INVEST 92L: Bahamas : Gone fron NRL

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Derek Ortt

#181 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed Oct 03, 2007 2:10 pm

again, Karen PLAYED NO ROLE IN THIS DISTURBANCE
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#182 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed Oct 03, 2007 2:11 pm

it is not fighting anything in the GOM

Model NCEP has shear over the system currently... while WV shows uppe ridging over the system. It is fighting something in the model now, not the GOM
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145295
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: INVEST 92L : Models Thread

#183 Postby cycloneye » Wed Oct 03, 2007 2:11 pm

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145295
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: INVEST 92L : Near Bahamas : Discussions & Images

#184 Postby cycloneye » Wed Oct 03, 2007 2:14 pm

boca,this morning you saw the position of low more north (27n) than what the 12:00 UTC models had.Guess what,at the 18:00 UTC iniciation point they have it at 26.9n so you saw it right this morning.Now we have to see how the more north position affects if any the future track.
0 likes   

User avatar
Weatherboy1
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1189
Age: 49
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 1:50 pm
Location: Jupiter/Sarasota, FL

#185 Postby Weatherboy1 » Wed Oct 03, 2007 2:28 pm

I think (based on high-res visible satellite) there might even be a "center" further north -- around 28/71.3. At the very least, there apperas to be a "naked swirl" that has maintained itself for several frames in that vicinity. It appears that a bit of NW-erly shear is displacing the convection south of its locale. On the other hand, it could just fizzle out, with a real center forming further south. But it is worth noting, in my view ...

Go to this link, then click in that general vicinity with "high" selected as the zoom factor to see what I'm talking about ...

http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/GOES/goeseastconus.html
0 likes   

User avatar
hurricanetrack
HurricaneTrack.com
HurricaneTrack.com
Posts: 1781
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 10:46 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC
Contact:

#186 Postby hurricanetrack » Wed Oct 03, 2007 2:31 pm

My take: wait until this thing gets a real center and is an actual tropical cyclone- not just an invest on a map. Then we can see what the intensity models do with it.

Until then, go out and play- there's little to see here. :-)
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145295
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: INVEST 92L : Near Bahamas : Discussions & Images

#187 Postby cycloneye » Wed Oct 03, 2007 2:33 pm

The Latest at 19:15 UTC

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

#188 Postby x-y-no » Wed Oct 03, 2007 2:34 pm

So the deeper the system, the more southerly the track ...
0 likes   

User avatar
Weatherboy1
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1189
Age: 49
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 1:50 pm
Location: Jupiter/Sarasota, FL

#189 Postby Weatherboy1 » Wed Oct 03, 2007 2:37 pm

I'm more worried about what I'll jokingly call the "angle of attack." IF a center forms farther north (in the 28N vicinity), then even a WSW motion (which is what the models are forecasting) could mean a direct impact for South Florida, vs. a move farther south (which would result in Cuba or the Straits bearing the brunt of any possible hit). Of course, at this stage we don't even have a TD, much less something more powerful. So this is all idle speculation. But that's what is on my mind at this hour.
0 likes   

User avatar
hurricanetrack
HurricaneTrack.com
HurricaneTrack.com
Posts: 1781
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 10:46 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC
Contact:

#190 Postby hurricanetrack » Wed Oct 03, 2007 2:39 pm

Oh yeah- it is definitely a swirl there with nice spiral arms. Not large but there and moving northwest it appears:

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t2/loop-vis.html

Add the lat/lon and speed up the animation. Near 28 and 71.3 as mentioned above.
0 likes   

User avatar
GeneratorPower
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1648
Age: 45
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 11:48 pm
Location: Huntsville, AL

#191 Postby GeneratorPower » Wed Oct 03, 2007 2:40 pm

Many of the models showed Dean as a 999mb low when it was a Cat 5. Intensity off these models is the funniest joke of them all.

Please stop using the intensity data from the GFS. It's embarrassing.
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7182
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: INVEST 92L : Models Thread

#192 Postby jlauderdal » Wed Oct 03, 2007 2:40 pm

Stormcenter wrote:
DESTRUCTION5 wrote:
cycloneye wrote:12z GFDL Animation



GFDL Predicts a very weak joke of a storm..


Yes it does which means it will be fighting something in the GOM.
The GFS also shows the same with it's lastest run. In my opinion
all great news if this comes to pass.

it couldnt fight off a bad run, look its real early in the game and we will see funky model runs so dont start calling it until you see consistency.
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re:

#193 Postby Stormcenter » Wed Oct 03, 2007 3:08 pm

GeneratorPower wrote:Many of the models showed Dean as a 999mb low when it was a Cat 5. Intensity off these models is the funniest joke of them all.

Please stop using the intensity data from the GFS. It's embarrassing.


What about the GFDL? It shows it as a pretty tame system too and I think it's
a better model when it comes to intensity.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#194 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed Oct 03, 2007 3:09 pm

GFDL also has 993mb... not exactly a weak cyclone
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: INVEST 92L : Models Thread

#195 Postby Stormcenter » Wed Oct 03, 2007 3:21 pm

Well the bottom line is that most if not all of the models
don't show this as a U.S. mainland threat except for maybe
skirting or coming over lower Fl. but that would before it strenghthen significantly (if it did). Most of the models agree on a track which takes 92L westward across the Yucatan or into the BOC. That in my opinion is saying a lot when models agree this early.
0 likes   

cpdaman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3131
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 11:44 am
Location: SPB county (gulf stream)

Re: INVEST 92L : Near Bahamas : Discussions & Images

#196 Postby cpdaman » Wed Oct 03, 2007 3:22 pm

it seems as though conditions thankfully (for those in fl and keys) are not in a hurry to become conductive for this to do anything fast

Promet's any idea when the upper air shear will relax over this invest
0 likes   

User avatar
Cyclenall
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6666
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re:

#197 Postby Cyclenall » Wed Oct 03, 2007 3:23 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:GFDL also has 993mb... not exactly a weak cyclone

That's what I thought but it seems that is the new "very weak" type of tropical cyclone among everyone. Next we'll start hearing how a category 3 hurricane wasn't strong enough.
0 likes   

User avatar
'CaneFreak
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1486
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:50 am
Location: New Bern, NC

#198 Postby 'CaneFreak » Wed Oct 03, 2007 3:30 pm

Shear is not a problem and has not been a problem for this disturbance or invest if you will since about this time yesterday. The problem right now is developing a tight core. As the promets have said already, if you will go back and read, it will take a couple of days in order for this to develop a tight LLC and until it does that, it will remain a rather poorly organized tropical wave. But once it gets a core going, its anybody's guess what happens then. :eek: :eek:
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10145
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re:

#199 Postby Blown Away » Wed Oct 03, 2007 3:30 pm

x-y-no wrote:So the deeper the system, the more southerly the track ...


I thought shallow systems tend to move more west and deeper systems tend to move poleward?
0 likes   

User avatar
'CaneFreak
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1486
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:50 am
Location: New Bern, NC

Re: INVEST 92L : Near Bahamas : Discussions & Images

#200 Postby 'CaneFreak » Wed Oct 03, 2007 3:30 pm

wxman57 wrote:
Blown_away wrote:Vortex, hard to argue w/ you. Looks like a cyclonic spin near 27.6N/71W w/ convection building around that area. I'm basing that observation on the NHC visible floater. Wxman57 has better resources to determine LLC locations. That being said, I can't imagine there is high confidence on the LLC location at this point.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t2/loop-vis.html


There isn't a significant LLC at this point, just a small low-level eddy well north of the convection. May not have a well-defined LLC for another day or two.
0 likes   


Return to “2007”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests