Aftershock rocks China lake, creates landslides
By CARA ANNA – 3 hours ago
QINGLIAN, China (AP) — A magnitude 5.0 aftershock shook a brimming, earthquake-formed lake and sent landslides tumbling down surrounding mountains Sunday, underscoring the persistent threat of flooding to more than 1 million weary refugees downstream.
No new evacuations were ordered and the lake's dam of unstable mud and rocks did not collapse, said Hu Peng, a media officer at the disaster relief headquarters of the lake. He had no additional details.
More than 250,000 people downstream have been evacuated in recent weeks.
The effect of the 20-second temblor on Tangjiashan lake, as it is known, was not clear and its dam was under surveillance, said the state-run Xinhua News Agency, which had a reporter at the site. A diversion channel draining the lake appeared to be operating smoothly following the aftershock and a rainstorm about the same time, the agency said.
The temblor was centered about seven miles northwest of the lake, according to data reported by the U.S. Geological Survey. It set off landslides on nearby mountains, Xinhua said, without indicating whether any rubble landed in the lake and pushed water levels even higher.
One evacuee in a mountainside tent camp about 25 miles downstream said the situation remained stable.
"We felt the aftershock but it wasn't anything bad. We're numb to this by now," said Yu Taichun, a doctor living with about 2,500 people on Taohua Mountain, overlooking the riverside town of Qinglian.
The Tangjiashan lake was formed when rubble from a landslide set off by the deadly May 12 earthquake blocked the flow of the Tongkou River. Despite a hastily dug diversion channel that began draining the lake early Saturday, water levels have continued rising dangerously.
Soldiers blew up wooden houses, boulders and other debris Sunday to speed the flow of water into the spillway. Other troops were deepening the channel and digging on a second spillway.
Managing Tangjiashan lake has become a priority for the government as it works to head off another catastrophe even as it cares for millions left homeless from the quake. More than 1.3 million people live downriver from the lake.
The death toll from the quake climbed Sunday to 69,136, with 17,686 people still missing.
The Tangjiashan lake is the largest of more than 30 created by last month's quake, which was centered in Sichuan province. Government experts quoted by state media have played down the threat of imminent flooding, though a variety of factors could set off a dam collapse: rain, aftershocks, landslides, increased leakage from the barrier.
"Controlling the lake outflow is critical for the dam's safety," Zhang Ting, head of the Sichuan provincial hydro-meteorological bureau, was quoted as saying by Xinhua. "If the water flows out too slowly, the accumulating inflow will increase pressure on the barrier, but too strong an outflow will also erode the diversion channel and lead to the dam collapse."
Evacuees, some of whom were forced to relocate from more permanent camps more than two weeks ago, were impatient for the lake to drain. Officials estimated it would be a week before people could return home, even if all goes well.
"I wish they'd hurry, look at us here," said rice farmer Cai Yuhua, gesturing at a cluster of mostly homemade tents built on a hillside in Jiuling village, where she and hundreds of others waited.
"The last time we could go back to our homes was May 22. I want to go home and look at my things," said Cai, who was living under a striped plastic tarp tied over bamboo poles.
Meanwhile, a cargo train derailed in northeastern Sichuan province early Sunday after being struck by rocks falling from a mountain, Xinhua said. One railway worker was killed and another was seriously injured.
It was not known if the falling rocks were related to the May 12 quake or its aftershocks. The rocks may have been loosened by recent heavy rains, Xinhua reported, citing a Chengdu railway administration official.
The damaged line was repaired by Sunday evening.
MW 7.9 SW China 69,159 confirmed dead; 17,469 still missing
Moderator: S2k Moderators
-
HurricaneBill
- Category 5
- Posts: 3420
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
- Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA
Re: MW 7.9 SW China 69,100 confirmed dead; 18,230 still missing
MAP 5.1 2008/06/08 17:56:20 33.102 92.089 10.0 SOUTHERN QINGHAI, CHINA
MAP 5.3 2008/06/10 10:04:58 33.153 92.017 10.0 SOUTHERN QINGHAI, CHINA
MAP 5.3 2008/06/10 11:04:15 33.190 92.076 10.0 SOUTHERN QINGHAI, CHINA
MAP 5.0 2008/06/10 11:36:45 33.136 92.191 10.0 SOUTHERN QINGHAI, CHINA
MAP 5.3 2008/06/10 14:15:38 33.107 92.040 10.0 SOUTHERN QINGHAI, CHINA
This area is to the west of Sichuan.
MAP 5.3 2008/06/10 10:04:58 33.153 92.017 10.0 SOUTHERN QINGHAI, CHINA
MAP 5.3 2008/06/10 11:04:15 33.190 92.076 10.0 SOUTHERN QINGHAI, CHINA
MAP 5.0 2008/06/10 11:36:45 33.136 92.191 10.0 SOUTHERN QINGHAI, CHINA
MAP 5.3 2008/06/10 14:15:38 33.107 92.040 10.0 SOUTHERN QINGHAI, CHINA
This area is to the west of Sichuan.
0 likes
Re: MW 7.9 SW China 69,100 confirmed dead; 18,230 still missing
Controversial Zipingpu dam may have caused China's deadly earthquake, says Chinese geologist Fan Xiao
June 10, 2008
Interview by Wang Yongchen
On May 27, 2008, one of China’s most celebrated radio journalists and founder of the environmental organization, Green Earth Volunteers, Wang Yongchen interviewed Fan Xiao, chief engineer of the Regional Geology Investigation Team of the Sichuan Geology and Mineral Bureau about the possibility that the Zipingpu dam induced China’s deadly May 12 earthquake.
Wang Yongchen: Now, two weeks after the powerful Wenchuan earthquake, what are your thoughts?
Fan Xiao: This earthquake was a Richter scale magnitude 8 and, strictly speaking, it is very unusual for this area. The historic records show that the highest recorded earthquake in this area was magnitude 6.5, and no seismic activities of more than magnitude 7 occurred along the Longmenshan seismic belt before. (see map here)
These records, which begin in 1900, record seismic activities in general and big earthquakes in particular with earthquake instruments and so represent accurate recordings. But for seismic activities before 1900, we know about them only from history books. For that reason, it is difficult to know how big they were exactly. And it’s impossible for us to know about the seismic activity that occurred in remote regions, where almost no people lived.
Wang Yongchen: How about the Diexi earthquake1?
Fan Xiao: In the case of Diexi, there are two seismic belts rather than one (Editor's note: i.e. the Longmenshan belt), with different structures and geological conditions though. In the case of the Longmenshan seismic belt, the earthquake authority conducted studies and predicted that an earthquake could occur, but not with a magnitude above 7.
Wang Yongchen: But Li Youcai’s2 forecast was magnitude 7.5.
Fan Xiao: Li Youcai wasn’t referring specifically to the Longmenshan seismic belt but to the China south-north earthquake belt, which covers a vast area and consists of a dozen seismic belts, as a matter of fact. As far as the China south-north earthquake belt is concerned, earthquakes with magnitude of not only 7, but of magnitude 8 have occurred in history. Thus, forecasting earthquakes in this area isn’t hard because there have been so many. What worries me most is that more and more hydro dams have been or will be built on the earthquake belts with high risk and high magnitude of earthquakes, such as the middle and lower Jinsha River (Note: the main channel of the upper Yangtze) and the Dadu and Yalong rivers (Note: both tributaries of the Yangtze). The cascade of dams such as Xiluodu (Note: under construction) and Wudongde (Note: approved) on the Jinsha River are on the Dongchuansonglin earthquake belt on which earthquakes with magnitude 8 have occurred before. For earthquakes, generally speaking, there is a cycle of occurrence every 100 or 200 years, for instance. But the phenomena of RIS (reservoir-induced seismicity) is likely to change the timing, the location of the epicentre, and the seismic intensity of an earthquake. The reservoir exerts an external influence, and is likely to interrupt the cycle.
Wang Yongchen: Do you think this unusual quake was triggered by the reservoir?
Fan Xiao: Very likely, given its geological conditions, and the epicentre being so close to the reservoir.
Wang Yongchen: Where?
Fan Xiao: Zipingpu. The reservoir of Zipingpu is only five kilometres away from the epicentre. Typically, RIS occurs within a dozen kilometres from a reservoir, and the distance between the epicentre and Zipingpu is only five kilometres.
Wang Yongchen: So, you are saying that the reservoir is likely to have induced the earthquake, but how? What are the conditions that trigger an earthquake?
Fan Xiao: There are many conditions, but from past experience and cases, both inside and outside China, at least three conditions are really important. First, the dam should be high enough, at least higher than one hundred metres. Second, the dam should be big enough, generally with a storage capacity of 1 billion cubic metres or more, because a small reservoir wouldn’t create significant threats. Third, and very important, the reservoir should be located in a fault zone. The case of the Zipingpu meets all three conditions: it has a height of 156 metres, a storage capacity of 1.126 billion cubic metres, and the reservoir is built in a fault zone. It wouldn’t be crucial if the reservoir was located in an inactive fault zone, but it does matter if a reservoir is located on an active fault belt. It’s unfortunate that Zipingpu is exactly this case: it is located on an active fault belt, with the tail of the reservoir really close to Yingxiu, where the quake occurred.
The entire Longmenshan fault belt consists of three parallel fault lines (see map): with the Wenchuan-Maoxian Fault on the west, the Dujiangyan-Jiangyou Fault on the east, and the Yingxiu-Beichuan Fault in the middle. It was on the Yingxiu-Beichuan Fault, which is called the main central fault, where the quake with magnitude 8 occurred. So this is why the Zipingpu reservoir is not far from the epicentre.
It’s interesting to note that the quake is called the “Wenchuan earthquake,” so everybody thought that the epicentre was in the county seat of the Wenchuan area. But actually the epicentre is much nearer to Dujiangyan than to the county seat of Wenchuan, despite the fact that the epicentre area is within the county of Wenchuan. This is why the losses in the county seat of Wenchuan were not as severe as in the county seat of Beichuan.
The main central fault, or the Yingxiu-Beichuan Fault, is several hundred kilometres long, and the Zipingpu reservoir has been filled for more than three years, which is in the period of time in which the reservoir is most likely to trigger earthquakes.
The Zipingpu reservoir started filling in December of 2004 from a water level of 700 metres above sea level, and was filled to its NPL (Normal Pool Level) of 877 metres above sea level by October 2006. According to the operating mode, the reservoir is raised to its highest water level in late September and early October, and lowered to its lowest water level in late April and early May, before the flood season arrives.
Therefore, Zipingpu has experienced the procedure of raising and lowering the reservoir level at least twice since it was put into operation—with the highest water level in the fall of 2006 and the lowest level in late April 2007, and again the highest water level in the fall of 2007 and the lowest level this late April and early May. I believe this significant change, and the repeated raising and lowering of the reservoir water level, might be a factor triggering the earthquake. Therefore, it’s understandable that the powerful quake occurred on May 12, when the water level was going down.
Wang Yongchen: Cheng Genwei, senior researcher at the Chengdu Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, said the quake should be named the “Sichuan earthquake,” but someone else argued it should be called the “May 12 earthquake.”
Fan Xiao: In my opinion, it should be called “Sichuan Longmenshan earthquake,” because whether it was the quake or aftershocks, they all occurred along the Longmenshan fault belt. Moreover, the main destruction is also concentrated in the Longmenshan fault belt.
Wang Yongchen: So Gansu (Note: north of Sichuan; see map) is also affected by the Longmenshan fault belt?
Fan Xiao: Right.
Wang Yongchen: So the affected regions are all near the mountains of the Longmenshan area?
Fan Xiao: True. Even Dujiangyan is on the edge of the Dujiangyan-Jiangyou fault.
Wang Yongchen: I have heard that residents in Dujiangyan don’t dare live in their houses for now, due to their great fears. Is that true?
Fan Xiao: True. If you take a closer look, it becomes clear that the Zipingpu reservoir is actually sandwiched between two fault lines. The dam site is less than two kilometres away from the Dujiangyan-Jiangyou Fault in east, while the nearest point of the reservoir is only 500 metres away from the Yingxiu-Beichuan Fault in the west. Moreover, there are many smaller fault lines parallel to these two main fault lines just below the reservoir itself. Those smaller fault lines are already seriously crushed, so after building a big dam on it, the reservoir exerts hydraulic pressure, crushing the fault below it and causing a disturbance in the fault belt, as a result. Furthermore, with rock stratums in the fault belt below the reservoir crushed and broken, more and more cracks would appear and develop, helping the water from the reservoir seep in deeply, which would significantly influence activities in the fault belt.
In general, there are two types of RIS. The first is called “rapid reaction type” which refers to seismic activities that occur shortly after filling the reservoir; the second is called “delayed reaction type” in which earthquakes take place several years after the reservoir is filled, such as two years, three years, five years, and even ten years, and so on. Based on global studies, the second one is much more severe than the first one because greater hydraulic pressure is exerted by the reservoir and has a greater influence on the fault lines.
As mentioned above, the Zipingpu reservoir has been filled for longer than three years since it began filling in December 2004, so it is definitely the case of the second type. According to state regulations, a seismic risk assessment should be done before building a hydro dam. Actually, the China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research did such a risk assessment, and predicted that the highest magnitude earthquake that would occur there was a 5.5 magnitude. The state regulations also require that a seismic monitoring network be established before filling a big reservoir. In the Zipingpu’s case, a seismic monitoring network was set up. The problem was not that the government or dam authority failed to do this, nor that the experts involved didn’t take the seismic issue into account, but that nobody thought such a powerful earthquake of 8 on the Richter scale would occur. The experts who participated in the feasibility study for Zipingpu predicted or estimated that an earthquake only as big as magnitude 6 could occur.
Recently, I looked at a scholarly article published by the Bureau of Seismology but it contained data from the seismic monitoring network only for 2004-2005. Complete data should cover a period from the very beginning of filling the reservoir (Note: December 2004) to May 12, 2008, when the earthquake occurred. But even that one year of data showed that seismic activity was, not only more frequent, but highly concentrated in the two faults—the Dujiangyan-Jiangyou and Yingxiu-Beichuan Faults in general, and in the Yingxiu-Beichuan Fault in particular.
As the above scholarly article revealed, as many as 730 seismic events were recorded from December 2004 to December 2005, with the highest at magnitude 3 or a little bit higher. The recorded earthquake waves also indicated that the seismic activity was concentrated in a line, which was consistent with the earthquake surface of the quake that occurred on May 12, 2008. In other words, the direction and locations of this earthquake and aftershocks tallied with the records obtained from the seismic monitoring stations set up around Zipingpu, though the recorded magnitude of seismic events in the December 2004-2005 period were not that high.
But the data from the end of 2005 to May 12, 2008 has not been published yet. It would be much easier to do a good analysis if the data was available.
Many experts are doing studies on RIS in China. As far as I know, at least two institutes in China have been involved in this discipline: the Chengdu-based Institute of RIS at the Sichuan Bureau of Seismology, and the Beijing-based Institute of RIS at the China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research.
Wang Yongchen: So they definitely have the data.
Fan Xiao: Definitely. This data would really help to determine whether or not Zipingpu induced the quake, though the data would not be sufficient to explain the earthquake on the Richter scale of magnitude 8.
Wang Yongchen: Forecasting earthquakes is still a difficult thing to do. And what we really want to know is not whether earthquakes can be predicted but whether the Zipingpu dam reservoir triggered the quake. One of the experts from Beijing commented that there have been cases of reservoir-induced earthquakes, but he has also argued that no reservoir has ever triggered such a large earthquake. Thus a better explanation, he said, is that the May 12 Sichuan earthquake was a result of diastrophism3 rather than being induced by a reservoir. Currently, most people have accepted that.
Fan Xiao: Right. Even if the Zipingpu reservoir hadn’t been built, the quake would have occurred in this area, but not necessarily with a magnitude of 8, because the Longmenshan belt had never before recorded a quake bigger than magnitude 7. Secondly, if Zipingpu hadn’t been built, the epicentre would not have been in the current position, so close to the reservoir, but possibly somewhere else. Thirdly, if Zipingpu hadn’t been built, the quake would likely have occurred 100 or even 200 years later, but not now.
Before the earthquake, this fault had actually been moving, not with fast breakage but slow deformation, which is hardly perceptible to humans. In a region like the Longmenshan belt, the earth's crust extrusion movement has been very strong, as if it was looking for the weakest link to break through. At this moment, the reservoir introduced an external influence, which not only allowed the seismic stress to be released at an earlier date, but in a truly unexpected and devastating manner. This is why the epicentre was really close to the reservoir. Because, in general, RIS occurs within a dozen kilometres from the reservoir.
Days ago, at a press conference by the Ministry of Water Resources, Liu Ning, chief engineer of the MWR, said that, after this earthquake, there is a need to re-assess the water resources development plan, especially the geological implications. Despite what he said, I don’t think there will be significant changes made in the major plans.
Wang Yongchen: Do you think there is a possibility of having more earthquakes?
Fan Xiao: It’s hard to say. It depends on whether the reservoir continues to store water. If the reservoir is filled again, it will definitely have an impact on the recurrence of earthquakes if a link between the reservoir and quakes exists. However, it would take time, given that the energy built up was released already. In general, there are intervals between one quake and the next.
Wang Yongchen: I wonder if anybody refutes your point of view?
Fan Xiao: No problem. Anybody can challenge me. Actually I talked to the South Urban Daily about that before. It is possible to determine whether Zipingpu triggered the earthquake through careful analysis and study with the already established seismic monitoring network and with complete data from the time the reservoir was filled to when the earthquake occurred. The experts at the Bureau of Seismology can do that for sure.
Wang Yongchen: I have got a story to tell you: a senior engineer in dam design in Yingxiu, now in his eighties, was invited to be in charge of dam projects many times, but he firmly refused, saying it’s too dangerous to do so because the mountains were too intensively used.
Fan Xiao: Human activity can be seen everywhere in the upper Min valley, such as building hydro dams in a massive way, developing industrial development zones, and expanding roads and so forth. More and more man-made projects and large-scale excavation have done so much harm to the environment, disturbing the stability of mountains in this area. As a matter of fact, landslides had already become a serious problem in many places, even before the May 12 quake occurred.
Therefore, it is no wonder that so much infrastructure collapsed as a result of the rock and landslides as soon as the big quake came. It’s sad to see, when you look from an airplane, that the Min valley has been afflicted with all kinds of man-made ills. It would be hard for the valley to recover completely in a short period of time. I believe it would take several decades and even up to one hundred years to recover.
Wang Yongchen: One of the experts says this is a new orogenic4 movement.
Fan Xiao: An orogenic movement would take a very long time, but we are truly shocked by such widespread destruction and change in such a short period of time. I believe that inappropriate human activities played a significant role in the earthquake, making the degree of destruction greater and the losses bigger. We have to say that conditions in this area make earthquakes inevitable, but the dam as the factor triggering the earthquake is too significant to ignore.
June 10, 2008
Interview by Wang Yongchen
On May 27, 2008, one of China’s most celebrated radio journalists and founder of the environmental organization, Green Earth Volunteers, Wang Yongchen interviewed Fan Xiao, chief engineer of the Regional Geology Investigation Team of the Sichuan Geology and Mineral Bureau about the possibility that the Zipingpu dam induced China’s deadly May 12 earthquake.
Wang Yongchen: Now, two weeks after the powerful Wenchuan earthquake, what are your thoughts?
Fan Xiao: This earthquake was a Richter scale magnitude 8 and, strictly speaking, it is very unusual for this area. The historic records show that the highest recorded earthquake in this area was magnitude 6.5, and no seismic activities of more than magnitude 7 occurred along the Longmenshan seismic belt before. (see map here)
These records, which begin in 1900, record seismic activities in general and big earthquakes in particular with earthquake instruments and so represent accurate recordings. But for seismic activities before 1900, we know about them only from history books. For that reason, it is difficult to know how big they were exactly. And it’s impossible for us to know about the seismic activity that occurred in remote regions, where almost no people lived.
Wang Yongchen: How about the Diexi earthquake1?
Fan Xiao: In the case of Diexi, there are two seismic belts rather than one (Editor's note: i.e. the Longmenshan belt), with different structures and geological conditions though. In the case of the Longmenshan seismic belt, the earthquake authority conducted studies and predicted that an earthquake could occur, but not with a magnitude above 7.
Wang Yongchen: But Li Youcai’s2 forecast was magnitude 7.5.
Fan Xiao: Li Youcai wasn’t referring specifically to the Longmenshan seismic belt but to the China south-north earthquake belt, which covers a vast area and consists of a dozen seismic belts, as a matter of fact. As far as the China south-north earthquake belt is concerned, earthquakes with magnitude of not only 7, but of magnitude 8 have occurred in history. Thus, forecasting earthquakes in this area isn’t hard because there have been so many. What worries me most is that more and more hydro dams have been or will be built on the earthquake belts with high risk and high magnitude of earthquakes, such as the middle and lower Jinsha River (Note: the main channel of the upper Yangtze) and the Dadu and Yalong rivers (Note: both tributaries of the Yangtze). The cascade of dams such as Xiluodu (Note: under construction) and Wudongde (Note: approved) on the Jinsha River are on the Dongchuansonglin earthquake belt on which earthquakes with magnitude 8 have occurred before. For earthquakes, generally speaking, there is a cycle of occurrence every 100 or 200 years, for instance. But the phenomena of RIS (reservoir-induced seismicity) is likely to change the timing, the location of the epicentre, and the seismic intensity of an earthquake. The reservoir exerts an external influence, and is likely to interrupt the cycle.
Wang Yongchen: Do you think this unusual quake was triggered by the reservoir?
Fan Xiao: Very likely, given its geological conditions, and the epicentre being so close to the reservoir.
Wang Yongchen: Where?
Fan Xiao: Zipingpu. The reservoir of Zipingpu is only five kilometres away from the epicentre. Typically, RIS occurs within a dozen kilometres from a reservoir, and the distance between the epicentre and Zipingpu is only five kilometres.
Wang Yongchen: So, you are saying that the reservoir is likely to have induced the earthquake, but how? What are the conditions that trigger an earthquake?
Fan Xiao: There are many conditions, but from past experience and cases, both inside and outside China, at least three conditions are really important. First, the dam should be high enough, at least higher than one hundred metres. Second, the dam should be big enough, generally with a storage capacity of 1 billion cubic metres or more, because a small reservoir wouldn’t create significant threats. Third, and very important, the reservoir should be located in a fault zone. The case of the Zipingpu meets all three conditions: it has a height of 156 metres, a storage capacity of 1.126 billion cubic metres, and the reservoir is built in a fault zone. It wouldn’t be crucial if the reservoir was located in an inactive fault zone, but it does matter if a reservoir is located on an active fault belt. It’s unfortunate that Zipingpu is exactly this case: it is located on an active fault belt, with the tail of the reservoir really close to Yingxiu, where the quake occurred.
The entire Longmenshan fault belt consists of three parallel fault lines (see map): with the Wenchuan-Maoxian Fault on the west, the Dujiangyan-Jiangyou Fault on the east, and the Yingxiu-Beichuan Fault in the middle. It was on the Yingxiu-Beichuan Fault, which is called the main central fault, where the quake with magnitude 8 occurred. So this is why the Zipingpu reservoir is not far from the epicentre.
It’s interesting to note that the quake is called the “Wenchuan earthquake,” so everybody thought that the epicentre was in the county seat of the Wenchuan area. But actually the epicentre is much nearer to Dujiangyan than to the county seat of Wenchuan, despite the fact that the epicentre area is within the county of Wenchuan. This is why the losses in the county seat of Wenchuan were not as severe as in the county seat of Beichuan.
The main central fault, or the Yingxiu-Beichuan Fault, is several hundred kilometres long, and the Zipingpu reservoir has been filled for more than three years, which is in the period of time in which the reservoir is most likely to trigger earthquakes.
The Zipingpu reservoir started filling in December of 2004 from a water level of 700 metres above sea level, and was filled to its NPL (Normal Pool Level) of 877 metres above sea level by October 2006. According to the operating mode, the reservoir is raised to its highest water level in late September and early October, and lowered to its lowest water level in late April and early May, before the flood season arrives.
Therefore, Zipingpu has experienced the procedure of raising and lowering the reservoir level at least twice since it was put into operation—with the highest water level in the fall of 2006 and the lowest level in late April 2007, and again the highest water level in the fall of 2007 and the lowest level this late April and early May. I believe this significant change, and the repeated raising and lowering of the reservoir water level, might be a factor triggering the earthquake. Therefore, it’s understandable that the powerful quake occurred on May 12, when the water level was going down.
Wang Yongchen: Cheng Genwei, senior researcher at the Chengdu Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, said the quake should be named the “Sichuan earthquake,” but someone else argued it should be called the “May 12 earthquake.”
Fan Xiao: In my opinion, it should be called “Sichuan Longmenshan earthquake,” because whether it was the quake or aftershocks, they all occurred along the Longmenshan fault belt. Moreover, the main destruction is also concentrated in the Longmenshan fault belt.
Wang Yongchen: So Gansu (Note: north of Sichuan; see map) is also affected by the Longmenshan fault belt?
Fan Xiao: Right.
Wang Yongchen: So the affected regions are all near the mountains of the Longmenshan area?
Fan Xiao: True. Even Dujiangyan is on the edge of the Dujiangyan-Jiangyou fault.
Wang Yongchen: I have heard that residents in Dujiangyan don’t dare live in their houses for now, due to their great fears. Is that true?
Fan Xiao: True. If you take a closer look, it becomes clear that the Zipingpu reservoir is actually sandwiched between two fault lines. The dam site is less than two kilometres away from the Dujiangyan-Jiangyou Fault in east, while the nearest point of the reservoir is only 500 metres away from the Yingxiu-Beichuan Fault in the west. Moreover, there are many smaller fault lines parallel to these two main fault lines just below the reservoir itself. Those smaller fault lines are already seriously crushed, so after building a big dam on it, the reservoir exerts hydraulic pressure, crushing the fault below it and causing a disturbance in the fault belt, as a result. Furthermore, with rock stratums in the fault belt below the reservoir crushed and broken, more and more cracks would appear and develop, helping the water from the reservoir seep in deeply, which would significantly influence activities in the fault belt.
In general, there are two types of RIS. The first is called “rapid reaction type” which refers to seismic activities that occur shortly after filling the reservoir; the second is called “delayed reaction type” in which earthquakes take place several years after the reservoir is filled, such as two years, three years, five years, and even ten years, and so on. Based on global studies, the second one is much more severe than the first one because greater hydraulic pressure is exerted by the reservoir and has a greater influence on the fault lines.
As mentioned above, the Zipingpu reservoir has been filled for longer than three years since it began filling in December 2004, so it is definitely the case of the second type. According to state regulations, a seismic risk assessment should be done before building a hydro dam. Actually, the China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research did such a risk assessment, and predicted that the highest magnitude earthquake that would occur there was a 5.5 magnitude. The state regulations also require that a seismic monitoring network be established before filling a big reservoir. In the Zipingpu’s case, a seismic monitoring network was set up. The problem was not that the government or dam authority failed to do this, nor that the experts involved didn’t take the seismic issue into account, but that nobody thought such a powerful earthquake of 8 on the Richter scale would occur. The experts who participated in the feasibility study for Zipingpu predicted or estimated that an earthquake only as big as magnitude 6 could occur.
Recently, I looked at a scholarly article published by the Bureau of Seismology but it contained data from the seismic monitoring network only for 2004-2005. Complete data should cover a period from the very beginning of filling the reservoir (Note: December 2004) to May 12, 2008, when the earthquake occurred. But even that one year of data showed that seismic activity was, not only more frequent, but highly concentrated in the two faults—the Dujiangyan-Jiangyou and Yingxiu-Beichuan Faults in general, and in the Yingxiu-Beichuan Fault in particular.
As the above scholarly article revealed, as many as 730 seismic events were recorded from December 2004 to December 2005, with the highest at magnitude 3 or a little bit higher. The recorded earthquake waves also indicated that the seismic activity was concentrated in a line, which was consistent with the earthquake surface of the quake that occurred on May 12, 2008. In other words, the direction and locations of this earthquake and aftershocks tallied with the records obtained from the seismic monitoring stations set up around Zipingpu, though the recorded magnitude of seismic events in the December 2004-2005 period were not that high.
But the data from the end of 2005 to May 12, 2008 has not been published yet. It would be much easier to do a good analysis if the data was available.
Many experts are doing studies on RIS in China. As far as I know, at least two institutes in China have been involved in this discipline: the Chengdu-based Institute of RIS at the Sichuan Bureau of Seismology, and the Beijing-based Institute of RIS at the China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research.
Wang Yongchen: So they definitely have the data.
Fan Xiao: Definitely. This data would really help to determine whether or not Zipingpu induced the quake, though the data would not be sufficient to explain the earthquake on the Richter scale of magnitude 8.
Wang Yongchen: Forecasting earthquakes is still a difficult thing to do. And what we really want to know is not whether earthquakes can be predicted but whether the Zipingpu dam reservoir triggered the quake. One of the experts from Beijing commented that there have been cases of reservoir-induced earthquakes, but he has also argued that no reservoir has ever triggered such a large earthquake. Thus a better explanation, he said, is that the May 12 Sichuan earthquake was a result of diastrophism3 rather than being induced by a reservoir. Currently, most people have accepted that.
Fan Xiao: Right. Even if the Zipingpu reservoir hadn’t been built, the quake would have occurred in this area, but not necessarily with a magnitude of 8, because the Longmenshan belt had never before recorded a quake bigger than magnitude 7. Secondly, if Zipingpu hadn’t been built, the epicentre would not have been in the current position, so close to the reservoir, but possibly somewhere else. Thirdly, if Zipingpu hadn’t been built, the quake would likely have occurred 100 or even 200 years later, but not now.
Before the earthquake, this fault had actually been moving, not with fast breakage but slow deformation, which is hardly perceptible to humans. In a region like the Longmenshan belt, the earth's crust extrusion movement has been very strong, as if it was looking for the weakest link to break through. At this moment, the reservoir introduced an external influence, which not only allowed the seismic stress to be released at an earlier date, but in a truly unexpected and devastating manner. This is why the epicentre was really close to the reservoir. Because, in general, RIS occurs within a dozen kilometres from the reservoir.
Days ago, at a press conference by the Ministry of Water Resources, Liu Ning, chief engineer of the MWR, said that, after this earthquake, there is a need to re-assess the water resources development plan, especially the geological implications. Despite what he said, I don’t think there will be significant changes made in the major plans.
Wang Yongchen: Do you think there is a possibility of having more earthquakes?
Fan Xiao: It’s hard to say. It depends on whether the reservoir continues to store water. If the reservoir is filled again, it will definitely have an impact on the recurrence of earthquakes if a link between the reservoir and quakes exists. However, it would take time, given that the energy built up was released already. In general, there are intervals between one quake and the next.
Wang Yongchen: I wonder if anybody refutes your point of view?
Fan Xiao: No problem. Anybody can challenge me. Actually I talked to the South Urban Daily about that before. It is possible to determine whether Zipingpu triggered the earthquake through careful analysis and study with the already established seismic monitoring network and with complete data from the time the reservoir was filled to when the earthquake occurred. The experts at the Bureau of Seismology can do that for sure.
Wang Yongchen: I have got a story to tell you: a senior engineer in dam design in Yingxiu, now in his eighties, was invited to be in charge of dam projects many times, but he firmly refused, saying it’s too dangerous to do so because the mountains were too intensively used.
Fan Xiao: Human activity can be seen everywhere in the upper Min valley, such as building hydro dams in a massive way, developing industrial development zones, and expanding roads and so forth. More and more man-made projects and large-scale excavation have done so much harm to the environment, disturbing the stability of mountains in this area. As a matter of fact, landslides had already become a serious problem in many places, even before the May 12 quake occurred.
Therefore, it is no wonder that so much infrastructure collapsed as a result of the rock and landslides as soon as the big quake came. It’s sad to see, when you look from an airplane, that the Min valley has been afflicted with all kinds of man-made ills. It would be hard for the valley to recover completely in a short period of time. I believe it would take several decades and even up to one hundred years to recover.
Wang Yongchen: One of the experts says this is a new orogenic4 movement.
Fan Xiao: An orogenic movement would take a very long time, but we are truly shocked by such widespread destruction and change in such a short period of time. I believe that inappropriate human activities played a significant role in the earthquake, making the degree of destruction greater and the losses bigger. We have to say that conditions in this area make earthquakes inevitable, but the dam as the factor triggering the earthquake is too significant to ignore.
0 likes
-
HURAKAN
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 46086
- Age: 37
- Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
- Location: Key West, FL
- Contact:
MW 7.9 SW China 69,159 confirmed dead; 17,469 still missing
China quake death toll rises to 69,159
BEIJING, June 12 (Xinhua) -- The death toll of China's May 12 earthquake increased by 13 overnight to 69,159 as of Thursday noon, the State Council Information Office said.
A total of 374,141 people were injured and 17,469 others were still missing after the 8.0-magnitude quake devastated southwestern Sichuan Province and neighboring regions a month ago.
Hospitals had treated 95,516 injured people as of Thursday noon, of whom 77,437 had been discharged and 15,478 were still being treated.
By Wednesday, more than 1.4 million quake survivors had been found and evacuated.
Relief supplies continued to pour into the quake zone. As of Thursday noon, about 1.11 million tents, 4.772 million quilts, 14 million garments, 947,700 tonnes of fuel oil and 2.02 million tonnes of coal had been sent.
The office said as of Wednesday, relief workers had built 92,500 temporary houses and another 27,800 were being installed, while the material for 90,800 makeshift houses had arrived in the affected areas.
As of Thursday noon, the government disaster relief fund had reached 23.61 billion yuan (about 3.42 billion U.S. dollars), including 19.01 billion yuan from the central budget and 4.6 billion yuan from the local budget.
In addition, domestic and foreign donations had reached 44.85 billion yuan in cash and goods, among which 13.97 billion yuan had been forwarded to the quake-hit areas.
In the 24 hours ending Thursday noon, 178 aftershocks were monitored in the quake zone, none above 4.0 magnitude, according to the China Earthquake Administration.
A total of 11,779 aftershocks have been detected in the quake areas since May 12.
As of Thursday noon, 6,033 water plants and 40,154.3 kilometers of water supply pipelines had been repaired, according to the office.
The quake had damaged 8,426 water plants and 47,642.5 kilometers of water supply channels.
BEIJING, June 12 (Xinhua) -- The death toll of China's May 12 earthquake increased by 13 overnight to 69,159 as of Thursday noon, the State Council Information Office said.
A total of 374,141 people were injured and 17,469 others were still missing after the 8.0-magnitude quake devastated southwestern Sichuan Province and neighboring regions a month ago.
Hospitals had treated 95,516 injured people as of Thursday noon, of whom 77,437 had been discharged and 15,478 were still being treated.
By Wednesday, more than 1.4 million quake survivors had been found and evacuated.
Relief supplies continued to pour into the quake zone. As of Thursday noon, about 1.11 million tents, 4.772 million quilts, 14 million garments, 947,700 tonnes of fuel oil and 2.02 million tonnes of coal had been sent.
The office said as of Wednesday, relief workers had built 92,500 temporary houses and another 27,800 were being installed, while the material for 90,800 makeshift houses had arrived in the affected areas.
As of Thursday noon, the government disaster relief fund had reached 23.61 billion yuan (about 3.42 billion U.S. dollars), including 19.01 billion yuan from the central budget and 4.6 billion yuan from the local budget.
In addition, domestic and foreign donations had reached 44.85 billion yuan in cash and goods, among which 13.97 billion yuan had been forwarded to the quake-hit areas.
In the 24 hours ending Thursday noon, 178 aftershocks were monitored in the quake zone, none above 4.0 magnitude, according to the China Earthquake Administration.
A total of 11,779 aftershocks have been detected in the quake areas since May 12.
As of Thursday noon, 6,033 water plants and 40,154.3 kilometers of water supply pipelines had been repaired, according to the office.
The quake had damaged 8,426 water plants and 47,642.5 kilometers of water supply channels.
0 likes
Re: MW 7.9 SW China 69,159 confirmed dead; 17,469 still missing
Strong earthquake hits western China
44 minutes ago
BEIJING (AP) — A strong aftershock struck a western Chinese region where a May earthquake killed almost 70,000 people, shaking buildings a few hours after the Olympic torch relay passed through the area Tuesday. No injuries or damage were reported.
The quake struck Gansu and Shaanxi provinces in Sichuan, shaking buildings in the cities of Hanzhong, Xi'an and Chongqing, the official Xinhua News Agency reported. Panicked residents fled swaying buildings and ran into the streets.
The U.S. Geological Survey measured the quake at magnitude-6.0. It struck shortly before 6:00 p.m. local time and the USGS said the epicenter was 30 miles northwest of Guangyuan town at a depth of 6 miles.
The temblor was the latest of scores of aftershocks from the magnitude-7.9 quake that struck Sichuan on May 12, killing almost 70,000 people and leaving 5 million homeless.
The earthquake hit a few hours after the Olympic torch relay was held in the Sichuan provincial capital of Chengdu, its last stop before the flame officially opens the Beijing Games on Friday.
On Friday, another powerful aftershock hit Pingwu and Beichuan in Sichuan, injuring 231 people.
44 minutes ago
BEIJING (AP) — A strong aftershock struck a western Chinese region where a May earthquake killed almost 70,000 people, shaking buildings a few hours after the Olympic torch relay passed through the area Tuesday. No injuries or damage were reported.
The quake struck Gansu and Shaanxi provinces in Sichuan, shaking buildings in the cities of Hanzhong, Xi'an and Chongqing, the official Xinhua News Agency reported. Panicked residents fled swaying buildings and ran into the streets.
The U.S. Geological Survey measured the quake at magnitude-6.0. It struck shortly before 6:00 p.m. local time and the USGS said the epicenter was 30 miles northwest of Guangyuan town at a depth of 6 miles.
The temblor was the latest of scores of aftershocks from the magnitude-7.9 quake that struck Sichuan on May 12, killing almost 70,000 people and leaving 5 million homeless.
The earthquake hit a few hours after the Olympic torch relay was held in the Sichuan provincial capital of Chengdu, its last stop before the flame officially opens the Beijing Games on Friday.
On Friday, another powerful aftershock hit Pingwu and Beichuan in Sichuan, injuring 231 people.
0 likes
Return to “Astronomy and Geology”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests