ATL IKE: Models Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145668
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1881 Postby cycloneye » Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:58 pm

Incredible that the 00z GFS has in 72 hours the same area Gustav made landfall.Those people in Pinar del Rio haved no recuperated from the Gustav landfall.

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... n_072l.gif
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1882 Postby ROCK » Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:58 pm

quote="setxweathergal"]
vaffie wrote:
setxweathergal wrote:But even on Gus, weren't there some models that always showed NOLA area? Or was that further down the road and not this far out? How far out did NHC have it nailed?


If you want to analyze the forecasts and how the models did with Gustav, you can do so here:
http://i.flhurricane.com/images/2008/clark7/

Thanks...but I wouldn't even pretend to know how to read all of that. I was just trying to figure out if there was one model more reliable to fixate on, and that doesn't shift as much as the others.[/quote]

None of the models are really all that consistent or right all the time. The GFDL jumps around a LOT, as does the GFS. The EURO jumps around less, but it can be wrong a lot too. Generally, I've found that if you take the average of the GFDL, the GFS, and the EURO, you get a very accurate track--and that's basically what the National Hurricane Center does--it uses a lot of consensus tracks in it's analyses.[/quote]


Heres what I do...CMC for possible TC formation....EURO , GFDL for track. In that order....probably over simplying somewhat.....
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1883 Postby Sanibel » Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:58 pm

The GFDL jumps around a LOT, as does the GFS



It tends to react immediately to present features like a trough that isn't near to the hurricane but is near to the tail end of GFDL's current track. You have to learn GFDL's tendencies which is why I was saying it was locked on to the SW dips this year and nailed them well ahead of everything else. GFDL was so precisely accurate in advance of these SW tracks that, even though it is a computer model, I feel it deserves better.
0 likes   

User avatar
vaffie
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 898
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 5:11 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1884 Postby vaffie » Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:59 pm

No change in GFS position at 72 hours so far. Ridge looks the same too.

Compare:
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... 0_078l.gif

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... 0_072l.gif
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1885 Postby ROCK » Sat Sep 06, 2008 11:00 pm

cycloneye wrote:Incredible that the 00z GFS has in 72 hours the same area Gustav made landfall.

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... n_072l.gif



man that would really wipe out that portion of Cuba if that verified....The Isle of Youth would be hammered once again....now if this goes into Central LA then I am going to choke on my doughnut..... :D
0 likes   

mattpetre
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 510
Age: 53
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 3:20 pm
Location: Missouri City,TX & Galleria
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1886 Postby mattpetre » Sat Sep 06, 2008 11:02 pm

meteorologyman wrote:With me being an amature, how do you guys think my forecasting is, I'm just curious what your oppinion is I've been posting my hypothesis and seem to get no positive or negative feed backs?


Seems to me that you have pretty good knowledge of the dynamics and synoptics and are relatively conservative with your prognosis. All things that it takes to be a good and trusted forecaster. Myself on the other hand like to be a bit more wild and gambling on such things. Perhaps this should continue in a personal forecast thread however...

On the topic of models... seems to me like track is much more unknown than intensity in this particular case. That's rather unusual, huh?
0 likes   

User avatar
PTrackerLA
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5277
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
Location: Lafayette, LA

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1887 Postby PTrackerLA » Sat Sep 06, 2008 11:02 pm

Why does this all seem so familiar?! :roll:
0 likes   

User avatar
Windy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1628
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 10:13 pm

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1888 Postby Windy » Sat Sep 06, 2008 11:03 pm

90 hours:

Image
0 likes   

shah8
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 363
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 4:36 pm

#1889 Postby shah8 » Sat Sep 06, 2008 11:04 pm

Actually, here are the cities drastically affected by Ike, potentially...

Camaguey
Holguin
Nuevitas
Cienfuegos
Pinar Del Rio

the eastern part of Cuba is not all that lightly populated, you know...
0 likes   

jinftl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: fort lauderdale, fl

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1890 Postby jinftl » Sat Sep 06, 2008 11:05 pm

Where is the forecast and analysis? This thread is primarily to discuss the computer models so maybe this isn't going to be the most effective place to put it...maybe share your ideas in the other Ike discussion thread. There is so much going on, don't take a lack of response to your forecast as anything negative....things move very fast at times like this here.


meteorologyman wrote:With me being an amature, how do you guys think my forecasting is, I'm just curious what your oppinion is I've been posting my hypothesis and seem to get no positive or negative feed backs?
0 likes   

User avatar
vaffie
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 898
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 5:11 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1891 Postby vaffie » Sat Sep 06, 2008 11:05 pm

Moving faster and further west in this run so far. Also a tad south.
Last edited by vaffie on Sat Sep 06, 2008 11:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Bellarose
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 160
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 2:16 pm
Location: Just a hair North of Tampa

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1892 Postby Bellarose » Sat Sep 06, 2008 11:06 pm

Windy wrote:90 hours:


Is that a little more to the east than it has been? It seems to be closer to FL to me, but I'm blurry eyed and tired.
0 likes   

User avatar
vaffie
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 898
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 5:11 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1893 Postby vaffie » Sat Sep 06, 2008 11:07 pm

Bellarose wrote:
Windy wrote:90 hours:


Is that a little more to the east than it has been? It seems to be closer to FL to me, but I'm blurry eyed and tired.


It's further west and slightly south.
0 likes   

User avatar
PTPatrick
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1831
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2004 8:38 am

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1894 Postby PTPatrick » Sat Sep 06, 2008 11:07 pm

actually is almost identical to the 18z in speed and location
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1895 Postby ROCK » Sat Sep 06, 2008 11:07 pm

vaffie wrote:Moving faster and further west in this run so far. Also a tad south.



misses that shortwave then west....pick it up then NNE......
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23692
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#1896 Postby gatorcane » Sat Sep 06, 2008 11:08 pm

if the US is lucky Ike stays south and is a Mexico issue.

Sounds impossible but who knows. Ike certainly keeps making these models shift west.
0 likes   

Bellarose
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 160
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 2:16 pm
Location: Just a hair North of Tampa

#1897 Postby Bellarose » Sat Sep 06, 2008 11:08 pm

Thanks everyone. That will help me sleep a little better tonite!
0 likes   

Weatherfreak000

#1898 Postby Weatherfreak000 » Sat Sep 06, 2008 11:08 pm

The trough is clearly evident in this run.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145668
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1899 Postby cycloneye » Sat Sep 06, 2008 11:13 pm

0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#1900 Postby ROCK » Sat Sep 06, 2008 11:14 pm

0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests