ATL IKE: Models Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#4001 Postby Wx_Warrior » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:29 am

Rita, mandatory was issued for Jefferson & Orange Counties that Thursday morning @ 6 a.m.
0 likes   

txag2005
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 229
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 1:16 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#4002 Postby txag2005 » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:30 am

Any idea when the new GFDL will come out?
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: Re:

#4003 Postby Air Force Met » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:31 am

Stormcenter wrote:
smw1981 wrote:The way everything has been shifting, I really, really hope the people in Louisiana are prepared...just in case. Not because I think it will go there, but because I think that is a possibility and it would be horrible if Ike came knocking at their door and they weren't prepared.



Except for SW La. the remainder of the LA. coast is not in the NHC's cone.
I'm sure if they thought there was a significant danger they would have put the entire
coastline under the cone and a Hurricane Watch. IMO


Again...the cone does not change. It does not depend on the model spread...or how much they think they have a track nailed. It is 2/3rds the average error for each point.

The only way to move the CONE is to move the TRACK. Unless you suggest placing the track over SE TX...Jefferson County...there is no way to get the cone over there.

I will harp on this until everyone understands it...or I die. Stop this misguided notion that the NHC arbitrarily changes the cone to fit the circumstances.
0 likes   

User avatar
Starburst
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 484
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 11:03 pm
Location: Beeville, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#4004 Postby Starburst » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:32 am

Dr. Masters said in his on air question session tonight that the NOAA Jet was sampling the gulf at that very moment and a wee bit of the data would be in the 2am model runs and all of it would be in the next run. That he said should nail down the track.
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6683
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

#4005 Postby Stormcenter » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:34 am

I guess this is the latest GFDL run.

http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/gfdltc2. ... =Animation
0 likes   

jimguru
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 50
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 12:50 am
Location: Centralia, Washington
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#4006 Postby jimguru » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:35 am

WHXX04 KWBC 102333
CHGQLM
ATTENTION...NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER
NCEP COUPLED GFDL HURRICANE MODEL FORECAST MADE FOR
HURRICANE IKE 09L
INITIAL TIME 18Z SEP 10
DISCLAIMER ... THIS INFORMATION IS PROVIDED AS GUIDANCE. IT
REQUIRES INTERPRETATION BY HURRICANE SPECIALISTS AND SHOULD
NOT BE CONSIDERED AS A FINAL PRODUCT. PLEASE SEE THE TPC/NHC
OFFICIAL FORECAST.
FORECAST STORM POSITION
HOUR LATITUDE LONGITUDE HEADING/SPEED(KT)
0 24.2 85.8 310./ 7.0
6 24.5 86.5 292./ 6.9
12 24.8 87.2 296./ 7.5
18 25.3 88.0 302./ 8.4
24 25.7 89.0 293./ 9.9
30 26.0 89.9 287./ 8.6
36 26.4 91.2 288./12.6
42 26.9 92.2 298./ 9.9
48 27.7 93.3 304./12.6
54 28.5 94.3 309./11.7
60 29.4 95.2 313./12.2
66 30.5 96.0 326./13.5
72 31.8 96.2 351./12.5
78 33.5 95.8 12./17.2
84 35.6 94.8 25./23.2
90 37.8 92.5 46./28.6
96 40.0 88.9 59./35.3
102 41.9 84.3 67./39.5
108 44.0 79.4 68./41.3
114 46.1 73.7 69./45.8
120 48.7 68.2 65./45.4
126 50.2 63.9 71./31.8
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re:

#4007 Postby ROCK » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:35 am

Stormcenter wrote:I guess this is the latest GFDL run.

http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/gfdltc2. ... =Animation




thats Lowell.... :wink:
0 likes   

User avatar
PTrackerLA
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5277
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
Location: Lafayette, LA

#4008 Postby PTrackerLA » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:37 am

That was run for Lowell, while one would think it should be the same, multiple times this year did the model runs for (storm a) but actually showed storm b was alot different than the specific model output for storm b. Make sense?
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

#4009 Postby HouTXmetro » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:37 am

you can see the GFDL too on that run, no change?
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6683
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Re:

#4010 Postby Stormcenter » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:38 am

Air Force Met wrote:
Stormcenter wrote:
smw1981 wrote:The way everything has been shifting, I really, really hope the people in Louisiana are prepared...just in case. Not because I think it will go there, but because I think that is a possibility and it would be horrible if Ike came knocking at their door and they weren't prepared.



Except for SW La. the remainder of the LA. coast is not in the NHC's cone.
I'm sure if they thought there was a significant danger they would have put the entire
coastline under the cone and a Hurricane Watch. IMO


Again...the cone does not change. It does not depend on the model spread...or how much they think they have a track nailed. It is 2/3rds the average error for each point.

The only way to move the CONE is to move the TRACK. Unless you suggest placing the track over SE TX...Jefferson County...there is no way to get the cone over there.

I will harp on this until everyone understands it...or I die. Stop this misguided notion that the NHC arbitrarily changes the cone to fit the circumstances.


Please don't die...I would hate to think I had something to do with that. All kidding aside this has got to be one of the most stressful nights since Rita.
0 likes   

User avatar
thetruesms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 844
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:14 pm
Location: Tallahasee, FL
Contact:

Re: Re:

#4011 Postby thetruesms » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:39 am

HouTXmetro wrote:
Extremeweatherguy wrote:Image


Most recent?
First thing I've learned to do when a spaghetti plot gets posted up is to check the timestamps on the top of the image. There's a lot of 18Z runs in there.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re:

#4012 Postby Air Force Met » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:39 am

HouTXmetro wrote:you can see the GFDL too on that run, no change?


Nope...No change. Still just west of San Luis Pass.
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6683
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re:

#4013 Postby Stormcenter » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:40 am

HouTXmetro wrote:you can see the GFDL too on that run, no change?



My mistake...yes I agree. i don't see much change.
Last edited by Stormcenter on Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

smw1981
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 253
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 9:04 pm
Location: Alabamer

Re: Re:

#4014 Postby smw1981 » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:41 am

Air Force Met wrote:
Stormcenter wrote:
smw1981 wrote:The way everything has been shifting, I really, really hope the people in Louisiana are prepared...just in case. Not because I think it will go there, but because I think that is a possibility and it would be horrible if Ike came knocking at their door and they weren't prepared.



Except for SW La. the remainder of the LA. coast is not in the NHC's cone.
I'm sure if they thought there was a significant danger they would have put the entire
coastline under the cone and a Hurricane Watch. IMO


Again...the cone does not change. It does not depend on the model spread...or how much they think they have a track nailed. It is 2/3rds the average error for each point.

The only way to move the CONE is to move the TRACK. Unless you suggest placing the track over SE TX...Jefferson County...there is no way to get the cone over there.

I will harp on this until everyone understands it...or I die. Stop this misguided notion that the NHC arbitrarily changes the cone to fit the circumstances.


Hey AFM..Not sure if you were talking to me or not, but I was saying that for the SWLA coast that is in the cone right now (according to the graphic at the top of this page!). I have had on TWC all night and they keep saying "Texas better be prepared", more and more of the same, but no talk whatsoever about SWLA should also be prepared. So my point was that if Ike was to track on the right side of the cone, I really hope those people in SW LA are prepared. (I think I probably should have noted all of this in my first post to reduce the confusion...sorry about that!)

PS - I understand the whole track/cone thing because of your explaination the other day (Sunday or Monday maybe?). I didn't really grasp it before that so thanks for that one too lol...
Last edited by smw1981 on Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: Re:

#4015 Postby Air Force Met » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:43 am

smw1981 wrote:
Hey AFM..Not sure if you were talking to me or not, but I was saying that for the SWLA coast that is in the cone right now (according to the graphic at the top of this page!). I have had on TWC all night and they keep saying "Texas better be prepared", more and more of the same, but no talk whatsoever about SWLA should also be prepared. So my point was that if Ike was to track on the right side of the cone, I really hope those people in SW LA are prepared. (I think I probably should have noted all of this in my first post to reduce the confusion...sorry about that!)


Nope...was speaking to the other poster. Pretty sure they have seen numeroud pro-met rants from me and others about the nature of the cone.
0 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#4016 Postby Wx_Warrior » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:43 am

After this run, when are the next HWRF/GFDL runs????
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#4017 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:43 am

00z GFDL very similar at landfall..perhaps a hair further south and west.
Last edited by Extremeweatherguy on Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Viper54r
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:08 am

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#4018 Postby Viper54r » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:49 am

jimguru wrote:WHXX04 KWBC 102333
CHGQLM
ATTENTION...NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER
NCEP COUPLED GFDL HURRICANE MODEL FORECAST MADE FOR
HURRICANE IKE 09L
INITIAL TIME 18Z SEP 10
DISCLAIMER ... THIS INFORMATION IS PROVIDED AS GUIDANCE. IT
REQUIRES INTERPRETATION BY HURRICANE SPECIALISTS AND SHOULD
NOT BE CONSIDERED AS A FINAL PRODUCT. PLEASE SEE THE TPC/NHC
OFFICIAL FORECAST.
FORECAST STORM POSITION
HOUR LATITUDE LONGITUDE HEADING/SPEED(KT)
0 24.2 85.8 310./ 7.0
6 24.5 86.5 292./ 6.9
12 24.8 87.2 296./ 7.5
18 25.3 88.0 302./ 8.4
24 25.7 89.0 293./ 9.9
30 26.0 89.9 287./ 8.6
36 26.4 91.2 288./12.6
42 26.9 92.2 298./ 9.9
48 27.7 93.3 304./12.6
54 28.5 94.3 309./11.7
60 29.4 95.2 313./12.2
66 30.5 96.0 326./13.5
72 31.8 96.2 351./12.5
78 33.5 95.8 12./17.2
84 35.6 94.8 25./23.2
90 37.8 92.5 46./28.6
96 40.0 88.9 59./35.3
102 41.9 84.3 67./39.5
108 44.0 79.4 68./41.3
114 46.1 73.7 69./45.8
120 48.7 68.2 65./45.4
126 50.2 63.9 71./31.8

Thats 18Z, where is 00Z?
0 likes   

jimguru
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 50
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 12:50 am
Location: Centralia, Washington
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#4019 Postby jimguru » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:51 am

Viper54r wrote:
jimguru wrote:WHXX04 KWBC 102333
CHGQLM
ATTENTION...NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER
NCEP COUPLED GFDL HURRICANE MODEL FORECAST MADE FOR
HURRICANE IKE 09L
INITIAL TIME 18Z SEP 10
DISCLAIMER ... THIS INFORMATION IS PROVIDED AS GUIDANCE. IT
REQUIRES INTERPRETATION BY HURRICANE SPECIALISTS AND SHOULD
NOT BE CONSIDERED AS A FINAL PRODUCT. PLEASE SEE THE TPC/NHC
OFFICIAL FORECAST.
FORECAST STORM POSITION
HOUR LATITUDE LONGITUDE HEADING/SPEED(KT)
0 24.2 85.8 310./ 7.0
6 24.5 86.5 292./ 6.9
12 24.8 87.2 296./ 7.5
18 25.3 88.0 302./ 8.4
24 25.7 89.0 293./ 9.9
30 26.0 89.9 287./ 8.6
36 26.4 91.2 288./12.6
42 26.9 92.2 298./ 9.9
48 27.7 93.3 304./12.6
54 28.5 94.3 309./11.7
60 29.4 95.2 313./12.2
66 30.5 96.0 326./13.5
72 31.8 96.2 351./12.5
78 33.5 95.8 12./17.2
84 35.6 94.8 25./23.2
90 37.8 92.5 46./28.6
96 40.0 88.9 59./35.3
102 41.9 84.3 67./39.5
108 44.0 79.4 68./41.3
114 46.1 73.7 69./45.8
120 48.7 68.2 65./45.4
126 50.2 63.9 71./31.8

Thats 18Z, where is 00Z?



DOH!!! Let me see what I can find - SORRY ALL
0 likes   

jimguru
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 50
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 12:50 am
Location: Centralia, Washington
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#4020 Postby jimguru » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:52 am

SORRY FOR THE BAD POST.. HERE IS THE LATEST



Code: Select all

WHXX04 KWBC 110530
CHGQLM
ATTENTION...NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER
NCEP COUPLED GFDL HURRICANE MODEL FORECAST MADE FOR
HURRICANE IKE       09L
INITIAL TIME   0Z SEP 11
DISCLAIMER ...  THIS INFORMATION IS PROVIDED AS GUIDANCE.  IT
REQUIRES INTERPRETATION BY HURRICANE SPECIALISTS AND SHOULD
NOT BE CONSIDERED AS A FINAL PRODUCT.  PLEASE SEE THE TPC/NHC
OFFICIAL FORECAST.
FORECAST STORM POSITION
HOUR        LATITUDE        LONGITUDE        HEADING/SPEED(KT)
   0            24.7             86.3           315./ 6.0
   6            24.9             87.1           286./ 7.8
  12            25.2             88.0           291./ 8.3
  18            25.5             88.8           284./ 7.9
  24            25.7             89.8           286./ 9.3
  30            26.0             90.9           285./10.7
  36            26.6             92.0           299./11.2
  42            27.3             93.3           297./12.9
  48            28.1             94.2           310./11.4
  54            28.9             95.2           311./12.3
  60            30.1             96.0           326./13.3
  66            31.4             96.5           340./13.3
  72            32.9             96.3             7./15.2
  78            34.5             95.6            23./17.7
  84            36.5             93.9            40./23.4
  90            38.2             91.1            59./28.6
  96            39.4             87.5            71./30.0
 102            40.6             83.4            74./33.9
 108            41.5             78.9            79./35.0
 114            42.6             73.6            78./40.9
 120            43.6             68.7            78./37.0
 126            44.9             63.9            75./37.0
Last edited by jimguru on Thu Sep 11, 2008 1:20 am, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests