Hurricane FELIX: Caribbean-Discussions

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38087
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re:

#141 Postby Brent » Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:15 pm

ConvergenceZone wrote:The good news is that this isn't forecast to be a major like Dean was...in fact, not even remotely close to being a major, based on the latest forecast. Hopefully it will miss any real populated areas like Dean did as well....


Ummm... do you really think this will be only be a Cat 1? NHC is being conservative because it's weak right now. I'll be surprised if this is not a major.
0 likes   

User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

Re: TD SIX: Near Windwards-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#142 Postby southerngale » Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:16 pm

miamicanes177 wrote:
jhamps10 wrote:Wow, looking at the satellite loop, I see totally NO reason AT ALL why this should not be felix right now. in fact t numbers of 2.5, most times we will see an upgrade at 1.5 or even 2.0, There is NO excuse in my book right now.
Especially as it is threatening land at the moment. The NHC is out of line for not upgrading this.


Out of line? Disagreeing is one thing. Saying they are out of line is a little over the top.

From the rules in the Storm2K Rules & Announcements forum:

12. Storm2K.org does not allow personal attacks and/or personal insults of any kind directed to The National Hurricane Center, it’s staff or any other professional weather organization for that matter. While one may disagree it is very important we keep respecting the weather professionals and their opinions. We are expecting all members to act professionally at all times.
0 likes   

Coredesat

#143 Postby Coredesat » Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:17 pm

NHC is being conservative because of the forecast rapid movement through the Caribbean, not because the system appears to be weak.
0 likes   

User avatar
Beam
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 292
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 2:06 pm

Re: TD SIX: Near Windwards-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#144 Postby Beam » Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:17 pm

miamicanes177 wrote:
Coredesat wrote:Didn't I say Dvorak is trumped in this area?

Unless you've managed get your own private pilot to fly you up into this thing tonight to get data, I'm not sure how the 2.5 estimate could be overtaken. Recon is not flying in this right now and it looks 10x better since they were up there many hours ago.


Beven already stated in the discussion why it remains to be upgraded, and frankly, I don't see what difference it makes. A 35 mph TD vs. a 40 mph storm.... it's splitting hairs, really. The watches and warnings are up, the people have been advised, and there's no reason to pull the trigger on naming it a storm without rock-solid data simply because it's close to land. That's not how the game is played, my friend. I'm personally glad the NHC is conservative, and not jumping the gun like certain other entities have with this system.
0 likes   

User avatar
skysummit
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5305
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Ponchatoula, LA
Contact:

Re: Re:

#145 Postby skysummit » Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:17 pm

Brent wrote:
ConvergenceZone wrote:The good news is that this isn't forecast to be a major like Dean was...in fact, not even remotely close to being a major, based on the latest forecast. Hopefully it will miss any real populated areas like Dean did as well....


Ummm... do you really think this will be only be a Cat 1? NHC is being conservative because it's weak right now. I'll be surprised if this is not a major.


They may also be taking into account the HWRF for some reason. Who knows, I agree, it's a conservative forecast.
0 likes   

jhamps10

Re: Re:

#146 Postby jhamps10 » Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:17 pm

Brent wrote:
ConvergenceZone wrote:The good news is that this isn't forecast to be a major like Dean was...in fact, not even remotely close to being a major, based on the latest forecast. Hopefully it will miss any real populated areas like Dean did as well....


Ummm... do you really think this will be only be a Cat 1? NHC is being conservative because it's weak right now. I'll be surprised if this is not a major.


yeah I'd say 75% likelyhood of this being aoab cat 3 by tuesday.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145281
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: TD SIX: Near Windwards-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#147 Postby cycloneye » Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:18 pm

Coredesat wrote:
miamicanes177 wrote:
Coredesat wrote:Didn't I say Dvorak is trumped in this area?

Unless you've managed get your own private pilot to fly you up into this thing tonight to get data, I'm not sure how the 2.5 estimate could be overtaken. Recon is not flying in this right now and it looks 10x better since they were up there many hours ago.


Dvorak is trumped. Just look at Dean: based on Dvorak estimates it would not have been a Cat 5. The highest T associated with it was T6.5/6.5.


6.5/6.5 was almost the highest T number.7.0/7.0 was,which corresponds to 140 kts.

21/0615 UTC 18.6N 86.9W T7.0/7.0 DEAN

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/positions.html
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re: TD SIX: Near Windwards-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#148 Postby ConvergenceZone » Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:18 pm

Thanx guys for pointing that out. I was just reading the intensity graphical map that showed the yellow color coding for cat one and maintaining it as it approached landfall..........

Perhaps they will change that intensity map next advisory then.
0 likes   

User avatar
canegrl04
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2486
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 5:37 pm
Location: Texas

Re: Re:

#149 Postby canegrl04 » Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:18 pm

Brent wrote:
ConvergenceZone wrote:The good news is that this isn't forecast to be a major like Dean was...in fact, not even remotely close to being a major, based on the latest forecast. Hopefully it will miss any real populated areas like Dean did as well....


Ummm... do you really think this will be only be a Cat 1? NHC is being conservative because it's weak right now. I'll be surprised if this is not a major.


Latest NHC discussion mentions that this one has the potential to be a major in the next 5 days
0 likes   

miamicanes177
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1131
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:53 pm

Re: TD SIX: Near Windwards-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#150 Postby miamicanes177 » Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:18 pm

Coredesat wrote:Dvorak is trumped. Just look at Dean: based on Dvorak estimates it would not have been a Cat 5. The highest T associated with it was T6.5/6.5.
Dean got a T7.0/7.0 at landfall. This corresponds to the only time he reached category 5 intensity as well.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#151 Postby RL3AO » Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:19 pm

The NHC is saying it could be a conservative forecast. You just don't know what could happen. In 48 hours we could have a 880mb Cat 5 or a 1005mb tropical storm.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#152 Postby HURAKAN » Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:21 pm

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Category 5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10074
Age: 35
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:00 pm
Location: New Brunswick, NJ
Contact:

Re: TD SIX: Near Windwards-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#153 Postby Category 5 » Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:22 pm

miamicanes177 wrote:
Coredesat wrote:Didn't I say Dvorak is trumped in this area?

Unless you've managed get your own private pilot to fly you up into this thing tonight to get data, I'm not sure how the 2.5 estimate could be overtaken. Recon is not flying in this right now and it looks 10x better since they were up there many hours ago.


I'm guessing you found one?
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: TD SIX: Near Windwards-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#154 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:23 pm

With watches and warnings already issued for the islands being/to be affected, is there a huge difference between 35 mph and 40 or 45 mph? No real harm done, and Beven did explain his reasoning.
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: TD SIX: Near Windwards-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#155 Postby Sanibel » Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:27 pm

It's definitely pulling up slightly. Maybe 280* or more.
0 likes   

Coredesat

Re: TD SIX: Near Windwards-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#156 Postby Coredesat » Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:28 pm

miamicanes177 wrote:
Coredesat wrote:Dvorak is trumped. Just look at Dean: based on Dvorak estimates it would not have been a Cat 5. The highest T associated with it was T6.5/6.5.
Dean got a T7.0/7.0 at landfall. This corresponds to the only time he reached category 5 intensity as well.


Okay, it got T7.0 at landfall. Check the T history, though, it mostly doesn't correspond with its actual intensity.
0 likes   

User avatar
canegrl04
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2486
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 5:37 pm
Location: Texas

Re:

#157 Postby canegrl04 » Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:28 pm

HURAKAN wrote:Image


Wow :eek: Looks like historically,the majority went either in the GOM,or into the Atl.
0 likes   

User avatar
Beam
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 292
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 2:06 pm

Re: Re:

#158 Postby Beam » Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:30 pm

canegrl04 wrote:
HURAKAN wrote:Image


Wow :eek: Looks like historically,the majority went either in the GOM,or into the Atl.


Like a certain pro-met said earlier today... it's a good thing climatology doesn't steer hurricanes.
0 likes   

Coredesat

Re:

#159 Postby Coredesat » Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:33 pm

HURAKAN wrote:Image


Interesting that two of the storms on that image are basin-crossers (Irene-Olivia and Joan-Miriam).
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: TD SIX: Near Windwards-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#160 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:35 pm

Sanibel wrote:It's definitely pulling up slightly. Maybe 280* or more.


Hmmm, the 0Z GFS has the 500 mb steering sort of pointing more WNW than W. Posting image on model thread now...
0 likes   


Return to “2007”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests