STORM2K

Posted: **Sat Dec 20, 2003 4:44 pm**

I do not know what to think about this image!! Any thoughts?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3760119/

Posted: **Sat Dec 20, 2003 5:27 pm**

Do you believe?

Na

Posted: **Sat Dec 20, 2003 6:31 pm**

Looks real to me.

Posted: **Sat Dec 20, 2003 6:35 pm**

Whoa...that's scary...

Posted: **Sat Dec 20, 2003 8:02 pm**

Posted: **Sat Dec 20, 2003 8:26 pm**

I second Chad's na. Bad angle and poor lighting. Shadows can play tricks on you.

Posted: **Sat Dec 20, 2003 9:45 pm**

I would say it is a person or ghost. I don't think it's just shadows.

Posted: **Sat Dec 20, 2003 10:17 pm**

I fall into the non-believers as well :-)

Posted: **Sat Dec 20, 2003 10:32 pm**

welll i believe, saw this picture early today and it could be a photo picture shot, but they said it wasnt. who knows. but i do believe in ghost. my oldest brothers house was haunted, i know this for a fact. to many strange things happen.

Posted: **Sun Dec 21, 2003 7:51 am**

Well, I just blew up the photo and got a good, hard look at it...shadows are consistent, it IS a robed figure (actually, caped with a hood), and the too-white face IS indeterminate.

Also, it DID open what is now a fire door, but was once a large, wooden door opening into the bailey (inner grounds) of the castle.

Verdict? Whatever it is, it's "real". :eek:

Posted: **Sun Dec 21, 2003 10:26 am**

I've always believed in ghosts and the "supernatural". If Bill analyzed the picture and found that it isn't superimposed, then I'm inclined to think that the picture is real and probably a ghost. That's pretty wild!

Posted: **Sun Dec 21, 2003 12:23 pm**

it's jacko in london!

Posted: **Sun Dec 21, 2003 1:55 pm**

pawlee wrote:it's jacko in london!

Posted: **Sun Dec 21, 2003 3:24 pm**

pawlee wrote:it's jacko in london!

You could be on to something. LOL!!

Posted: **Sun Dec 21, 2003 9:01 pm**

That's odd.... I don't know what to think.

Posted: **Sun Dec 21, 2003 10:25 pm**

I do, and it looks very real to me ... England is notorious for such hauntings and IMO, this looks very genuine ... I took liberty to do a negative (though I wish I had infrared to pick up a heat source) but in the negative image, I cannot pick up ANY evidence of the figure having legs or feet) and well as doing other various photo investigation.

Normal

Negative

Posted: **Sun Dec 21, 2003 10:30 pm**

But, there's no such thing as ghosts...

Posted: **Sun Dec 21, 2003 10:37 pm**

Well, if it is true.. Then tell the oficials over there to PM me.. I just happen to know who they need to call :lol:

Posted: **Sun Dec 21, 2003 11:31 pm**

Ummm Chad....

GHOSTBUSTERS!! :lol:

Posted: **Mon Dec 22, 2003 1:00 am**

On closer inspection, the cape/robe and (look closely) a hint of neck "ruff" is consistent with Tudor-era fashion, particularly for a lady of the Henry VIII/early Elizabethan period.

Strange stuff, this.