ATL: Tropical Depression Fay

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: Re:

#2101 Postby RL3AO » Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:20 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:
Brent wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:the 2 A.M. is AST


Which is the same time as EDT(meaning it's 2am EDT also).

Anyway, I still think this looks good.


AST is one hour ahead of eastern//


AST = EDT

AST is one hour ahead of EST, not EDT.
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10157
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: Invest 92L in Western Atlantic

#2102 Postby Blown Away » Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:22 pm

If the NHC classifies this as a TD this morning, will the 5 day track line make it to SFL, I'm sure the cone will?
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6108
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: ATL: Invest 92L in Western Atlantic

#2103 Postby cheezyWXguy » Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:23 pm

Blown_away wrote:If the NHC classifies this as a TD this morning, will the 5 day track line make it to SFL, I'm sure the cone will?

should be at least 5 or 6 days, due to weak steering currents near florida.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#2104 Postby Aric Dunn » Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:24 pm

0 likes   

User avatar
boca
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6369
Age: 60
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:49 am
Location: Boca Raton,FL

Re: ATL: Invest 92L in Western Atlantic

#2105 Postby boca » Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:24 pm

I think the track will miss us to the east based upon the 00GFS so far. Maybe the western most edge of the cone. Just an opinion.
0 likes   

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL: Invest 92L in Western Atlantic

#2106 Postby Bocadude85 » Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:25 pm

I doubt they would pick a landfall point.. probably just keep it off the coast
0 likes   

txag2005
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 229
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 1:16 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: Invest 92L in Western Atlantic

#2107 Postby txag2005 » Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:27 pm

Even though this flight is research, will they still do recon?
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10157
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: Invest 92L in Western Atlantic

#2108 Postby Blown Away » Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:27 pm

boca wrote:I think the track will miss us to the east based upon the 00GFS so far. Maybe the western most edge of the cone. Just an opinion.


The 18z GFS loops back and landfalls in SFL and the GFDL skirts just E of SFL??

http://www.wunderground.com/tropical/tr ... model.html
0 likes   

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL: Invest 92L in Western Atlantic

#2109 Postby Bocadude85 » Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:28 pm

boca wrote:I think the track will miss us to the east based upon the 00GFS so far. Maybe the western most edge of the cone. Just an opinion.


Take a look at the high the ooz gfs builds in....
0 likes   

User avatar
boca
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6369
Age: 60
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:49 am
Location: Boca Raton,FL

Re: ATL: Invest 92L in Western Atlantic

#2110 Postby boca » Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:30 pm

Blown_away wrote:
boca wrote:I think the track will miss us to the east based upon the 00GFS so far. Maybe the western most edge of the cone. Just an opinion.


The 18z GFS loops back and landfalls in SFL and the GFDL skirts just E of SFL??

http://www.wunderground.com/tropical/tr ... model.html


The 00GFS kicks it out 200 miles to our ENE between 132hrs and 156hrs. Further away than the 18z model runs.
0 likes   

User avatar
haml8
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 188
Age: 50
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: Katy, Texas
Contact:

Re: ATL: Invest 92L in Western Atlantic

#2111 Postby haml8 » Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:30 pm

Is this where you think the LLC will pop up Derek? IF it does??

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
boca
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6369
Age: 60
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:49 am
Location: Boca Raton,FL

Re: ATL: Invest 92L in Western Atlantic

#2112 Postby boca » Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:31 pm

Bocadude85 wrote:
boca wrote:I think the track will miss us to the east based upon the 00GFS so far. Maybe the western most edge of the cone. Just an opinion.


Take a look at the high the ooz gfs builds in....


Why does it look like its kicking this out between 132 and 156hrs.Wierd.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#2113 Postby Aric Dunn » Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:32 pm

i would look in that area .. but most likely closer to the convection where ther is more convergence
0 likes   

Zip
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 5:26 pm

#2114 Postby Zip » Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:34 pm

What is known about the ultimate size of tropical cyclones? What causes a storm, say Katrina, to grow so large in diameter, and a storm like the Great Labor Day Hurricane of 1935 to remain small and tightly wound?

Is there a time in the life cycle of a given system when one "knows" if it will be large or small?

I'm thinking 92L looks like the kind of system that has the potential to be small, but possibly viscious. Or maybe in a few days, after leaving the dry air behind, 92L expands a windfield to huge size (assuming it develops at all, which is looking more and more likely, to me, anyway)...?

Thanks
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6108
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: ATL: Invest 92L in Western Atlantic

#2115 Postby cheezyWXguy » Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:36 pm

haml8 wrote:Is this where you think the LLC will pop up Derek? IF it does??

Image

No I dont believe thats what he was referring to, but Im not him. But with such favorable upper level winds occuring, the center would likely form underneath convection. The obviously strong mlc is a good indication that this is strengthening, and a llc could form underneath it in the next 12 hours.
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

#2116 Postby ConvergenceZone » Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:36 pm

So where's Mecklenberg tonight? :lol:


If this forms, I'll be eating crow, that's for sure....
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re:

#2117 Postby Stormcenter » Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:37 pm

Zip wrote:What is known about the ultimate size of tropical cyclones? What causes a storm, say Katrina, to grow so large in diameter, and a storm like the Great Labor Day Hurricane of 1935 to remain small and tightly wound?

Is there a time in the life cycle of a given system when one "knows" if it will be large or small?

I'm thinking 92L looks like the kind of system that has the potential to be small, but possibly viscious. Or maybe in a few days, after leaving the dry air behind, 92L expands a windfield to huge size (assuming it develops at all, which is looking more and more likely, to me, anyway)...?

Thanks


Hugo type?
0 likes   

User avatar
haml8
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 188
Age: 50
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: Katy, Texas
Contact:

Re: ATL: Invest 92L in Western Atlantic

#2118 Postby haml8 » Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:38 pm

cheezyWXguy wrote:
haml8 wrote:Is this where you think the LLC will pop up Derek? IF it does??

Image

No I dont believe thats what he was referring to, but Im not him. But with such favorable upper level winds occuring, the center would likely form underneath convection. The obviously strong mlc is a good indication that this is strengthening, and a llc could form underneath it in the next 12 hours.


Thanks for the feedback, he had mentioned something earlier abou watching 18N, so that is why I asked. Still learning here but unless I ask questions I won't get anywhere :) thanks again.
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6108
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re:

#2119 Postby cheezyWXguy » Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:38 pm

ConvergenceZone wrote:So where's Mecklenberg tonight? :lol:


If this forms, I'll be eating crow, that's for sure....

I believe he was banned. Thank God.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re:

#2120 Postby Aric Dunn » Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:38 pm

Zip wrote:What is known about the ultimate size of tropical cyclones? What causes a storm, say Katrina, to grow so large in diameter, and a storm like the Great Labor Day Hurricane of 1935 to remain small and tightly wound?

Is there a time in the life cycle of a given system when one "knows" if it will be large or small?

I'm thinking 92L looks like the kind of system that has the potential to be small, but possibly viscious. Or maybe in a few days, after leaving the dry air behind, 92L expands a windfield to huge size (assuming it develops at all, which is looking more and more likely, to me, anyway)...?

Thanks


lots of questions..

to answer the size part..
alot is due to the environment its in, for instance a very moist surrounding will likely lead to a larger expansive system ( not all the time)
when a system is sourrounded by dry air then typically you have smaller more compact system ( again not always the case) Annular hurricanes is a good example..

and there is no time that i know of that we can tell if it will bne large or small .. as they often "shed" outer rainbands when they become full fledged hurricanes..
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests