Page 1 of 1

Is the number 2 man of Al-Qaeda dead?

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 9:02 pm
by cycloneye
http://edition.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast ... index.html

In a few days they will find out if really the #2 man of Al-Qaeda was at that target or not.

Image

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 9:18 pm
by wxcrazytwo
No, he is playing peek-a-boo..

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 9:21 pm
by Skywatch_NC
Is he dead... :?:

Can only pray and hope he is!

Eric

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 9:22 pm
by feederband
I hope his buddy UBL was with him...

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 9:25 pm
by wxcrazytwo
The collateral loss was not worth the effort in MO

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 9:40 pm
by Brent
wxcrazytwo wrote:The collateral loss was not worth the effort in MO


I think it was... he's the #2 man in Al-Qaeda, and for the last year, has been the MAIN guy we've seen on TV. OBL has not been seen since October 29, 2004, a full 15 1/2 months ago.

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 10:16 pm
by feederband
wxcrazytwo wrote:The collateral loss was not worth the effort in MO


9/11 Was the colateral loss my friend....

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 12:50 am
by kevin
wxcrazytwo wrote:The collateral loss was not worth the effort in MO


What happened in Missouri? :D :D :D

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 1:12 am
by wxcrazytwo
feederband wrote:
wxcrazytwo wrote:The collateral loss was not worth the effort in MO


9/11 Was the colateral loss my friend....


are we always going to back to 9/11 everytime we need to act.

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 1:13 am
by Sean in New Orleans
wxcrazytwo wrote:
feederband wrote:
wxcrazytwo wrote:The collateral loss was not worth the effort in MO


9/11 Was the colateral loss my friend....


are we always going to back to 9/11 everytime we need to act.

With the War on Terror---Yes.

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 1:20 am
by wxcrazytwo
Sean in New Orleans wrote:
wxcrazytwo wrote:
feederband wrote:
wxcrazytwo wrote:The collateral loss was not worth the effort in MO


9/11 Was the colateral loss my friend....


are we always going to back to 9/11 everytime we need to act.

With the War on Terror---Yes.


figures your from the sur. LOL. :wink:

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 1:21 am
by Brent
wxcrazytwo wrote:
feederband wrote:
wxcrazytwo wrote:The collateral loss was not worth the effort in MO


9/11 Was the colateral loss my friend....


are we always going to back to 9/11 everytime we need to act.


Yes.

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 1:21 am
by wxcrazytwo
Brent wrote:
wxcrazytwo wrote:
feederband wrote:
wxcrazytwo wrote:The collateral loss was not worth the effort in MO


9/11 Was the colateral loss my friend....


are we always going to back to 9/11 everytime we need to act.


Yes.


again from the sur. I WISH I WAS IN DIXIE HURRAY, HURRAY.........

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 1:24 am
by Brent
wxcrazytwo wrote:
Brent wrote:
wxcrazytwo wrote:
feederband wrote:
wxcrazytwo wrote:The collateral loss was not worth the effort in MO


9/11 Was the colateral loss my friend....


are we always going to back to 9/11 everytime we need to act.


Yes.


again from the sur. I WISH I WAS IN DIXIE HURRAY, HURRAY.........


Florida IS Dixie. :wink:

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 1:25 am
by wxcrazytwo
Brent wrote:
wxcrazytwo wrote:
Brent wrote:
wxcrazytwo wrote:
feederband wrote:
wxcrazytwo wrote:The collateral loss was not worth the effort in MO


9/11 Was the colateral loss my friend....


are we always going to back to 9/11 everytime we need to act.


Yes.


again from the sur. I WISH I WAS IN DIXIE HURRAY, HURRAY.........


Florida IS Dixie. :wink:


COME ON DUDE!! :wink:

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 1:29 am
by kevin
I am literally astonished.

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 3:06 am
by Dr. Jonah Rainwater
I get a bad feeling we'll probably find out in a few days that they never found his body, and there'll be no way of confirming whether he survived or not. Didn't Al-Zawahiri just release a tape in the past week?

The collateral deaths are a tragedy. Among the 17 killed in the airstrike were women and children who probably were not Al Qaeda militants, although they may have been the families of the terrorists. It's a well-known tactic of these types of groups - they hide in densely populated residential areas and innocents as human shields while baiting an airstrike. Since it would be unthinkable to let a target like Al-Zawahiri go...terrorist leaders surround themselves with innocent people who will be killed in the airstrike as well, so that they can use their deaths as a propaganda advantage. It's sickening. These people claim to be fighting for God, while they sacrifice their own people in the process.

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 10:11 am
by gtalum
Don't worry, they missed him again. I can't believe how incompetent our leadership is.

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 10:12 am
by mike815
i dont think hes dead

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 10:17 am
by GalvestonDuck
gtalum wrote:Don't worry, they missed him again. I can't believe how incompetent our leadership is.


IMO, these "non-political" threads :roll: have gone on long enough. Too much gray area and I'm not gonna let it keep going. Any other mods disagree...unlock it and knock yourselves out.