GULF OF MEXICO...

#5
A VIGOROUS TROPICAL WAVE LOCATED FROM EASTERN HISPANIOLA SOUTHWARD
OVER THE CENTRAL CARIBBEAN SEA IS PRODUCING WIDESPREAD CLOUDINESS
AND SHOWERS ACROSS MUCH OF THE CENTRAL AND EASTERN CARIBBEAN SEA...
HISPANIOLA...PUERTO RICO...AND NORTHERN VENEZUELA. THIS DISTURBANCE
CONTINUES TO SHOW SIGNS OF INCREASED ORGANIZATION...AND UPPER-LEVEL
WINDS ARE CONDUCIVE FOR A TROPICAL DEPRESSION TO FORM DURING THE
NEXT COUPLE OF DAYS. THIS WEATHER SYSTEM COULD PRODUCE LOCALLY
HEAVY RAINFALL AND GUSTY WINDS OVER PORTIONS OF PUERTO RICO...THE
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC...HAITI...AND THE NETHERLANDS ANTILLES DURING THE
NEXT DAY OR SO AS THE SYSTEM MOVES WEST-NORTHWESTWARD AT 10 TO 15
MPH. THERE IS A MEDIUM CHANCE...50 PERCENT...OF THIS SYSTEM
BECOMING A TROPICAL CYCLONE DURING THE NEXT 48 HOURS.

ELSEWHERE...TROPICAL CYCLONE FORMATION IS NOT EXPECTED DURING THE
NEXT 48 HOURS.

$$
FORECASTER STEWART

0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145295
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#188 Postby cycloneye » Mon Jun 21, 2010 6:51 pm

:uarrow: That is a very strong language in a TWO that assure things look good for development.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11160
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#189 Postby Ivanhater » Mon Jun 21, 2010 6:53 pm

I think they saw Wxmans post :wink:

Seriously though, a long week shaping up it seems
0 likes   
Michael

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#190 Postby KWT » Mon Jun 21, 2010 6:53 pm

Yeah the structure has improved with this system, but convection is still rather on the tame-side, I think though as it pulls away from SA and moves under the building upper high conditions aloft look decent enough for development.

I think thats why the TWO is bullish...
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#191 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Jun 21, 2010 6:54 pm

cycloneye wrote::uarrow: That is a very strong language in a TWO that assure things look good for development.

not only that its from stewart !! very very reliable :)
0 likes   

User avatar
Aquawind
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6714
Age: 62
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 10:41 pm
Location: Salisbury, NC
Contact:

#192 Postby Aquawind » Mon Jun 21, 2010 6:54 pm

50% with no defined LLC must mean they are expecting the condusive conditions ahead to make it happen.
0 likes   

User avatar
KatDaddy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2815
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 6:23 pm
Location: League City, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#193 Postby KatDaddy » Mon Jun 21, 2010 6:56 pm

Yep and the GOM is very warm. This will be the big ticket item for the media.......TS Alex and the BP oil spill. I am scheduled to fly out to
Salt Lake City next Monday and return next Friday. I hope this stay away from the Upper TX Coast. It way to early to say where this will
end up and how strong it will be.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

SunnyThoughts
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2263
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 12:42 pm
Location: Pensacola, Florida

#194 Postby SunnyThoughts » Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:02 pm

Big ticket item for the media indeed. Wall to wall blitz coming by Thursday or Friday probably, IF this does indeed strengthen and head to the gulf. Thanks to everyone for their insights and the satellite pics.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re:

#195 Postby KWT » Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:05 pm

Aquawind wrote:50% with no defined LLC must mean they are expecting the condusive conditions ahead to make it happen.


Indeed, not all that surprising though given you've got quite a decent upper high forecasted to develop right over the disturbance, so conditions really are going to be pretty decent, esp over W.Caribbean and when its away from SA.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

Frank2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4061
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:47 pm

#196 Postby Frank2 » Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:06 pm

What the system seems to lack is good vorticity. Perhaps this is what the models are forecasting - no rotation to spark a cyclone.


Jeff Masters also mentioned that in his blog...

Certainly it's not lacking for moisture, that's for sure...

Have a good evening everyone,

Frank
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11160
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#197 Postby Ivanhater » Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:26 pm

AXNT20 KNHC 212357
TWDAT

TROPICAL WEATHER DISCUSSION
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
805 PM EDT MON JUN 21 2010

...SPECIAL FEATURES...

THE WAVE IS ACCOMPANIED BY A LARGE AREA OF DEEP LAYER
MOISTURE THAT COVERS THE ENTIRE ERN HALF OF THE CARIBBEAN
EVIDENT IN TOTAL PRECIPITABLE WATER IMAGERY. BROAD LOW TO
MID-LEVEL CYCLONIC FLOW IS ABOUT THE WAVE. IT APPEARS THAT A
SURFACE CIRCULATION IS TRYING TO FORM W OF THE WAVE AXIS NEAR
14N72W SEEN IN THE LAST VISIBLE SATELLITE IMAGERY OF THE DAY.
0 likes   
Michael

clfenwi
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3331
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:54 pm

Re:

#198 Postby clfenwi » Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:32 pm

Frank2 wrote:
What the system seems to lack is good vorticity. Perhaps this is what the models are forecasting - no rotation to spark a cyclone.


Jeff Masters also mentioned that in his blog...

Certainly it's not lacking for moisture, that's for sure...

Have a good evening everyone,

Frank


Looking at the UW-CIMSS TPW graphic, there seems to be some cyclonic rotation in the area of interest starting in the past few hours. Hmm.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#199 Postby HURAKAN » Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:33 pm

00z

AL, 93, 2010062200, , BEST, 0, 149N, 700W, 25, 1010, WV

wave reaches 70°W
0 likes   

User avatar
Aquawind
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6714
Age: 62
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 10:41 pm
Location: Salisbury, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#200 Postby Aquawind » Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:36 pm

Image

I missed this mornings ASCAT.. It does show some interesting barbs on the western edge.
0 likes   


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests