Page 1 of 1
Dilemma grows about Baghdad
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2003 7:37 am
by cycloneye
http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServe ... 2571727088
Let's see what they decide to do about when the Baghdad invasion will happen but it may wait for a few days waiting for more forces to arrive at the theater.
I would like to see this thing finish quickly but I know that it wont be the case but eventually no matter how much time it takes we will outster that tyrant and liberate Iraq.
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2003 7:57 am
by wx247
I agree...it may take awhile, but at this point the outcome MUST be to oust Saddam and his terrible regime.
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2003 8:12 am
by rainstorm
president bush can not allow saddam to leave iraq.
i heard last night saddam will ask for a cease fire after he has done as much damage to us as he can, and leave iraq. our pow's were executed. saddam can not be given a free pass
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2003 8:31 am
by cycloneye
He will not go anywhere rainstorm because Donald Rumsfeld said that no ceasefire will take place..
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2003 8:34 am
by rainstorm
i hope so cyclone eye. what worries me is so many people saying we should "oust" saddam. oust does not=kill. i say the time has past to even think of anything other than death for saddam. what i want is for george bush to say categorically that unconditional surrender is our non-negotiable demand.
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2003 9:19 am
by Stephanie
rainstorm wrote:president bush can not allow saddam to leave iraq.
i heard last night saddam will ask for a cease fire after he has done as much damage to us as he can, and leave iraq. our pow's were executed. saddam can not be given a free pass
I didn't hear that but that's not a surprise. No, we need to finish this thing once and for all. Otherwise we'll be dealing with this again in another 12 years.
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2003 9:22 am
by Derek Ortt
Unless Saddam can split our forces, anything less than unconditional surrender will be unacceptable