Page 1 of 1
'Fox & Friends' Ratings
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2003 8:55 pm
by southerngale
'Fox & Friends' On Cable Pulls More Viewers Than CBS's 'The Early Show' On Broadcast... FOX NEWS CHANNEL's 'Fox & Friends' beat CBS's The Early Show for the entire week of 3/31-4/4, research shows -- F&F averaged 2.905 million to CBS 2.796 million total viewers, marking the first time FOX NEWS cable ever topped a broadcast net in lucrative morning daypart.
And for Wednesday night...
CABLE RACE
WEDS, APRIL 09, '03
O'REILLY 5.3 [RATING]
HANNITY/COLMES 4.1
GRETA 4.0
AARON BROWN 3.3
LARRY KING 2.9
SOUTH PARK 2.7
CNN 8 PM 2.6
MSNBC 9 PM 1.8
MSNBC 10 PM 1.6
MSNBC 8 PM 1.5
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2003 9:13 pm
by sunny shine
IMO... all networks are going to be losers when all this is said and done. They have become nothing but liberal biased. When you watch Fox you know you are getting accurate and fair reporting. They are also not slanted on this war and are not trying to make America view this war as they view it like ABC, NBC the LA Times Washington Times and Post. Something needs to be done about the slanted media.
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2003 9:31 pm
by streetsoldier
Who wants to wake up to "Imus in the morning" when they can have E.D. Hill, Kiran Chetry, Juliet Huddy, Lauren Green and/or Jane Skinner to steam up the coffee?
(They don't call it FOX for nothing!)
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2003 9:33 pm
by sunny shine
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2003 12:00 am
by ColdFront77
The proof is in the numbers. I really enjoy Fox News Channel's style. Being laid back and humorous when they can be helps. Out of the three cable news channels, they are the only one that mention their colleagues in a serious or funny manner.
While most networks have a more liberal stance. Fox News Channel is considered more conservative, they are more "fair and balanced." -- but of course being in the middle from the left, is to the right. Does it really matter if they are more conservative if the other two are more liberal?
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2003 7:53 am
by j
I like E.D. (until she laughs
)..I think she's one smart cookie, and good enough to co-host with O'reilly on his radio program from time to time.
Lauren is nice too, and filled in admirably for E.D. while she was out on Maternity leave. Her only problem is she wasn't used to sitting full bodied in front of the camera and her first day on she wore way too short a skirt (not that I'm complaining
)
Fox rules...and as I posted on another thread...our company finally wised up and listened to the majority..switching the canteen TV's from Clinton News Network to FoxNews 24/7.
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2003 8:31 am
by Guest
I have found FOX and Friends - I love watching it in the mornings now.
Streetsoldier - you are too much LOL. Made me smile today.
Patricia
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2003 10:10 pm
by JQ Public
i guess i'm the lone south park'er hehe jk!
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2003 11:13 pm
by streetsoldier
Ticka, let us not forget the FoxNews talent out "on scene" in the world stage, either...Amy Kellogg, Heather Nauert, Jennifer Eccleston..and those "guys" with the troops, too.
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2003 12:34 am
by coriolis
Fox and Friends is perfect in the morning
Jane Skinner
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2003 6:05 pm
by wx247
I like Fox and Friends for the most part, except I turn the channel when Doocy does the weather.
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2003 12:06 am
by ColdFront77
I don't believe Jane Skinner has ever been on Fox & Friends.
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2003 12:40 am
by streetsoldier
Jane took on a segment or two while E.D. was on pregnancy leave...TRUST me, I'd notice!
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2003 2:40 am
by ColdFront77
Okay, Bill. I am not saying you're incorrect. I am rarely up between 6:00 AM and 9:00 Eastern. I knew that Kiran Chetry filled in for E.D. Hill while she was on maternity leave.
While we are discussing
Fox & Friends- Andrew Napolitano filled in for Brian Kilmeade one week, and a couple weeks later, he was in for Steve Doocey. I caught him one morning (last month) and he was pretty good.
