Bush or Kerry?
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2004 9:39 pm
Vote then tell why you support him. I support Bush because he can do a much better job than Kerry can and can run a war in the right direction.
STORM2K
Welcome to Storm2k! Your Year Round Weather Community since 2002!
http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/
Bush or Kerry?
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2004 9:43 pm
bush, better than kerry
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2004 9:47 pm
Kerry.. I don't like Bush.. and I always vote Deomcratic
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2004 9:55 pm
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2004 10:15 pm
Lindaloo wrote::vote:
I second that!!!!
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2004 10:21 pm
I like Kerry because he is not Bush and he is not a wimp.
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2004 10:22 pm
zwyts wrote:I like Kerry because he is not Bush and he is not a wimp.
LOL, a wimp?
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2004 10:24 pm
I dont like either personally, but ill take the lesser of the two evils and go w/ bush.
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2004 10:25 pm
ummm kerry=french, french=wimps, wimps=kerry?
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2004 10:27 pm
I think Zwyts got the names mixed up.
It's ok though, I'll fix it for you:
I like Bush because he is not Kerry and he is not a wimp.
It's ok though, I'll fix it for you:
I like Bush because he is not Kerry and he is not a wimp.
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2004 10:30 pm
Bush a whimp? HA! Atleast he has the balls to declare war on a nation and go to war pretty much ALONE.
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2004 10:31 pm
southerngale wrote:I think Zwyts got the names mixed up.
It's ok though, I'll fix it for you:
I like Bush because he is not Kerry and he is not a wimp.
agreed.
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2004 10:35 pm
FWBHurricane wrote:Bush a whimp? HA! Atleast he has the balls to declare war on a nation and go to war pretty much ALONE.
Right on!
Nothin more courageous than declaring war.
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2004 10:37 pm
zwyts wrote:Nothin more courageous than declaring war.
Well what about when they declared war on us by killing 3,000 Americans? Was that justified to you?
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2004 10:38 pm
USAwx1 wrote:I dont like either personally, but ill take the lesser of the two evils and go w/ bush.
Good choice!
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2004 10:39 pm
Yeah, it would have been much more courageous to do nothing and then whine when they attack us in our homeland again. Nothing like cowering down and letting the enemy win.
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2004 10:41 pm
southerngale wrote:Yeah, it would have been much more courageous to do nothing and then whine when they attack us in our homeland again. Nothing like cowering down and letting the enemy win.
AMEN!
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2004 10:51 pm
Lindaloo wrote:zwyts wrote:Nothin more courageous than declaring war.
Well what about when they declared war on us by killing 3,000 Americans? Was that justified to you?
I was talking about Iraq and not Afghanistan.
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2004 10:52 pm
And besides the war ON terrorism...Bush is a man of MORALS and CHARACTER! 
Not like Clinton who cheats with a floosy in the White House behind his wife's back!
Need we say MORE...zits...er zwyts...
Eric
Not like Clinton who cheats with a floosy in the White House behind his wife's back!
Need we say MORE...zits...er zwyts...
Eric
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2004 10:56 pm
Skywatch_NC wrote:And besides the war ON terrorism...Bush is a man of MORALS and CHARACTER!
Not like Clinton who cheats with a floosy in the White House behind his wife's back!
Need we say MORE...zits...er zwyts...
Eric
The way he treated McCain was very moralistic. Quite a man to cast disrespect on a POW, while he and Cheney were floating along back home.