ATL: Tropical Storm Cristobal in North Atlantic

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
seahawkjd
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 632
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 4:12 pm
Location: Morehead City, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L near Southeast US

#181 Postby seahawkjd » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:17 am

So where exactly is the center in relation to land right now? Sorry, just got up and trying to get a grasp on what its doing.
0 likes   

User avatar
storms in NC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2338
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Wallace,NC 40 miles NE of Wilm
Contact:

#182 Postby storms in NC » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:21 am

We have some bands coming in here now But no rain yet.

If the low has move to the east some that would put Myrtle Beach, SC to Wilm NC for a partly land fall. JIMO only
0 likes   

cpdaman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3131
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 11:44 am
Location: SPB county (gulf stream)

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L near Southeast US

#183 Postby cpdaman » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:23 am

seahawkjd wrote:So where exactly is the center in relation to land right now? Sorry, just got up and trying to get a grasp on what its doing.



good question. bouy observations to me indicate it is very close to land

linked noaa discussions indicated a new low near 31.2 79.8 or so may be in the process of taking over.

but until this bouy changes from a moderate south wind (over to NE or so) i don't see how the redevelop theory could be reality http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=SKMG1
Last edited by cpdaman on Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L near Southeast US

#184 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:26 am

i'm on the coast in north carolina. chances of getting attacked by a large reptile are definitely there. we just tend to look before we swim.



There are supposedly alligators in the bayous around Houston, but I've never heard of a human attacked around here.


Maybe Texans are just smart enough to swim at the pool or the beach.
0 likes   

User avatar
hiflyer
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 562
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 11:24 am
Location: West Broward Florida

#185 Postby hiflyer » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:29 am

"THE SABSOON NETWORK OFF THE SE GEORGIA COAST"

More here
http://www.skio.usg.edu/Skioresearch/ph ... /index.php
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#186 Postby KWT » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:32 am

If you look at the floater loop you can clearly see where the center is at the moment, it seems to have been drifting eastwards a little bit though there may also be some NE movement as well its really tought to say as it really is only drifting at the moment.
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L near Southeast US

#187 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:33 am

There are no plans to send a plane into that region today, as highest winds are currently 15 to 20 mph and there are no signs of it developing any tropical characteristics.

Regards,

Dennis Feltgen
Public Affairs Officer
Meteorologist
National Hurricane Center
Miami, Florida

Ed Mahmoud wrote:
> I see yesterday's POD didn't see a mission into the system off the SE
> Coast until tomorrow. However, seeing that something seems to be
> brewing, which may indeed threaten the US coast this weekend, do you
> think we'll get a resources permitting invest into 96L today?
>
>
>
> Edward M. Mahmoud
> Production Engineer
> EXXXXX Operating Company
> 713 953-xxxx
> Ed_Mahmoud@EXXXX.net


Bummer
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#188 Postby KWT » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:37 am

Well I think Mr.Feltgen is going to be proved a little bit wrong with this system not sure how it can be claime dits not got tropical properties when convection is flaring up right near the LLC. Still who knows!
0 likes   

User avatar
BUD
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 719
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 8:01 am
Location: N.M.B :SC

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L near Southeast US

#189 Postby BUD » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:43 am

Lets not forget about in 2004 Gaston did the same thing and was a Hurricane in 48 hours time.
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#190 Postby senorpepr » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:44 am

I'm not surprised, honestly. The circulation is well exposed still and surface observations don't support an upgrade. Recon would tell you the same thing.
0 likes   

User avatar
funster
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 816
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 4:27 pm
Location: North Dallas

Re:

#191 Postby funster » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:45 am

KWT wrote:Well I think Mr.Feltgen is going to be proved a little bit wrong with this system not sure how it can be claime dits not got tropical properties when convection is flaring up right near the LLC. Still who knows!


Yes, I would have thought this one was going to be an obvious disturbance to at least become a depression. :?:
0 likes   

User avatar
jrod
Military Member
Military Member
Posts: 546
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 1:22 pm
Location: jacksonville, fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L near Southeast US

#192 Postby jrod » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:51 am

"The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products."

I am seeing a more defined center on radar that is drifting to the south. With the proximiny to land and the lack of hot water availible near the coast I am still not expecting much from this area. Look at the heat potential charts, the LLC will have to move east to tap into the gulf steam. The nearshore waters are in the mid-70s and dropping with the offshore winds causing more upwelling. All I see is a rainmaker.

Image
Image
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re:

#193 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:51 am

senorpepr wrote:I'm not surprised, honestly. The circulation is well exposed still and surface observations don't support an upgrade. Recon would tell you the same thing.



Unofficial, but I think this is darn close to being a tropical depression. I think the remnants of the old front, while still having drier air in the area, have faded enough this isn't really sub-tropical. But I guess it could be sub-tropical. But that doesn't really matter.

If aircraft had run in there late this afternoon, and found what I suspect, a tropical depression, and advisories were initiated at 5 pm, or maybe 8 pm, as a special, depending on timing, watches could have been issued.


Granted, this probably won't ever make hurricane strength, and a 12 or 18 hour delay in issuing watches/warnings isn't huge in this case, except for maybe small craft, whose operators should be smart enough to heed locally issued marine forecasts anyway, but a watch might keep one or two foolish boaters out of trouble by making it onto local TV and radio.

Again, my opinion that this is darn near being a depression is unofficial, and I am not (sadly) a meteorologist.
0 likes   

User avatar
jrod
Military Member
Military Member
Posts: 546
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 1:22 pm
Location: jacksonville, fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L near Southeast US

#194 Postby jrod » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:54 am

Also look at all the dry air around the system. We all have been suprised in the past by development or no development, but it appears to me that there is little supporting this becoming a depression anytime soon. We'll see how persistant this area is....
0 likes   

User avatar
orion
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 165
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 5:44 pm
Location: Indian Harbour Beach, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L near Southeast US

#195 Postby orion » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:56 am

Sat image with stations showing windbarbs...

Image

and same image with radar...

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#196 Postby KWT » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:58 am

There certainly i dry air present however there was also some dry air with Humberto and that didn't exactly stop that from bombing.
There is clearly some strong convection is that eastern side and as long as the LLC doesn't get cut off from that mass then there is no reason why this can't develop. Heat content isn't amazing but we've seen Bertha become a tropical storm over pretty much no heat content at all!
0 likes   

User avatar
jrod
Military Member
Military Member
Posts: 546
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 1:22 pm
Location: jacksonville, fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L near Southeast US

#197 Postby jrod » Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:03 am

The eastern side is over water with a much higher heat content and is my guess of why it is strong on that side. It has potential and I have seen better organzed systems go poof and worse go boom.
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L near Southeast US

#198 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:03 am

I'll repeat, dry air sometimes hampers systems that try to spin up right before moving into Texas, creating "half a storm", with low clouds and isolated showers East of the center, a partially or completely exposed LLC, and all the deep convection over or East of the center.

Without much convection to mix down stronger winds above the surface, West side is just breezy, while the wind and rain is on the East side.


Important if this moves North or North-Northeast and makes landfall with coastline East of the center.


In my humble and unofficial opinion.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#199 Postby KWT » Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:05 am

jrod, indeed we have the gulf waters over there which may be helping to boost the convection, interestingly mos tof the models has this heading NE and so whilst it probably doesn't quite reach those warm waters it probably does stay in water.
0 likes   

User avatar
orion
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 165
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 5:44 pm
Location: Indian Harbour Beach, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L near Southeast US

#200 Postby orion » Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:06 am

Latest from Morehead City, NC NWS... they are still thinking it's going to move slowly up the coast and be mostly an offshore event. Although they admit it is "tricky" if 96L stays far enough from land over warm waters.

AREA FORECAST DISCUSSION
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE NEWPORT/MOREHEAD CITY NC
1050 AM EDT FRI JUL 18 2008

.SHORT TERM /6 PM THIS EVENING THROUGH SATURDAY NIGHT/...
GIVEN WEAK STEERING THE LOW TO THE S WILL MOVE SLOWLY WITH MDLS
SHOWING IT STAYING CLOSE THE THE CST AS IT MOVES MAINLY NNE.
FOLLOWED CLOSE TO THE GFS WITH INCREASING CHCS OF SHRA AND A FEW
TSRA SAT INTO SUN WHEN THE LOW MOVES CLOSE TO NC. KEPT LIKELY
POPS CONFINED TO SRN AND IMD CSTL SITES WHERE MOISTURE/CONVERGENCE
EXPECTED TO BE BETTER. WITH INCREASING MOISTURE AND SLOW MOTION OF
LOW SOME AREAS COULD SEE SOME TRAINING OF SHRA/TSRA WITH LOCALLY
VERY HEAVY RAINFALL POSS. WILL HAVE TO MONITOR LOW CLOSELY FOR
INCREASING TROPICAL DEVELOPMENT ESPCLY IF IT STAYS OVER WARM WTR
AND DOESNT MOVE OVER LAND.
HIGHS WILL CONT AROUND 90 INLAND AND N
SAT AND SUN WITH LESS RAIN POTENTIAL WITH MAINLY MID 80S CST.

and from the marine forecast...

REST OF MARINE FCST IS TRICKY AS IT HINGES HEAVILY ON EVENTUAL TRACK
AND INTENSITY OF LOW PRES NOW OFF GA COAST...WHICH HAS THE POTENTIAL
TO DEVELOP INTO A TROPICAL DEPRESSION
. NAM/ECMWF ARE NOW IN BETTER
AGREEMENT WITH SLOWER SOLUTION AND KEEPING THE SYSTEM OFFSHORE.
SE/S WINDS WILL BE INCREASING ALONG THE CAROLINA COAST SATURDAY.
LIKELY TO SEE SC CONDITIONS DEVELOP SATURDAY INTO SUNDAY. HAVE PUT
SC SEAS IN FORECAST...BUT FOR NOW KEPT WINDS UNDER 20 KT.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests