Tropical Depression HUMBERTO Discussion & Images
Moderator: S2k Moderators
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1220
- Joined: Sat May 10, 2003 1:59 pm
- Location: Near KCMO
- Contact:
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 38087
- Age: 36
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
- Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
- Contact:
Re:
simplykristi wrote:What was the peak wind before landfall? When I stopped looking last evening, this was a tropical storm!
Kristi
Officially 85 mph.
Interesting note from the discussion:
BASED ON OPERATIONAL ESTIMATES...HUMBERTO STRENGTHENED FROM A 30 KT
DEPRESSION AT 15Z YESTERDAY TO A 75 KT HURRICANE AT 09Z THIS
MORNING...AN INCREASE OF 45 KT IN 18 HOURS. TO PUT THIS
DEVELOPMENT IN PERSPECTIVE...NO TROPICAL CYCLONE IN THE HISTORICAL
RECORD HAS EVER REACHED THIS INTENSITY AT A FASTER RATE NEAR
LANDFALL. IT WOULD BE NICE TO KNOW...SOMEDAY...WHY THIS HAPPENED.
Last edited by Brent on Thu Sep 13, 2007 9:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
- DESTRUCTION5
- Category 5
- Posts: 4423
- Age: 43
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
- Location: Stuart, FL
Re: Re:
Brent wrote:simplykristi wrote:What was the peak wind before landfall? When I stopped looking last evening, this was a tropical storm!
Kristi
Officially 85 mph.
Interesting note from the discussion:
BASED ON OPERATIONAL ESTIMATES...HUMBERTO STRENGTHENED FROM A 30 KT
DEPRESSION AT 15Z YESTERDAY TO A 75 KT HURRICANE AT 09Z THIS
MORNING...AN INCREASE OF 45 KT IN 18 HOURS. TO PUT THIS
DEVELOPMENT IN PERSPECTIVE...NO TROPICAL CYCLONE IN THE HISTORICAL
RECORD HAS EVER REACHED THIS INTENSITY AT A FASTER RATE NEAR
LANDFALL. IT WOULD BE NICE TO KNOW...SOMEDAY...WHY THIS HAPPENED.
I went to bed to friggin early last night Brent...LOL Darnit!
0 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34002
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re:
KWT wrote:Made landfall as a 85mph category-1 hurricane though there was some data to suggest it was even stronger then that from recon right before landflal including flight level winds at 98kts.
That suggests it might have been 90 mph (80 kt) at landfall.
Why did it happen? I think it comes down to the ridge pushing it, combined with spending extra time over warm water in an environment with virtually no shear or dry air. It was small enough to prevent land interaction from being a significant factor.
0 likes
- 'CaneFreak
- Category 5
- Posts: 1486
- Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:50 am
- Location: New Bern, NC
- Downdraft
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 906
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 8:45 pm
- Location: Sanford, Florida
- Contact:
Re: Re:
jschlitz wrote:feederband wrote:jschlitz wrote:BTW, I didn't have a chance to repsond, but I was a little irritated yesterday --
Someone cited "shallow waters off the Texas coast" as a reason why this would not intensify. As if Charley and Claudette were not an example enough - let this be an example that a storm CAN and WILL intensify over nearshore shelf waters if conditions are favorable.
Wouldn't shallower waters have a higher heat content?
No, deeper waters have a higher heat content b/c a factor in TCHP is the depth of warm water. However, I think this is negated by the fact that shallow waters can't upwell deep, cold water.
There is a lot of question as to whether Andrew actually intensified in the shallow bay prior to landfall and also as it passed through the Everglades it was able to keep it's strength. Haven't read much on it so don't know much about it but we have seen several cases of rapid intensification over shallow waters. I think water depth is just one part of the equation.
0 likes
Re:
That's pretty close to 30.0N and 90.0W isn't it. BTW your posts are good.Steve wrote:This was from the 5am discussion.
12HR VT 13/1800Z 30.9N 93.5W 55 KT...INLAND
At 7am, the advisory noted that the system was at 30.3N and 93.6W. So the storm is traveling south of the points prior indicated. This also may mean that my call last night for Humberto to track just south of or over Alexandria may be right. 12 hours, it's not going to be at 30.9N and 93.5W, rest assured of that.
Steve
0 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34002
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re:
HURAKAN wrote:This is why tropical meteorology is so interesting. Who would have imagined in their wildest dreams that 90L would become a history-making hurricane. Humberto replaced Hugo and now he has his own little corner in the GREAT BOOK OF HURRICANES.
At least this probably isn't enough for Humberto to be replaced...maybe in 2013 he'll go after his "father"...
0 likes
CrazyC83, thats of course providing that Humberto doesn't decide to swing back into the gulf of mexico, not forecasted to do by the NHC but you never know with these systems.
Still a fairly strong tropical storm at 65mph, will be interesting to see how long it can last as a TS and eeen more interesting to see how long it can keep going as a TD...hope it doesn't do an Erin!
Shouldn't do that though!!
Still a fairly strong tropical storm at 65mph, will be interesting to see how long it can last as a TS and eeen more interesting to see how long it can keep going as a TD...hope it doesn't do an Erin!
Shouldn't do that though!!
0 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34002
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re:
KWT wrote:CrazyC83, thats of course providing that Humberto doesn't decide to swing back into the gulf of mexico, not forecasted to do by the NHC but you never know with these systems.
Still a fairly strong tropical storm at 65mph, will be interesting to see how long it can last as a TS and eeen more interesting to see how long it can keep going as a TD...hope it doesn't do an Erin!
Shouldn't do that though!!
Yeah, all bets are off if he goes back into the Gulf. It did happen in 1985 with Juan, and of course with Allison...
0 likes
-
- Tropical Low
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 11:12 pm
- Location: Gentilly Terrace, New Orleans, LA
Re: TS HUMBERTO (Louisiana): Discussion & Images
attallaman wrote:That's pretty close to 30.0N and 90.0W isn't it. BTW your posts are good.Steve wrote:This was from the 5am discussion.
12HR VT 13/1800Z 30.9N 93.5W 55 KT...INLAND
At 7am, the advisory noted that the system was at 30.3N and 93.6W. So the storm is traveling south of the points prior indicated. This also may mean that my call last night for Humberto to track just south of or over Alexandria may be right. 12 hours, it's not going to be at 30.9N and 93.5W, rest assured of that.
Steve
30.0N and 90.0W?!? Wait......that's me, dang it!!!
LOL
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1220
- Joined: Sat May 10, 2003 1:59 pm
- Location: Near KCMO
- Contact:
Re: TS HUMBERTO (Louisiana): Discussion & Images
Thanks for the replies!
I was watching the radar returns on TWC at 9:30 PM last night It looked like the storm had a well-formed center of circulation and strengthening. I thought that it was too close to shore to develop any further. It's amazing what a storm can do. I shouldn't be surprised after what Charley did in 2004.
Kristi
I was watching the radar returns on TWC at 9:30 PM last night It looked like the storm had a well-formed center of circulation and strengthening. I thought that it was too close to shore to develop any further. It's amazing what a storm can do. I shouldn't be surprised after what Charley did in 2004.
Kristi
0 likes
Re: TS HUMBERTO (Louisiana): Discussion & Images
It is... impossible.
90L wasnt... even... suppoused to be Humberto....
sorry... 75 KT??? I cant... talk...
90L wasnt... even... suppoused to be Humberto....
sorry... 75 KT??? I cant... talk...
0 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34002
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: TS HUMBERTO (Louisiana): Discussion & Images
simplykristi wrote:Thanks for the replies!
I was watching the radar returns on TWC at 9:30 PM last night It looked like the storm had a well-formed center of circulation and strengthening. I thought that it was too close to shore to develop any further. It's amazing what a storm can do. I shouldn't be surprised after what Charley did in 2004.
Kristi
Just like Charley, we seemed to nail it (some of us said hurricane as early as yesterday afternoon) when no one else did...I am sure some NHC mets were thinking this would happen though but there were in-house disputes.
This is why we can't always rely on the media and we sometimes have to go with our own gut feelings...
0 likes
- JtSmarts
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1437
- Age: 39
- Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 1:29 pm
- Location: Columbia, South Carolina
Re: TS HUMBERTO (Louisiana): Discussion & Images
That is a great radar loop Chad. I advise all the collectors to grab it, it really shows how Humberto came together before landfall.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests