Hurricane Félix: RECON Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
miamicanes177
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1131
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:53 pm

Re:

#41 Postby miamicanes177 » Sun Sep 02, 2007 12:56 pm

WmE wrote:The crew estimates 120kts.
thanks...I really think it would be useful if they would change the VDM so that on the D. column they instead put the highest SFMR. Eyeballing the waters and giving an estimate is not as helpful as SFMR.
0 likes   

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 33
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

#42 Postby WindRunner » Sun Sep 02, 2007 1:05 pm

If they have an SFMR estimate, it does sometimes show up in section D. I have not noticed this to be a consistent practice of the crews, however.
0 likes   

MiamiensisWx

Re: Hurricane Félix: RECON Discussion

#43 Postby MiamiensisWx » Sun Sep 02, 2007 2:02 pm

They found flight-level winds of 128 kts (118 kts 1-min) and a pressure of 952 mbar (extrapolated) in the eyewall. The data and structure strongly supports a Category 4 hurricane. The VDM will be extremely interesting.
0 likes   

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 33
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

#44 Postby WindRunner » Sun Sep 02, 2007 2:02 pm

Eye penetration in process (probably complete by this moment). FL winds 114kt inbound with auto-extrapolated pressure at 952.4mb - which would suggest a dropsonde reading of 956mb (hopefully we'll see for real in a minute).
0 likes   

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 33
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

#45 Postby WindRunner » Sun Sep 02, 2007 2:09 pm

We have 132kt FL winds now . . . corresponds to a weak Cat 4 surface via standard reduction factors.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#46 Postby HURAKAN » Sun Sep 02, 2007 2:11 pm

weak and Cat. 4 shouldn't go in the same sentence!!! :D :D :D
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 63
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

Re:

#47 Postby x-y-no » Sun Sep 02, 2007 2:13 pm

HURAKAN wrote:weak and Cat. 4 shouldn't go in the same sentence!!! :D :D :D


No kidding. I've seen "weak Cat. 4" conditions and there's absolutely nothing weak about it ... :eek: :eek:
0 likes   

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 33
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

#48 Postby WindRunner » Sun Sep 02, 2007 2:15 pm

Wow . . . totally forgot how sensitive some people were to that. Technically, weak is an adjective describing "cat 4" . . . so that would mean that as a Category 4's go, this is weaker than most . . .

But yes, I get your point . . .
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re: Re:

#49 Postby HURAKAN » Sun Sep 02, 2007 2:18 pm

x-y-no wrote:
HURAKAN wrote:weak and Cat. 4 shouldn't go in the same sentence!!! :D :D :D


No kidding. I've seen "weak Cat. 4" conditions and there's absolutely nothing weak about it ... :eek: :eek:


The only things that are weak in a Cat. 4 are those things that confront a Cat. 4!!!
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re:

#50 Postby HURAKAN » Sun Sep 02, 2007 2:19 pm

WindRunner wrote:Wow . . . totally forgot how sensitive some people were to that. Technically, weak is an adjective describing "cat 4" . . . so that would mean that as a Category 4's go, this is weaker than most . . .

But yes, I get your point . . .


I understood perfectly your point and it's valid. I just made a remark that it sounds funny having Cat. 4 and weak in the same sentence!!!
0 likes   

User avatar
Vortex
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4644
Age: 52
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 9:34 pm
Location: Hilton Head, SC

Re: Hurricane Félix: RECON Discussion

#51 Postby Vortex » Sun Sep 02, 2007 2:19 pm

Cat 4 and weak..R u kidding!!!
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 63
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

Re:

#52 Postby x-y-no » Sun Sep 02, 2007 2:20 pm

WindRunner wrote:Wow . . . totally forgot how sensitive some people were to that. Technically, weak is an adjective describing "cat 4" . . . so that would mean that as a Category 4's go, this is weaker than most . . .

But yes, I get your point . . .


No sweat ... it's not that I'm sensitive so much as the phrase is just mentally jarring to me. :D

I'm in the habit of saying something like "lower end Cat. 4" for that reason ... but that is somewhat more clumsy phrasing I'll admit.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139773
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: Hurricane Félix: RECON Discussion

#53 Postby cycloneye » Sun Sep 02, 2007 2:20 pm

000
URNT12 KNHC 021917
VORTEX DATA MESSAGE
A. 02/18:54:20Z
B. 13 deg 29 min N
071 deg 25 min W
C. 700 mb 2703 m
D. 95 kt
E. 268 deg 008 nm
F. 356 deg 114 kt
G. 268 deg 007 nm
H. 957 mb
I. 8 C/ 3060 m
J. 16 C/ 3050 m
K. 13 C/ NA
L. CLOSED WALL
M. C12
N. 12345/ 7
O. 0.02 / 01 nm
P. AF305 0806A FELIX OB 12
MAX FL WIND 122 KT NE QUAD 17:21:10 Z
MAX OUTBOUND FL WIND 132 KT NE QUAD 18:57:10 Z
SFC CNTR WITHIN 5NM OF FL CNTR
STADIUM EFFECT
AL06 2007
0 likes   

User avatar
Vortex
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4644
Age: 52
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 9:34 pm
Location: Hilton Head, SC

#54 Postby Vortex » Sun Sep 02, 2007 2:21 pm

Definition of weak

Main Entry: weak
Function: adjective
Pronunciation: 'wek

1 : lacking strength: as a : deficient in physical vigor :

I don't think so...
0 likes   

miamicanes177
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1131
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:53 pm

Re: Hurricane Félix: RECON Discussion

#55 Postby miamicanes177 » Sun Sep 02, 2007 2:23 pm

M. C12

The eye continues to shrink...is this the sign of the beginnings of an EWRC? I know it does not have a double wind maxima, but the eye is contracting.
0 likes   

User avatar
hurricanefloyd5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1659
Age: 43
Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 10:53 am
Location: Spartanburg
Contact:

Re: Hurricane Félix: RECON Discussion

#56 Postby hurricanefloyd5 » Sun Sep 02, 2007 2:24 pm

MiamiensisWx wrote:They found flight-level winds of 128 kts (118 kts 1-min) and a pressure of 952 mbar (extrapolated) in the eyewall. The data and structure strongly supports a Category 4 hurricane. The VDM will be extremely interesting.



Is this some real info from recon????could it really be a Cat.4 now or by 5pm tonight????? :eek: :eek: anyone in the path of FELIX I bet would like to :spam: :spam: felix Rightback to Africa!!!!!
0 likes   

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 33
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

#57 Postby WindRunner » Sun Sep 02, 2007 2:25 pm

Umm . . . dropsonde in eyewall also has 128kt SURFACE winds . . . I think that's enough for a Cat 4, even if the actual value is ruled to by non-representative of the storm's winds . . .
0 likes   

User avatar
hurricanefloyd5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1659
Age: 43
Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 10:53 am
Location: Spartanburg
Contact:

Re:

#58 Postby hurricanefloyd5 » Sun Sep 02, 2007 2:29 pm

WindRunner wrote:Umm . . . dropsonde in eyewall also has 128kt SURFACE winds . . . I think that's enough for a Cat 4, even if the actual value is ruled to by non-representative of the storm's winds . . .



OH man this is so uncool!!!!! A possible Cat.5 on our hands again whoo hoo!!!!! any one here want to make the hot boiling water under FELIX :froze: :froze: so the storm will weaken?????

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/loop-rb.html
0 likes   

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 33
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

Re: Re:

#59 Postby WindRunner » Sun Sep 02, 2007 2:37 pm

x-y-no wrote:
WindRunner wrote:Wow . . . totally forgot how sensitive some people were to that. Technically, weak is an adjective describing "cat 4" . . . so that would mean that as a Category 4's go, this is weaker than most . . .

But yes, I get your point . . .


No sweat ... it's not that I'm sensitive so much as the phrase is just mentally jarring to me. :D

I'm in the habit of saying something like "lower end Cat. 4" for that reason ... but that is somewhat more clumsy phrasing I'll admit.


Ahh yeah, I was a "low-end Cat 4" fan myself last season, but taking the winter off leads to slips like that . . . :wink:
0 likes   

txwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm

#60 Postby txwatcher91 » Sun Sep 02, 2007 2:39 pm

What does "SFC CNTR WITHIN 5NM OF FL CNTR" mean? Is that a sign rapid strengthening?
0 likes   


Return to “2007”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests