INVEST 92L: Bahamas : Gone fron NRL

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5597
Age: 37
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

#341 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Wed Oct 03, 2007 9:48 pm

'CaneFreak wrote:
OK...FIRST OF ALL...there is no such thing as ANTICYCLONIC SHEAR....I am laughing my *** off right now. Second of all, I really am confused about the second part of your post.



Saying that there is no such thing as anticyclonic shear is a
FALSE statement.

There IS such a thing as anticyclonic shear: :lol: :lol:
anticyclonic shear (¦an·tē′sī¦klän·ik ′shēr)
(meteorology) Horizontal wind shear of such a nature that it tends to produce anticyclonic rotation of the individual air particles along the line of flow.

http://www.answers.com/topic/anticyclon ... technology

It is a meteorological term...
Last edited by Tampa Bay Hurricane on Wed Oct 03, 2007 9:51 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#342 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed Oct 03, 2007 9:49 pm

Matt,

never refer to a person as "it"

as for the system, the upper winds are quite favorable... we just do not have a well-defined surface circulation yet
0 likes   

User avatar
'CaneFreak
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1486
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:50 am
Location: New Bern, NC

Re:

#343 Postby 'CaneFreak » Wed Oct 03, 2007 9:50 pm

americanrebel wrote:So the new center sould be somewheres around 23.5N 78.5 W?


Probably not that far west...closer to probably 72 or 73W
0 likes   

User avatar
lrak
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1770
Age: 58
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 2:48 pm
Location: Corpus Christi, TX

Re: INVEST 92L : Near Bahamas : Discussions & Images

#344 Postby lrak » Wed Oct 03, 2007 9:50 pm

that was an odd way of learning something.
0 likes   

User avatar
'CaneFreak
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1486
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:50 am
Location: New Bern, NC

Re:

#345 Postby 'CaneFreak » Wed Oct 03, 2007 9:51 pm

Tampa Bay Hurricane wrote:Saying that there is no such thing as anticyclonic shear is a
FALSE statement.

There IS such a thing as anticyclonic shear:
anticyclonic shear (¦an·tē′sī¦klän·ik ′shēr)
(meteorology) Horizontal wind shear of such a nature that it tends to produce anticyclonic rotation of the individual air particles along the line of flow.

http://www.answers.com/topic/anticyclon ... technology

It is a meteorological term...


I think you used it incorrectly then.
0 likes   

User avatar
Vortex
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4644
Age: 53
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 9:34 pm
Location: Hilton Head, SC

Re: INVEST 92L : Near Bahamas : Discussions & Images

#346 Postby Vortex » Wed Oct 03, 2007 9:51 pm

reminds me of those large systems in the WPAC that take a while to organize given the large envelope...
0 likes   

User avatar
robert_88
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 3:05 pm
Location: S.C./N.C.

Re: INVEST 92L : Models Thread= 18z GFS Rolling in at page 4

#347 Postby robert_88 » Wed Oct 03, 2007 9:52 pm

vacanechaser wrote:
robert_88 wrote:Anyone care to tell me what makes 92L take this sharp NE turn??? This is one crazy looking track IF this even verifies.


here is the upper air pattern, looks like a trough does dig down in there in the upper levels... 500mb level... 204 hours

Image



Jesse V. Bass III
http://www.vastormphoto.com
Hurricane Intercept Research Team


Thanks for that graph and info. 8-)
0 likes   

User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5597
Age: 37
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

Re: INVEST 92L : Near Bahamas : Discussions & Images

#348 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Wed Oct 03, 2007 9:54 pm

It is horizontally based not vertically based...because the velocity
vectors tangential to the circulation of the anticyclone
have horizontal directional components- there is no
vertical change in wind direction with height IIRC under an
anticyclone.

Perhaps anticylonic shear is not produced by an anticyclone...
but for some reason this anticyclone is producing anticyclonic
shear. A very neat phenomenon to observe. Note the clouds
and bands being sheared anticyclonically and getting caught up
in the anticyclone- now of course the magnitude of this shear
pales with comparison to ULL/TUTT shear.

The current situation suggests an atmospheric paradox to be sure-
an anticyclone producing anticyclonic shear.
Last edited by Tampa Bay Hurricane on Wed Oct 03, 2007 9:57 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Vortex
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4644
Age: 53
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 9:34 pm
Location: Hilton Head, SC

#349 Postby Vortex » Wed Oct 03, 2007 9:55 pm

00Z should be interesting regarding the front kicking out of the rockies in 3-4 days..Could become a major factor in terms of E VS W Gulf...
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#350 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed Oct 03, 2007 9:57 pm

I am expecting a TC as large as the WPAC typhoons based upon the initial vortex size and model solutions.

if this gets into the GOM, it will probably take up most of the GOM
0 likes   

americanrebel

#351 Postby americanrebel » Wed Oct 03, 2007 9:59 pm

Derek, I understand you saying it will be large in size, but what kind of intensity and will it be Rapid or steady slow growing intensity.

If it is that large, most of the Gulf Coast will feel the effects of this system for more than one day, correct???
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145304
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: INVEST 92L : Models Thread

#352 Postby cycloneye » Wed Oct 03, 2007 9:59 pm

There is the 00z NAM posted two posts above this one.This model only goes for 84 hours,but it shows a track theu the Florida Straits and ends SW of Key West.
0 likes   

User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5597
Age: 37
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

#353 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Wed Oct 03, 2007 10:00 pm

The physics of 92L are just magnificient. The banding is developing under
the niche or most favorable spot directly under the anticyclonic center-
this is a perfect set up for rapid intensification.

As for future implications of the track, the axis of the ridge will be
important. A strong trough can cause the axis of the ridge to
alter in a way that by atmospheric dynamic force allows NE
acceleration later in the period along the path.

Agree 100% derek that this will be a very large system...anticyclonic
support is free lunch for 92L.
Last edited by Tampa Bay Hurricane on Wed Oct 03, 2007 10:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Vortex
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4644
Age: 53
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 9:34 pm
Location: Hilton Head, SC

#354 Postby Vortex » Wed Oct 03, 2007 10:00 pm

I'm going with 2 scenarios...

(1) Heads west then dives SW into the BOC behind the exiting trough and building ridge to the north

(2)Enters NW carribean and/or SE Gulf stalls and turns N/NNE towards the E Gulf...

50/50 awaiting the 00z globals
0 likes   

User avatar
'CaneFreak
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1486
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:50 am
Location: New Bern, NC

#355 Postby 'CaneFreak » Wed Oct 03, 2007 10:00 pm

I agree Derek...as for Tampa Bay Hurricane...its ok dude...but I still dont see what your seeing...I see winds in the upper levels blowing clouds to the south but its not SHEAR...shear is defined as a difference in winds at different respective levels in the atmosphere...UL winds are totally different than shear winds....get it straight... :wink:
0 likes   

User avatar
Vortex
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4644
Age: 53
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 9:34 pm
Location: Hilton Head, SC

Re:

#356 Postby Vortex » Wed Oct 03, 2007 10:01 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:I am expecting a TC as large as the WPAC typhoons based upon the initial vortex size and model solutions.

if this gets into the GOM, it will probably take up most of the GOM



Derek, my thoughts exactly!!
0 likes   

americanrebel

#357 Postby americanrebel » Wed Oct 03, 2007 10:02 pm

If the SHIPS intensity shows a hurricane with 95MPH winds in 5 days, this would be very interesting because it would be directly over the loop of the GOM where there would be RI.
0 likes   

User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5597
Age: 37
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

Re:

#358 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Wed Oct 03, 2007 10:03 pm

'CaneFreak wrote:I agree Derek...as for Tampa Bay Hurricane...its ok dude...but I still dont see what your seeing...I see winds in the upper levels blowing clouds to the south but its not SHEAR...shear is defined as a difference in winds at different respective levels in the atmosphere...UL winds are totally different than shear winds....get it straight... :wink:


Oh thanks...learned something new...Upper Level winds are distinct from shear then if
that is the definition. And so then it is not shear but upper level winds...Now I get it...
For some reason I interpreted upper level winds as shear...OOOPS.
0 likes   

User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5597
Age: 37
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

#359 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Wed Oct 03, 2007 10:06 pm

WPAC systems seem to form involving monsoonal troughs...of which there
was one lifting out of the caribbean providing a massive inundation of
moisture into the area where 92L is developing...this will no
doubt be a large storm...wouldn't be surprised
if a good chunk of south florida saw some strong winds
soon...as it passes south through the straits.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#360 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed Oct 03, 2007 10:06 pm

I'd look for a system with a fairly low pressure, but with winds much lower than the pressure would tend to indicate. Based upon the model solutions, it may take 970-965mb to produce hurricane force winds from this thing
0 likes   


Return to “2007”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests