ATL: Tropical Storm Bertha RECON Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Matt-hurricanewatcher
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11649
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Portland,OR
Contact:

Re: ATL: Hurricane Bertha RECON Discussion

#41 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Fri Jul 11, 2008 11:42 am

I've got a question, if the plane has a big problem in the pilot has only a short enough time to make a landing in Bermuda. Could they land in Bermuda, or is the airport not able to land a recon plane?
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: Hurricane Bertha RECON Discussion

#42 Postby RL3AO » Fri Jul 11, 2008 11:44 am

Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:I've got a question, if the plane has a big problem in the pilot has only a short enough time to make a landing in Bermuda. Could they land in Bermuda, or is the airport not able to land a recon plane?


They could land in Bermuda (aka long enough runway). They would rather make it back to the states. But Bermuda is better than the ocean.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#43 Postby HURAKAN » Fri Jul 11, 2008 11:45 am

I think in the situation of an emergency they will be able to land in Bermuda. Bermuda is part of England's commonwealth, if I'm correct, and I don't think there will be a problem b/w the US and the UK.
0 likes   

User avatar
hiflyer
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 556
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 11:24 am
Location: West Broward Florida

Re: ATL: Hurricane Bertha RECON Discussion

#44 Postby hiflyer » Fri Jul 11, 2008 11:47 am

short answer...very much yes. Long answer...the airport handles up to 747's without a problem...a C130 is no issue. As regards to being military BDA is used by many nations as a fuel stop when transporting their aircraft from the US to Europe/Middle East
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#45 Postby Chacor » Fri Jul 11, 2008 11:50 am

As HURAKAN alluded to, Bermuda is not an independent, sovereign nation, but rather, is under British rule, so I doubt there would be an issue politically. And I'm sure the airport is more than capable of taking the plane in any emergency.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31391
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#46 Postby KWT » Fri Jul 11, 2008 11:51 am

Already got winds that justify TS strength, highest FL so far 49kts:

164430 2937N 06310W 6965 03187 0125 +064 +050 044049 049 040 000 00
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33399
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#47 Postby CrazyC83 » Fri Jul 11, 2008 11:58 am

68 kt FL, 56 kt SFMR found.

Those support 60 kt and we are way outside the eye.
Last edited by CrazyC83 on Fri Jul 11, 2008 11:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#48 Postby Chacor » Fri Jul 11, 2008 11:59 am

That itself is not surprising, Crazy. 64-kt winds only extend out up to 25 nm in the NE quad.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#49 Postby HURAKAN » Fri Jul 11, 2008 11:59 am

:uarrow: That's also the NW quadrant. The strongest winds are usually found in the NE Quadrant.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31391
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#50 Postby KWT » Fri Jul 11, 2008 12:01 pm

Yep the estimates indeed support 60kts and we haven't sampled the stornger sections, indeed the NW side is easily the weaker of the two northern quadrants though given its slow foward speed I'd imagine most of the quadrants are of similar strength, maybe bar the NE quad which may be a little stronger.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#51 Postby HURAKAN » Fri Jul 11, 2008 12:03 pm

Image

Furthermore, the RECON plane is inside the weakest convection.
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#52 Postby Chacor » Fri Jul 11, 2008 12:07 pm

Peak SFMR of 72 kts.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33399
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#53 Postby CrazyC83 » Fri Jul 11, 2008 12:07 pm

Yep and 80 kt FL supports 70 kt as well. Pressure 985mb and falling.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31391
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#54 Postby KWT » Fri Jul 11, 2008 12:12 pm

Yep went through the NW eyewall and we've found winds to support 70kts, therefore seems highly likely we will find 75kts winds in the NE quadrant I should imagine. Interestingly deepest convection is on the southern side which may mean the southern side being nearly as strong as the northern side.
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#55 Postby Chacor » Fri Jul 11, 2008 12:14 pm

Winds should be pretty low in this upcoming HDOB as the plane flies through the eye. Looks like it's a little bit early for the planned 18z fix.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33399
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: Hurricane Bertha RECON Discussion

#56 Postby CrazyC83 » Fri Jul 11, 2008 12:17 pm

Pressure 976mb on that pass, at least based on extrapolation.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: Hurricane Bertha RECON Discussion

#57 Postby HURAKAN » Fri Jul 11, 2008 12:17 pm

Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:I've got a question, if the plane has a big problem in the pilot has only a short enough time to make a landing in Bermuda. Could they land in Bermuda, or is the airport not able to land a recon plane?


Image

Matt, there's the runway.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31391
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#58 Postby KWT » Fri Jul 11, 2008 12:17 pm

Looks like it has a central pressure of 975.9mbs according to recon, so about 976mbs then!
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33399
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#59 Postby CrazyC83 » Fri Jul 11, 2008 12:27 pm

Did I just see 99 kt FL? That supports 90 kt...although the SFMR does not do such.
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#60 Postby Chacor » Fri Jul 11, 2008 12:27 pm

92 kts flight-level. 85% reduction = 78 kts
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests