Invest 99L:Off E Coast-Discussions

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
UpTheCreek
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 397
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:28 pm
Location: Vassalboro, Maine

#1841 Postby UpTheCreek » Fri Sep 07, 2007 3:16 pm

whelp, this storm sure took a crapper....... :roll:
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#1842 Postby KWT » Fri Sep 07, 2007 3:17 pm

Its a real mess in terms of circulations but then again its not worse then say Arlene (or TD1 at the time) was in 05 as that also had multiple circulations around a broad one.

Derek, maybe the fact they found 1010mbs maybe further proof that the central LLC is decaying?
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#1843 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Sep 07, 2007 3:18 pm

advisories should not be started at this time

I did not say ever

However, the preliminary data indicates a much weaker cyclone than we had on Wednesday (even though it is more tropical)
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: Invest 99L: Off SE Coast-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#1844 Postby wxman57 » Fri Sep 07, 2007 3:18 pm

I'm trying a different approach. I zoomed out more on the satellite and ran a 6-hr loop. When I do that, I see what looks like a center near 30.3N/71.6W. That position is in between the two convective complexes. Probably correct.I don't have much doubt we'll have Gabrielle by morning. Outflow is looking more impressive.

Oh, and don't expect a very low central pressure this afternoon. Environmental pressures are relatively high off the east coast. Maybe only 1009-1011mb for now.
0 likes   

User avatar
storms in NC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2338
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Wallace,NC 40 miles NE of Wilm
Contact:

Re:

#1845 Postby storms in NC » Fri Sep 07, 2007 3:18 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:based upon the recon, I would not upgrade

pressure much higher than it was 2 days ago (not sure how the 1006mb was derived... recon seems to have apssed through the center and found 1010mb)

Unless I see better organization, IMO, advisories should not be initiated


Really. I would have thought it would be lower. With it looking lik it has today. I guess it has fooled a few on here
0 likes   

chadtm80

#1846 Postby chadtm80 » Fri Sep 07, 2007 3:19 pm

1110 Lowest so far Wxman
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re:

#1847 Postby RL3AO » Fri Sep 07, 2007 3:20 pm

chadtm80 wrote:1110 Lowest so far Wxman


That is one strong ridge. :eek: :P
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#1848 Postby KWT » Fri Sep 07, 2007 3:22 pm

wxman57, thats the LLC that came out of the eastern convective complex about 4-5hrs ago when that large convective burst went up on the western side. Still looks a bit of a strange looking mess though!
0 likes   

User avatar
BensonTCwatcher
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1046
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 10:11 pm
Location: Southport NC

Re: Invest 99L: Off SE Coast-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#1849 Postby BensonTCwatcher » Fri Sep 07, 2007 3:24 pm

if you go here http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic2/# and bring up the invest. check the SST's ahead of the storm, and also look at the shear from the western half of the storm to the coast. Looks to me like improving conditions ahead. I think we'll have Gabrielle by morning as well.
0 likes   

User avatar
storms in NC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2338
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Wallace,NC 40 miles NE of Wilm
Contact:

#1850 Postby storms in NC » Fri Sep 07, 2007 3:26 pm

From NWC of Morehead City just came out

SHORT TERM /6 AM SATURDAY MORNING THROUGH MONDAY NIGHT/...
MAIN FEATURE DURING PERIOD WILL BE LOW APPROACHING FROM OFFSHORE
WITH PSBL TROPICAL DEVELOPMENT. THINK VERY DRY AIR OVER AREA WILL
LIMIT DEVELOPMENT. MODELS REMAIN CONSISTENT WITH SYSTEM MOVING NW
TOWARD COAST THEN MOVING N OVER ERN NC. GFS PREFERRED OVER NAM12
WITH BETTER INITIALIZATION AND NAM LOOKS TOO SLOW. STILL SOME
UNCERTAINTY ON TIMING BUT DID RAISE POPS TO LIKELY COASTAL SECTIONS
ON SUN...OTRW GRADUALLY INCRSNG CHC POPS LATE SAT...AND CHC POPS SUN
NIGHT INTO MON NIGHT. USED BLEND OF GFS AND HPC QPF WITH AMOUNTS
AROUND 1 INCH.
0 likes   

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

Re:

#1851 Postby Thunder44 » Fri Sep 07, 2007 3:26 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:based upon the recon, I would not upgrade

pressure much higher than it was 2 days ago (not sure how the 1006mb was derived... recon seems to have apssed through the center and found 1010mb)

Unless I see better organization, IMO, advisories should not be initiated


I'm not sure if they really flew over the center yet. They just went back NW, and they didn't find any W or NW winds.
0 likes   

OuterBanker
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1731
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 10:53 am
Location: Nags Head, NC
Contact:

#1852 Postby OuterBanker » Fri Sep 07, 2007 3:26 pm

Recon didn't show anything. That's for sure. But the catch 22 is that it could organize very quickly once it reaches 75w or so. Wouldn't be enough time to warn anyone before landfall. Sticky wicket. Alex blew up in less than 24. Will they upgrade jut to be causious?
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#1853 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Sep 07, 2007 3:29 pm

as most here know, I HATE upgrading without a well-defined center and without surface winds of at least 25KT (and I perfer 30KT before making an upgrade)
0 likes   

dtrain44
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 141
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 7:45 am
Location: Norman, OK

Re: Invest 99L: Off SE Coast-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#1854 Postby dtrain44 » Fri Sep 07, 2007 3:30 pm

Given its proximity to the coast, I think the NHC might move ahead a little more quickly if they expect significant development and organization overnight. Even a strong tropical storm requires some preparations and most people aren't going to do that unless there's a clearly identified system out there. Even TD status would be enough to get some of those balls moving, especially if the NHC sees a chance for a minimal hurricane. I don't see much more than a middling tropical storm coming of this, but I think the NHC might be a bit more aggressive at 5 PM. I guess we'll all know in about twenty nine minutes..... I don't know that I see a TD here, but there is some argument for one and the proximity to land might be enough to get an upgrade.
0 likes   

User avatar
storms in NC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2338
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Wallace,NC 40 miles NE of Wilm
Contact:

Re:

#1855 Postby storms in NC » Fri Sep 07, 2007 3:30 pm

OuterBanker wrote:Recon didn't show anything. That's for sure. But the catch 22 is that it could organize very quickly once it reaches 75w or so. Wouldn't be enough time to warn anyone before landfall. Sticky wicket. Alex blew up in less than 24. Will they upgrade jut to be causious?


Don't think so. They may for gale winds and ruff seas. But up it to a TD not going to happen at 5:30
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: Invest 99L: Off SE Coast-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#1856 Postby wxman57 » Fri Sep 07, 2007 3:32 pm

Recon reports indicate an LLC near 29.6N/71.3W. 25kt winds about 30 miles NE of the center.
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

Re:

#1857 Postby x-y-no » Fri Sep 07, 2007 3:32 pm

OuterBanker wrote:Recon didn't show anything. That's for sure. But the catch 22 is that it could organize very quickly once it reaches 75w or so. Wouldn't be enough time to warn anyone before landfall. Sticky wicket. Alex blew up in less than 24. Will they upgrade jut to be causious?


Not if there's no closed circulation.

Haven't found ant NW or W winds yet.
0 likes   

User avatar
windstorm99
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1578
Age: 47
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 8:10 am
Location: Miami, Florida
Contact:

Re: Invest 99L: Off SE Coast-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#1858 Postby windstorm99 » Fri Sep 07, 2007 3:33 pm

Guys this might be the wrong thread but what is this?

TROPICAL DISCUSSION - INTERNATIONAL DESKS
NWS HYDROMETEOROLOGICAL PREDICTION CENTER CAMP SPRINGS MD
154 PM EDT FRI SEP 07 2007

THE TROUGH LIES
ALONG THE EAST COAST OF THE USA TO THE BAHAMAS/CENTRAL CUBA...WITH
A CLOSED LOW NEAR 28N 74W. AT 24-48 HRS...A WIND MAXIMA OF 50-75KT
WILL EJECT ACROSS THE GULF OF MEXICO...FORCING THE BASE OF THE
TROUGH TO STRETCH TO THE SOUTHWEST ACROSS THE EASTERN GULF TO THE
CAMPECHE SOUND/NORTHERN YUCATAN. THE CLOSED LOW IS TO THEN MOVE
OVER CENTRAL/SOUTHERN FLORIDA...WHILE ANOTHER FORMS OVER THE
CAMPECHE SOUND/TABASCO MEXICO BY 60-72 HRS. ALTHOUGH CONSIDERABLY
WEAKER THAN ON PREVIOUS RUNS...THE MODELS STILL FORECAST A WARM
CORE CYCLONE TO DEVELOP NORTH OF THE ISLANDS..
0 likes   

User avatar
Wthrman13
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 502
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 12:44 pm
Location: West Lafayette, IN
Contact:

#1859 Postby Wthrman13 » Fri Sep 07, 2007 3:34 pm

After looking carefully at the visible satellite loops, I have to agree that, although the convection has increased substantially, the low-level circulation has decreased in organization quite a bit. It looks like there is a large area of very light winds on the SW side of the circulation. However, the large-scale circulation envelope still appears well-defined, and as long as convection continues to increase, we should see it start to wrap up over the next day.
0 likes   

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

#1860 Postby WindRunner » Fri Sep 07, 2007 3:35 pm

Anyone notice the nasty outflow boundary closing in on the center from the east? Completely destroying the low clouds on that side of the storm . . .

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/vis-l.jpg
0 likes   


Return to “2007”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests