TC Bertha

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Jason_B
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 503
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 12:46 pm

Re: INVEST 92L in the Eastern Atlantic

#21 Postby Jason_B » Tue Jul 01, 2008 7:18 am

Has a nice outflow to it. Next 24hrs will be interesting.
0 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 14947
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

#22 Postby NDG » Tue Jul 01, 2008 7:19 am

If a low pressure center is trying to organize near 10.5 N, it is in plenty of warm waters, low shear environment with very little if any SAL, it will have to move WNW as the most to stay in warmer waters south of the CV islands, if it gain any more latitude like most models past 3 days it will start encountering cooler waters and more stable environment, but it should be at least a named system by then.
Let not call this a fish storm, because if weakens past 40W it will be steered more W by the lower atmospheric steerings, so way to early to go even there.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re: INVEST 92L in the Eastern Atlantic

#23 Postby HURAKAN » Tue Jul 01, 2008 7:23 am

0 likes   

User avatar
Recurve
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1630
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 8:59 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

Re: INVEST 92L in the Eastern Atlantic

#24 Postby Recurve » Tue Jul 01, 2008 7:27 am

Current shear

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139604
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: INVEST 92L in the Eastern Atlantic

#25 Postby cycloneye » Tue Jul 01, 2008 7:33 am

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 14947
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

#26 Postby NDG » Tue Jul 01, 2008 7:34 am

Lets look at this area map instead for windshear:
Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#27 Postby Chacor » Tue Jul 01, 2008 7:41 am

In decent conditions. 12Z SHIPS run is due any time now...
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#28 Postby Derek Ortt » Tue Jul 01, 2008 7:44 am

every model has a fairly intense TC out of this.

Have to give props for Falko Judt for calling this last evening
0 likes   

User avatar
DESTRUCTION5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4391
Age: 42
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
Location: Stuart, FL

Re:

#29 Postby DESTRUCTION5 » Tue Jul 01, 2008 7:46 am

Derek Ortt wrote:every model has a fairly intense TC out of this.

Have to give props for Falko Judt for calling this last evening


Fairly intense Cyclone in early July coming off Africa can only mean one thing.....I think we all know what that is...
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#30 Postby HURAKAN » Tue Jul 01, 2008 7:47 am

Loop: http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/product ... 010900.GIF

Convection developing. System not weakening at the moment.
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#31 Postby Chacor » Tue Jul 01, 2008 7:52 am

This is old — the 06z SHIPS run — but the SHIPS RI index showed a massive RI potential.

Prob of RI for 25 kt RI threshold= 999% is 999.0 times the sample mean(12.3%)
Prob of RI for 30 kt RI threshold= 999% is 999.0 times the sample mean( 7.8%)
Prob of RI for 35 kt RI threshold= 999% is 999.0 times the sample mean( 4.5%)
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139604
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re:

#32 Postby cycloneye » Tue Jul 01, 2008 7:54 am

Chacor wrote:This is old — the 06z SHIPS run — but the SHIPS RI index showed a massive RI potential.

Prob of RI for 25 kt RI threshold= 999% is 999.0 times the sample mean(12.3%)
Prob of RI for 30 kt RI threshold= 999% is 999.0 times the sample mean( 7.8%)
Prob of RI for 35 kt RI threshold= 999% is 999.0 times the sample mean( 4.5%)


That is posted at the models thread.All model runs are being posted at the 92L models thread to not have this main 92L thread congested.
0 likes   

User avatar
Gustywind
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 12334
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 7:29 am
Location: Baie-Mahault, GUADELOUPE

#33 Postby Gustywind » Tue Jul 01, 2008 7:55 am

http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real- ... wg8sht.htm
Low shear in vicinity of Invest 92 L, and farther west, winds seems to decrease a bit given the map, maybe a window of opportunity for this beauty. This awesome wave looks like a an august wave typical of CV storm ( what an appearence!!), amazing . Well, very interresting trip ahead, something to watch within the next 24 hours.... :roll:
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#34 Postby Chacor » Tue Jul 01, 2008 7:55 am

I don't think posting the RI probabilities "congests" this thread, seeing how it's fairly relevant as to how the invest is developing pretty quickly...
0 likes   

User avatar
boca
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6306
Age: 59
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:49 am
Location: Boca Raton,FL

Re: INVEST 92L in the Eastern Atlantic

#35 Postby boca » Tue Jul 01, 2008 7:58 am

If this wave develops into a well developed storm it would almost 100% chance of being a fish because of how east it developed.
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#36 Postby Chacor » Tue Jul 01, 2008 8:00 am

ATCF is in the process of updating now so 12z information and models should be out in the next few minutes.

EDIT:
AL, 92, 2008070112, , BEST, 0, 108N, 166W, 25, 1011, DB, 34, NEQ, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1012, 120, 40, 0, 0, L, 0, , 0, 0, INVEST, M,
0 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 14947
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

#37 Postby NDG » Tue Jul 01, 2008 8:03 am

So far everything is going as the concensus model were indicating for the past couple of days, it would be hard to go against them at this time for those who are still reluctant, which I can not imagine at this time.

Convergence & UL divergence are getting little by little closer to the broad cyclonic center:
Image
Image
0 likes   

User avatar
hawkeh
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 109
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:35 pm
Location: Bahamas

Re: INVEST 92L in the Eastern Atlantic

#38 Postby hawkeh » Tue Jul 01, 2008 8:05 am

Wow I was expecting to wake up to a ragged looking wave, not this. Nice outflow on it...
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22506
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: INVEST 92L in the Eastern Atlantic

#39 Postby wxman57 » Tue Jul 01, 2008 8:10 am

For the record, I measured a movement of 280nm from 12Z yesterday to 12Z today, a forward speed of 11.7 kts. The previous 24 hours it moved 240nm, or 10 kts. That 15-20 kt statement from the NHC is a bit high, but it is typical of the speed most waves travel in the Tropical Atlantic.

Was checking back through climo and from 1851-2007 could find only 1 storm that formed within 500nm of where 92L is in July. That was Ceasar in 1990. Ceasar tracked NW and out to sea. Bertha formed near 10N/34W - much farther west. When I expanded the search to all named storms developing within 100nm of 11N/20W in all months since 1851, I get the tracks in the image below. Only one storm that formed so far north and east in 1973 managed to reach land.

92L is certainly a strong wave with perhaps a weak LLC, but we see many such systems move off the west coast of Africa each season without developing. Odds are the thunderstorms will weaken over the next 24-48 hours and the rotation will slowly dissipate. If it does develop, then there appears to be a weakness in the ridge between 30W-40W that will very likely allow a recurvature to the northwest and out to sea over cooler waters.

All storms forming within 100nm of 11N/20W since 1851:
Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#40 Postby Chacor » Tue Jul 01, 2008 8:15 am

Oh, the 999% in the RI index? Appears to be because the Ocean Heat Content input into the model run was/is missing. So it's best not to take that at face value.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests