Tropical Depression HUMBERTO Discussion & Images

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38087
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: Hurricane HUMBERTO (GOM): Discussion & Images

#1561 Postby Brent » Thu Sep 13, 2007 9:45 am

Down to a 65 mph TS at 11am.
0 likes   

simplykristi
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1220
Joined: Sat May 10, 2003 1:59 pm
Location: Near KCMO
Contact:

#1562 Postby simplykristi » Thu Sep 13, 2007 9:46 am

What was the peak wind before landfall? When I stopped looking last evening, this was a tropical storm!

Kristi
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38087
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re:

#1563 Postby Brent » Thu Sep 13, 2007 9:48 am

simplykristi wrote:What was the peak wind before landfall? When I stopped looking last evening, this was a tropical storm!

Kristi


Officially 85 mph.

Interesting note from the discussion:

BASED ON OPERATIONAL ESTIMATES...HUMBERTO STRENGTHENED FROM A 30 KT
DEPRESSION AT 15Z YESTERDAY TO A 75 KT HURRICANE AT 09Z THIS
MORNING...AN INCREASE OF 45 KT IN 18 HOURS. TO PUT THIS
DEVELOPMENT IN PERSPECTIVE...NO TROPICAL CYCLONE IN THE HISTORICAL
RECORD HAS EVER REACHED THIS INTENSITY AT A FASTER RATE NEAR
LANDFALL.
IT WOULD BE NICE TO KNOW...SOMEDAY...WHY THIS HAPPENED.
Last edited by Brent on Thu Sep 13, 2007 9:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#1564 Postby KWT » Thu Sep 13, 2007 9:48 am

Made landfall as a 85mph category-1 hurricane though there was some data to suggest it was even stronger then that from recon right before landflal including flight level winds at 98kts.
0 likes   

User avatar
DESTRUCTION5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4423
Age: 43
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
Location: Stuart, FL

Re: Re:

#1565 Postby DESTRUCTION5 » Thu Sep 13, 2007 9:49 am

Brent wrote:
simplykristi wrote:What was the peak wind before landfall? When I stopped looking last evening, this was a tropical storm!

Kristi


Officially 85 mph.

Interesting note from the discussion:

BASED ON OPERATIONAL ESTIMATES...HUMBERTO STRENGTHENED FROM A 30 KT
DEPRESSION AT 15Z YESTERDAY TO A 75 KT HURRICANE AT 09Z THIS
MORNING...AN INCREASE OF 45 KT IN 18 HOURS. TO PUT THIS
DEVELOPMENT IN PERSPECTIVE...NO TROPICAL CYCLONE IN THE HISTORICAL
RECORD HAS EVER REACHED THIS INTENSITY AT A FASTER RATE NEAR
LANDFALL. IT WOULD BE NICE TO KNOW...SOMEDAY...WHY THIS HAPPENED.


I went to bed to friggin early last night Brent...LOL Darnit!
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re:

#1566 Postby CrazyC83 » Thu Sep 13, 2007 9:50 am

KWT wrote:Made landfall as a 85mph category-1 hurricane though there was some data to suggest it was even stronger then that from recon right before landflal including flight level winds at 98kts.


That suggests it might have been 90 mph (80 kt) at landfall.

Why did it happen? I think it comes down to the ridge pushing it, combined with spending extra time over warm water in an environment with virtually no shear or dry air. It was small enough to prevent land interaction from being a significant factor.
0 likes   

User avatar
'CaneFreak
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1486
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:50 am
Location: New Bern, NC

#1567 Postby 'CaneFreak » Thu Sep 13, 2007 9:51 am

Yet another record broken in a weird 2007 season.
0 likes   

User avatar
Downdraft
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 906
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 8:45 pm
Location: Sanford, Florida
Contact:

Re: Re:

#1568 Postby Downdraft » Thu Sep 13, 2007 9:52 am

jschlitz wrote:
feederband wrote:
jschlitz wrote:BTW, I didn't have a chance to repsond, but I was a little irritated yesterday --

Someone cited "shallow waters off the Texas coast" as a reason why this would not intensify. As if Charley and Claudette were not an example enough - let this be an example that a storm CAN and WILL intensify over nearshore shelf waters if conditions are favorable.


Wouldn't shallower waters have a higher heat content?


No, deeper waters have a higher heat content b/c a factor in TCHP is the depth of warm water. However, I think this is negated by the fact that shallow waters can't upwell deep, cold water.


There is a lot of question as to whether Andrew actually intensified in the shallow bay prior to landfall and also as it passed through the Everglades it was able to keep it's strength. Haven't read much on it so don't know much about it but we have seen several cases of rapid intensification over shallow waters. I think water depth is just one part of the equation.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#1569 Postby HURAKAN » Thu Sep 13, 2007 9:52 am

This is why tropical meteorology is so interesting. Who would have imagined in their wildest dreams that 90L would become a history-making hurricane. Humberto replaced Hugo and now he has his own little corner in the GREAT BOOK OF HURRICANES.
0 likes   

attallaman

Re:

#1570 Postby attallaman » Thu Sep 13, 2007 9:54 am

Steve wrote:This was from the 5am discussion.

12HR VT 13/1800Z 30.9N 93.5W 55 KT...INLAND

At 7am, the advisory noted that the system was at 30.3N and 93.6W. So the storm is traveling south of the points prior indicated. This also may mean that my call last night for Humberto to track just south of or over Alexandria may be right. 12 hours, it's not going to be at 30.9N and 93.5W, rest assured of that.

Steve
That's pretty close to 30.0N and 90.0W isn't it. BTW your posts are good.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re:

#1571 Postby CrazyC83 » Thu Sep 13, 2007 9:59 am

HURAKAN wrote:This is why tropical meteorology is so interesting. Who would have imagined in their wildest dreams that 90L would become a history-making hurricane. Humberto replaced Hugo and now he has his own little corner in the GREAT BOOK OF HURRICANES.


At least this probably isn't enough for Humberto to be replaced...maybe in 2013 he'll go after his "father"...
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#1572 Postby KWT » Thu Sep 13, 2007 10:02 am

CrazyC83, thats of course providing that Humberto doesn't decide to swing back into the gulf of mexico, not forecasted to do by the NHC but you never know with these systems.

Still a fairly strong tropical storm at 65mph, will be interesting to see how long it can last as a TS and eeen more interesting to see how long it can keep going as a TD...hope it doesn't do an Erin!
Shouldn't do that though!!
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re:

#1573 Postby CrazyC83 » Thu Sep 13, 2007 10:04 am

KWT wrote:CrazyC83, thats of course providing that Humberto doesn't decide to swing back into the gulf of mexico, not forecasted to do by the NHC but you never know with these systems.

Still a fairly strong tropical storm at 65mph, will be interesting to see how long it can last as a TS and eeen more interesting to see how long it can keep going as a TD...hope it doesn't do an Erin!
Shouldn't do that though!!


Yeah, all bets are off if he goes back into the Gulf. It did happen in 1985 with Juan, and of course with Allison...
0 likes   

Puddinhead
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 40
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 11:12 pm
Location: Gentilly Terrace, New Orleans, LA

Re: TS HUMBERTO (Louisiana): Discussion & Images

#1574 Postby Puddinhead » Thu Sep 13, 2007 10:05 am

attallaman wrote:
Steve wrote:This was from the 5am discussion.

12HR VT 13/1800Z 30.9N 93.5W 55 KT...INLAND

At 7am, the advisory noted that the system was at 30.3N and 93.6W. So the storm is traveling south of the points prior indicated. This also may mean that my call last night for Humberto to track just south of or over Alexandria may be right. 12 hours, it's not going to be at 30.9N and 93.5W, rest assured of that.

Steve
That's pretty close to 30.0N and 90.0W isn't it. BTW your posts are good.

30.0N and 90.0W?!? Wait......that's me, dang it!!!

LOL
0 likes   

simplykristi
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1220
Joined: Sat May 10, 2003 1:59 pm
Location: Near KCMO
Contact:

Re: TS HUMBERTO (Louisiana): Discussion & Images

#1575 Postby simplykristi » Thu Sep 13, 2007 10:10 am

Thanks for the replies!

I was watching the radar returns on TWC at 9:30 PM last night It looked like the storm had a well-formed center of circulation and strengthening. I thought that it was too close to shore to develop any further. It's amazing what a storm can do. I shouldn't be surprised after what Charley did in 2004.

Kristi
0 likes   

mightyerick

Re: TS HUMBERTO (Louisiana): Discussion & Images

#1576 Postby mightyerick » Thu Sep 13, 2007 10:11 am

It is... impossible.
90L wasnt... even... suppoused to be Humberto....
sorry... 75 KT??? I cant... talk...
0 likes   

chadtm80

Re: TS HUMBERTO (Louisiana): Discussion & Images

#1577 Postby chadtm80 » Thu Sep 13, 2007 10:12 am

Image
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: TS HUMBERTO (Louisiana): Discussion & Images

#1578 Postby CrazyC83 » Thu Sep 13, 2007 10:17 am

simplykristi wrote:Thanks for the replies!

I was watching the radar returns on TWC at 9:30 PM last night It looked like the storm had a well-formed center of circulation and strengthening. I thought that it was too close to shore to develop any further. It's amazing what a storm can do. I shouldn't be surprised after what Charley did in 2004.

Kristi


Just like Charley, we seemed to nail it (some of us said hurricane as early as yesterday afternoon) when no one else did...I am sure some NHC mets were thinking this would happen though but there were in-house disputes.

This is why we can't always rely on the media and we sometimes have to go with our own gut feelings...
0 likes   

User avatar
skysummit
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5305
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Ponchatoula, LA
Contact:

#1579 Postby skysummit » Thu Sep 13, 2007 10:18 am

I love that so many people wrote this off yesterday. There were comparisons to Cindy on how Cindy strengthened into a hurricane right before landfall, and replies were made "no way his will be like Cindy". LOL....I LOVE IT!

This was actually worse than Cindy!
0 likes   

User avatar
JtSmarts
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1437
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 1:29 pm
Location: Columbia, South Carolina

Re: TS HUMBERTO (Louisiana): Discussion & Images

#1580 Postby JtSmarts » Thu Sep 13, 2007 10:20 am

That is a great radar loop Chad. I advise all the collectors to grab it, it really shows how Humberto came together before landfall.
0 likes   


Return to “2007”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests