#9891 Postby clfenwi » Sun Aug 19, 2007 8:36 pm
As far as that wind observation goes, I wouldn't trust TWC to QC it, but rather to simply report it (without analyzing it). I would, however, trust the NHC to QC it.
Here's the six hour sequence of observations from Kingston:
MKJP 191900Z 35008KT 6000 RA BKN016 SCT020CB OVC100 26/22 Q9983=
MKJP 192000Z 09013KT 6000 BKN018 SCT020CB OVC100 27/21 Q0995=
MKJP 192029Z 10024KT 2000 BKN016 SCT020CB OVC100 25/22 Q0993=
MKJP 192100Z 14070KT 1000 BKN010 SCT016 OVC080 XX/XX Q0992=
MKJP COR 192200Z 10099OO120KT 0KM BKN010 BKN012CB OVC080 XX/XX Q0994=
MKJP 192200Z COR 10099OO120KT 0KM BKN010 BKN012CB OVC080 XX/XX Q0994=
MKJP 192300Z E11099OO180KT 0KM BKN008 BKN010CB OVC080 24/24 Q0998=
MKJP 200000Z E11099OO150KT 0KM BKN008 SCT010CB OVC080 25/24 Q1001=
MKJP 200100Z 110P99KT 0000 +SHRASQ BKN008 SC010CB OVC080=
And here's what the NHC had to say in their 0Z advisory:
AN OBSERVATION OF SUSTAINED WINDS OF 80 MPH WAS
REPORTED FROM KINGSTON JAMAICA...AND AN UNOFFICIAL OBSERVATION OF
SUSTAINED WINDS OF 100 MPH WAS REPORTED FROM LIONEL TOWN JAMAICA.
That 80 mph from Kingston correlates to the 1900Z observation. Looking at the subsequent observations it looks to me that there was a sensor failure sometime after that. Hopefully, the 11 PM discussion will have a comment on this matter.
0 likes