Invest 90L SE GOM: Discussions & Images

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10348
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: Invest 90L SE GOM: Discussions-Analysis & Images

#101 Postby Sanibel » Sun Sep 09, 2007 12:01 pm

I'm still waiting for something definite to form from this.
0 likes   

jaxfladude
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1246
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:36 pm
Location: Jacksonville, Fla

Re: Invest 90L SE GOM: Discussions-Analysis & Images

#102 Postby jaxfladude » Sun Sep 09, 2007 12:14 pm

Coredesat wrote:Just up on NRL.

Image

:uarrow: :uarrow: :uarrow:
It is dead, next...
:double: :oops:
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5273
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re: Invest 90L SE GOM: Discussions-Analysis & Images

#103 Postby Ptarmigan » Sun Sep 09, 2007 12:16 pm

Computer models got it wrong in the past. I remember when Allison formed in 2001, it was never forecasted to happen. In fact conditions were not favorable for development.
0 likes   

User avatar
lrak
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1770
Age: 57
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 2:48 pm
Location: Corpus Christi, TX

Re: Invest 90L SE GOM: Discussions-Analysis & Images

#104 Postby lrak » Sun Sep 09, 2007 12:19 pm

it seems that each satellite loop from that NASA site makes it look much more organized. I said to myself if this were a thousand miles out in the Atlantic we would really have something to worry about.
0 likes   

User avatar
lrak
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1770
Age: 57
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 2:48 pm
Location: Corpus Christi, TX

Re: Invest 90L SE GOM: Discussions-Analysis & Images

#105 Postby lrak » Sun Sep 09, 2007 12:21 pm

how old is that photo?
Last edited by lrak on Sun Sep 09, 2007 12:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139722
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: Invest 90L SE GOM: Discussions-Analysis & Images

#106 Postby cycloneye » Sun Sep 09, 2007 12:21 pm

:uarrow: That is from 10:40 PM EDT last night.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 10859
Age: 37
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: Invest 90L SE GOM: Discussions-Analysis & Images

#107 Postby Ivanhater » Sun Sep 09, 2007 12:29 pm

CMC sends 90L north to Mobile Pensacola area FWIW

Image
Last edited by Ivanhater on Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#108 Postby HURAKAN » Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:11 pm

TWD 205:

GULF OF MEXICO...
THE S GULF IS VERY ACTIVE TODAY AS A SURFACE TROUGH EXTENDS FROM
THE W ATLC ACROSS CENTRAL FLORIDA FROM DAYTONA BEACH TO FORT
MYERS CONTINUING ACROSS THE GULF ALONG 26N84W 26N87W TO 24N91W.
THIS SURFACE TROUGH IS ASSOCIATED WITH AN UPPER TROUGH THAT
EXTENDS ACROSS NE FLORIDA A MID/UPPER LEVEL LOW IN THE S GULF
NEAR 22N91W AND IS BEING MONITORED BUT DEVELOPMENT IS NOT
EXPECTED AT THIS TIME.


Same song.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139722
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: Invest 90L SE GOM: Discussions-Analysis & Images

#109 Postby cycloneye » Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:24 pm

09/1745 UTC 24.7N 88.8W T1.5/1.5 90L -- Atlantic Ocean


http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/positions.html

Surprise,surprise,this is almost a TD. :)
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 37146
Age: 35
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: Invest 90L SE GOM: Discussions-Analysis & Images

#110 Postby Brent » Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:28 pm

Hmmmmm, it's got more convection now. Still disorganized but it does look better.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9254
Age: 53
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: Invest 90L SE GOM: Discussions-Analysis & Images

#111 Postby ROCK » Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:29 pm

cycloneye wrote: 09/1745 UTC 24.7N 88.8W T1.5/1.5 90L -- Atlantic Ocean


http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/positions.html

Surprise,surprise,this is almost a TD. :)



are those raw T#'s?
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#112 Postby RL3AO » Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:30 pm

This could be a really really busy week. For us, the NHC and the Hunters.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9254
Age: 53
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: Invest 90L SE GOM: Discussions-Analysis & Images

#113 Postby ROCK » Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:33 pm

looking at the vis and can't understand why this has T#'s that high...if anything it should be to weak...maybe they got mixed up with all the invests....I am looking at the vis and see nothing remotely at the surface....has good upper air divergence but no low level convergence....

http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real- ... g8dvg.html
0 likes   

mattpetre
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 510
Age: 52
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 3:20 pm
Location: Missouri City,TX & Galleria
Contact:

Re: Invest 90L SE GOM: Discussions-Analysis & Images

#114 Postby mattpetre » Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:35 pm

I'm not surprised this is close to finally being a depression and I still believe we will see a landfalling minimal hurricane with this. The conditions will become much more favorable for this as it goes from troughiness to concentrated surface low, which I very much think will happen by tomorrow midday at the latest. Still a lot of SWAGgering here though.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139722
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: Invest 90L SE GOM: Discussions-Analysis & Images

#115 Postby cycloneye » Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:35 pm

Maybe one of our resident pro mets can chim in about the dvorak T numbers for this system being at 1.5/1.5,distint from what looks in images.
0 likes   

mattpetre
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 510
Age: 52
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 3:20 pm
Location: Missouri City,TX & Galleria
Contact:

Re: Invest 90L SE GOM: Discussions-Analysis & Images

#116 Postby mattpetre » Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:36 pm

ROCK wrote:looking at the vis and can't understand why this has T#'s that high...if anything it should be to weak...maybe they got mixed up with all the invests....I am looking at the vis and see nothing remotely at the surface....has good upper air divergence but no low level convergence....

http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real- ... g8dvg.html


I disagree in that from the visibles before this began to pop again there was some convergence going on just north of the Yucatan. I think it was very localized, but seemed to be maintaining something at the lower levels for almost 24 hours now.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#117 Postby RL3AO » Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:37 pm

Don't get too excited from those T#'s. It is not that close to being a depression.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 37146
Age: 35
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re:

#118 Postby Brent » Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:40 pm

RL3AO wrote:Don't get too excited from those T#'s. It is not that close to being a depression.


Agreed, I think 91L and 92L will be depression's before this is.
0 likes   

User avatar
srainhoutx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6919
Age: 66
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 11:34 am
Location: Haywood County, NC
Contact:

Re: Invest 90L SE GOM: Discussions-Analysis & Images

#119 Postby srainhoutx » Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:44 pm

Although T#'s are still a bit low, the area has persisted and condition are becoming a bit more favorable as ULL to SW quickly moves away and the slow NW movement the past 24 hours. Consider the threat area from a NHC/TPC view point. Lots of leases to be concerned about and potential Gulf Coast threat in a couple of days. Just a thought.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9254
Age: 53
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: Invest 90L SE GOM: Discussions-Analysis & Images

#120 Postby ROCK » Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:50 pm

mattpetre wrote:
ROCK wrote:looking at the vis and can't understand why this has T#'s that high...if anything it should be to weak...maybe they got mixed up with all the invests....I am looking at the vis and see nothing remotely at the surface....has good upper air divergence but no low level convergence....

http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real- ... g8dvg.html


I disagree in that from the visibles before this began to pop again there was some convergence going on just north of the Yucatan. I think it was very localized, but seemed to be maintaining something at the lower levels for almost 24 hours now.



Matt, I guess we agree to disagree... :D but if you look at the last Qscat (decending pass) not much of any surface reflection going on except maybe off the Cuba west coast. This is backed up by the CIMSS low level convergance map......the area in question has good upper air divergence but is lacking surface support....
0 likes   


Return to “2007”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests