Lets Double NOAA's Budget

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
kevin

Lets Double NOAA's Budget

#1 Postby kevin » Fri Sep 23, 2005 1:15 pm

I did a search and I believe that NOAAs 2005 buget is 3.4 billion dollars, and if someone could find an official source stating that I would be very appreciative.

If we assume 100,000,000 taxpayers that means our share is 34 dollars a year. I'm willing to give another 34 dollars to the federal government every year so that they can enhance the science of weather forecasting and advance science in other areas. And we know that isn't how it works. We pay much less than that since there are rich individuals and corporations which pay the majority of taxes.

Lets double the budget. None of this Santorum bs, lets give the NHC and all NOAA branches the ability to better serve our nation.

Comments, criticisms?
0 likes   

Aqua Teen Hunger Force

#2 Postby Aqua Teen Hunger Force » Fri Sep 23, 2005 3:08 pm

Let's not! If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Let's try and balance the budget first before we talk about doubling budgets.
0 likes   

kevin

#3 Postby kevin » Fri Sep 23, 2005 4:10 pm

Do you have any idea what a little sum 3.4 billion is in the scheme of fiscal spending? Our budget will never be balanced, and especially not with democrats or republicans in office. If we're going to put 400 billion into the military, and if we're going to put more than that into entitlement programs, and if billions can go into the pet projects of federal and state legislatures, then I believe we can afford to cut pork in the interests of predicting these storms.

And if it ain't broke don't fix it is a good way to postponing a breakdown. We need better systems for recording atmospheric and oceanic data, so that we can better predict these beasts. Better model damage scenarios, and better prepare municipal governments.
0 likes   

User avatar
BEER980
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1727
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2003 9:55 am
Location: Ocala, Fl
Contact:

#4 Postby BEER980 » Sat Sep 24, 2005 6:46 am

I will have to do some more looking because I thought I read that their budget for 2006 was cut. Here is the budget request.
In FY 2006, NOAA is requesting $3,586.3 million in total appropriations, a net increase of $242.5 million, or 7.3% over the current program level.

You can read all about the NOAA budget Here.
0 likes   

jburns
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 84
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 6:33 pm
Location: Archdale, NC

#5 Postby jburns » Sun Oct 09, 2005 10:04 am

kevin wrote:Do you have any idea what a little sum 3.4 billion is in the scheme of fiscal spending? Our budget will never be balanced, and especially not with democrats or republicans in office.


A billion here, a billion there and pretty soon you're talking about real money.

Sen. William Fullbright

Now for the record Clinton inherited a 290 billion dollar deficit in 1992. It dropped every year of his first term until in 1998 we ran a 69 Billion dollar surplus. The surplus grew each year and topped out at a 238 billion dollar surplus in 2000. Four years later in 2004 our current leaders, through a combination of tax cuts and run away domestic spending, turned the surplus into a 412 billion dollar deficit. It seems a possibility that "tax and spend" is a lot better for the country than "cut and spend".

***I am not an expert but I did sleep at a Holiday Inn Express last night.
0 likes   

kevin

#6 Postby kevin » Sun Oct 09, 2005 11:55 am

Yes I'm sure when we're spending over one trillion dollars every fiscal year without Iraq, without Katrina, and so on, that an extra three billion dollars to protect lives and property is just dumb.
0 likes   

User avatar
Aslkahuna
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4550
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 5:00 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ
Contact:

#7 Postby Aslkahuna » Sun Oct 09, 2005 4:51 pm

There is a 1 billion dollar difference between the House and Senate versions of the NOAA appropriation with the Seante version being less. Seems like the Dems and Reps in the Senate like to play money games with the lives of the American People-they all deserve to be thrown out of office.

Steve
0 likes   

User avatar
USCG_Hurricane_Watcher
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 268
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 6:08 am
Location: Youngsville, LA & Apra Harbor, Guam
Contact:

#8 Postby USCG_Hurricane_Watcher » Tue Oct 11, 2005 5:46 pm

All for it...Let the Fisheries Enforcement side get some of that money so they can ramp up their efforts...

It's NOAA's fisheries regulations, but it falls to us to go out and enforce them because of the personnel in the enforcement side are spread way too thin.
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#9 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Tue Oct 11, 2005 11:18 pm

I say make the noaa buget to a even 10 billion from that 3.4 billion. Add forecasters to the nhc/Nws. Improve forecasting with understanding of the weather systems. Improve forecasting with the improvement of forecasting models,surface data. Double the Buoy's over the Atlatnic basin. In which will improve the data to upgrade or down grade tropical cyclones.

Add more temperature stations. In end the satellite black out for good with more satellite. Also double the recon planes...More radar!

10 billion should be a good number. In it will save lifes,Improve foreacst,In do more then alot of the pork projects could ever wish for.
0 likes   

f5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1550
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 3:29 pm
Location: Waco,tx

#10 Postby f5 » Tue Oct 11, 2005 11:38 pm

when need better wind speed equipment so we won't have an intensity debate.
0 likes   


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests