ATL IKE: Models Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 2718
- Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
- Location: Beaumont, TX
Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion
Rita, mandatory was issued for Jefferson & Orange Counties that Thursday morning @ 6 a.m.
0 likes
-
- Military Met
- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
Re: Re:
Stormcenter wrote:smw1981 wrote:The way everything has been shifting, I really, really hope the people in Louisiana are prepared...just in case. Not because I think it will go there, but because I think that is a possibility and it would be horrible if Ike came knocking at their door and they weren't prepared.
Except for SW La. the remainder of the LA. coast is not in the NHC's cone.
I'm sure if they thought there was a significant danger they would have put the entire
coastline under the cone and a Hurricane Watch. IMO
Again...the cone does not change. It does not depend on the model spread...or how much they think they have a track nailed. It is 2/3rds the average error for each point.
The only way to move the CONE is to move the TRACK. Unless you suggest placing the track over SE TX...Jefferson County...there is no way to get the cone over there.
I will harp on this until everyone understands it...or I die. Stop this misguided notion that the NHC arbitrarily changes the cone to fit the circumstances.
0 likes
- Starburst
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 484
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 11:03 pm
- Location: Beeville, TX
- Contact:
Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion
Dr. Masters said in his on air question session tonight that the NOAA Jet was sampling the gulf at that very moment and a wee bit of the data would be in the 2am model runs and all of it would be in the next run. That he said should nail down the track.
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 6683
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
- Location: Houston, TX
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 12:50 am
- Location: Centralia, Washington
- Contact:
Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion
WHXX04 KWBC 102333
CHGQLM
ATTENTION...NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER
NCEP COUPLED GFDL HURRICANE MODEL FORECAST MADE FOR
HURRICANE IKE 09L
INITIAL TIME 18Z SEP 10
DISCLAIMER ... THIS INFORMATION IS PROVIDED AS GUIDANCE. IT
REQUIRES INTERPRETATION BY HURRICANE SPECIALISTS AND SHOULD
NOT BE CONSIDERED AS A FINAL PRODUCT. PLEASE SEE THE TPC/NHC
OFFICIAL FORECAST.
FORECAST STORM POSITION
HOUR LATITUDE LONGITUDE HEADING/SPEED(KT)
0 24.2 85.8 310./ 7.0
6 24.5 86.5 292./ 6.9
12 24.8 87.2 296./ 7.5
18 25.3 88.0 302./ 8.4
24 25.7 89.0 293./ 9.9
30 26.0 89.9 287./ 8.6
36 26.4 91.2 288./12.6
42 26.9 92.2 298./ 9.9
48 27.7 93.3 304./12.6
54 28.5 94.3 309./11.7
60 29.4 95.2 313./12.2
66 30.5 96.0 326./13.5
72 31.8 96.2 351./12.5
78 33.5 95.8 12./17.2
84 35.6 94.8 25./23.2
90 37.8 92.5 46./28.6
96 40.0 88.9 59./35.3
102 41.9 84.3 67./39.5
108 44.0 79.4 68./41.3
114 46.1 73.7 69./45.8
120 48.7 68.2 65./45.4
126 50.2 63.9 71./31.8
CHGQLM
ATTENTION...NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER
NCEP COUPLED GFDL HURRICANE MODEL FORECAST MADE FOR
HURRICANE IKE 09L
INITIAL TIME 18Z SEP 10
DISCLAIMER ... THIS INFORMATION IS PROVIDED AS GUIDANCE. IT
REQUIRES INTERPRETATION BY HURRICANE SPECIALISTS AND SHOULD
NOT BE CONSIDERED AS A FINAL PRODUCT. PLEASE SEE THE TPC/NHC
OFFICIAL FORECAST.
FORECAST STORM POSITION
HOUR LATITUDE LONGITUDE HEADING/SPEED(KT)
0 24.2 85.8 310./ 7.0
6 24.5 86.5 292./ 6.9
12 24.8 87.2 296./ 7.5
18 25.3 88.0 302./ 8.4
24 25.7 89.0 293./ 9.9
30 26.0 89.9 287./ 8.6
36 26.4 91.2 288./12.6
42 26.9 92.2 298./ 9.9
48 27.7 93.3 304./12.6
54 28.5 94.3 309./11.7
60 29.4 95.2 313./12.2
66 30.5 96.0 326./13.5
72 31.8 96.2 351./12.5
78 33.5 95.8 12./17.2
84 35.6 94.8 25./23.2
90 37.8 92.5 46./28.6
96 40.0 88.9 59./35.3
102 41.9 84.3 67./39.5
108 44.0 79.4 68./41.3
114 46.1 73.7 69./45.8
120 48.7 68.2 65./45.4
126 50.2 63.9 71./31.8
0 likes
Re:
Stormcenter wrote:I guess this is the latest GFDL run.
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/gfdltc2. ... =Animation
thats Lowell....

0 likes
- PTrackerLA
- Category 5
- Posts: 5277
- Age: 41
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
- Location: Lafayette, LA
- HouTXmetro
- Category 5
- Posts: 3949
- Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
- Location: District of Columbia, USA
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 6683
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
- Location: Houston, TX
Re: Re:
Air Force Met wrote:Stormcenter wrote:smw1981 wrote:The way everything has been shifting, I really, really hope the people in Louisiana are prepared...just in case. Not because I think it will go there, but because I think that is a possibility and it would be horrible if Ike came knocking at their door and they weren't prepared.
Except for SW La. the remainder of the LA. coast is not in the NHC's cone.
I'm sure if they thought there was a significant danger they would have put the entire
coastline under the cone and a Hurricane Watch. IMO
Again...the cone does not change. It does not depend on the model spread...or how much they think they have a track nailed. It is 2/3rds the average error for each point.
The only way to move the CONE is to move the TRACK. Unless you suggest placing the track over SE TX...Jefferson County...there is no way to get the cone over there.
I will harp on this until everyone understands it...or I die. Stop this misguided notion that the NHC arbitrarily changes the cone to fit the circumstances.
Please don't die...I would hate to think I had something to do with that. All kidding aside this has got to be one of the most stressful nights since Rita.
0 likes
- thetruesms
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 844
- Age: 41
- Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:14 pm
- Location: Tallahasee, FL
- Contact:
Re: Re:
First thing I've learned to do when a spaghetti plot gets posted up is to check the timestamps on the top of the image. There's a lot of 18Z runs in there.HouTXmetro wrote:Extremeweatherguy wrote:
Most recent?
0 likes
-
- Military Met
- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
Re:
HouTXmetro wrote:you can see the GFDL too on that run, no change?
Nope...No change. Still just west of San Luis Pass.
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 6683
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
- Location: Houston, TX
Re:
HouTXmetro wrote:you can see the GFDL too on that run, no change?
My mistake...yes I agree. i don't see much change.
Last edited by Stormcenter on Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
Re: Re:
Air Force Met wrote:Stormcenter wrote:smw1981 wrote:The way everything has been shifting, I really, really hope the people in Louisiana are prepared...just in case. Not because I think it will go there, but because I think that is a possibility and it would be horrible if Ike came knocking at their door and they weren't prepared.
Except for SW La. the remainder of the LA. coast is not in the NHC's cone.
I'm sure if they thought there was a significant danger they would have put the entire
coastline under the cone and a Hurricane Watch. IMO
Again...the cone does not change. It does not depend on the model spread...or how much they think they have a track nailed. It is 2/3rds the average error for each point.
The only way to move the CONE is to move the TRACK. Unless you suggest placing the track over SE TX...Jefferson County...there is no way to get the cone over there.
I will harp on this until everyone understands it...or I die. Stop this misguided notion that the NHC arbitrarily changes the cone to fit the circumstances.
Hey AFM..Not sure if you were talking to me or not, but I was saying that for the SWLA coast that is in the cone right now (according to the graphic at the top of this page!). I have had on TWC all night and they keep saying "Texas better be prepared", more and more of the same, but no talk whatsoever about SWLA should also be prepared. So my point was that if Ike was to track on the right side of the cone, I really hope those people in SW LA are prepared. (I think I probably should have noted all of this in my first post to reduce the confusion...sorry about that!)
PS - I understand the whole track/cone thing because of your explaination the other day (Sunday or Monday maybe?). I didn't really grasp it before that so thanks for that one too lol...
Last edited by smw1981 on Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
-
- Military Met
- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
Re: Re:
smw1981 wrote:
Hey AFM..Not sure if you were talking to me or not, but I was saying that for the SWLA coast that is in the cone right now (according to the graphic at the top of this page!). I have had on TWC all night and they keep saying "Texas better be prepared", more and more of the same, but no talk whatsoever about SWLA should also be prepared. So my point was that if Ike was to track on the right side of the cone, I really hope those people in SW LA are prepared. (I think I probably should have noted all of this in my first post to reduce the confusion...sorry about that!)
Nope...was speaking to the other poster. Pretty sure they have seen numeroud pro-met rants from me and others about the nature of the cone.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 2718
- Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
- Location: Beaumont, TX
- Extremeweatherguy
- Category 5
- Posts: 11095
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
- Location: Florida
00z GFDL very similar at landfall..perhaps a hair further south and west.
Last edited by Extremeweatherguy on Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion
jimguru wrote:WHXX04 KWBC 102333
CHGQLM
ATTENTION...NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER
NCEP COUPLED GFDL HURRICANE MODEL FORECAST MADE FOR
HURRICANE IKE 09L
INITIAL TIME 18Z SEP 10
DISCLAIMER ... THIS INFORMATION IS PROVIDED AS GUIDANCE. IT
REQUIRES INTERPRETATION BY HURRICANE SPECIALISTS AND SHOULD
NOT BE CONSIDERED AS A FINAL PRODUCT. PLEASE SEE THE TPC/NHC
OFFICIAL FORECAST.
FORECAST STORM POSITION
HOUR LATITUDE LONGITUDE HEADING/SPEED(KT)
0 24.2 85.8 310./ 7.0
6 24.5 86.5 292./ 6.9
12 24.8 87.2 296./ 7.5
18 25.3 88.0 302./ 8.4
24 25.7 89.0 293./ 9.9
30 26.0 89.9 287./ 8.6
36 26.4 91.2 288./12.6
42 26.9 92.2 298./ 9.9
48 27.7 93.3 304./12.6
54 28.5 94.3 309./11.7
60 29.4 95.2 313./12.2
66 30.5 96.0 326./13.5
72 31.8 96.2 351./12.5
78 33.5 95.8 12./17.2
84 35.6 94.8 25./23.2
90 37.8 92.5 46./28.6
96 40.0 88.9 59./35.3
102 41.9 84.3 67./39.5
108 44.0 79.4 68./41.3
114 46.1 73.7 69./45.8
120 48.7 68.2 65./45.4
126 50.2 63.9 71./31.8
Thats 18Z, where is 00Z?
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 12:50 am
- Location: Centralia, Washington
- Contact:
Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion
Viper54r wrote:jimguru wrote:WHXX04 KWBC 102333
CHGQLM
ATTENTION...NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER
NCEP COUPLED GFDL HURRICANE MODEL FORECAST MADE FOR
HURRICANE IKE 09L
INITIAL TIME 18Z SEP 10
DISCLAIMER ... THIS INFORMATION IS PROVIDED AS GUIDANCE. IT
REQUIRES INTERPRETATION BY HURRICANE SPECIALISTS AND SHOULD
NOT BE CONSIDERED AS A FINAL PRODUCT. PLEASE SEE THE TPC/NHC
OFFICIAL FORECAST.
FORECAST STORM POSITION
HOUR LATITUDE LONGITUDE HEADING/SPEED(KT)
0 24.2 85.8 310./ 7.0
6 24.5 86.5 292./ 6.9
12 24.8 87.2 296./ 7.5
18 25.3 88.0 302./ 8.4
24 25.7 89.0 293./ 9.9
30 26.0 89.9 287./ 8.6
36 26.4 91.2 288./12.6
42 26.9 92.2 298./ 9.9
48 27.7 93.3 304./12.6
54 28.5 94.3 309./11.7
60 29.4 95.2 313./12.2
66 30.5 96.0 326./13.5
72 31.8 96.2 351./12.5
78 33.5 95.8 12./17.2
84 35.6 94.8 25./23.2
90 37.8 92.5 46./28.6
96 40.0 88.9 59./35.3
102 41.9 84.3 67./39.5
108 44.0 79.4 68./41.3
114 46.1 73.7 69./45.8
120 48.7 68.2 65./45.4
126 50.2 63.9 71./31.8
Thats 18Z, where is 00Z?
DOH!!! Let me see what I can find - SORRY ALL
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 12:50 am
- Location: Centralia, Washington
- Contact:
Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion
SORRY FOR THE BAD POST.. HERE IS THE LATEST
Code: Select all
WHXX04 KWBC 110530
CHGQLM
ATTENTION...NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER
NCEP COUPLED GFDL HURRICANE MODEL FORECAST MADE FOR
HURRICANE IKE 09L
INITIAL TIME 0Z SEP 11
DISCLAIMER ... THIS INFORMATION IS PROVIDED AS GUIDANCE. IT
REQUIRES INTERPRETATION BY HURRICANE SPECIALISTS AND SHOULD
NOT BE CONSIDERED AS A FINAL PRODUCT. PLEASE SEE THE TPC/NHC
OFFICIAL FORECAST.
FORECAST STORM POSITION
HOUR LATITUDE LONGITUDE HEADING/SPEED(KT)
0 24.7 86.3 315./ 6.0
6 24.9 87.1 286./ 7.8
12 25.2 88.0 291./ 8.3
18 25.5 88.8 284./ 7.9
24 25.7 89.8 286./ 9.3
30 26.0 90.9 285./10.7
36 26.6 92.0 299./11.2
42 27.3 93.3 297./12.9
48 28.1 94.2 310./11.4
54 28.9 95.2 311./12.3
60 30.1 96.0 326./13.3
66 31.4 96.5 340./13.3
72 32.9 96.3 7./15.2
78 34.5 95.6 23./17.7
84 36.5 93.9 40./23.4
90 38.2 91.1 59./28.6
96 39.4 87.5 71./30.0
102 40.6 83.4 74./33.9
108 41.5 78.9 79./35.0
114 42.6 73.6 78./40.9
120 43.6 68.7 78./37.0
126 44.9 63.9 75./37.0
Last edited by jimguru on Thu Sep 11, 2008 1:20 am, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests