ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION DANNY (05L)

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#201 Postby CrazyC83 » Mon Aug 24, 2009 7:56 pm

20 kt? QuikSCAT seems to think it is more like 50-55 kt. It is still nowhere near being a tropical cyclone though.
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10145
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: Invest 92L

#202 Postby Blown Away » Mon Aug 24, 2009 7:59 pm

cycloneye wrote:00 UTC Best Track

AL, 92, 2009082500, , BEST, 0, 178N, 599W, 20, 1012, DB

ftp://ftp.tpc.ncep.noaa.gov/atcf/tcweb/ ... 009.invest


Starting to see slight cyclonic rotation near that area.
0 likes   

User avatar
weatherwindow
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 904
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 9:48 am
Location: key west/ft lauderdale

Re: Re:

#203 Postby weatherwindow » Mon Aug 24, 2009 7:59 pm

weatherwindow wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:have seen many TCs intensify very quickly when moving at 25KT.

the speed is not a problem at all if there is no shear

derek....given forward speed and proximity, what are the chances that cyclogenesis occurs further west than, say, 73degw or so , as could be implied by the 72hr tafb surface forcast??...any plausible chance of missing the trough and impacting the southern half of the penisula?.......rich

looking for an informed opinion here..can any promet answer this one?....thanks, rich
0 likes   

jinftl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: fort lauderdale, fl

Re: ATL: Invest 92L - Computer Models

#204 Postby jinftl » Mon Aug 24, 2009 8:03 pm

Current est of 17.8N and 59.9W already puts out south and west of all models in the map

cycloneye wrote:00 UTC Bam Models

SHIP continues to forecast hurricane intensity by 96 hours.


WHXX01 KWBC 250044
CHGHUR
TROPICAL CYCLONE GUIDANCE MESSAGE
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
0044 UTC TUE AUG 25 2009

DISCLAIMER...NUMERICAL MODELS ARE SUBJECT TO LARGE ERRORS.
PLEASE REFER TO NHC OFFICIAL FORECASTS FOR TROPICAL CYCLONE
AND SUBTROPICAL CYCLONE INFORMATION.

ATLANTIC OBJECTIVE AIDS FOR

DISTURBANCE INVEST (AL922009) 20090825 0000 UTC

...00 HRS... ...12 HRS... ...24 HRS. .. ...36 HRS...
090825 0000 090825 1200 090826 0000 090826 1200

LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON
BAMS 17.8N 59.9W 20.2N 63.6W 22.7N 66.2W 25.0N 68.6W
BAMD 17.8N 59.9W 19.8N 62.2W 21.9N 64.3W 23.8N 66.1W
BAMM 17.8N 59.9W 19.5N 62.8W 21.3N 65.2W 22.9N 67.1W
LBAR 17.8N 59.9W 19.6N 62.9W 21.4N 65.4W 23.0N 67.6W
SHIP 20KTS 24KTS 29KTS 36KTS
DSHP 20KTS 24KTS 29KTS 36KTS

...48 HRS... ...72 HRS... ...96 HRS. .. ..120 HRS...
090827 0000 090828 0000 090829 0000 090830 0000

LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON
BAMS 27.2N 70.4W 30.9N 72.3W 34.4N 71.8W 38.5N 66.8W
BAMD 25.3N 67.9W 27.6N 70.5W 30.1N 71.3W 34.2N 69.0W
BAMM 24.4N 68.9W 26.7N 71.7W 29.1N 72.6W 32.1N 71.5W
LBAR 24.4N 69.3W 26.2N 71.4W 27.8N 72.7W 29.8N 73.5W
SHIP 44KTS 56KTS 66KTS 72KTS
DSHP 44KTS 56KTS 66KTS 72KTS

...INITIAL CONDITIONS...
LATCUR = 17.8N LONCUR = 59.9W DIRCUR = 290DEG SPDCUR = 20KT
LATM12 = 16.5N LONM12 = 56.0W DIRM12 = 288DEG SPDM12 = 20KT
LATM24 = 15.2N LONM24 = 52.0W
WNDCUR = 20KT RMAXWD = 50NM WNDM12 = 20KT
CENPRS = 1012MB OUTPRS = 1013MB OUTRAD = 120NM SDEPTH = M
RD34NE = 0NM RD34SE = 0NM RD34SW = 0NM RD34NW = 0NM

Image
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#205 Postby Derek Ortt » Mon Aug 24, 2009 8:03 pm

dont think you'll see anything in the southern half of the peninsula
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10145
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: Invest 92L - Computer Models

#206 Postby Blown Away » Mon Aug 24, 2009 8:09 pm

Image

Image
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#207 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Aug 24, 2009 8:09 pm

I highly doubt we are going to see such a sharp recurve.. that trough off the east coast is very weak and the ridge pushing towards the east coast is quite strong... I expect the models to trend more west over the next few runs... considering the Euro is significantly farther west before any recurve..
0 likes   

Rainband

Re:

#208 Postby Rainband » Mon Aug 24, 2009 8:16 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:dont think you'll see anything in the southern half of the peninsula

or anywhere in Florida for that matter :D
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22977
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: Invest 92L - Computer Models

#209 Postby wxman57 » Mon Aug 24, 2009 8:22 pm

jinftl wrote:Current est of 17.8N and 59.9W already puts out south and west of all models in the map



I thought that, too, at first. But the map's latitude lines are drawn every 2 degrees. The starting point of all the models is 17.8N/59.9W. Of course, there's no center of anything there now. It's just a point picked to represent a "center". And the BAM models are probably way too slow in moving the disturbance. Only to 70W in 4 days? Should be past 75W by then.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#210 Postby gatorcane » Mon Aug 24, 2009 8:24 pm

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


These models are struggling with the Upper-level low in the vicinity. We have seen the models shown above (e.g like the BAMs) struggle with this type of setup time and time again. In addition the XTRAP (i.e. extrapolation of current movement) shows a more WNW movement, while all of the models shown above call for a more NW component now which clearly is not happening.

With that said, I expect models to shift more left over the coming days but show a recurve to be far enough east to miss Florida (I'm thinking about 150-200 miles or so east of Florida, similar to NAM/ECMWF). Development into Danny is a real possibility here still.
0 likes   

JTD
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1558
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2003 6:35 pm

Re: ATL: Invest 92L - Computer Models

#211 Postby JTD » Mon Aug 24, 2009 8:42 pm

I'm certainly not a forecaster at the National Hurricane Center and am an amateur at watching these things at best; however, I just checked the 0z early model guidance that was posted above and all I can say is wow. This is about a clear cut case of recurvature as I've seen. Also, look at the standard synoptic this season, signifcant east coast troughs constantly that serve to deflect systems away from the USEC.

Unless, something drastic changes and yes I realize that the models can change and that they have trouble handling something that isn't clearly defined, this seems to be a system that will cause trouble only to fish.

Also, I heard on multiple weather boards last week why the models were wrong and that Bill would be a threat to New England. It was not. When the models indicate recurvature like this the way that they did with Bill, I tend to believe them candidly.

Now if the models start hinting at something else, I'll gladly change my opinion. I prefer to go by best available data.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#212 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Aug 24, 2009 8:43 pm

Expect a track more west.. very similar to the UKMET .. as the ridge coming off the east coast is strong and most of the models are over estimating the strength of the weak trough near florida and the they are clearly not initializing the current overall motion as many have said and that is clearly noticeable.

http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~gadomski/UKTR ... kloop.html
0 likes   

User avatar
hurricanedude
Military Member
Military Member
Posts: 1856
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 9:54 am
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Contact:

Re: ATL: Invest 92L - Computer Models

#213 Postby hurricanedude » Mon Aug 24, 2009 8:47 pm

hate to bust your bubble tropics dude. but bill was a threat to NE...as the coast of Mass had TS conditions...and there were at least a half dozen deaths from rip currents in coastal maine alone....threats of a storm dont always just mean wind...effects from tropical systems have may varibles, so think before u speak!
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

Re: ATL: Invest 92L - Computer Models

#214 Postby Derek Ortt » Mon Aug 24, 2009 8:50 pm

Tropics_Dude83 wrote:I'm certainly not a forecaster at the National Hurricane Center and am an amateur at watching these things at best; however, I just checked the 0z early model guidance that was posted above and all I can say is wow. This is about a clear cut case of recurvature as I've seen. Also, look at the standard synoptic this season, signifcant east coast troughs constantly that serve to deflect systems away from the USEC.

Unless, something drastic changes and yes I realize that the models can change and that they have trouble handling something that isn't clearly defined, this seems to be a system that will cause trouble only to fish.

Also, I heard on multiple weather boards last week why the models were wrong and that Bill would be a threat to New England. It was not. When the models indicate recurvature like this the way that they did with Bill, I tend to believe them candidly.

Now if the models start hinting at something else, I'll gladly change my opinion. I prefer to go by best available data.


you'd be wrong

most dynamical models, except GFS and its slaves (GFDL/HWRF) have this hitting the U.S. East Coast
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10145
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: Invest 92L - Computer Models

#215 Postby Blown Away » Mon Aug 24, 2009 8:56 pm

The deep convection seems to be moving N and the wave is moving WNW at 25mph??
0 likes   

User avatar
hurricanedude
Military Member
Military Member
Posts: 1856
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 9:54 am
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Contact:

Re: ATL: Invest 92L - Computer Models

#216 Postby hurricanedude » Mon Aug 24, 2009 9:00 pm

its called shear....blowing the tops off to the north
0 likes   

The Eye Wall

Re: ATL: Invest 92L

#217 Postby The Eye Wall » Mon Aug 24, 2009 9:20 pm

From Adrian'sWeather.com--

The wind shear is eating 92L's lunch right now. Wow....

Image

Though, I'm not sure if this was there earlier, but there is a bit of convergence at the surface near the deeper convection. Grant it, I haven't paid too much attention lately.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
george_r_1961
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3171
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 9:14 pm
Location: Hampton, Virginia

#218 Postby george_r_1961 » Mon Aug 24, 2009 9:25 pm

I am watching this VERY closely. Could be an interesting weekend/early next week here. :eek:
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: Invest 92L

#219 Postby ROCK » Mon Aug 24, 2009 9:26 pm

it eating it lunch alright but it also is helping sustain the convection. Long enough I supposed to get a LLC out of it by tomorrow IMO.....

some nice warm water to work with as it gets closer to FL...

http://wxmaps.org/pix/hurpot.html#ATL
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10145
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: Invest 92L - Computer Models

#220 Postby Blown Away » Mon Aug 24, 2009 9:27 pm

hurricanedude wrote:its called shear....blowing the tops off to the north


Yeah I know, all the convection is on the N side of the approximate circulation center and this convection is being blown N while the circulation is moving WNW. I think we will see the forward speed slow some at the 2am update, because if 92L continues at 25 mph it appears all the convection will be left behind.
0 likes   


Return to “2009”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests