ATL: Dolly Model Runs

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6108
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L Model Runs

#321 Postby cheezyWXguy » Thu Jul 17, 2008 2:55 pm

txag2005 wrote:Looks more and more like my Cancun vacation this week is going to be bad....

Chill out man...no one has any idea whats going to happen. So itll rain a little...it rains everyday in the tropics. The GFDL has probably lost its mind in terms of strength, but a track like that is somewhat believable. I was in Cozumel during spring break on a cruise and rained like hell the whole day, but we had fun anyway...theres lots of stuff to do down there.
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L Model Runs

#322 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Thu Jul 17, 2008 2:59 pm

Most of the tourist hotels stood up to Hurricane Wilma pretty well, so I wouldn't worry about that.
0 likes   

MWatkins
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2574
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 7:51 pm
Location: SE Florida
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L Model Runs

#323 Postby MWatkins » Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:35 pm

Looking at the SHIPS guidance (and using synoptic meteorology) the environment for 94L is going to become very favorable for development by the middle of this weekend. Given how vigirous this system has been, and how it has maintained pretty deep convection under some very hostile conditions...there is some concern that things can change significantly by Sunday.

TIME (HR) 0 6 12 18 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120
SHEAR (KTS) 21 22 22 21 15 16 13 21 5 8 5 2 1


94L will be moving into the environment that 95L is currently enjoying (and is why that system looks so impressive in satellite imagery) starting tomorrow, when shear relaxes under 20 knots (in the model) and by Sunday, there is virtually no shear.

Moreover, if 96L develops there could be some impact on the track of 94L. There may be less ridging to the north than currently forecast by the models.

MW
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L Model Runs

#324 Postby Ivanhater » Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:39 pm

MWatkins wrote:Looking at the SHIPS guidance (and using synoptic meteorology) the environment for 94L is going to become very favorable for development by the middle of this weekend. Given how vigirous this system has been, and how it has maintained pretty deep convection under some very hostile conditions...there is some concern that things can change significantly by Sunday.

TIME (HR) 0 6 12 18 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120
SHEAR (KTS) 21 22 22 21 15 16 13 21 5 8 5 2 1


94L will be moving into the environment that 95L is currently enjoying (and is why that system looks so impressive in satellite imagery) starting tomorrow, when shear relaxes under 20 knots (in the model) and by Sunday, there is virtually no shear.

Moreover, if 96L develops there could be some impact on the track of 94L. There may be less ridging to the north than currently forecast by the models.

MW


Great analysis Mike..Im not watching this as I once was, but still watching from a distance...
0 likes   

coreyl
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 77
Age: 36
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 9:14 pm
Location: Bay St Louis,Mississippi

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L Model Runs

#325 Postby coreyl » Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:42 pm

MWatkins wrote:Looking at the SHIPS guidance (and using synoptic meteorology) the environment for 94L is going to become very favorable for development by the middle of this weekend. Given how vigirous this system has been, and how it has maintained pretty deep convection under some very hostile conditions...there is some concern that things can change significantly by Sunday.

TIME (HR) 0 6 12 18 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120
SHEAR (KTS) 21 22 22 21 15 16 13 21 5 8 5 2 1


94L will be moving into the environment that 95L is currently enjoying (and is why that system looks so impressive in satellite imagery) starting tomorrow, when shear relaxes under 20 knots (in the model) and by Sunday, there is virtually no shear.

Moreover, if 96L develops there could be some impact on the track of 94L. There may be less ridging to the north than currently forecast by the models.

MW



What would less ridging to the north mean?
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L Model Runs

#326 Postby RL3AO » Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:45 pm

coreyl wrote:
What would less ridging to the north mean?


It would allow a developed storm to possibly curve into the GOM instead of moving west into the Yucatan.
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L Model Runs

#327 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:56 pm

Hmmm, I just replied to a post, and it said my post didn't exist, and now I don't see the post I replied to.



Anyway, was just saying GFDL seems an outlier, and if 94L does develop (it might in a day or two), Nicaragua to the Yucatan, with a possible second landfall South of Texas, maybe bringing some squalls and rough seas to Padre Island, but no major impact.


In my unofficial opinion.


Edit to add- unofficial opinion based on 3/4 of GFS ensembles, Canadian and Euro. Euro suggests a landfall in Mexico close enough to bring some sensible wx to BRO area.
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6108
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L Model Runs

#328 Postby cheezyWXguy » Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:02 pm

Ed Mahmoud wrote:Hmmm, I just replied to a post, and it said my post didn't exist, and now I don't see the post I replied to.



Anyway, was just saying GFDL seems an outlier, and if 94L does develop (it might in a day or two), Nicaragua to the Yucatan, with a possible second landfall South of Texas, maybe bringing some squalls and rough seas to Padre Island, but no major impact.


In my unofficial opinion.


Edit to add- unofficial opinion based on 3/4 of GFS ensembles, Canadian and Euro. Euro suggests a landfall in Mexico close enough to bring some sensible wx to BRO area.

It not that far of an outlier...models with similar tracks include the BAMM, and the HWRF as well. Also, remember that yesterday, the gfdl and the cmc were the most southerly models. They have all shifted northward. Even the cmc, which showed landfall in central nicaragua now shows a track closer to the southern yucatan. I wonder what will happen in the coming days.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#329 Postby KWT » Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:09 pm

TRhe models do seem to be trending northwards but right now its very deep, its going to have to pick up some lattiude very soon if its not going to slam into central America and I just can't see it strengthening quickly enough if it all to be able to make a turn to the north west in time, saying that who knows what will happen, right now shear is too high for anything but the models do have shear lowering in the western Caribbean/
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L Model Runs

#330 Postby Stormcenter » Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:09 pm

Way too early to make any call on this one. But just looking at the current situation I don't like it's chances of affecting anyone in the U.S mainland if it were to develop. Just my opinion.
0 likes   

chadtm80

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L Model Runs

#331 Postby chadtm80 » Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:11 pm

Image
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L Model Runs

#332 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:17 pm

chadtm80 wrote:Image


I'll get nervous tomorrow afternoon if that trend continues for a couple more model cycles. But not yet.
0 likes   

User avatar
oyster_reef
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 123
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 3:05 pm
Location: Alabama

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L Model Runs

#333 Postby oyster_reef » Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:57 pm

We may end up with a GOMer on our hands...
That GFSL is looking ominous. :double:
0 likes   

CYCLONE MIKE
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2183
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 6:04 pm
Location: Gonzales, LA

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L Model Runs

#334 Postby CYCLONE MIKE » Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:59 pm

Boy if the models continue to show tracks like this for 94L over the weekend and 96L does something this site will be overrun with so many "what-if's" and "wobble watchers' it will probably melt down, especially if they both decide to develop at the same time.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#335 Postby KWT » Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:59 pm

All I will say with the models is remember what they kept doing with Dean and remember what actually happened, i think the key like with so many other systems is if this actually develops and how strong it does develop if it can get going.
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re:

#336 Postby HouTXmetro » Thu Jul 17, 2008 5:07 pm

KWT wrote:All I will say with the models is remember what they kept doing with Dean and remember what actually happened, i think the key like with so many other systems is if this actually develops and how strong it does develop if it can get going.


There were a couple of maor outliers with Dean, but the majority pegged Dean a tad North of where it hit.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#337 Postby KWT » Thu Jul 17, 2008 5:14 pm

I was more talking about what the GFDL was estimating it to do, indeed the Euro model I remember did very well in the track forecast once Dean was developed.

I think once again the GFDL is to ofar north but we will have to wait and see, I can imagine its rather under-estimating the upper high just like it did with Dean.

Still if it can form and gain enough lattiude to reach the Yucatan it may yet need to be watched.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re:

#338 Postby wxman57 » Thu Jul 17, 2008 5:15 pm

KWT wrote:All I will say with the models is remember what they kept doing with Dean and remember what actually happened, i think the key like with so many other systems is if this actually develops and how strong it does develop if it can get going.


I was going to point out that the models have been trying to move 94L north for quite a while. See this earlier forecast that moved it through the NE Caribbean. 94L has consistently moved left of all guidance. And GFDL/HWRF have been the worst models with 94L so far. Go back and check the model plot archive (aal94 2008...)
http://euler.atmos.colostate.edu/~vigh/ ... c/archive/

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L Model Runs

#339 Postby Ivanhater » Thu Jul 17, 2008 5:21 pm

Well to be fair wxman, if 94L would of developed like the models showed im sure it would have moved to the NE caribbean, however when the models backed off development they have been spot on with track, now that they are developing 94L again to even a possible hurricane they show this getting into the Gulf, and if 96L develops, there will be a weakness, not sure if enough to really get this to turn north, but this discussion is all for not if it doesnt develop...

I even believe you said yesterday, this may try to get its act together in the Western Caribbean...seems like conditions look pretty good once there 8-)
Last edited by Ivanhater on Thu Jul 17, 2008 5:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6108
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: Re:

#340 Postby cheezyWXguy » Thu Jul 17, 2008 5:22 pm

wxman57 wrote:
KWT wrote:All I will say with the models is remember what they kept doing with Dean and remember what actually happened, i think the key like with so many other systems is if this actually develops and how strong it does develop if it can get going.


I was going to point out that the models have been trying to move 94L north for quite a while. See this earlier forecast that moved it through the NE Caribbean. 94L has consistently moved left of all guidance. And GFDL/HWRF have been the worst models with 94L so far. Go back and check the model plot archive (aal94 2008...)
http://euler.atmos.colostate.edu/~vigh/ ... c/archive/

Image

Then again, that was right when it formed, and at the time of that model run Bertha was supposed to leave a weakness and be dead by then. However, as 94l passed long south of the weakness, models began shifting back west i believe. But even the southern outlier, the cmc, is shifting northward again. Much uncertainty in the days to come.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests