Page 1 of 2
John Kerry's senate voting record(or lack thereof)
Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2004 4:37 pm
by Brent
Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2004 6:11 pm
by southerngale
He rarely shows up to vote for anything but he made sure he showed up to vote AGAINST Laci and Conner's Law. Who cares if a baby who is near term is assaulted and murdered and who cares about the pregnant mother? Not Kerry!
It passed anyway.
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 8:05 am
by j
southerngale wrote:He rarely shows up to vote for anything but he made sure he showed up to vote AGAINST Laci and Conner's Law. Who cares if a baby who is near term is assaulted and murdered and who cares about the pregnant mother? Not Kerry!
It passed anyway.
The Pro Abortion crowd doesn't give a rats a*s about the "baby", and to be consistent with their stance, they can't agree with the the Laci & Conner Law.
Kerry may flip flop on every other issue, but when it comes to killing babies, he is determined to fight to for the murderers rights.
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 8:28 am
by j
I counted 17 votes out of 157 for the this year so far. Right at 10%.
Good job Kerry.
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 8:40 am
by Guest
What the h#ll are we paying this man for??? Since everyone is so h#ll bent on responsibility, shouldn't our Congress men and women have to be accountable too? How does someone serve in Congress and do NOTHING??? It's beyond me.
...Jennifer...
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 8:50 am
by Brent
mrschad wrote:What the h#ll are we paying this man for??? Since everyone is so h#ll bent on responsibility, shouldn't our Congress men and women have to be accountable too? How does someone serve in Congress and do NOTHING??? It's beyond me.
...Jennifer...
If you remember... when Bob Dole ran against Bill Clinton in 1996 he resigned from the senate. Kerry should have done the same months ago.
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 9:05 am
by Guest
j wrote:southerngale wrote:He rarely shows up to vote for anything but he made sure he showed up to vote AGAINST Laci and Conner's Law. Who cares if a baby who is near term is assaulted and murdered and who cares about the pregnant mother? Not Kerry!
It passed anyway.
The Pro Abortion crowd doesn't give a rats a*s about the "baby", and to be consistent with their stance, they can't agree with the the Laci & Conner Law.
Kerry may flip flop on every other issue, but when it comes to killing babies, he is determined to fight to for the murderers rights.
Laci and Conner was a step toward undermining Roe. We do care about babies. We just also care about women.
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 9:26 am
by Brent
j wrote:I counted 17 votes out of 157 for the this year so far. Right at 10%.
Good job Kerry.
Not be picky... but it's actually 9.2 percent.
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 10:02 am
by j
Brent wrote:j wrote:I counted 17 votes out of 157 for the this year so far. Right at 10%.
Good job Kerry.
Not be picky... but it's actually 9.2 percent.
not to be picky but .... its really closer to 11%
17/157 *100 = 10.82%
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 10:03 am
by chadtm80
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 10:05 am
by Lindaloo
And BTW, all this caring about women spew needs to go. Do not speak for me John Kerry.
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 10:07 am
by j
Bravo Linda...and I think you speak for about 80.823% of the country
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 10:09 am
by Guest
Lindaloo wrote::roflmao:
And BTW, all this caring about women spew needs to go. Do not speak for me John Kerry.
I feel the same about the caring about babes spew, although I understand the anti-choice stance and dont think it makes the person a bad one.
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 10:12 am
by Lindaloo
Women do talk the talk and walk the walk when it comes to their children, unborn or not.
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 10:13 am
by Brent
j wrote:Brent wrote:j wrote:I counted 17 votes out of 157 for the this year so far. Right at 10%.
Good job Kerry.
Not be picky... but it's actually 9.2 percent.
not to be picky but .... its really closer to 11%
17/157 *100 = 10.82%
I divided 157 by 17, not the other way around.
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 10:14 am
by Brent
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 10:56 am
by southerngale
Brent wrote:If you remember... when Bob Dole ran against Bill Clinton in 1996 he resigned from the senate. Kerry should have done the same months ago.
Yes he
should have but why am I not surprised?
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 11:10 am
by Guest
JK is in a unique position. Most of the votes he has missed have been inconsequential(already decided without his vote).
Bush is making a big deal out of it, yet he has spent almost a year at his ranch in Texas since he was sworn in.
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 11:19 am
by southerngale
lol, he works there.
John Kerry should be showing up to vote. That's his job. What if some of the other senators decided their votes were inconsequential and many of them didn't show up?
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 11:22 am
by Guest
southerngale wrote:lol, he works there.
John Kerry should be showing up to vote. That's his job. What if some of the other senators decided their votes were inconsequential and many of them didn't show up?
If those Sens were the Presidential nominee, I would look more favorably upon it.
