Page 1 of 1
Is the number 2 man of Al-Qaeda dead?
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 9:02 pm
by cycloneye
http://edition.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast ... index.html
In a few days they will find out if really the #2 man of Al-Qaeda was at that target or not.

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 9:18 pm
by wxcrazytwo
No, he is playing peek-a-boo..
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 9:21 pm
by Skywatch_NC
Is he dead...
Can only pray and hope he is!
Eric
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 9:22 pm
by feederband
I hope his buddy UBL was with him...
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 9:25 pm
by wxcrazytwo
The collateral loss was not worth the effort in MO
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 9:40 pm
by Brent
wxcrazytwo wrote:The collateral loss was not worth the effort in MO
I think it was... he's the #2 man in Al-Qaeda, and for the last year, has been the MAIN guy we've seen on TV. OBL has not been seen since October 29, 2004, a full 15 1/2 months ago.
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 10:16 pm
by feederband
wxcrazytwo wrote:The collateral loss was not worth the effort in MO
9/11 Was the colateral loss my friend....
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 12:50 am
by kevin
wxcrazytwo wrote:The collateral loss was not worth the effort in MO
What happened in Missouri?

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 1:12 am
by wxcrazytwo
feederband wrote:wxcrazytwo wrote:The collateral loss was not worth the effort in MO
9/11 Was the colateral loss my friend....
are we always going to back to 9/11 everytime we need to act.
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 1:13 am
by Sean in New Orleans
wxcrazytwo wrote:feederband wrote:wxcrazytwo wrote:The collateral loss was not worth the effort in MO
9/11 Was the colateral loss my friend....
are we always going to back to 9/11 everytime we need to act.
With the War on Terror---Yes.
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 1:20 am
by wxcrazytwo
Sean in New Orleans wrote:wxcrazytwo wrote:feederband wrote:wxcrazytwo wrote:The collateral loss was not worth the effort in MO
9/11 Was the colateral loss my friend....
are we always going to back to 9/11 everytime we need to act.
With the War on Terror---Yes.
figures your from the sur. LOL.

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 1:21 am
by Brent
wxcrazytwo wrote:feederband wrote:wxcrazytwo wrote:The collateral loss was not worth the effort in MO
9/11 Was the colateral loss my friend....
are we always going to back to 9/11 everytime we need to act.
Yes.
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 1:21 am
by wxcrazytwo
Brent wrote:wxcrazytwo wrote:feederband wrote:wxcrazytwo wrote:The collateral loss was not worth the effort in MO
9/11 Was the colateral loss my friend....
are we always going to back to 9/11 everytime we need to act.
Yes.
again from the sur. I WISH I WAS IN DIXIE HURRAY, HURRAY.........
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 1:24 am
by Brent
wxcrazytwo wrote:Brent wrote:wxcrazytwo wrote:feederband wrote:wxcrazytwo wrote:The collateral loss was not worth the effort in MO
9/11 Was the colateral loss my friend....
are we always going to back to 9/11 everytime we need to act.
Yes.
again from the sur. I WISH I WAS IN DIXIE HURRAY, HURRAY.........
Florida IS Dixie.

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 1:25 am
by wxcrazytwo
Brent wrote:wxcrazytwo wrote:Brent wrote:wxcrazytwo wrote:feederband wrote:wxcrazytwo wrote:The collateral loss was not worth the effort in MO
9/11 Was the colateral loss my friend....
are we always going to back to 9/11 everytime we need to act.
Yes.
again from the sur. I WISH I WAS IN DIXIE HURRAY, HURRAY.........
Florida IS Dixie.

COME ON DUDE!!

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 1:29 am
by kevin
I am literally astonished.
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 3:06 am
by Dr. Jonah Rainwater
I get a bad feeling we'll probably find out in a few days that they never found his body, and there'll be no way of confirming whether he survived or not. Didn't Al-Zawahiri just release a tape in the past week?
The collateral deaths are a tragedy. Among the 17 killed in the airstrike were women and children who probably were not Al Qaeda militants, although they may have been the families of the terrorists. It's a well-known tactic of these types of groups - they hide in densely populated residential areas and innocents as human shields while baiting an airstrike. Since it would be unthinkable to let a target like Al-Zawahiri go...terrorist leaders surround themselves with innocent people who will be killed in the airstrike as well, so that they can use their deaths as a propaganda advantage. It's sickening. These people claim to be fighting for God, while they sacrifice their own people in the process.
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 10:11 am
by gtalum
Don't worry, they missed him again. I can't believe how incompetent our leadership is.
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 10:12 am
by mike815
i dont think hes dead
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 10:17 am
by GalvestonDuck
gtalum wrote:Don't worry, they missed him again. I can't believe how incompetent our leadership is.
IMO, these "non-political" threads

have gone on long enough. Too much gray area and I'm not gonna let it keep going. Any other mods disagree...unlock it and knock yourselves out.