ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION DANNY (05L)

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Evil Jeremy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5463
Age: 32
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: ATL: Invest 92L

#261 Postby Evil Jeremy » Tue Aug 25, 2009 6:59 am

I don't think this should be a code red just yet. Anyways, I am watching this one closely from South Florida. It does not seem likely it will affect us right now, but things change.
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7182
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL: Invest 92L

#262 Postby jlauderdal » Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:00 am

ROCK wrote:must had a hiccup in the software....the red is gone now.... :D


the written word from the analysis at 8 is more important than the cheesy graphics
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7182
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL: Invest 92L

#263 Postby jlauderdal » Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:01 am

Evil Jeremy wrote:I don't think this should be a code red just yet. Anyways, I am watching this one closely from South Florida. It does not seem likely it will affect us right now, but things change.


why not code red, the code red criteria has been met according to their 8 am outlook
0 likes   

User avatar
Evil Jeremy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5463
Age: 32
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: ATL: Invest 92L

#264 Postby Evil Jeremy » Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:07 am

jlauderdal wrote:
Evil Jeremy wrote:I don't think this should be a code red just yet. Anyways, I am watching this one closely from South Florida. It does not seem likely it will affect us right now, but things change.


why not code red, the code red criteria has been met according to their 8 am outlook


Just my opinion, sure it is getting better organized but it does not look like a Red yet, but that is just me.
0 likes   

User avatar
Recurve
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1640
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 8:59 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

Re: ATL: Invest 92L

#265 Postby Recurve » Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:07 am

I'd make a wild guess that 20n 65w is where lowering pressure might be, if it were focusing.

In any case, what is the track prognosis with no development -- where would you expect the moisture/convection go if it stays a wave?
0 likes   

User avatar
RevDodd
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 184
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 10:40 am
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: Invest 92L

#266 Postby RevDodd » Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:11 am

Evil Jeremy wrote:
jlauderdal wrote:
Evil Jeremy wrote:I don't think this should be a code red just yet. Anyways, I am watching this one closely from South Florida. It does not seem likely it will affect us right now, but things change.


why not code red, the code red criteria has been met according to their 8 am outlook


Just my opinion, sure it is getting better organized but it does not look like a Red yet, but that is just me.


FWIW, it's back to Code Red on the Tropical Oulook page...
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#267 Postby KWT » Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:15 am

The thing to watch is when the ULL moves away the NE most convection should die down quite a lot as well and refocus closer to where any developing center may be. The NHC are watching the furtherest east convection whilst looking at the obs any circulation will be forming somewhat further west...however the area the NHC are watching does have decent convection over it so that could also need watching for development.

For now it seems like its just got one big broad circulation, where it pinpoints is going to be key for the eventual track.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: Invest 92L

#268 Postby wxman57 » Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:15 am

Nope, nothing at the surface yet but a weak wave axis. Surface obs don't lie:

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#269 Postby KWT » Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:17 am

Remember 200 miles really isn't that much away, think of what the cone of error would look like and it'd be close enough to the shore at this stage to at least warrent watching if nothing else.

Of course the main risk looking at the models has to be to the Carolinas and possibly places north of that if the recurve isn't sharp enough.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145295
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: Invest 92L

#270 Postby cycloneye » Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:18 am

57,the plane will tell the truth about what is there.
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#271 Postby Chacor » Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:19 am

WTNT01 KNGU 251201
SUBJ/TROPICAL CYCLONE FORMATION ALERT 251200Z AUG 09//
RMKS/
1. FORMATION OF A SIGNIFICANT TROPICAL CYCLONE IS POSSIBLE WITHIN
100 NM EITHER SIDE OF A LINE FROM 19.5N 58.0W TO 22.0N 64.6W
WITHIN THE NEXT 24 HOURS. AVAILABLE DATA DOES NOT JUSTIFY
ISSUANCE OF NUMBERED TROPICAL CYCLONE WARNINGS AT THIS TIME.
WINDS IN THE AREA ARE ESTIMATED TO BE 20 TO 25 KNOTS. METSAT IM-
AGERY AT 250900Z INDICATES THAT A CIRCULATION CENTER IS LOCATED
NEAR 19.5N 58.0W. THE SYSTEM IS MOVING WEST-NORTHWESTWARD AT 17
KNOTS.
2. REMARKS: THE UPPPER LEVEL TROUGH LOCATED NORTH OF PUERTO RICO
IS WEAKENING AS IT IS TRACKING NORTHWARD. WITH WARMER SEA
SURFACE TEMPERATURES AND THE TROUGH WEAKING, EXPECT POSSIBLE
DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE NEXT 24 HOURS.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#272 Postby HURAKAN » Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:20 am

Image

That's too fast!
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10145
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: Invest 92L

#273 Postby Blown Away » Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:23 am

:uarrow: The center relocated more NE?
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#274 Postby HURAKAN » Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:25 am

Image

Convection is popping everywhere, not really a good indication of a center.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145295
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: Invest 92L

#275 Postby cycloneye » Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:26 am

If I say where to focus it may be around 20N-61W.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: Invest 92L

#276 Postby ROCK » Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:27 am

wxman57 wrote:Nope, nothing at the surface yet but a weak wave axis. Surface obs don't lie:

Image



I dont think "X" marks the spot for the center on that plot. I would put it more NW up in the covection. IN the vis you can see low level clouds streaming into convection area from SW to NE. Makes me believe if something was trying to get down to the surface it would be in this area.....also to note there are no surface obs in that area that I can find.

Just my 2 cents
Last edited by ROCK on Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#277 Postby KWT » Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:28 am

Sounds like they think there is a possible developing center right on the SE side of the convection.

Lots of convection blowing up thanks to the interaction with the ULL, will be very interesting 24hrs I'd suspect. It just looks like a very odd system right now, then again systems that interact with a ULL usually don't look that impressive.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: Invest 92L

#278 Postby ROCK » Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:29 am

jlauderdal wrote:
ROCK wrote:must had a hiccup in the software....the red is gone now.... :D


the written word from the analysis at 8 is more important than the cheesy graphics



I dont know JL...I tend to enjoy cheesy graphics..... :D
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: Invest 92L

#279 Postby wxman57 » Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:31 am

cycloneye wrote:57,the plane will tell the truth about what is there.


The plane will help with the winds/temps aloft, but there are plenty of surface obs around the disturbance that don't lie. No LLC yet.
0 likes   

User avatar
srainhoutx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6919
Age: 67
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 11:34 am
Location: Haywood County, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: Invest 92L

#280 Postby srainhoutx » Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:32 am

wxman57 wrote:
cycloneye wrote:57,the plane will tell the truth about what is there.


The plane will help with the winds/temps aloft, but there are plenty of surface obs around the disturbance that don't lie. No LLC yet.


Check your pm's wxman57 :wink:
0 likes   


Return to “2009”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests