ATL: TROPICAL LOW ex-FRED (ex-07L)

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22977
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION SEVEN

#161 Postby wxman57 » Mon Sep 07, 2009 4:53 pm

My curiosity has been satisfied. I don't want to ever see another hurricane anywhere near the TX coast. A little rain might be nice, once every month or two. Right, irak?
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145277
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re:

#162 Postby cycloneye » Mon Sep 07, 2009 4:55 pm

caribepr wrote:I like fish. Even the ones that get away... 8-)


Same here.I like to track these kind of storms to see how they do in open sea.
0 likes   

O Town
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5205
Age: 52
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 9:37 pm
Location: Orlando, Florida 28°35'35"N 81°22'55"W

Re:

#163 Postby O Town » Mon Sep 07, 2009 5:25 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:consensus .??? the discussion speaks of such a thing that does not exist.. lol
this is probably one of the worst consensus of the models i have seen at least this season and over the last couple. lol


Except for Paloma maybe....... :lol:


Image
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#164 Postby brunota2003 » Mon Sep 07, 2009 5:32 pm

They are consistent...consistently inconsistent =]
0 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4822
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL : INVEST 96L

#165 Postby ronjon » Mon Sep 07, 2009 5:37 pm

jinftl wrote:No storm that fails to get west of 50W will crack that list below...there have been many storms with longer lifespans than ones on the list below. All comes down to "location location location" (i.e., storms threatening landfall, esp to areas with many posters on here). Erika is the furthest east of all the storms on that list. No way a storm recurving at 40W or east generates much interest overall....this is a system for the die-hards and for those interested in the life of a system in the middle of nowhere.


cycloneye wrote:
I imagine this thread will top 100 pages in a few days


Most number of pages in storm threads at Active Storms forum.

2009 gets one into the top ten,Erika.Will future Fred get to the list? It depends on how long it lasts.

1-Ike=676
2-Fay=671
3-Dean=583
4-Gustav=520
5-Dolly=422
6-Ivan=352
7-Wilma=282
8-Chris=265
9-Erika=223
10-Bertha=222


Wow, Katrina or Rita didn't make the top 10 and pitiful Erika did - man that's not right. :grr:
0 likes   

jinftl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: fort lauderdale, fl

Re:

#166 Postby jinftl » Mon Sep 07, 2009 5:38 pm

The bulk show a system heading north at the end of the period between 32W and 37W. The distance between those two points is well within the margin of error as you go out in time 5 days. Many times, we see two distinct camps of models with systems...one suggesting a recurve and one showing a system moving more west and not being influenced by a trough. I have to agree there is pretty good consensus of this being a fish and turning north at the end of the period...whether it is at 30W or 35W or 40W is within the margin of error this far out. All you have to do is run these models with the same system moving at 15 mph and then run the models with the system moving 12 mph, and that alone would produce the spread of results seen.

Oh, XTRP (black triangles) isn't a model.....it is the extrapolated current heading. I know I didn't need to state that. lol

Aric Dunn wrote:consensus .??? the discussion speaks of such a thing that does not exist.. lol
this is probably one of the worst consensus of the models i have seen at least this season and over the last couple. lol

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#167 Postby brunota2003 » Mon Sep 07, 2009 5:43 pm

There are way more members now than there was back in 2005
0 likes   

jinftl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: fort lauderdale, fl

Re: ATL : INVEST 96L

#168 Postby jinftl » Mon Sep 07, 2009 5:46 pm

A testament to the growth of this board!!!

ronjon wrote:
jinftl wrote:No storm that fails to get west of 50W will crack that list below...there have been many storms with longer lifespans than ones on the list below. All comes down to "location location location" (i.e., storms threatening landfall, esp to areas with many posters on here). Erika is the furthest east of all the storms on that list. No way a storm recurving at 40W or east generates much interest overall....this is a system for the die-hards and for those interested in the life of a system in the middle of nowhere.




Most number of pages in storm threads at Active Storms forum.

2009 gets one into the top ten,Erika.Will future Fred get to the list? It depends on how long it lasts.

1-Ike=676
2-Fay=671
3-Dean=583
4-Gustav=520
5-Dolly=422
6-Ivan=352
7-Wilma=282
8-Chris=265
9-Erika=223
10-Bertha=222


Wow, Katrina or Rita didn't make the top 10 and pitiful Erika did - man that's not right. :grr:[/quote]
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38087
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: ATL : INVEST 96L

#169 Postby Brent » Mon Sep 07, 2009 5:49 pm

ronjon wrote:Wow, Katrina or Rita didn't make the top 10 and pitiful Erika did - man that's not right. :grr:


Katrina and Rita was before we had just one thread for a storm, there were hundreds of individual threads for both storms if you go back in the archives.

But it is also true the board has grown by leaps and bounds since then.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#170 Postby CrazyC83 » Mon Sep 07, 2009 5:49 pm

Katrina and Rita were responsible for the explosive growth here in 2005-06...but back to TD7, I don't see much out of this, unless it stays south. Otherwise very early recurve, too early to be a fish.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145277
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION SEVEN - Computer Models

#171 Postby cycloneye » Mon Sep 07, 2009 5:50 pm

jimfti,what do you think of the 18z GFS that bends back west around 23N and then zigzags?

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... loop.shtml
0 likes   

jinftl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: fort lauderdale, fl

Re: ATL : INVEST 96L

#172 Postby jinftl » Mon Sep 07, 2009 5:51 pm

Good point....there used to be dozens of threads for each storm. Kudos to those folks who decided to consolidate threads for each storm.

Brent wrote:
ronjon wrote:Wow, Katrina or Rita didn't make the top 10 and pitiful Erika did - man that's not right. :grr:


Katrina and Rita was before we had just one thread for a storm, there were hundreds of individual threads for both storms if you go back in the archives.

But it is also true the board has grown by leaps and bounds since then.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145277
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION SEVEN

#173 Postby cycloneye » Mon Sep 07, 2009 5:56 pm

Katrina and Rita was before we had just one thread for a storm, there were hundreds of individual threads for both storms if you go back in the archives.


There you go.
0 likes   

jinftl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: fort lauderdale, fl

Re: ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION SEVEN - Computer Models

#174 Postby jinftl » Mon Sep 07, 2009 5:58 pm

As of now, an outlier with a sense of humor. There are two things I will look for to see if it is catching on to something....consistency over runs and other models jumping on board. Right now, this seems a pretty straightforward forecast....if one trough doesn't get it, the next one will. All east of the islands thankfully.

cycloneye wrote:jimfti,what do you think of the 18z GFS that bends back west around 23N and then zigzags?

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... loop.shtml
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#175 Postby HURAKAN » Mon Sep 07, 2009 5:59 pm

Image

Fred at 11? Stay tuned!! Looking great
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145277
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION SEVEN

#176 Postby cycloneye » Mon Sep 07, 2009 6:01 pm

:uarrow: Is it my eyes but I see it a tad more south than earlier today.CV islands are not getting the real bad weather as expected.
0 likes   

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 29112
Age: 73
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Cypress, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION SEVEN

#177 Postby vbhoutex » Mon Sep 07, 2009 6:01 pm

wxman57 wrote:My curiosity has been satisfied. I don't want to ever see another hurricane anywhere near the TX coast. A little rain might be nice, once every month or two. Right, irak?

My curiosity was satisfied man, many, years ago. Alicia was almost like icing on the cake to the others I had gone through and I sure as hell don't want to go through another Alicia or Ike thank you, much less a hurricane stronger than that unless I am in a position that I will absolutely safe watching it and in a position where no one else will suffer from the fury of the storm(can we say impossible dreams?).

TD7 looks to become a hurricane before it is all over but the current and predicted weather patterns ahead of this TC all but assure us that we will have a fish storm.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#178 Postby HURAKAN » Mon Sep 07, 2009 6:03 pm

There is something fishy about what looks to be Fred sooner than later. Stay tuned to get more about this fishy subject.
0 likes   

leanne_uk
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 214
Age: 42
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:38 pm
Location: Loughborough countryside, Leicestershire, UK

#179 Postby leanne_uk » Mon Sep 07, 2009 6:04 pm

looking very impressive indeed. Just hope it doesnt curve as early as predicted and we get to see some more from this :)
0 likes   

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 29112
Age: 73
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Cypress, TX
Contact:

Re:

#180 Postby vbhoutex » Mon Sep 07, 2009 6:05 pm

Gustywind wrote::D :) Looks like a fish given the first models tracks...so very good news for us in the islands. Hope this fishy trend will continue during the next couple of days, whereas as usual we could keep a small eye on TD 7 or maybe Fred?! ( tonight. :?: ).

That is also good news for those of us in the CONUS. :D
0 likes   


Return to “2009”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest